I’m an attractive single queer woman in my late 20s, who has never had a hard time finding sex partners. I don’t know what has happened to casual sex etiquette lately, but recently I’ve noticed a pattern of (potential) sex partners insisting on watching a movie/Netflix before getting it on. Wtf? If I come back to your place after midnight it is because I want to fuck, that is all. I don’t want to cuddle in front of a computer screen on a Friday night; if I did, I would get myself a girlfriend. Do not say, “I just need to chill out with a movie before we do anything,” when I arrive at your place for a booty call you requested. Definitely don’t say “I’m gonna take you home and fuck you” when we’re out on the town, if when I get to your place, you just put on Buffy and never get around to fucking me. Don’t waste my time. —Fuck Buddy

Join the Conversation

23 Comments

  1. Doesn’t say much about your company, fuck bud. Seriously consider an attitude overhaul.

    ‘I’m an attractive single queer woman in my late 20s, who has never had a hard time finding sex partners.’

    Are you for fucking real? Or do you freelance for Penthouse Forum?

  2. Sounds like OP keeps her Rohypnol in a Pez dispenser shaped like Jodie Foster’s fist.

  3. why is it that so many of you people have such a hard time beleiving that someone actually considers themselves attractive an desirable? It’s called confidence.

  4. attractive, unattractive, no difference. if someone makes an arrangement for sex with a willing partner, who then decides they want romance first ( and I say FIRST, not instead of, which would be changing their mind completely and fair play) op has reason to grumble. she’s not shooting her, Texan style. just grumbling. and with the limited number of potential sex partners for her here, its likely that she an d she have hooked up times in the past, but now t’other is changing what she wants without speaking up.

    ( and I am not saying this just because I am wondering where the frig she was when I was in my 20’s – I know she prob wasn’t born yet)

  5. I’m not being malicious when I ask this, but is ‘fucking’ the proper term for two females engaged in an intimate encounter? I imagine ‘fucking’ as penetration with a penis, but maybe I’m wrong? The terminology just struck me kinda funny. What’s your thoughts?

  6. Nurse, I have two friends, both female. One is gay the other is straight (sort of). They were in a secret relationship for about a year and a half, only a few ppl knew b/c the ‘straight’ woman was embarassed. She thought the same way that you do, Nurse, that ‘sex’ has to involve penetration – particularly with a penis. My lesbian friend was usually pretty understanding if not a little annoyed and hurt that her partner did not consider their intimate encounters as sex. I think people in the gay community view sexual intercourse in a different way than heterosexual people do, for obvious reasons.

    Personally I think an intimate encounter and even sex is not limited to penetration. Kissing is an intimate encounter and a person giving another person an orgasm (with their hands, mouth and/or genitals) can constitute as sex.

  7. Not sure if fucking necessitates penetration. Etymology of the fuck suggests it originally meant “doing the deed”. As Hoist suggested fingers and tongues can penetrate orifices though maybe not to the degree penises can. Orgasm is the goal obviously but not a necessity in the raw definition of sex. Then there’s strap-ons not to mention tribadism (rubbing of female genitals against each other). I think you could call tribadism fucking though I’m no expert.

  8. well, since only the immediate opening of a vagina has any response the length of inserted object is irrelevant. there’s an emotional aspect to ‘more’ but it’s not required. and truth be told, that whole penis penetration thing is highly over rated when that’s all there is. from the female perspective. seems like a heckuva lot of fun for the person with the penis though. kind of unfair.

    any further secrets of why lesbian orgasms are 1000% better than straight orgasms have to be withheld, or I lose my toaster oven.

  9. If you’re not upfront about this, you have nothing to complain about. If you are well.. nothing so queer as folk I guess.

    And no, that’s not my idea of irony.

  10. TJ, “why is it that so many of you people have such a hard time beleiving that someone actually considers themselves attractive an desirable? It’s called confidence.”

    It’s actually called *obnoxious* confidence. One can also be modestly confident in that one does not boast loudly and frequently and without reservation about their accomplishments and genetic advantages.

  11. Nurse- if you base your opinion on the crap lesbian porn you see on straight sites, then I can see your confusion. It’s very different in the real world.

    I’m a thirty something lesbian. Believe me… it’s fucking.

  12. “I’m an attractive single queer woman in my late 20s, who has never had a hard time finding sex partners.”

    In my opinion that is not an obnoxious statement, SirMeowalot.

  13. I was not referring to OB in general, but your generic criticism of people on this forum disliking “confident people”. There is a fine line between patting yourself on the back and boasting.

    That said, the quote you’ve given does lack a certain level of humility, for sure. As though she’s entitled, for whatever reason, to a barrier-free sex life just because she’s enjoyed one up until now.

  14. aw shit. so not only do we have to start totting up likes and dislikes here to ascertain if one is a worthwhile human being, now we have to abase ourselves before any future postings as a ‘OP’ ? (no, I am not this OP)

    this is starting to sound like a life o’ brian skit.

    oh lord, I am averting my eyes!

    (‘umble enough for ya?)

  15. Thanks for the feedback peeps. I guess I was thinking the term “fucking” just seems kind of harsh for acts of female intimacy

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *