The moratorium on fracking has put Nova Scotia’s business elite in a spot they’re not accustomed to: On the outside looking in. It’s a spot that social and environmental activists, heritage groups and even small local producers know all too well. Business elites have taken to our newspapers, radio call-ins and any other source that will have them in an attempt to rouse Nova Scotians to recognize the injustice of the ban. Echoing their compatriots in Ottawa, most of our elites have condemned Nova Scotia’s refusal to take this “opportunity” to generate the kind of resource-based economic boom that Albertans and Newfoundlanders have, ostensibly, benefitted enormously from.

According to those who’ve lambasted us in Parliament and the press, we’ve foolishly turned down the chance to finally pull ourselves up by our provincial bootstraps, after centuries of dependence on the feds. Barrels of ink have been spilled to convince us fracking is the only way to convey to the rest of the world that Nova Scotia is “open for business.” Some have even gone so far as to suggest that we have a history of leaving our natural resources alone instead of making ourselves rich off them, ignoring the centuries of fishing and foresting and mining. To them, we are being classically Nova Scotian: Moving backward while the rest of the world moves forward.

But what if backward is exactly what’s needed today? What if, as a growing number of economists the world over are pointing out, we need to abandon the dogged pursuit of economic growth at any cost in favour of something more like “de-growth?”

In some ways, we already know the answers to these questions. Numerous Nova Scotians are quietly (but passionately) toiling to create a more sustainable, more modest future. Compared to the places we seem hell-bent on emulating (all those “world-class cities” and boom economies), Halifax and Nova Scotia have long been wrestling and living with the reality of an economics and necessity of scarcity. Indeed, we live it every day, partly in stubborn resistance to the dominant pressure to live bigger, and partly because we simply don’t have the the territory, the economic capital or the scale of unexploited reserves of resources that would let us grow, grow, grow.

Haligonians, Nova Scotians, and Atlantic Canadians should take pride in the lifestyle that we’ve developed, and which seems to frustrate so many of our elites. We’ve mastered the art of “occupational pluralism;” that bare-bones strategy that allows us to make ends meet by cobbling together small, ad hoc jobs, in harmony with the seasons and the ups and downs of the local economy. We were also once, thanks to the Antigonish Movement, a model of co-operative business—a model that is, today, being proposed as a promising and liberating alternative to the kind of economic growth that creates so much waste and so little prosperity for most of us.

Instead of hollering to the resource-extracting economic elite of the country that we’re “open for business,” we ought to subvert and re-claim the labels meant to demean us (“Nova Scarcity”) and the notions of our backwardness. Yes, we’re slow to jump at the “opportunities” to frack—but it’s not because we’re a bunch of bumpkins. It’s because we’re an intelligent population.

Our efforts to fit into the global economy have taught us that boom-time promises of plenty often leave us worse off than when we started. Perhaps our little province has internalized, a bit quicker than provinces where the physical landscape seems more vast, the idea that we have to tend to nature rather than simply dominate it. And in this, perhaps we are so backward we’re forward again.


Karen Foster is an assistant professor of sociology and the Canada research chair in sustainable rural futures for Atlantic Canada at Dalhousie University. Brian Foster teaches North American history at Dalhousie and Mount Saint Vincent University.

Join the Conversation

27 Comments

  1. I don’t think the ability to oppose fracking puts us on a pedestal of being trend setters, or necessarily lifts us up intelleticually. I also hear the “make ends meet” sentiment that you also included in your article far too often in this province. Residents of this province are so complacent with their situations, as if “making ends meet” is all their is, never seeking more out of life. I hear; “it’s a job”‘ and “I’ll do that when I win the lottery” far too often in N.S. Fracking is one of the cogs in a development mix, but letting environmental group run the show isn’t the only way. I feel so many people in this Province suffer from the NIMBY syndrome, it’s ok somewhere else but as soon as that same industry comes knocking to bring possible properity, everyone is fighting against it.

  2. Brilliantly stated and oh, so true. Younger and McNeil may turn out to be a different kind of Nova Scotia politician and they deserve to be congratulated.

  3. These lunatics are actually arguing in this article that we should de-grow the economy? This is one of the most anti-human and immoral articles I have ever seen in the Coast. These two are outrageous, outrageous lunatics, and of course they are left wing university professors. The Coast is an outrageous newspaper for publishing this pap. Unbelievable. People are going hungry and need jobs and working for minimum wage, and leaving NS in droves; and these pompous left wing moon-bats who probably make 100 thousand dollars a year are saying we should de-grow the economy, we should embrace living “sustainably” which means subsistence hand-to-mouth “bare-bones,” “in harmony with the seasons,” the “Antigonish Movement.” According to wikipedia the Antigonish movement was a rural farming thing from the early 20th century, news flash most people aren’t peasant serfs it’s 2014 we live in a high-tech industrial economy. Romanticizing peasant serf utopia fantasy land. Let’s go back to 1927 woo!

  4. Love this perspective, and hoping PEI who is at the moment in love with the potato monoculture and all the pollution that it brings, will pay attention and follow suit. The economy, although many would argue against this until they are BLUE and RED in the face, can be built on many foundations. What people want isn’t just an economy, they want a quick and dirty route to money, as much money as possible. It’s not that people support fracking, it’s that they aren’t prepared to move for a job or retrain for a job or heck, figure out how to craft themselves a job. So throw a couple jobs at them that pay a ridiculous amount of money and they are all in. That doesn’t mean they support the particular industry, that only means they want money. Fossil fuel isn’t the be all and end off of economic development, but I applaud the advertising companies that make it look that this is the case.

  5. Do these assholes live on ramen noodles “on principle”, too? I vote you two dicks live on $30,000 each for the next year (don’t worry, you can bank any excess for later use, you just can’t dip into it for the year.)

  6. I would like to know what a low income maritimer thinks of this article? The single mother with 2 kids that lives in North End Dartmouth, struggling to buy food and pay rent? The University grad that can’t find work in their area of study due to little or no job opportunities? Lets not kid ourselves, this Province has lots of social-economic problems that I am afraid would only get worse if we were to “de-grow” the economy. That single mom is not looking to “de-grow” her income, rather she is looking to grow it.
    The Antigonish movement has done little to help Nova Scotia, the only by-product is credit unions, which is not a Nova Scotian idea. Its easy to write an article like this when all your needs are met, But in a Province with the some of the highest levels of unemployment, poverty, low income, and real lack of good job opportunities is this “de-growth” really what you think will help this Province?
    The Fracking subject is contentious and polarizing, but putting that aside, it seems to me your clouding real, social and economic issues this Province is facing with buzzwords and ideas that in a modern economy are just not practical.

  7. “This is all a bit rich, coming from me. Barring catastrophe, there’s a full-time, permanent job awaiting me after my current short-term post is up. But I count myself among those whose duty is to push back on contractualization, precarious work, devalued labour, and market fundamentalism. If you get a good job, good for you. But it will be your duty to ally yourself with the growing legions of young workers who are exploited—and underemployment is exploitation—just because they can be.”

    from http://behindthenumbers.ca/2014/02/20/my-a…

    Thanks for the advice/support?

  8. Fracking businesses have not yet been able to have a strong enough business plan. This includes dealing with any environmental issues. If they can come up with a better plan, maybe it will happen. The gas aint going no where, so no rush. No use extracting it if you wont be able to live in same area. There are other ways to be open for business. Be an entrepreneur and create a business.

  9. They make ~ 100 K per year EACH as unionized university faculty , while they argue Nova Scotians should “de grow” the economy, “embrace (economic) backwardness,” and live a kind of Grapes of Wrath style hard-scrabble, hand to mouth, subsistence, “bare bones” lifestyle, “cobbling together ad-hoc employment” “In Harmony with the seasons,” based on early 1900’s rural agrarian peasant serfs.

  10. Yes, lets all make do with what we have. Hey, some have more to make do with than others but its all good, right?

  11. Its like an alternate universe where Claude grew up and went to grad school (after backpacking through India) and married Caitlin after all.

  12. now yupsters you know you opened yourselves up to personal criticism on this! Uni profs telling all the layabouts, huddled masses, and snot nosed elites what THEY think of the socio -economic forces wielding that honed capitalist sword down on the underdeveloped east coast! Oh my!

    Simple facts, NS has been hurting for years AND through those years, based on a overly free hand market take what ya want away resource extraction economy, what do we have left? Not much. I think many miss the point in what they are trying to say–it is just easier to shit on the messenger–The province needs a strategic plan that moves beyond(once more) a foreign ownership of any and all resources(frack that!), and developing local secondary industries, along with tertiary, to try and keep ALBERTA bound, good to be ALBERTA bounders at home, may ease the pain…BUT as I rant, the simple polemic of telling off someone who writes in thinking they may have a solution is quite useless.

    Being a NFLDER, I grew up(still am trying to) in a resource extractive economy where by elites (within and out) of province rule, while the province itself is a ghost town after tourist season and over half the population works and lives around St John’s(insert Halifax here!)….frack that…..we have not learned anything from this type of economy, elites get richer and well all the others try to keep up and grab some pie in the sky….. and yes it is friday night and I have nothing better to do…best look for aj ob….

  13. What utter poppycock. There is no heroism in continuing policies that make us poor. The richer parts of this country have so much more to offer that they are draining away the few children the latest generation is bothering to have rather than buy the latest dress or big screen TV. Nova Scotia as an administrative entity is dying precisely because its not producing enough revenue to sustain itself, keep its young people and attract people like all those economies that adopted Fracking and or other riskier type ways of making money. We can rationalize all we want about the groovy lifestyle we have, enjoy it because even it can’t last without money.

  14. Alberta always seems to surface whenever we talk about the economy, opportunities, keeping people in Nova Scotia etc. I have lived in both Provinces, and one big fundamental difference between the two Provinces is in Alberta you are rewarded handsomely for your ambition, in Nova Scotia, ambitious people are not rewarded for this quality, and ambition is often looked upon as a trait that people seem to abhor for some reason. Successful people in Nova Scotia (such as the business “elites”) noted in the article are feared. As soon as you become successful in Nova Scotia, people hate you, instead of celebrating the accomplishment of others. Elsewhere people embrace and reward success, maritimers loathe and ostracize you because of it. This phenomenon is referred to as The “tall poppy syndrome”, or “Zero sum prestige”.

  15. I’m okay with not rushing into fracking. Nova Scotia has other potential energy resources like tidal and wind, and we should have a balanced approach. Nova Scotia is showing success in some other industries, like shipbuilding, the arts, and some new technologies, we should continue to support those people. Fracking would be just a Fraction of the overall economy. So I basically agree with what the Fosters are saying, however not without some criticism.

    The Fosters have failed to speak a common language that we can all understand. The sociological and economic jargon they speak reads like a university paper. Or in other words, it reads like, sh-t that most people don’t read. I agree with this statement: “…we’re slow to jump at the “opportunities” to frack—but it’s not because we’re a bunch of bumpkins. It’s because we’re an intelligent population.” I understand the point, yet I feel that as professors they need to practice what they preach. So, Dear professors Fosters, Please be better representatives of this “intelligent population” please make an effort to shoot from the hip and give it to us straight up, and if you don’t have anything hopeful to say then don’t say anything at all. Please help us foster a better community by living up to responsibilities of your privileged positions.

  16. This article states much that is lacking in the mainstream press and is helpful in developing the dialogue that is needed in NS. I applaud the Fosters for making their case, especially when I see all the vitriol coming from the readers’ comments (although many of the comments do undermine the Fosters’ assertion about “intelligent population”).

    People have been leaving home and ‘going down the road’ for generations. Some come back, others don’t. It’s a part of life; people in Ontario & Alberta do it as well. It’s called life experience. Just like the Fosters have moved away from their home to stretch their wings (and possibly remain here) so too have many others. My family moved away in the early 50s to make a better life in Ontario for a couple of decades. Then they came home. I also went out west to work for a couple of decades. It’s not so bad, really. In fact I made lots of friends and had much success (although my chosen career didn’t involve receiving “tons of money”).

    Comparing Nova Scotia to Ontario or Alberta is a chump’s game. Alberta is 12 times the land mass of our province. Ontario is almost 20 times larger. Their resources much vaster than what exists here. And Nova Scotia has had all of its resources harvested extensively for ages. How many times have the forests of Nova Scotia been clear-cut? Where are the fish stocks in the Atlantic? What happened to all the wealth generated from coal mining? Who received all the wealth from these resources and why hasn’t Nova Scotia benefited more from this? Fracking would be déjà vu … and this time our water is at risk. It is on this point that the First Nations in Nova Scotia agreed unanimously — they do not want to proceed with hydraulic fracturing of shale gas because there is not enough information on what the real dangers are nor what the elements are they are dealing with.

  17. I agree that the response (my own, of course) has been less than fruitful in adding to the dialog. For me, I don’t see the point in debating anything meaningful in an online anonymous forum. I get where they are coming from but I also see the reality, on the ground so to speak, and find it hard to take them seriously.

  18. TOTALLY AGREE and actually wrote Ivany and others about it a few months ago. Ivany was the only one who wrote back saying he agreed too! NIMBY can be our hallmark and not a bad one at that! He was “particularly struck” by my ideas about turning NIMBY-ism into an asset via telecommuting, the ‘virtual model’ of decentralizing government services, and the use of telecommuting as a means of accommodating the increased numbers of seniors we are likely to see in the workplace of the (near) future. It is TIME to turn conventional wisdom on its ear on these issues! In particular, this is what I wrote about NIMBYism:

    On to Jim Meek (re his article, “We must stake odds in prosperity’s favour”). Yes,
    yes! we need more open ears to new ideas. But in Saskatchewan and
    Alberta, there is so much land that the resource-extraction industries
    are miles and miles away from any concentrated population. In Nova
    Scotia, however, in comparison to SK or AB, everywhere is in our back
    yard. It’s just not as big a space. But to put down NIMBYism is an old
    idea, an old attitude, an old paradigm. Instead, why not embrace and
    promote it? It is an advantage to Nova Scotia that its population
    wants to retain and protect and enhance the nature beauty that is
    ever-present in 90% of our land. The combination of the natural
    environment and telecommuting would be an incredibly powerful
    immigration campaign – and those “immigrants” could be from as nearby
    as Toronto or NYC. “Immigration” does not need to mean refugees from
    third-world countries. Organizations could cherry-pick the best and
    brightest from anywhere in the world, without huge costs or red tape.
    I imagine the labour, tourism and real estate communities getting
    together and running a campaign to entice families to move here, buy
    an abandoned home for cheap (recall the days when land was given to
    settlers) and retain their existing jobs, bringing them with them via
    the Information Highway. And so I say Yes! we have to make success
    stories a norm rather than “against the odds.” But as long as old
    paradigms of labour-at-location persist, so will those odds.

  19. Dear Eric MacLeod, most climate scientists agree that we need to keep 80% of the known fossil fuels in the ground in order to have the possibility of a liveable planet for future generations to come. Therefore the authors of this article are right. We do need to de-grow the economy in order to save our species. Failure to do so is anti-human and immoral to all the people who are and who will be suffering from the effects of climate change. Please educate yourself on this matter.

  20. De Grow (shut it down). Once you see your friends and family poor and destitute you may rethink your government employee attitude.

  21. If we can’t live without fracking now, how are we going to live after fracking? What will the next economy saving, ‘finite resource’ mania be?

  22. It sounds like you picture Nova Scotia as a quaint little community with people living their cute little lives. Poverty is a big problem, linked to the other huge problems with physical and mental health. Then trying to “cobble together” healthcare on a shoe-string budget. Young people are leaving the province.

    Nova Scotia needs money. Even if it starts with something unsustainable, that boost to the economy could be used to built something that will last long term.

  23. Melissa Brushett sez ”We do need to de-grow the economy in order to save our species” and “leave fossil fuels in the ground” Melissa if there is going to be an apocalypse caused by burning fossil fuel then you support nuclear energy right?

  24. All you Ecology Action Center fart catchers and cult worshippers who believe there’s going to be an apocalypse unless we stop burning fossil fuel are aware natural gas supply boom caused by fracking has reduced USA’s CO2 Emissions by 20% right?

  25. Dear Eric McLeod: True, burning natural gas produces half the carbon dioxide released by coal, and shale gas proponents argue that gas can therefore be a “bridge” fuel, curbing emissions while very low carbon sources such as renewable and nuclear energy are ramped up. But a new analysis published in the journal Nature shows that a gas boom is likely to actually increase overall carbon emissions. See http://www.theguardian.com/environment/201…

  26. LOL love the picture of the protester in the Guardian, wearing the Guy Fawkes Anonymous mask. Ban Fracking and Fluoride and Chemtrails, man! 9/11 was an inside job!!!!111

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *