Last week environmental groups applauded Nova Scotia government’s announcement that it will protect 13 percent of the province as wilderness areas, nature reserves or parks. This brings the total lands protected to just over 700,000 hectares. Within HRM, 17 percent of land and water is provincially protected, and now it’s time for the city to do its part, say environmentalists.
For its part, in 2006, city council adopted a 25-year master plan to establish six regional wilderness parks. To date, none have come into existence. One of these defined areas was Blue Mountain – Birch Cove Lake, comprised of pristine headwater lakes and old growth forest, which sits directly behind the Bayers Lake Shopping Centre.
The provincial government protected 1,316 hectares of public land in BMBCL in 2009, and last week’s decision expanded that by an additional 465 hectares. But the 2006 “commitment” from the city to acquire adjacent private lands for a Regional Park has gone nowhere.
The new expansion of provincially protected BMBCL land is “a multi-million dollar gift to the city,” says Raymond Plourde of the Ecology Action Centre. “And yet shamefully the city has done nothing. It has acquired zero square inches of land so far. They should get on with it,”
“The city needs to get moving to hold its part of the bargain to protect Birch Cove Lakes,” agrees Chris Miller, a biologist with the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society. “Land’s not getting any cheaper.”
With BMBCL, there are five other provincially protected wilderness areas—Rogue’s Roost, Five Bridges, Pockwock, Waverley-Salmon River and the Sackville River Nature Reserve—that potentially form a 7,000-hectare greenbelt around the city, says Miller.
But Halifax council has yet to incorporate such a greenbelt into the regional plan, and its staff has recently rejected such a proposal.
Related Stories
Blue Mountain-Birch Cove Lakes is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for HRM
This article appears in Aug 8-14, 2013.
Should we be surprised. A quick tally will show developers provided in excess of $100,000 in campaign contributions to candidates last fall; and this is only that which has been reported.
Are we to honestly expect a non-bias when development agreements come to staff and Council with that kind of cash floating around?
It is very difficult to accept that developers are interested in democracy and are making available these kinds of funds that are not tax deductable. Democratic process prevails where cash flows.
This staff will never -ever- make a recommendation to set aside wilderness area.
Nibs – there is no link between developer donations and decisions by council.
Put up or give up.
Butts runs the show not the Mayor & councillors.
http://url.ie/il83