Over the weekend, two important labour agreements were reached. Dalhousie University came to an accord with the Dalhousie Faculty Association, averting a strike scheduled to begin today, and Metro Transit and the Amalgamated Transit Union hatched a deal that may soon bring an end to the 39-day strike by transit employees.

Both agreements are tentative at this point, and must be ratified by union membership and the managing public agencies. For the transit strike, city council has scheduled a meeting for 6pm tomorrow, and union members will vote earlier in the day. No votes have been announced for the Dalhousie Board of Governors or the Dalhousie faculty, but these votes are less pressing now that a strike has been avoided.

The two agreements were both brokered by the same man: conciliator John Greer, who is one of four conciliators employed by the provincial Department of Labour and Advanced Education. On the weekend, Greer was shuttling back and forth between four meeting rooms at the Holiday Inn Harbourfront.

“I wore out a pair of shoes,” says Greer, laughing.

It was just coincidental that both negotiations came to a head at the same time, says Greer, but he had been handling both issues for months, and knew them well.

“Having worked with them for quite some time, I knew that both of them would take time to go over the issues, so my only worry was that I might be a problem for them, but it turns out that I wasn’t—the timing worked out that if anybody was inconvenienced it wouldn’t be any more than 10 minutes.”

How does one become a labour conciliator?

“The only thing we have is neutrality,” says Greer. “The independent third party.”

Greer is 56. He worked for CBC as a technician, and so was in a union. He left that job to go to law school, then practiced law independently for eight years. In 1996 he went to work for the province, and ended up working on various health department contracts with its public employee unions. He’s been a conciliator since 2004.

Asked for details about the back-and-forth of the transit and Dalhousie negotiation, Greer demurs, although he says he “believes” that premier Darrell Dexter’s announcement last Wednesday that the province will extend an exemption to the Dal pension plan “had an effect.”

I asked Greer if the transit deal centred on allowing some form of the existing scheduling with a cap on overtime, but he wasn’t biting. “I’m just happy I was able to leave the hotel last night with both sides saying they’ve reached an agreement,” he says.

Now that the transit and university cases seem resolved, Greer and his three colleagues go back to work on the 30-to-40 other labour negotiations currently under way in the province.

“As you know, all the health organizations are lining up,” says Greer. “In that industry, there are probably in excess of 80 different collective agreements” coming up in the next few months. “It’s going to be hot and heavy here, in early spring—and I’m getting that from the premier saying we can’t afford to give the kind of wage that the nurses in arbitration got, but the unions are going to say, ‘please, they got it, why shouldn’t we?’ It’s going to be interesting.”

Since he’s been at the job both before and after the financial collapse of 2008, I asked Greer if, before the collapse, it was the case that both public agencies and private companies were able to contain immediate labour costs by promising increases in pension benefits that they thought the ever-growing stock market would let them over.

“That’s exactly right,” he answers. “We’re in changing times, and sometimes labour relations become more strained trying to find a way through.”

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. The pension extension for Dal is crazy. They previously had 2 extensions. Once again a government has failed to enforce the pension regulations and just kicked the can down the road.

  2. The next generation of taxpayers thanks the wankers at province house

  3. And so does the one after that, the one after that, and the one after that.
    Yes, taxpayers in this province, in 2125, will still be paying for the pension you’ll get in about five years babyboomers. aka fuck-nuts…

  4. This pension fiasco wouldn’t have happened if they weren’t allowed to place the money paid in to the fund, in high risk investments. Our pension account has a clause of NO RISK investment, sure it pays less than the higher risk ones…but when 2008 happened, our pension plan never lost 1 cent.

    The people in power are basicly gambling with pensioners of the futures funds & IMO it should be illegal.
    You would think that after all the money that was lost playing the markets by the Bridge commission years ago people would learn the lesson…but the greedy can’t help themselves any more than a gambling addict can & its even easier …IF it Isn’t Your Money !

  5. If the reports coming out about the union deal they got are true i don’t even know what to say anymore.

  6. Dartmouthy you don’t know shit. Province didn’t bail anyone out. Dal and its unions still have to make up the deficit on their own, so not a nickel of your tax money will go in, if you even pay any. Just gave them more time to allow markets to recover, better investments made with everyone in agreement, and less risk. Government caused the problem 15 years ago when they insisted on a “pension holiday” when there was big excess over requirements. Now they allow the people involved to fix it for themselves. Keep your uniformed drivel to yourself, it just makes you look stupid.

  7. More – what risky investments ? Dal has beat the markets for a long time and is in the top quartile of pension funds. You are totally ignorant of the details of the Dal pension fund.
    Both sides at Dal agreed to the pension holiday.
    The bridge commission didn’t play the markets, it borrowed Swiss Francs and some time later our dollar started falling into the toilet and that is back almost 40 years ago.

    leftee – part of the problem at Dal relates to low contribution rates from employees and a reliance on continuing to generate top quartile returns. If the pension plan fails to generate such returns Dal is on the hook 100% for any increase in contributions.

    All a pack of cards.

  8. joeblow – I agree that Dal employees have to come up with part of a solution to the deficit and the blame for the shortfall is not all on the Admin. Everybody else lost, why not both sides sharing in the recovery effort?

    more – no such thing as NO RISK

  9. @leftee

    “Province didn’t bail anyone out”

    They didn’t, technically, but they have in this province in the past, and it’s only a matter of time. Reach back into your cro-magnon skull for this treasured memory of our socialist heritage: The NSTU Bail-out. It happened twice just in case you missed it the first time. But hey, that’s only a few billion dollars… It’s nice to sell our children’s future away for the sake of our present teachers’ retirements, I’m sure.
    And if they are kicking the can, guess what people in “the future” will have to deal with?
    I know, I know. Your leftie sensibilities preclude you from thinking about financial issues in the future…

    “Dal and its unions still have to make up the deficit on their own”

    The taxpayers bail out our scholarly institutions to the tune of more than 1/3 a billion EVERY YEAR. You do understand that the “employers” portion of these pensions come out of general tax revenue…. right??

    “Keep your uniformed drivel to yourself, it just makes you look stupid.”

    Time to get learnin, leftie…

  10. And now Council sold us out. Not only are we paying them for going on strike, now they are raising the fares.

  11. Since we’re still talking about the bus strike, I’m curious what the Ed. has to say about the $4000 signing bonus in relation to his tweeted comparison of the ATU member’s jobs to slavery?

    (Yeah, that’s right. Bus driver making a *&^% fortune off of our backs = slave. Unreal.)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *