
After “drop the bomb,” never have three simple words
so devastated a place.
The first reference I can find to anyone using the phrase “world-class city” to describe Halifax comes from 1994. That July, Fred MacGillivray was hired as president of the World Trade and Convention Centre, the provincial crown corporation now called Trade Centre Limited. Three months into the job, Halifax was picked as the site of the 1995 G7 summit, and on October 17, MacGillivray gushed to the Daily News about Halifax’s bright future.
“The problem,” MacGillivray told reporter Brian Flinn, “is that all the world doesn’t know where Halifax is. But hundreds of millions of eyes will be set upon Halifax during the [G7] conference. To me, that’s the biggest opportunity this city, this area, has ever been presented. No longer will we be deemed a small place in Canada. We’ll be seen as a world-class city.”
“MacGillivray’s description of the summit and its potential benefits is peppered with the term ‘world-class,'” explained Flinn in the news article. “It’s a piece of hyperbole that Torontonians have frequently used to describe their city, its institutions and its public buildings, in an attempt to assert their big-league status.”
Within weeks, the adopted hyperbolic Toronto phrase had permeated the local provincial and city bureaucracy. It was also bandied about by Haligonians in the business world who think of themselves movers and shakers, and by wannabe mucky-mucks running for office.
“The purpose of the project is to demonstrate to the world that Nova Scotia has world-class
technologies to deal with the harbour and estuary pollution problems.”—City staff report, 1995
The province got ready for the G7 by hiring Bristol Communications for $270,000 “to market Nova Scotia as a world-class venue during the summit,” reported the Daily News.
No one then, or since, has defined “world-class city.” It’s just understood to be a good thing, like “proactive” in the ’80s, “sustainable” in the aughts, “innovation” in the current decade—substance-less bureaucratic lingo. Among the ignorant managerial classes, the person who masters bullshit is considered smart.
But whatever “world-class city” meant, it probably didn’t mean a place that had raw sewage and associated “floatables” lapping against the bulkheads along the waterfront where G7 delegates and the international press corps were meeting.
Someone suggested that, for maybe a million dollars, the five sewage outfalls along the downtown waterfront could be connected to a pipe that carried the mess a bit further out into the harbour. But Halifax council rejected that idea, with then-alderman Howard Epstein pointing out the pipe wouldn’t improve water quality one iota, but merely masked the problem for visiting high-wattage politicians while locals suffered the same environmental and health problems unabated.
ACOA, of course, came to the rescue, contracting out a $297,500 “demonstration project.”
“The purpose of the project is to demonstrate to the world that Nova Scotia has world-class technologies to deal with the harbor and estuary pollution problems,” read a city report, employing “world-class” to appeal to the rube-iest councillors: Ignore that raw shit, folks, we’ve got world-class technologies!
During the G7, six firms set up sewage demonstrations in tents in the parking lot north of the Cogswell Interchange. The tents were open to the public, and the hope was that G7 delegates and international reporters would check them out, but if Bob Woodward or Helmut Kohl stopped by to sniff the world-class technology, I can find no record of how impressed they were.
“How can we be a world-class city, a smart city, without a stadium and a CFL team?”—Talk show host Rick Howe, 2004
Infused with G7 euphoria and drinking the “world-class city” Kool-Aid, Haligonians were dreaming big. Mayor Walter Fitzgerald and federal Public Works minister David Dingwall proposed that Halifax host…the 2008 Summer Olympics.
“If we can handle the G7 summit, we can handle anything,” Fitzgerald told then-reporter Shaune MacKinlay, who now runs PR for mayor Mike Savage. “It’s only limited by the imagination,” said Fitzgerald.
Amazingly, the absurd notion that Halifax could host the Olympics kicked around government offices for nearly two years before Joe Gillivan, the manager at Holiday Inn, threw cold water on it. He pointed out that to handle the onslaught of visitors, not only would every hotel and dorm room in town need to be rented out, but each and every private home in HRM would have to take in 14 guests. Fitzgerald’s response to that objection was to suggest that the city could rent out a flotilla of cruise ships to act as temporary hotels.
Nova Scotia has a provincialism that’s typical of colonial
outposts: a sad need for outside validation, a craving for attention from the wider world coupled perhaps paradoxically with a suspicion of actual Come From Aways.
The zenith point of that provincialism, its most absurd and embarrassing moment, had to be when, as part of CBC Information Morning‘s bid to get David Letterman to visit Nova Scotia, then-premier Rodney MacDonald read an awkward Top 10 list full of sexual and scatological references, and culminating with MacDonald playing the fiddle while step-dancing. Thankfully, Letterman ignored the entire “Visit Nova Scotia!” campaign, the way classy people pretend they don’t notice a fart in the elevator.
Lots of places are guilty of provincialism. I’ve seen it in the American south. In the 19th century, towns on the western frontier ridiculously argued with each about which would become “the next Pittsburgh.” I’m sure the agents of empire in the British Raj checked the London papers for references to Madras and Punjab.
But Nova Scotia’s provincialism has two intertwined aspects I’ve not seen elsewhere. The first is an ideological commitment to mercantilism, the prevailing economic theory when Halifax was founded in 1749. For the people now running the show in Nova Scotia, it’s as if Adam Smith and Karl Marx had never been born. As with the mercantilists, for Nova Scotia’s present-day economic development professionals there is only a fixed amount of wealth in the world. Wealth can not be created through our own hard work, but rather can only be obtained from others.
“Halifax has community support, the facilities, expertise and world-class hospitality to successfully open its arms to the people of the world and the athletes of the Commonwealth in 2014.”—Commonwealth Games bid committee website, 2006
Therefore, the route to economic success is to get rich people out there in the world to bring their money here, and we’ll do just about anything to make that happen: forgive their payroll taxes, give them hundreds of millions of dollars in flat-out subsidies, outsource our government agencies to them.
This thinking led to the horrendous decision to outsource the provincial SAP department to IBM. “This success is owed to Nova Scotia’s world-class infrastructure and short commutes,” explained a Nova Scotia Business, Inc. press release issued when the deal was announced earlier this year.
Anything for Money From Away. What we won’t do is invest in our own students, so they can graduate debt-free and generate homegrown wealth—because that view of the world doesn’t fit the ideological filter of mercantilism. We worship rich people who might bring money here. Our own hard-working people are worthless, because they have no money.
The second unique aspect to Nova Scotian provincialism is an over-the-top over-compensation for poor self-image. It’s not enough to want to do something a little better than we’re doing it now, or in ways that simply work–we have to leap from “not working” right past “competent” and become the very best in the entire world, immediately, by force of will alone.
These two qualities interact to bring us the mega-project, the bizarrely over-reaching schemes that will bring rich people’s money to us, keep us employed forever and “put us on the map.” I’m building a running list of such. Here are a few:
In the 1960s, semi-feudal Nova Scotia was going to enter the nuclear age, and so hundreds of millions of dollars were dumped into a subsidized heavy water plant in Glace Bay, with the hope it could make sales to nuclear plants around the world. But the heavy water plant was mis-engineered and poorly managed, and within a decade seawater had entered its pipes, rusting them out. The entire factory was torn down, then rebuilt, at a cost of $130 million. Even then, however, it failed to turn a profit, and was shut down in the 1980s. Last year the feds funded an environmental clean-up of the monument to wasteful wishful thinking.
“We have a world-class port in a world-class city and this conference allows us to showcase all we have to offer.” —Port president Karen Oldfield, 2006
In 1969, desperate for jobs that are the eternal promise of Money From Away, then-premier Robert Stanfield gave subsidies to the Clairtone Sound Corporation, a cutting-edge builder of stereos, to set up shop in Nova Scotia. The company instantly flopped. “Its main mistake,” explain Paul Matthews, Alexander Herman and Andrew Feindel in a blog promoting their book Kickstart, was “it went after easy regional development funding in Nova Scotia, setting up factories for the manufacture of radios and TV in rural Stellarton and allowing politicians and local business people onto its board in lieu of industry experts. Then it tried to get into the automobile industry and one day found itself controlled by the provincial government of Nova Scotia. A significant whoops to be sure.” The province lost $20 million.
In his tell-all book Bagman, former PC insider Don Ripley details many failed mega-projects from the 1970s. One was “the idea of having a cruise ship, like the Love Boat of TV fame, sail out of Halifax to various southward points on the eastern Seaboard and to the Caribbean Islands…to promote tourism, employment, and all the other motherhood ideas politicians adore,” wrote Ripley. A German ship, the Regina Maris, was purchased and renamed the Mercator One, after a Dartmouth company, but the boat was a piece of junk and—shocker!—the scheme inspired by a TV sitcom proved unworkable. The province ended up losing millions of dollars.
There were also two attempts to get Money From Away to build oil refineries in the province—one at Canso, another at Pittson—with similar “we’ll give you millions of dollars if you come here and employ us” thinking behind them. Thankfully, they both failed to get off the ground.
My favourite mega-project idea is from the 1970s, just after the Three Mile Island incident. As US states were strengthening regulation of nuclear power plants, an American huckser, using a false identity, saw his opportunity. He managed to sucker the provincial government into believing he could build 10 nuclear reactors, Fukushima-style, on Stoddart Island in Shag Harbour, and then sell all the power to New York City via a deep sea cable. I’ve tried to find government documents related to the scam, but apparently they’ve all been destroyed. No doubt the scamster made off with millions of dollars, courtesy of the Nova Scotian taxpayer. On the plus side, this was one of a series of environmental issues that led to the creation of the Ecology Action Centre.
All these mega-projects had one thing in common: Nova Scotia was going to get rich thanks to rich people from away bringing their money here. For that, ironically, we paid dearly, losing hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars.
After MacGillivray first uttered it, there was an unwritten
law that no bureaucrat, business person, pundit or politician could talk about Halifax without using the phrase “world-class city.”
In a 2001 op-ed, the Daily News‘ David Rodenhiser defended himself, his wife and other nude sunbathers at Crystal Crescent Beach, who had been threatened with arrest by the cops. Rodenhiser quoted a Toronto economic development official explaining that city created a nude beach because “given that Toronto is a major world-class city, we should recognize that there is an element of the population who enjoy nude sunbathing and recreation.”
“Not in our world-class city, though,” wrote Rodenhiser. “Here in Halifax, we welcome police harassment and handcuffs.” Rodenhiser now works, mostly clothed, as a flack for Nova Scotia Power.
In June, 2002, an official named Harry Adams said the federal government wouldn’t reimburse downtown Halifax businesses that lost business due to security at the G7 summit. “The reality of it is,” Adams told the Daily News, “anytime you’re a world-class city, you’re going to attract meetings and you’re going to attract protestors.”
“New convention centre to attract world-class events to city and province.” —Trade Centre Limited press release announcing funding for new convention centre, 2009
“How can we be a world-class city, a smart city, without a stadium and a CFL team?” Rick Howe asked in his Daily News column, in 2004.
In 2005, port president Karen Oldfied celebrated the naming of Halifax as host for a convention of international port officials, explaining that “we have a world-class port in a world-class city and this conference allows us to showcase all we have to offer.”
The following year, Chronicle-Herald columnist Marilla Stephenson complained that a real world-class city would clear the streets of snow more quickly. And that paper once editorialized that a true world-class city wouldn’t have taxi zones.
The phrase “world-class” shows up 442 different places on halifax.ca, the city’s website, in documents dating from the formation of HRM in 1996, right up to last week.
The obsession with becoming a “world-class city” led
naturally, necessarily, to the colossal clusterfuck of the Commonwealth Games bid.
In 2006 the man who introduced “world-class city” to Halifax, Trade Centre Limited’s president Fred MacGillivray, was appointed chair of the Commonwealth Games Bid Committee. “Halifax,” explained the bid committee’s website, “has community support, the facilities, expertise and world-class hospitality to successfully open its arms to the people of the world and the athletes of the Commonwealth in 2014.”
Of course, important world-class go-getters in charge of world-class games needed to have world-class office space and world-class salaries and world-class suits (yes, we paid for their suits) and world-class first-class air travel to world-class destinations to host world-class schmoozefests over world-class cocktails with other world-class movers and shakers. And the next thing you know, MacGillivray had presided over the secret expenditure of $8.5 million in tax money.
As for the Commonwealth Games themselves, the group of world-class bullshitters had pieced together a $2 billion pile o’ crap, an unworkable plan with unrealistic assumptions and unachievable goals. A consultant hired to de-fumigate the mess lambasted every aspect of the plan, including the business plan, ticket prices, sports selected, bogus projections of media sales, and more. Finally, even fiddle-playing, step-dancing Rodney MacDonald couldn’t stomach the grift, and on March 8, 2007, the premier pulled the plug on the games bid.
Halifax had adopted the phrase from Toronto, but in 2008
then-Toronto mayor David Miller realized that “world-class city” stank of desperation.
“I think the phrase is both meaningless and demeaning,” Miller tells me over the phone, from what sounds like an airport departure gate. “A city’s goal, from my perspective, should be to be the best it can possibly be. If you’re a great place to live, and you’ve got great public amenities and thriving businesses and relative social equality, you’re going to be a place that attracts people from around the world.
“And in Toronto’s case, there are some very concrete things we should be doing: building transit, making sure our huge number of immigrants settle well and participate in the life of the city, addressing some of our economic inequality issues, building on the industries in which we have strength to create strong employment for the future, things like that.
“When you say ‘world-class,'” continues Miller, “you’re really saying something like, ‘Well, we actually really don’t like what we are, we want to try to be something else.’ And first of all, you never can be something else, and secondly, that’s demeaning to a city. Toronto is a great city, and if it focuses on its strengths it can be even better. The same thing is true of Halifax. But neither of us is Paris. Nor should we try to be.”
Miller says he doesn’t know MacGillivray, and isn’t very familiar with Trade Centre Limited or details of the Commonwealth Games fiasco. But, “I can say that ambitions like this were the kinds of ambitions that brought us the SkyDome, which is probably the biggest municipal boondoggle in the history of Canada–it was supposed to be $150 million, and it ended up being over $600 million.” Of bureaucratic infatuation with the term “world-class city,” Miller says: “You may be right, it may be cover to give you broad latitude to do things that if you discussed them in detail, the public wouldn’t support.”
Alas, as Toronto was seeing through the world-class bullshit,
Halifax doubled down on it.
The dust hadn’t yet settled on the Commonwealth Games bid when Trade Centre Limited prez Scott Ferguson (MacGillivray had retired) joined up with Halifax’s then-mayor Peter Kelly and the city’s top bureaucrat, Wayne Anstey, to turn the Halifax Common into an outdoor concert Mecca.
“We are very confident we can make this a world-class event,” Kelly told the Chronicle-Herald, in the days leading up to one of the concerts. To that end, Ferguson, Kelly and Anstey did what all world-class self-important people do: they lied and they cheated.
They lied about concert attendance figures, allowing all the world believe that over 50,000 people went to the Paul McCartney concert, when in reality only 26,000 tickets were sold. That lie led to more lies about attendance at the other Common concerts.
“No longer will we deemed a small place in Canada. We’ll be seen as a world-class city.” —Trade Centre Limited president Fred MacGillivray, 1994
They cheated by ignoring city finance policies and secretly loaning $7.4 million in city funds to Harold MacKay, the concert promoter who couldn’t turn a profit on a former Beatle. The house of cards collapsed in 2010, and eventually the city ate nearly $400,000.
As a result of the scandal, in true world-class city style, Ferguson got a raise and was praised by Economic Development minister Percy Paris. Kelly took no responsibility and put all blame on Anstey, who managed to retire with full benefits.
And now, sigh, there’s the convention centre. The existing convention centre, managed by TCL, has long billed itself as, yep, a “world-class facility” that serves “world-class cuisine.” The adjoining Metro Centre, also managed by TCL, hosts “world-class sporting events” and “world-class acts.” But apparently the convention centre isn’t world-classy enough. Because all wealth comes from rich people bringing their money here, it was decided we needed a bigger, even more world-classier convention centre to attract even more Money From Away.
So in 2009, the city and province signed a financing deal subsidizing private developer Joe Ramia to the tune of $375 million in taxpayer money. TCL justified that financing through a series of bogus delegate projections for a bigger centre, which in turn were amplified by a bogus economic impact report. TCL then issued a press release: “New convention centre to attract world-class events to city and province,” it read.
As it’s all based on bogus numbers, there’s no doubt that, like the Commonwealth Games and concert scandals before it, the new convention centre will be a world-class failure. Because we’ve been collectively obsessed with being a “world-class city,” we’ll be paying through the nose for the convention centre, for decades.
If nothing else, this strand of Nova Scotia history should have taught us one thing by now: When people declare they are going to turn Halifax into a “world-class city,” prepare to be fleeced.
Thankfully, Nova Scotia has an alternate strand of history
from which we can learn.
Just as former Toronto mayor David Miller tells us the path to economic development lies in creating “relative social equality” and resisting the lure of Money From Away, Nova Scotia has a long tradition of people coming together to create home-grown institutions of social equality that lead to wealth. In the early part of the last century, the Antigonish Movement was started by Catholic clerics fearing the very real appeal of communism in the hard-scrabble coal mines and fishing villages of Cape Breton and eastern Nova Scotia.
The problem they sought to address was the crushing poverty caused by exploitation of workers by a handful of corporations. The coal fields had first been turned over to Boston-based Henry Whitney, whose Dominion Coal Company was given a 99-year lease on Cape Breton’s coal mines, and then to Roy “The Wolf” Wolvin, a Minnesotan who teamed up with the British Empire Steel Corporation to take over the failed Dominion operations and immediately cut wages in the mines. On the fishery side, most sales went through Boston-based brokers who offered take-it-or-leave-it low prices for the catch—Money From Away.
The Antigonish Movement’s solution was mutual support and self-reliance on the part of common people. The movement hinged foremost on education, to teach communities about the wider world, and how to build and manage the institutions they needed to break the cycle of dependence on Money From Away. About 10,000 “study clubs” were formed, where adults helped each other to learn.
Instead of going to the company store, miners formed cooperative grocery stores, keeping prices low and profits in the community. Fishers joined together to create cooperative fish plants and lobster canneries, bypassing the cutthroat buyers in the middle. Housing cooperatives started everywhere, breaking the hold of the rentier class. Many of these rural people joined the military and moved to the Halifax area, where they improved their lot by building military housing cooperatives in Sackville and Dartmouth.
The most successful institution of mutual support was the credit union. Hundreds of credit unions were started, freeing people from banks, and allowing deposits to be re-invested in the community, stimulating local, and locally owned, economic enterprise.
Unfortunately we’ve turned our back on those institutions of mutual support. Nova Scotia once had the highest credit union membership rate in the country; it now has among the lowest. And membership in those surviving credit unions is mostly inactive, allowing the institutions to turn themselves into something indistinguishable from commercial banks. Cooperative grocery stores are closing across the province. Housing cooperatives struggle. Education is either simply a commodity, or ridiculed.
We’ve given up on mutual support. Now it’s every man and
every woman for his- or herself. We delude ourselves into thinking prosperity will come by turning Halifax into a “world-class city,” whatever that is. We dream that wealth will come not from communities investing back into themselves, but rather through the benevolence of Money From Away, a true sucker’s game.
But imagine if the money squandered on pie-in-the-sky world-class delusions was instead used to support cooperative enterprises and small start-ups. Imagine a significant annual provincial investment to build an off-market housing stock owned cooperatively by residents.
Our city and provincial governments are gearing up to spend a billion dollars for the widening of Bayers Road and Highway 102, a project that will keep commuters atomized, separated from each other by two-tonne individualized chunks of steel, which will increase our reliance on imported oil, and therefore increase the amount of our incomes going directly out of here. Imagine instead if we spent half as much money to build an environmentally friendly light rail system, where we travelled together–sitting next to each other–and kept much of the money that would otherwise go to fuel right here in the community.
Imagine the entire provincial budget being deposited in credit unions to give a solid financing base for economic development projects decided democratically by members, rather than by scamsters in suits. Better yet, imagine a provincially owned bank.
As for education, in the personal or family sense, people have always thought of education as being valuable in terms of personal financial gain. You go to college, become a doctor or whatever, and you’re a success because you make the big money.
But in terms of public policy, it used to be that education was valuable in its own right, as education: it made us more rounded people, appreciative of the arts, knowledgeable about at least the broad outlines of the sciences, more informed citizens. Money aside, a society that educates its citizens is a nicer, more interesting place, with people who are respectful of each other and who care for those who would otherwise be overlooked.
Nowadays, however, education isn’t much spoken of in those broad terms. The “value of education” is merely that educated people get better-paying jobs as drones at all those corporations we’re supposedly luring here with our world-class subsidies. And because education is only about personal enrichment, with no societal benefit, the cost of education is increasingly saddled on students, who carry unrelenting debt into their dronehood for decades to come, limiting their options in life.
This is hamster-wheel thinking: running faster and faster, chasing the Money From Away, but getting nowhere at all.
Even if we were to somehow actually reach the fabled pot of gold at the end of the world-class hamster wheel, to what end? To get a bigger wheel? We can run, run, run, never getting to know our neighbours, never experiencing the satisfaction of self-accomplishment, never finding community through mutual endeavour.
It doesn’t have to be this way. Halifax is a nice small city, full of wonderful people, interesting university communities, a fun arts and music scene, beautiful scenery. We should celebrate ourselves for what we are, stand tall without seeking that outside approval or the Money From Away. We should enjoy the things that work, fix the things that are fixable, come together in face of the woes that are inescapable.
Let’s rediscover and make live our history of mutual support, and forget about our world-class delusions.
This article appears in Jul 11-17, 2013.


This is a great essay Tim. Thanks.
I’m sure we can focus in more on where our wealth comes from and where it goes. We can learn more about the hard limits of our economy and how to live within those limits. We can get back to the most important goals of education. We can be more productive, be more responsible and put in more effort.
The great thing is that we can do it all, in spite of everything you’ve said here being true, from a wonderful starting point.
We live in one of the wealthiest, healthiest, safest regions in the world… that the world has ever known. Few people have ever had it so good. That we know we can do better is a kind of wild activist optimism. But it’s true. And in some ways it’s easy.
Mostly, as you say, we just have to help people on the ground get more productive and we have to stop making giant and discouraging field errors like the ones you’ve accounted above.
I don’t have the words to say how valuable I think this article is for Halifax and NS. I’ve lived many places and Tim speaks the truth. From the Premier, from other government officials, I hear that no matter what happens or how bad/expensive it gets, people will stay here because of the good quality of life. Yet the quality of life in Halifax seems to be subsumed by the poor self image and the need for come-from-away dollars that Tim writes of. I’m soooo tired of hearing “world class city” and I hope this article wakes people the hell up!! We don’t need high-rises and convention centres to make Halifax cool. We have our special Nova Scotian character which, I should say, exists nowhere else and we still have the bones of the mutual support Tim writes about. We just need to honour it. The rest will fall into place.
Bang on Tim. I recently got married at the existing Trade Centre and I can tell you that not one person was disappointed. I had guests from out of town who had never been to Halifax (westerners) who were awed at the history and feel of our downtown. I was told that our waterfront was better than anything in Old Montreal or Quebec. We have a unique city and we need to celebrate it rather than dumping on what it doesn’t have (and doesn’t need). The “build it and they will come” mentality of the 70s and 80s still reigns in this province and needs to be shown for what it is – pure bull. And on another note, I remember Mayor Fitzgerald standing on the waterfront saying that we could host an Olympics. I laughed myself sick…
World class, my ass.
These buzzphrases are worked up at the conventions and trade association meetings where these beuros and business people meet. The theme is selected, the language formed and then the campaign begins.
The first object is to get the HOLE in the ground, that is get the Government to commit $$$ to the scheme/scam. Object achieved in Halifax! See Anglo-Irish tapes on how these executives conspire to get the intitial money and get governments committed so that they must spend more and more. Get government Skin In The Game.
Down here in Bridgewater some years back, the economic flavor-saviour of the month was GOLF COURSE. There weren’t enough golf courses. Bridgewater would BOOM with a golf course. Golf course needed to attract doctors. All worked up by the golf industry. Research showed that these golf courses were being put up in communities across Canada with Infrastructure money. Yes, your tax dollars for golf. I imagine research would show the same for the recent spate of recreation centers across Nova Scotia and Canada.
Well, the golf course in Bridgewater is now bankrupt. Seems now there are too many golf courses.
So, Halifax, good luck with your WORLD CLASS HOLE, it is going to be sucking down lots of $$$$$$$$$$.
I’m uncomfortable with the use of unproven statements like “No doubt the scamster made off with millions of dollars, courtesy of the Nova Scotian taxpayer”.
I bristle at the characterization of those who run for office as “wannabe mucky-mucks”.
However, I’m over-joyed at the discussion I’m sure this piece will spark, and heartened by its message of self-reliance.
And while we are at it, isn’t it time we stopped using the phrase ‘Come From Away’. It is xenophobic (fear of anyone different than you) in the extreme. And, yes, I get that Tim is using it in a pejorative way.
We must be world class in HRM – we hired a city manager who lives 1,300 kms from his office. No other city in the world can match that.
And we hired an accountant to be the planning boss .
World class fools for putting up with BS.
And we are not a city, just a collection of small towns.
How about we change “world class city” to “world class people.” People make a city not the other way around. And Halifax is filled with amazing people.
To be fair, Toronto as a whole never really saw through the world-class BS. Miller did. Most of the city is still pretty hung up on it, however, as are most Canadian cities (except Montreal, which just don’t give a fuck).
Yes, thanks, Tim.
The megaproject delusion is just that, a delusion. It is an economic driver, to be sure, and I suppose it satisfies Lewis Blacks economic stimulus theory of building a Big Fucking Thing. But see, right there, we drive head first into the split and potentially contradictory goals of government spending.
Category A, government has the responsibility to provide reasonable, and reasonably cost effective, services. Roads, schools, police, water, parks, hospitals. Generally, spending here should be low risk. There is some room to innovate, and to try out some reversible projects (gov paving crews come to mind), but generally, spend $x for $x value, with a 99% confidence it will work. Even pure, undirected scientific research falls into this category, even if there isn’t any direct measurable benefit.
The other major area of government spending, Category B for now, isn’t really spending on government services, but on the more vague “economic development”. Fish farms, radio factories, steel mills, call centers. Almost by definition, these are high risk projects; if they are low risk, they would just borrow money from a bank or some investor who can be convinced with a pure argument on profitability. Or if not high risk, potentially just so absurdly expensive that no non-government is able to touch it.
I don’t mind government throwing money at a project that has a 10% chance of success (necessarily), if the potential reward is >= 10x the spend. $8.5 million, flying around the world, bribing commonwealth sports officials seems about how much that would cost, and a good deal, provided that is, that the end-goal of actually hosting the games was realistically possible. There was 0 chance it would happen from day 1.
Great and amazing things can happen when there is a confluence of Category A and B projects. Hoover Dam comes to mind; it never could have been built with private money, and a mix of the economy being so absurdly fucked and having some truly visionary politicians allowed the building of the Biggest Fucking Thing imaginable, which is long-term financially self sufficient, power sold covering the cost of irrigating southern California.
Horrific fuck ups happen when Cat-A and Cat-B projects are confused, combined, and run for bad reasons. SYSCO comes to mind, and more generally the government intervention into all coal related projects. It wasn’t some cash to cover payroll for a week, a bridge loan to get things turned around. It simply was not possible to return that industry to being self sufficient over the long term. A steel mill isn’t a hospital. It has to be self-sufficient.
I’m reminded of the national $5 billion infrastructure spend that Chretien funded on his first day. The then City of Dartmouth, its chlorine-distribution system crumbling around it decided to do the logical thing with their one-time money from nowhere; they built a bingo hall.
A one time spend of $375 million on upgrades to the HRM sewer systems wouldn’t do very much. But its a Big Fucking Thing that would a) actually provide jobs today and b) actually be of zero risk long term benefit to basic government services.
Granting a convention center is better than a bingo hall, its not much better.
On a side note, I think its pretty clear that the biggest municipality fuckup in Canada is the Big O(we) in Montreal, not the Skydome. Not that anyone had any doubts to why, but the suspicions that it was above and beyond old fashioned good-intentioned stupidity are being proven.
C’mon Watson, one need only look as far back as the ineptness of those involved in the concert ca$h situation to be assured that, yes, those who run for office are indeed “wannabe mucky-mucks”, in over their heads.
We can’t even see fit to hire local talent to entertain our kids. (see Rapping Faerie).
With the amount of people getting sucked in from the hinterland my wife and I should have no problem finding real estate outside of this suckhole county. Counting the days.
Take a walk on Barrington from Duke to Spring Garden, does it look like this place is being run by people who know what they’re doing?
I’m curious to know what various university students who visit us 8 months at a time over a 3-4 year period take away with them. What stories do they tell of Halifax? Really, though, probably good ones considering their insular experience here. I guess thats a good thing.
You know what the best part of Halifax is? Cheap flights to Montreal.
Tim, Tim, Tim… It seems you need to cough up an article like this every so often, just like a cat needs to cough up a hairball every so often.
“World-class” is quite a common term, just like “employer of choice” or “leading edge”. They are all equally meaningless, just like “sustainable” or “environmentally friendly” or, dare I say, “progressive”. Such are the vagaries of language.
It seems clear your problem is any city or region that tries to change or grow or be different from what it currently may be. Why that is, you fail to explain in any coherent way. Instead you continue to flagellate the same old dead horses that seem to consume you. Really, Tim, you need to move on. Either that, or run for office using this as a platform, and be done with it.
It was one of the first things that struck me when I moved to Halifax from “out west” (away) back in 2008: the bizarre eagerness of the city’s business community and municipal leaders to waste buckets of tax-payer money on the construction of huge, purposeless buildings. I could only guess that the goal of these proposed mega-projects was to make community leaders feel like a “big deal.” The only other explanation being that some of these leaders are actually deluded enough to believe that one big-ass building can somehow transform our city. It is as clear to me now as it was then that the leaders of this city have lost sight of the fundamentals of building a happier, more prosperous city (assuming they ever grasped these fundamentals). Improving transit, increasing public access to important services, supporting LOCAL business and entrepreneurship, keeping the city clean and green, supporting a thriving arts community – this is how you make a community more attractive. The basics. Dumping millions of taxpayer dollars on enormous buildings and subsidies to foreign corporations are shortcuts that lead nowhere.
Wow, check out the Crank-hate. I actually like halifax, I just don’t like the people who run it or how they run it. The indy shop owners I like. The indy restos I like. The micro brews I love.
Ryek said up above: “It was one of the first things that struck me when I moved to Halifax from “out west” (away) back in 2008: the bizarre eagerness of the city’s business community and municipal leaders to waste buckets of tax-payer money on the construction of huge, purposeless buildings.”
There IS a sort of “let’s-do-this-one-megaproject-and-it-will-fix-everything” mentality here. But the west has fallen victim to it too. Look at Edmonton’s arena deal. Edmonton city council promised the arena will revitalize north downtown (pfft) and to that end voted to use $45 million of provincial infrastructure money to cover a funding gap. (The whole project is astonishingly expensive, with council BORROWING half a billions dollars to build the thing. It reeks of being a future boondoggle.)
Anyway, re: Halifax. I think the convention centre will actually be a good thing. I don’t think it will bring economic panacea, and I don’t think its benefits will be nearly as great as has been hyped, but I believe it will be much better than what was there before (i.e., nothing).
Pigeon says in his comment, “I believe [the convention centre] will be much better than what was there before (i.e., nothing).”
Well I can’t disagree that something is usually better than nothing however I don’t think that, “it’s better than nothing” is a strong enough argument to support spending tens of millions of taxpayer dollars on something. Also I’d like to point out to pigeon that in my earlier comment I wasn’t trying to say that west is better than east or anything silly like that. It’s just that prior to moving to Halifax I had never lived any place where city leaders seemed quite so pre-occupied with mega-projects as they are in Halifax.
Ryek: Yeah, you might be right about that (civic leaders being preoccupied with megaprojects).
Frankly, I think it’s just lazy politics. When you don’t have any better ideas, bet on a miraculous result from one project. Certainly not Halifax or Maritimes-specific (the Bilbao effect is the worldwide version, and the biggest cities in the world have fallen prey to it).
But in Halifax, the economy hasn’t performed as well, so perhaps there’s more stock put in miracle solutions. I’m pretty bullish on the next decade or so in NS—immigration and immigrant retention is increasing, attention is returning to the urban core, there are more cranes downtown than ever, and the employment rate, at least in HRM, has been consistently good. The fundamentals in NS are actually not as bad as most people think. I think if other things start to go better, there will be less attention paid to “this-will-fix-everything” thinking.
Tim, great article. You hit the nail on the head and I agree with everything you said. I know we’re getting fleeced, I know that those currently in front of economic development for our city are always trying to woo us with the next ‘shiny object’. You’ve shared what likely many Haligonians have been feeling for some time.
Here’s the thing though…I was born and raised in Halifax; have lived here my entire life. And now I’m at that point in my life where I want to make a difference but feel ill equipped and perhaps somewhat ignorant about what I – and other Haligonians like me – can do to stop this bullshit. I am proud to live here, couldn’t wait to come home when I lived in Toronto for a short while and always exhale when I return from a trip abroad. The people of Halifax deserve better than this. I also appreciate our differences and don’t want to follow the crowd to someone else’s definition of ‘world class’.
I vote in every election, and pay close attention to social issues. I see never-ending proposals for development in our city and feel most of them seem to reflect short term versus forward thinking. No one in leadership seems to have a vision for Halifax beyond their next election campaign.
So, that all said…I also am with you that education is critical. However, I think we may have to start with educating us on how to take back our wonderful city of Halifax. I am an avid reader of The Coast and look forward especially to your editorials every issue. Some have said that you only focus on what’s wrong with Halifax but I defend you and tell those folks that you are simply trying to shake Haligonians out of their complacent fog. I can tell you have more to offer and that you want Halifax to be the great city it can be; after all you live here too.
So Tim, we need some help. You’ve lived in the U.S. and other places and demonstrate a great ability for research on best practices in other areas of the world.
You’ve told us what’s wrong and rightly so. Now, how can we make it right?
I look forward to your editorial in response.
Tim, great article. You hit the nail on the head and I agree with everything you said. I know we’re getting fleeced, I know that those currently in front of economic development for our city are always trying to woo us with the next ‘shiny object’. You’ve shared what likely many Haligonians have been feeling for some time.
Here’s the thing though…I was born and raised in Halifax; have lived here my entire life. And now I’m at that point in my life where I want to make a difference but feel ill equipped and perhaps somewhat ignorant about what I – and other Haligonians like me – can do to stop this bullshit. I am proud to live here, couldn’t wait to come home when I lived in Toronto for a short while and always exhale when I return from a trip abroad. The people of Halifax deserve better than this. I also appreciate our differences and don’t want to follow the crowd to someone else’s definition of ‘world class’.
I vote in every election and pay attention to social issues. I see the never-ending proposals for development in our city most of which reflect short-term versus forward thinking. No one in leadership seems to have a vision for Halifax beyond their own election campaign agenda.
So, that all said…I also am with you that education is critical. However, I think we may have to start with educating us on how to take back our wonderful city of Halifax. I am an avid reader of The Coast and look forward especially to your editorials every issue. Some have said that you only focus on what’s wrong with Halifax but I defend you and tell those folks that you are simply trying to shake Haligonians out of their complacent fog. I can tell you have more to offer and that you want Halifax to be the great city it can be; after all you live here too.
So Tim, we need some help. You’ve lived in the U.S. and other places and demonstrate a great ability for research on best practices in other areas of the world.
You’ve told us what’s wrong and rightly so. Now, how can we make it right?
I look forward to your editorial in response.
Thanks for this.
A good start for stimulating the economy and creating wealth locally would be to encourage and support local food production so that we don’t continue to send 97% of our food dollars out of the province.
That’s something everyone can do at an individual level through buying choices and investing (through Farmworks for example, which invests in food entrepreneurs), at a local level through farmers’ markets and coops, as farmers and food entrepreneurs, at the community level and through cooperative efforts, and at the government policy level by reducing regulatory barriers for small food entrepreneurs, supporting initiatives such as mobile abattoirs, community food hubs and more.
We all have to eat, and we could do a much better job to keep our food money in the province – and eat better at the same time, which leads to better health.
How can you have a “world-class” city when only a handful of people own the downtown core and the waterfront? Impossible.
The problem with Nova Scotia and HRM moreover is this we will host something mentality and we will become famous . Frankly Everyone has had Paul McCartney and Elton John play in their local area including in the case of Summerside Prince Edward Island Elton John. Moncton is the king of outdoor concerts and they did it with a logical plan to build from event to event. Halifax well reassemble the fences , stage , portapotties each and every summer for the Commons concerts. The concept that you are going to blaze a trail to outdoor concert success with high rise apartments having a free view of a concert shows the utter stupidity of the city.
You’ve put into words some of what has been bugging me about Halifax; generally great city in which to live. Having lived for a while in Ontario, I know that this pathetic impulse to emulate Toronto is very much misplaced; a projection of the insecurity of the local elite. Thanks, too, for sparking the imagination on how to make Halifax a more livable city for the average working person. I feel inspired! Thanks, Tim.
