I had the misfortune of dating an abusive prick for over two years. Thankfully, I got away two years ago. But today I’m reminded of how much I friggin hate his goddamn guts. Why? Because that prick cheated on me and gave me herpes. The drug company decided they weren’t going to let another company make a generic brand of the suppressive meds I’ve been taking for three years anymore. My drug plan barely covers anything and I’m stuck paying $70 a month. Yes, I cried. I used to be able to pay five dollars a month on the generic brand. Big F U to my pos ex and to the drug companies. —Look stupid nothing
This article appears in Sep 18-24, 2014.
That is harsh OB, sorry to hear that. It’s frustrating that all anybody seems to care about anymore is money. I have a friend who shells out hundreds of dollars a month on cancer medication – to stay alive. It’s fucking sad that we live in a society where people have to go bankrupt just trying to afford the medication that keeps them alive and free of pain – borderline sociopathic. I’m sure there must be a way around paying all that money for a prescription, one of the other commenters on here might have some good info for you about that.
I hear ya, OB. You can’t get generic insulin and my drug plan won’t cover the only type I can take because it costs more than the stuff that I can’t take, so I have to pay $125/month for it just to stay alive. 🙁
I really sympathize, OB.
I think you might be confused. Drug companies don’t get to decide whether or not the companies make generic versions of their drugs. Once a patent is up, other companies can step in and make those drugs as well. Google Innovacares…
Yeah, that caught my attention, too, Meaty. Did your doc change your prescription, OB, or did the generic company decide to stop making it? In any case, it sounds like your drug plan sucks like mine does. Can you get an exception to have the brand due to the fact that there is no generic alternative, or maybe go on another med?
Erratum: That should read: “INNOVICARES” and I forgot I could post a link here: https://www.innovicares.ca/en
THE CONSEQUENCES OF PROMISCUOUS BEHAVIOUR
“But today I’m reminded of how much I friggin hate that guy. Why? Because that prick cheated on me and gave me herpes.” Look stupid nothing
Should the drug companies be legally liable for the promiscuous behaviour of its clients?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Bummer.
Now you’re treading into deeper waters, MM… someone is bound to call you stupid!
I’m sorry I called you stupid, Meaty. If we ever meet I will smoke some good stuff with you.
^^ MM will always be montrealman. Don’t pay much attention to him now though, his account has been hacked.
you’re a good boy furious
“DEEPER WATERS”
RSVP
Mr. Meaty (09/26, 12:27PM)
Michael Murphy (12:24)
Nukka (1:11PM)
“Should the drug companies be legally liable for the promiscuous behaviour of its clients?” (Montrealman, (10:00AM)
Note the term “legally” which brings the issue into the realm of the Law of Torts, i.e., personal injury law. (Interestingly, during my brief sojurn in Law School I took a course in Torts so my comments are not entirely without foundation.) The legal question devolves into determining where legal responsibility lies. Is “Look stupid nothing” legally innocent and so can proceed against her drug company for not permitting a generic brand of herpes drugs to be produced such that she would be able to afford it? What factors must come into play?
The plaintiff’s ignorance of her boyfriend’s condition cuts no ice in a court of law. It would appear that at a minimum her responsibility was to insure that she acquainted herself with her boyfriend’s condition and acted accordingly, either by taking appropriate prophylactic measures or by avoiding sexual intercourse with him entirely. But she took no such actions. She appears to have adopted the pose of an innocent bystander, a hapless victim of her state. While her boyfriend is clearly the primary offender here, the fact that she willfully engaged in sexual intercourse with him does not absolve her of culpability. She falls within the net of legal liability, if to a lesser degree than her boyfriend.
Deeper waters indeed. The verdict must come down for the drug company. Next!
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
RSVP
Montrealman (09/26 3:22PM)
Is that you or the hacker?
Yes, I agree with paingirl. No hard feelings!
aww, that’s my boys
And Michael Murphy… you may not want to he at the same smörgåsbord as me… all (men) are welcome, but things may not be to your taste… 😉
OP, so sorry you are going through this. Michael Murphy gave some interesting advice (I didn’t know l-lysine had anti-viral effects), but check with your doc first to make sure there is nothing medical preventing you from reaping its benefits. Your pharmacist may also be able to give you some excellent ideas. Hope it works out–hang in there!
___________________________________________
@hoist: if your friend is having trouble paying for cancer meds (for pain, nausea, treatment, etc), tell them to contact the Nova Scotia Cancer Center–they may be able to help!
Fuck lady, shitty deal. That’s why I always ALWAYS use condoms (even when I was married) and don’t let them get their cum anywhere near me. Point that shit out the window.
Did someone ask for legal advice? You do not have grounds to sue the insurance company for not covering generic brands of medications but you do have grounds to sue your cheating ex for negligence in tort and he may be also liable to criminal charges.
NON-DISCLOSURE OF KNOWN STD’S AS AN AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT:
Criminal Code, RSC 1985 c C-46 (3)(c) states that “no consent is obtained where the complainant submits or does not resist by reason of Fraud.”
Meaning of Consent is defined in s. 273.1 (1) Subject to subsection (2) and subsection 265(3), “consent” means, for the purposes of sections 271, 272 and 273, the voluntary agreement of the complainant to engage in the sexual activity in question.
Criminal Code, RSC 1985 c C-46, s.267 (1) defines Aggravated assault as, “Every one commits an aggravated assault who wounds, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant.”
Criminal Code, RSC 1984 c C-46, s. 273 (1) defines Aggravated sexual assault as, “Every one commits an aggravated sexual assault who, in committing a sexual assault, wounds, maims, disfigures or endangers the life of the complainant.
In R. v. Hutchinson [2013] N.S.J. No. 1, where the accused tricked the complainant into becoming pregnant by poking holes in the condoms they used during intercourse. The complainant became pregnant, ended the relationship and terminated pregnancy. Hutchinson was charged with aggravated sexual assault. On appeal, Hutchinson was acquitted of aggravated sexual assault but convicted of the included offence of sexual assault. The judge explained that the complainant did not voluntarily agree to the sexual activity in question, which was sexual intercourse without contraception. Hutchinson was sentenced to 18 months in jail. His appeals were dismissed.
In R v. Cuerrier, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 371, the accused was charged with two counts of aggravated assault pursuant to s. 268 of the Criminal Code. Even though the accused was instructed by a public health nurse to inform all prospective sexual partners that he was HIV-positive and to use condoms every time he engaged in sexual intercourse, the accused had unprotected sexual relations with the two complainants without informing them he was HIV-positive. Both complainants had consented to unprotected sexual intercourse with the accused, but they testified at trial that if they had known that he was HIV-positive they would never have engaged in unprotected intercourse with him. To establish that the dishonesty results in deprivation, which may consist of actual harm or simply a risk of harm, the Crown needs to prove that the dishonest act had the effect of exposing the person consenting to a significant risk of serious bodily harm. The risk of contracting AIDS as a result of engaging in unprotected intercourse meets that test. The Crown is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the complainant would have refused to engage in unprotected sex with the accused if she had been advised that he was HIV-positive.
You were exposed to Herpes and a realistic possibility of contracting other more serious diseases (HIV, Hepatitis) which is a significant risk of serious bodily harm. Condoms were not used during the sexual intercourse to negate the risk. If you can prove that your man knew of his medical circumstance and went ahead and had sex with you anyway; obtaining consent through fraud. You consented to having sex with a disease-free person. If he knew at the time of the intercourse that he was carrying the virus (had an outbreak before or visited a clinic); he could be held liable for negligence in tort as well as liable for criminal charges; such as aggravated sexual assault, or the included offences of assault or sexual assault.
RSVPS
: Nukka (09/26, 4:13PM)
It’s me. But then, who am I? What we have here, of course, is the problem of personal identity but one in respect to which the law of Torts does not apply since no personal injury has occurred or at least none that I am aware of.
: no fool (4:37PM)
My point exactly. As I initially maintained, “Look stupid nothing” has no grounds to proceed against her drug company but does against her boyfriend. Was his name Hutchinson, by any chance?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
That’s 4:37 AM Montrealman. I was up early to do my Jillian Michaels workout. Then I walked to the store for smokes and guess what!!! Nofool got a “FUCK YEAH!!” from 2 dudes in a black civic. Thanks dudes! Dem bubblegum jeans of mine were getting a little loose from all dem squats and they started to droop down a bit as I wuz walkin past, exposing my chiseled buttcrack for a second there. I can only imagine his buddy must have asked him, “hey pal, would you tap dat?” to which buddy replied “FUCK YEAH!!” Sure, it may be objectifying but I’ll take catcalls over being yelled at n called “POTATO CHIPS!” See ladies? Some dudes do like a strong curvy brickhouse over a boney bitch. Not sure how this relates to OB’s plight, but I sure do feel good! Sue honey, sue erryone who crosses ya path! Anytime ya need legal advice, nofool gotchur back.
Thanks SheSang, I’ll let her know next time I see her, though she’s probably explored those avenues by now it can’t hurt to pass along the info.
RSVP
: no_fool (9:44AM)
Sorry no_fool. You’re up very early.
Can you describe your Jillian Mitchell workout? Does it shrink your buttocks resulting in your bubblegum jeans getting loose? How then is your chiseled buttcrack exposed to say nothing of your strong curvy brickhouse? Aren’t these two claims self-contradictory? Write back soon with details.
Dis is it right hurr…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJ8Zdj0OPM…
I challenge anyone, especially you montrealman, to finish this 35 minute workout and not sweat your nutsack off or have your heart gurgling in you throat. I exercise for my own health not to fit into society’s bullshit ideals. My endurance has increased and so has my lean muscle mass and curves. When I do the “plank jacks” I smack myself in the face with my titties. BAM! BAM! BAM! But what can ya do. Dis bootieshape be toight! I’m a beast baby, briiiick HAWSE!!
Uh, condoms/not coming in contact with semen doesn’t protect against herpes 100%, no fool. That’s just basic knowledge anyone having any sort of sexual contact should already know.
POINT THAT SHIT OUT THE WINDOW!
RSVP
: no_fool (09/27, 10:24AM)
All excellent points no_fool an yes, when finishing the 35 minute workout I nearly sweated my nutsack off. But what is your reply to the Monstercock who, in response to your claim that you ALWAYS use condoms and demand that your partners “point that sit out the window,” maintains that “condoms/not coming in contact with semen doesn’t protect agains t herpes 100%.” She claims that it’s “just basic knowledge anyone having any sort of sexual contact should already know.”
You’re not going to let her get away with that, are you no_fool? This could be interesting.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Of course not Montrealman, my darling, I wouldn’t let her get away with that. And congrats on making it to the end of the workout! Now that I know you have the endurance to keep up with me, and a set of hot salty nuts, I think this could really work!
Yes, Petty Kitty, you can still catch Herpes even with condoms….that’s why it is important to also use your eyeballs to check to see if the person has an outbreak of visible sores on their junk. But people who have never had outbreaks can still be carriers of that virus. Luckily, my broke college self participated in a study at dal a few years back and I received the herpes vaccination (along with 60 bucks a shot) to receive the injections while it was still in the trial stages. I think this has helped to not get herpes. And so have the condoms, my brain says.
I’munna go walk to the liquor store now for some beer n make sure I sweat off da booze before I drink it and to see if I can get another “FUCK YEAH!!”
If you have not seen your partner’s blood test results with yo naked eye, all’eys point the devils cocktail of demon seed out the windurh.
Now, cannI get a fuck yeah?
THAT DEVIL’S COCKTAIL OF DEMON SEED
RSVP
: No_Fool (09/27, 3:24PM) & (3:37PM)
Well I guess you told the Monstercock where to go, No_Fool. Good work.
After your “broke college self-participated” (?) in the herpes study at Dal at $60 a shot, did you check your junk for visible sores? And how does one point that devil’s cocktail of demon seed out the window? You must live in a very small room or your partner’s junk must be of spectacular dimensions. Maybe something like a hose?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Try green fennel seeds. Just about a half a tea spoon after each meal. They are really cheap and have anti viral properties. They taste like black licorice so not great…unless you like that. They are high in magnesium so if you have too much you might be running to the bathroom. Good luck 🙂
RHN, Lady
Montrealman, you can shoot it out the windurh if you are well endowed and you have one of those low windows that have a windurh seat in front of them. Or shoot da demon seed into a kleenex, a tube sock, whatever you gotta do. Dis technique & the vaccine has kept me disease-free over the years — and I fuck a lot! I don’t need to rely on da monstercock 5000 like some petty peoples, I only date dudes dat can fit into a Magnum XL. I’m like goldicocks. Before da action, I do a lil’ scope n’ grope to see if you can fit da latex slipper, Cinderellurh?
RSVP
” no_fool (09/28, 4:03PM)
Got it. A low window seat. I thought the guy was still in bed but it looks like you joined him on the window seat. A bit crowded? Anyone fall off?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
“I only date dudes dat can fit into a Magnum XL”
that’s why your vag is all stretched out and dangly…
it’s like throwing a hotdog down a hallway.
Montrealman, do you see how Zeddy just magically appears when you mention anything to remind him of his little ‘shortcoming’. Zeddy speaks of vaginas as “hallways”and penises as hot dogs (or in his case, cocktail weenie) because his perspective has been skewed. He suffers from spacial issues and confuses his centimeters for inches. He also needs a biology lesson on the miraculous elasticity of the vajayjay – maybe you can write one of your philosophy papers for him on the subject. See da vajayjay (dats da biological term for poonami) has the power to grip even his tiny baby gerkin with all those muscles inside and if anyone has strong keigel muscles – it’s me! Yes, da vajay can stretch to accommodate those physically blessed speciMEN — it can stretch to accommodate the birth of a 10 lb. baby even!…. and then it marvellously tightens back up again with its magic resilience to provide plenty of friction for the dicksion. Zeddy will come back with a fat joke next because he is severely butt-hurt that he could never fit a magnum. He claims otherwise but, me thinks he doth protesteth too much. I trust you can enlighten him on why it is women prefer larger members Montrealman; as your manhood seemed to remain in tact after my comment.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1577502/thumbs/o…
RSVP my motherfucker
Your fetid gulch is probably no more elastic than Gandalf’s sleeve.
^^ Another butthurt baby carrot. ^^
LOL – Holland Tunnel
“Dat one felt like ma stepdad”
ON THE ELASTICITY OF THE VAJAYJAY
RSVP
: no_fool (09/29, 3:40PM)
“He also needs a biology lesson on the miraculous elasticity of the vajayjay – maybe you can write one of your philosophy papers for him on the subject.”
You mustn’t worry about the Dribbling Half-Wit (aka Zeddy) as I have previously had to spank him for misbehaving. (If you see a series of constant “Dislikes” on my comments you now know who it is. Of course, I’ve known for a long time, and still get a good laugh.)
As far as writing a philosophy paper on the miraculous elasticity of the vayjayjay, I believe that you have put your finger (so to speak) on the central difficulty. While the miraculous easticity of the vayjayjay is a clearly a biological phenomenon philosophy, equally clearly, is of a different order as it is concerned with matters of meaning and truth. Put differently, do the concepts of meaning and truth apply to the elasticity of the vajayjay?
Of course, the elasticity of the vajayjay is not simply an isolated phenomenon since its expansion and contraction is clearly related to the state of mind of its owner which then raises the discussion from the purely biological to the level of psychology but not, in my view, to that of philosophy. However, I may well be mistaken in this regard and would welcome your insights into the matter since you are, after all, the proud possessor of a vajayay. Write backl soon.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I want to see MM and Mo’ Fool combine their extensive knowledge of written erotica and girl bits to pen a series of public health pamplets aimed at the demographic who tend to give their daughters names that sound like skin ailments. Sort of like Readers Digest used to do.
“I Am Tineesha’s Kijiji”
Get cracking you creative fools.
We’ll have no racist comments here, if you don’t mind.