Nicotine patches and gums are medicines. These pharmaceutical nicotine products do make medicinal claims — hence they are “drugs” (medicines) under Canadian law, regardless of their content. E-cigarettes are not medicines. They do not make medicinal claims, and do not function as medicines either. Hence e-cigarettes are not “drugs” (medicines) under Canadian law, regardless of nicotine content.

Health Canada cannot lawfully “authorize” or approve non-medicines as medicines. Doctors know this, as does Health Canada. Insisting that e-cigarettes are required to seek approval as something that they aren’t (knowing full well that any such approval is impossible for Health Canada to ever grant) is ridiculous, unlawful, and puts Canadians at greater risk. The deception works to deter smokers from switching to vaping, and works to delay the e-cig industry from understanding and following applicable laws and regulations.

E-cigarettes are not tobacco products. E-cigarettes (with or without nicotine) contain no tobacco and produce no smoke. They are not tobacco products, and cannot be regulated as tobacco in Canada. The federal Tobacco Act exempts e-cigarette products with nicotine from being classed as tobacco.
Canadian law already regulates e-cigarettes. Popular myth says that e-cigarettes with nicotine are “illegal” or “banned” in Canada, and remain unregulated. Yet according to Canadian law, these products are legal and regulated. Canadian law says that e-cig hardware items are regulated as consumer products, and that e-liquid with nicotine (the liquid vaporized by an e-cigarette) is regulated as a consumer chemical product under the Consumer Chemicals and Containers Regulations, 2001. The government is simply not admitting this fact or enforcing these regulations.

Smoking kills. E-cigarettes do not. E-cigarettes with nicotine have not been scientifically demonstrated to be any more harmful than typical caffeine consumption.

Globally, smoking kills approximately six million people every year. E-cigarette use has never demonstrably killed anyone. To date there is no credible scientific evidence to suggest (let alone demonstrate) that e-cigarettes will ever kill anyone when used as intended.

Health Canada is lying about which laws apply. For years, Health Canada has provably misled Canadians about the regulatory requirements for e-cigarettes — and with reason. Billions of dollars are collected each year in tobacco-tax revenue alone. E-cigarettes present the gravest commercial threat to smoking the world has ever seen. The government is not eager to see the status quo change — even if it saves the lives of millions who would otherwise die from smoking.
Anti-smoking groups (like Smoke Free Nova Scotia – funded by Health care dollars from the government and health authorities, Cancer Care Nova Scotia, Capital Health themselves, the Lung Association of Nova Scotia) want smokers to keep on smoking. Tobacco control has become a very lucrative gravy train for them, well-funded by big pharmaceutical companies and government. If vast numbers of Canadian smokers switch to e-cigarettes and no longer smoke, anti-smoking groups will soon have no further reason to exist. They are no more eager than Health Canada is to see smokers voluntarily switch in droves to an attractive, non-lethal consumer alternative to smoking.

Flavors in e-cigarettes are a deterrent to smoking, not a gateway to it. Smokers who switch to electronic cigarettes quickly realize that, comparatively, cigarette smoke tastes disgusting. The wide variety of flavors available in e-cigarettes discourage a relapse to smoking. Why would anyone using an affordable, pleasantly flavored e-cigarette that is not killing them decide to switch to expensive, filthy-tasting real cigarettes which will kill them? “Gateway” fears are simply unfounded. —a vaper, no longer a smoker

Join the Conversation

30 Comments

  1. When I smoked, cigarettes tasted good.

    Your argument of drug and addiction is not the basis if why e-cigs are being taxed. They are being taxed because they CAN be taxed, thus generating much-needed dollars to appease the cries of economic foul voiced by CFAs who think this is Tranna.

    Blame the CFAs.

  2. The Captain would like to point our that taste is a matter of opinion, and stating that something tastes disgusting is pointless in this debate – because The Captain enjoys the taste, and act, of smoking a quality cigarette.

