Won over by the irresistible romance of railway? I’ll try to conjure up the experience of what might be to come. Chuffing slowly but surely along by the shores of the Bedford Basin, you soon leave the crappy sprawling environs of Bedford behind you. Hark! The call of an eagle penetrates the soft rhythmic clatter of wheels on rails. The rotunda flashes past as you gather speed. Order a beverage at the buffet and enjoy the best commute there is to be had for thousands of miles around. The woes of the Bedford Highway long since forgotten, this is travel the way it’s meant to be.
An unrivalled 21st century commute, right? Right. But our commuting problems are compounded by a disturbing set of circumstances: Increasing use of private vehicles for our transportation needs and its very significant effect on climate change and our health. And the large burden of this on both our personal and municipal financial resources.
Council has approved a 63 percent annual increase in our budget for street recapitalization (maintaining and resurfacing our streets) since 2012/13 from $18.5 million to $30M. Our combined proposed budget over the 2020/21 financial year for road-related spending is a whopping $64.5M. Most of that expenditure is utilized by people making unsustainable journeys by car, with a token $3 million dedicated to active transport projects.
So, no surprise given the very significant and ongoing resource bias towards road maintenance and infrastructure, that more of us are using cars. And with drivers providing the largest and loudest voice for our tax dollars, we need to think clever and efficient to deliver our strongest and most cost-effective solution with the leftover cash. Is a train service that killer number-one remedy?
First up, a train fixes some issues, worsens others. Bedford and every other area blessed with a railway station would become much more desirable as a place to live. House price increases and more development and sprawl will be sparked as soon as plans are firmed up for the railway link. It may also ease congestion on the highway routes to and from downtown which could promote more traffic, speeding and all of those undesirables. Many accustomed to a lifetime of car commuting will not give up door to door convenience for a multi-legged commute on a train, but they will be hoping others do, so their own journey time is quickened.
Crucially a train only “fixes” one commuting journey into downtown. What about the others? No train joy for Cole Harbour, Eastern Passage, Sambro, Timberlea and many more from our geographically dispersed communities. For them, it’s carry on with the cramped car commute.
One solution does stand head and shoulders over all others—express park and ride. We have some “park and ride” parking lots which are served by our regular transit services. We don’t have European-style park and ride solutions which combine enormous out of town car parking lots with express dedicated non-stop buses leaving every 15 minutes max during peak times. This solution is aimed squarely at the unchangeable reality of how we travel, but crucially it wins over drivers before the congested parts of their journey commence, utilizing dedicated bus lanes to get those queue-hating commuters downtown quicker than they could by car.
This last requirement is essential. Why bother taking the bus at all if you can get there quicker by car? So for this, we must use another common European solution—straight swapping traffic lanes for bus lanes, including at congested parts of the “at capacity” Bedford Highway.
Park and ride does not match the romance or experience of railway, but it delivers a solid solution for all out-of-town commuters in our municipality, if done properly. Even better, the understated and unromantic solution it offers is less likely to increase house prices or create more sprawl.
Let’s revisit that commute: Sambro neighbours car-pool to the park and ride at Spry- field, where they pick up a bus within 10 minutes which zips by queuing traffic to take them non-stop to multi drop-off locations downtown. Doesn’t sound quite as idyllic? Nope, but it fits perfectly with how we travel here.
Opinionated is a rotating column by Halifax writers featured regularly in The Coast. The views published are those of the author.
This article appears in Jan 3-9, 2019.
The argument of ‘its not fair to people that don’t live in Bedford’ that have to continue on their regular clogged commute is so perplexing to me. These transitions do not happen over night. As of now the proposed commuter rail is the ‘most bang for your buck’ option for Halifax; its a test. The success or failure of this first stage will perhaps pave the way for your suggested routes to Cole Harbour and Eastern Passage. Baby steps. To reject the project all together because it will benefit one side of the Harbour more so than the other is ridiculous.
It’s not that it’s not fair to people who live in Bedford; that land is HUGHKY valued by developers and the money from the taxes coming from the developments that will soon pop up along that land is highly valued by the city. There shall be no commuter rail. Ever. And those poor people in Bedford will have to tolerate their view being blocked by huge condos casting dark shadows over their gardens and the accompanying high winds produced by a long stretch of wind tunnel. As for commuter transportation, a subway system will be dug in 2050; The rock from which will create a series of small islands located in and in the basin; those islands will be created and developed containing living spaces for the even-richer.
Pffft, no one’s going to be living in this shithole in 2050.
Yes – “straight swapping traffic lanes for bus lanes, including at congested parts of the at capacity Bedford Highway.” These lanes can also serve emergency vehicles well. Perhaps the city could consider asking that the rail lines between the south-end pier and fairview pier be used instead of downtown, they could even put some asphalt down and run the trailers parallel to the tracks. Last, any and all solutions to get vehicles off the road need to be explored, just like smoking, make it harder, and we all might just quit.
I doubt that improving public transportation, will lower emissions. Not unless you find a way to run trains and busses that are full or almost full. In order to lower emissions significantly you must reduce off-peak service and eliminate low density routes.
At 1.56 occupants per car the ’emission break even’ is 17 passengers per bus. But remember don’t only consider the middle of routes, also consider the extremities where there are much fewer passengers.
Do you disagree with my comment or is it that you don’t like it? Is because I spelled hugely incorrectly? Do you think that by disliking my comment that will change the outcome of a commuter rail in Halifax? You crazy hipsters!
Wow! What a narrow minded and poorly presented article and argument – presuming there is an actual argument there. All I read is an opinion piece about one side of a story. Poor reporting technique to say the least. The comment “It may also ease congestion on the highway routes to and from downtown which could promote more traffic” is absurd to say the least. How can it ease congestion while promoting more traffic?!? Seems like a bit of a contradiction. And if congestion is eased, how does that directly relate to “speeding and all of those undesirables.” First off, what are those undesirables you write of? Where are your studies of traffic patterns supporting your view? Idiocy and lack of concern for traffic laws promotes speeding, not lack of congestion.
Yes, “Many accustomed to a lifetime of car commuting will not give up door to door convenience”, but then again MANY WOULD! And this is the reason for exploring the possibility of a commuter rail system.