Sadly, since Toronto elected Rob Ford as mayor, we’re back to “world-class city” crap, although the actual phrase gets used much less than it did in the ’90s. Ford wants a NFL team. He wants a stadium for the NFL team. He wants to host the Olympics. He wants a giant combined convention centre and casino so that people from elsewhere will “have something to do” when they’re here on conventions (because none of the restaurants, bars, theatres etc. in downtown Toronto qualifies as “something to do”). He wants a monorail and a ferris wheel on the waterfront. These things will not get built but the debates over them consume huge amounts of time and energy at City Hall.
When I lived in Halifax I found it so nice to be in a place that seemed to honour its own history, that didn’t appear to aspire to “world-class” status or crave validation from the rest of the world; this article is really disheartening. It’s sad when our officials show such disdain for the places they were elected to run. All these Big Fucking Things, as the commenter above put it, are generic — they have nothing to do with the places where they are built. The whole point of a convention centre, or a football stadium, or a Paul McCartney concert, is that it could be anywhere. But if you don’t care about what makes Halifax (or Toronto, or Saint John) itself, what makes it special, I guess that’s OK.
Well, actually, Gus, “world class city” is not quite the same as “employer of choice”. The wish to be a “World class city” expresses the adolescent need for peer approval, the need for self-validation derived only from the opinion of others. Only immature, insecure individuals require it. That does not mean that the bureacrats and politicians promoting the various agrandizing schemes are that naive – for the most part they sucker the taxpayers to finance their bureacratic empire building. I firmly believe that all members of the governing board of every organization advocating for government “loans” to finance Commonwealth Games, Olympic Games or any other project, should be required by law to personally guarantee any cost overuns of the project. All the huksters of the ” world class” mirages would suddenly fade away.
Kudos on this article, Tim. I’m from Saint John, NB and currently live in Toronto. I recognize strands of this deluded dogmatism from both places, and see it is as symptomatic of a struggle to articulate an economy in an investor-heavy climate that sees success at an order of magnitude higher than could ever be achieved by an the actual capabilities of the place in question. Around the world, citizens of struggling municipalities are often held hostage to the shifting winds of wealthy executives and charismatic hucksters, but there does seem a peculiar susceptibility to the appeal of “world class” in Atlantic Canada.
Great article. Well said. To add to the information stated, I have been following the money as well. Nova Scotia has traded its social organizational structure that supported the people for a corporate organizational structure that supports corporate welfare. We are inundated with financial bodies that are tripping over one another. It started with the creation of ACOA in 1987. Since then a total of sixteen new economic agencies have been created. They include NSBI (Nova Scotia Business Inc.), ECBC (Enterprise Cape Breton Corp.), NS CBDB (Nova Scotia Community Business Development Corporation), NSARDA (Nova Scotia Association Redevelopment Agency) which is the umbrella group for twelve sub redevelopment agencies spread through the province. They include; Annapolis Digby Economic Development Agency, Antigonish Regional Development Authority, Cape Breton County Economic Development Authority, Colchester Regional Development Agency, Cumberland Regional Economic Development Association, Guysborough County Regional Development Authority, Greater Halifax Partnership, Hants Regional Development Authority, Kings Community Economic Development Agency, Lunenburg Queens Regional Development Agency, Pictou Regional Development Commission, Strait-Highlands Regional Development Agency. Now you will note Cape breton has ACOA, NSBI, ECBC, CBDB and SHRDA, potentially all working for the Cape Breton Regional Authority. Halifax has ACOA, NSBI, CBDB, GHP and now, it has created another committee to oversee the GHP. How many economic and development agencies do we need? As far as i am concerned they are nothing but a make work projects for the well heeled and the well connected to provide high paying positions to friends of friends (nudge, nudge, wink, wink) and is comparable to what Mike Duffy has done on the national scene. We no longer have a free enterprise system where businesses survive through their own fiscal management but are supported by the taxpayer and only businesses from outside the province benefit. We also have traded Democracy for a system of Corporatism where the people are gouged and bled of their meagre incomes to support the rich and powerful. The mantra that is spouted every time taxpayer money is handed over to a corporation is, “It is for the economic good and the prosperity for the people of Nova Scotia.” I have lived in Nova Scotia all of my life and can remember all of the examples given in Tim Bousquet’s article for corporate handouts and despite the feeble attempts of economic prosperity and the creation of countless economic agencies, I have not experienced any great leaps of economic prosperity. All I have seen are young people leaving the province in droves for western jobs, high taxes, massive job losses and the health and education systems in shambles. The NDP are no better in caring for the people of Nova Scotia and in fact have given a record 3.2 billion dollars in corporate welfare. We live in the oldest province with the oldest population with the highest taxes and unemployment and pay the most for every thing we buy. Can it get any better?
Many great points in your article. To further stir things up please watch. http://on.ted.com/cmuT. Mr. Li compares the Chinese approach to grooming regional leaders through years of progressively increasing responsibility to our western system of popularity contests democracy. Guess who has the resume and track record to do their job? Not our leaders.
I agree education is key however that should not be construed as free university for all. Fix the P to 12 first. That requires a decade or more of tweaking before there is any benefit to increasing access to university. Run school all year and figure out how to reward teachers for performance instead of for tenure.
Halifax: the only place on earth where Paul McCartney tickets don’t sell out. Doesn’t that just about say it all?? No heart, no shame, no sense, No-va Scotia!