    And why are you the authority on what one can and can’t do? All these anti-smoking groups are just a bunch of fascists looking to control how others act – because how others act is upsetting to their delicate sensibilities.

  3. Fuck off with the esmoke bitches. Smoking is just one of those things where even former smokers think you are fucking dumb. Quit or gtfo

  4. Please…do go on OB. I’ll pretend I give a fuck about your stupid looking E-cig while you look just as stupid and whine about this oppression you are experiencing. Please. Continue.

  5. Hey Vaper,

    The problem with e-cigs is that they’re too easy to smoke. There is a tendency to look at e-cigs as a less dangerous way to smoke, or as a vehicle to cease smoking. Consider the other direction .. young people learning to smoke. When I try to smoke, I experience a wave of nausea .. my body is telling me something, yes? But e-cigs are designed to be easily ingested, and so may provide a gateway to smoking not available before.

    Also, you talk like an addict .. pretending that inhaling a toxic carcinogen into your body is somehow ok, just because it hasn’t been absolutely proven to kill .. yet.

    Call yourself vapid, not vaper.

  6. Exactly Buddha, they need to soak tobacco leaves in the mix to give ‘m some punch.
    Its like that gluten free biscuits & bread , to make it taste better you need to get a jar of gluten & slather it on thick , like it was a peanut butter sandwich ~; )

  7. And learn to spell ‘vapour’, Buddha-Bong. Are all your merchandise tags equally appalling in spelling? Do you have a special section for literate but bodacious individuals?

  8. Hey TT,

    He’s the one who called himself “a Vaper”.

    Are you always that stupid? If you can’t read the tags, my staff will help you, no special section section required.

  9. And you responded with equal ignorance, Buddha, not even offering OP the proper spelling! How very selfish of you, princess. Quelle horror!

    No chance I’ll ever be in your shop – I don’t buy pretentious, overpriced trash that could feed a family of four.

    Ciao, sweetie, have fun with your 1200% markups on the sucker bait.

  10. Ciao, TT

    Have fun with your cheap, sweatshop-made garments.
    The big box stores exist to serve the masses, I do not intend to compete with them. My target market are those who know quality when they see it, and are willing to pay for it. If you think their is no difference, you are sadly ignorant of the garment trade.

    Tell me .. do you complain to jewellers about the high cost of diamonds compared to costume jewels?

    Or is your idiocy reserved for this forum?

  11. I wear quality second hand clothing and have no use for jewelry, Buddha-Butt. Your speciality shop holds absolutely no interest to me, never will. And I still look terrific!!!

  12. One further note, Buddha, I was once married to a textile mill owner so I know all about the garment trade – I’m quite aware of how finished goods imported are cheaper than the raw materials available in this country so spare me your futile, condescending lecture. The prices you charge are on par with any number of Nigerian scams – stupid people being parted from their money is nothing new.

  13. “If you think their is no difference, you are sadly ignorant of the garment trade.”

    HAHA.

    u no spel gud, buddha!

  14. “I wear quality second hand clothing and have no use for jewelry, Buddha-Butt. Your speciality shop holds absolutely no interest to me, never will.” – TT

    Translation:

    I dress in the cheapest attire that I can find, with no jewellry, because I cannot afford it. I am jealous of the people who have more in life, and I hate them for it. I resort to foul language and insults to make it seem that I am above such attachment to material goods, when I really hate the fact that I cannot afford them.

    “I still look terrific!!!”

    Maybe so, but you would look better if you dressed better. And you know it.

    I’m finished speaking on this subject for now, enjoy your used clothing .. I will enjoy my fine garments, and jewellry. I think I’ll wear my new Datejust wristwatch that I purchased after Christmas when I go to supper tonight, I love the little diamonds surrounding the face, so elegant and finely crafted .. I’m sure that you have a equally good fifty dollar bargain watch to wear while you wolf down your burger combo, whilst complaining that life is so unfair!

  15. And you wonder why people think you’re a pretentious piece of shit, Buddha.

    Here’s the thing: it’s clear you need ‘stuff’ to make up for something lacking in your life. I promise you NO ONE but you cares that you’re wearing an overpriced watch, and NO ONE but you cares what you have on your back.

    I’ve met TTFN. Over the past three years I’ve had the pleasure of becoming genuine friends with her, and what you see is what you get. She honestly could give two turds about that shit because she sees it for the scam that it is and I feel really sorry for you, buddha, because without your expensive crap, you’re nothing — you are shallow and truly one-dimensional.

    Do you really wonder why everyone on this board mocks you? Do you really think you’re one-upping someone by going on about all the expensive ‘stuff’ you have?

    You really are a pathetic piece of shit. Here’s a tip: your employees act like you’re the shit because you pay them. They probably mock you relentlessly when you’re not around.

  16. Hahahahahaha – waaaaayyyyy off base there, Buddha-Butt! I’m a comfortably well-off retiree who gave up makeup, manicures, new clothes and jewelry in my 40s – they serve no useful purpose, nor would colouring my hair which will turn a lovely silver eventually.

    No, you empty-headed, little nitwit, I love who I am. I have learned well the ways of the world. My marvellous smile has a hint of mischievousness as does the twinkle in my big hazel eyes. This makes me beautiful to those who know me.

    Just because one’s clothing is 2nd hand doesn’t mean one can’t dress with taste and style – you honestly are a child, BuddhaBreath – by the way, where do you find all this time to post? Shouldn’t you be watching the minions?

    I can certainly afford nice things – I simply chose not to be so wasteful. Fine clothes do not make a good human being. The acquisition of money is not everyone’s prime directive. Either way, sucks to be you.

    OMG – you’re so out of it. What the hell is a Datejust wristwatch and why should I care? I haven’t eaten ‘fast food’ for decades, never, ever had a Big Mac. You are reading paragraphs between the lines, Buddha – such a silly sausage you are. Go back to the luxurious lies and have fun with that.

  17. I’m a home-owner who only goes out to dinner when I do not feel like cooking. A feast must present itself and never be forced. Also, I don’t need to wear an overpriced watch because all of my dates tend to be wearing one when we go out. When you’re as well off as I am, time doesn’t matter. 🙂

  18. BUT IT’S A ROLEX, BISCUIT!

    A ROLEX.

    Shit, my dad had a rolex in the 60s. He said it was heavy and bothersome and never kept good time.

  19. I’m wondering if kay graduated to now thinking of herself as a religious sage and not a retarded cereal.

  20. Thanks, Fearless Leader, you have more class and style in your elbow that this pathetic Barbie doll has in her three walk-in wardrobes. Think Kardashian Lite. Very Lite. Translucent even.

    Wow……

  21. Eh, people like Buddha never really fit in here because this board has never been and never will be a place where people circle jerk to tales of all the expensive shit they have. Those who have been here for a long time and newbies that end up sticking around and becoming part of the group are more interesting and have more interesting things to talk about than expensive condos, cars, watches and everything else they have had handed to them and use to satisfy their one-dimensional lives.

    That and the seriously entitled tend to not do well around these parts. Especially when they’re as dull as Buddha.

  22. Off topic, but hello Pretty Kitty, TTFB, and Biscuit. I wonder if a person can feel as old as I am and still have the feeling of a newbie, lol.

  23. “Are the Kardashians on Eastlink channel 10 now?”

    Buddha’s in talks to star in the TV version of The Dirty Halifax, actually: hoose who suck dick for rolex watches.

    Kardashian lite, as TT said.

  24. With appearances by The Artist Boyfriend: Lord Scott Disick Lite.

    Both unemployed. Both douchebags.

  25. A newbie but a goodie, Klydster!

    Don’t think Eastlink will bite. You need a catchy premise like Mob Wives, Atlantic edition. Buddha can be Halifax’s Big Ang.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *