So my bitch is that there is a courier company whom my bf is employed with, and come to find out he’s mingling with a co-worker and texting her. He is in a relationship and she supposedly knows that he is. He hides the texts, but I found out this weekend because he backed up his phone on my computer. I’m wondering if I should call her and let her know that this is inappropriate and I’ve already spoken to him about it. You’re there to work not socialize and flirt with one another. —Same Old Story
This article appears in Sep 29 – Oct 5, 2011.
Mind your own business, if he’s going to cheat let it happen now and dump his ass. It’s better now than when you have three kids, 2 dogs, a mortgage and 2 car payments. If you can’t trust him to deflect advances from other girls, then there isn’t much point in dating him, better to go back to being a booty call!!!
What does this have to do with the CO-WORKER? The issue is between you and your BF!
Why do people blame the other party who has no allegiance to you whatsoever……fuck off, and leave me alone to text (and fuck) who the hell I want.
…are you mental op..is the company upms? 🙂
dump him. for fuck sakes don’t sit here and bitch about it on the internet. He clearly isn’t worth your time. You spend way more time doing this then just dumping him and getting on with your life and finding someone else.
I’d say the issue is more with him hiding the fact that he’s doing it than the texting itself.
************************************
I’m wondering if I should call her and let her know that this is inappropriate and I’ve already spoken to him about it.
************************************
Call HER? Are you out of your lips? She owes you nothing! Your BF is the one who is cheating on you, not HER, fer cryin’ out loud!
Sounds like he’s just using you to back up his devices, if you know what I mean.
Ring, ring! Pick up the clue phone…It’s for you!
Sooo… if it was outside of work you’d be more comfortable with it?
Yeah.. you should tell HER it’s inappropriate. Because it has nothing to do with what he wants.
Face it OP, you’re right in the heat of getting fucked over. Just dump the guy already. No good will come of this and you know it. You’re just waiting for one of us to tell you otherwise. That you’re being paranoid, etc. You’re not being paranoid. Your boyfriend likes her. Move on. Because it won’t stop. He’s just going to lie to you from now on. He IS INTO HER. Period. When you’re into someone, you pursue them.
And while you’re at it, stop acting like “work ethic” is what’s pissing you off here.
Did you post a bitch disguised as your boyfriend a few weeks ago?
Oh noses, he’s socializing with somebody from work, call out the Spanish Inquisition. If he’s backing-up his texts and stuff on your computer, I can’t see how he’s hiding anything. Is he supposed to show you every text he recieves, and get your permission to correspond? I bet that he isn’t allowed any female friends.
I do agree with the rest on one point…dump him, and do both of you a favour.
To me, you sound like an insecure, jealous, controlling bitch.
And i agree with the rest of them here too. I’ve been the other woman. She won’t give a shit if you call. She might laugh at you and she’ll probably feel a little bad but SHE’S not the third wheel here…. And not only that honey, she’s not the problem. She’s just a chick who likes a guy who happens to be your boyfriend.
You sound like a control freak.. i’m not saying this to be mean but you still think you have control over this situation and you’re going to get your heart BADLY broken if you don’t change YOUR tactic. They’re not going to listen to you.. trust me my dear.
NOT the Spanish Inquisition, Hugo….
http://randomoverload.com/wp-content/uploa…
If YOUR guy is making time for another woman he is NOT YOUR GUY. A guy who is into you wouldn’t have time for someone else. DTMFA! Most men are like dogs. They’ll sniff the butt of any female who attracts their interest.
Now do you really want a guy who is SUPPOSEDLY fooling who is dumb enough to back up his phone in YOUR computer?
“I’ve been the other woman” i_k, did you know you were?
DTMFA, dumbass. This is just the one you know about.
Like most others have said just dump hiss sorry ass and move on to better.
The other woman isn’t going to care cause she doesn’t know you.
If he really cared for you he wouldn’t be making time for her in the first place.
So this female worker of your boyfriend delivers pussy to him? You should put out more often for your boyfriend OB.
Hey Chicky
You don’t have to go out with dumbasses who are keeping secret relationships with others.
OK?
Did you get the memo? I wrote it in language you can hopefully understand.
SHOW SOME RESPECT TO YOURSELF.
RSVPs
: Oceanchick (Oct. 4, 11:33AM) – “Most men are like dogs. They’ll sniff the butt of any female who attracts their interest.”
Really, Oceanchick, is that true? How do you know? In any case there is some interesting androphobic psychology going on here. Are you an androphobe, Oceanchick? Why would that be? Is it genetic or the result of some sort of social conditioning?
Let’s take the first sentence, “Most men are like dogs.” Is that true? Are you speaking from personal experience or is this something you picked up out of some Sapphic periodical? A personal note: Some time ago I was passing by a lesbian in a supermarket – she was striding along sternly leading her “fem” who walked a respectable two steps behind – but the interesting thing was the badge she had on her leather jacket. It featured a white circle outlined in red and contained the word “men.” A red line was drawn diagonally through the circle and, of course, through the word “man.” She was a nasty-looking customer. Like Oceanchick, I bet she felt men were “like dogs” as well. Do you have a badge like that, Oceanchick?
Oceanchick goes on to observe that, “They’ll sniff the butt of any female who attracts their interest.” Obviously, in Oceanchick’s view most men, unlike women I suppose, are just interested in sex but, once again, is this true? Are you speaking from personal experience Oceanchick or, once again, just picking up your views from some Sapphic periodical? Do females sniff the butt of any male who attracts their interest, Oceanchick, and if not, what do they do? Talk to us Oceanchick. Let us know what it’s like from the inside.
And then, of course, the question obviously arises that if men are just “like dogs,” what are women just like? What would be the appropriate animal that best captures the essence of the female, Oceanchick? How about the shrew? Would you go along with that? But do shrews sniff the butt of male shrews that attract their interest? Do you have any information on that Oceanchick?
Write and tell us all about it Oceanchick, that is, if the party line established at the “summit” prohibits all (social) intercourse with Montrealman who, of course, snaps his fingers in response.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Shrews have such a high metabolism they have eat twice their body weight to survive. They’re amazing creatures, at two inches long they eat earthworms and grasshoppers which are usually bigger than they by a fair margin.
I’m glad they’re not the size of dogs.
if anything, calling her may spur her on more…. to really up the ante, etc.
you should just do the sensible thing…
get him fired, of course!
http://blog.beaumontenterprise.com/bayou/f…
By the sounds of “same old story” he has done this before. Therefore, you, are only putting yourself through this.
Ah, I see I have hit a nerve l’homme du mont. Six whole paragraphs devoted just to my opinion. Quel honneur!
you are what is wrong with every stupid retarded girl. Any girl that “flirts” with someone elses boyfriend will NOT give two shits if she is confronted. She wins, she gets the asshole. Do yourself a favor, hand him to her with all his assholery and move on…. Or you could wait for until you get knocked up and then he leaves you because you’re fat and unattractive now. You’re choice really.
He’s just not that into you.
RSVPs
: Troondon4 (Oct. 4, 1:14PM) – Sounds like a female to me, Troon, at least females of a certain sort, i.e., the sort you find on Bitch.
: Oceanchick (1:38PM) – It may be your opinion but the question is, why do you have it? My opinion of motorcycle-riding, androphobic, Sapphic-periodical-reading females is that they are just heavy-duty bull-dykes, Oceanchick, just like that one I saw in the supermarket. Those are my reasons. Did that “hit a nerve” Oceanchick?
Hey, I don’t want to get you into trouble with that incestuous little summit-attending clique of commenters on Bitch, Oceanchick. If you feel that replying to my post might have negative blowback, I’ll understand.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
you’re always welcome at our summits monsieur
Tres amusant monsieur, I’m sure. You are so far off target you failed to hit anything, much less a nerve. I don’t have to explain my reasons for my opinion. Time and time again so many members of your gender have proven my observations to be true. I am the observer, not the perpetrator. Androphobe? Pas moi! Where would we all be without men?
RSVPs
: Paingirl (Oct. 4, 3:37PM) – I’m always welcome at your “summits,” Paingirl? Don’t you remember that you formally severed all communication with me when I jokingly made reference to your introductory speech on “Mindless Anonymous?” (It was on “Shave It,” if I remember correctly.) So doesn’t your invitation sound a bit odd?
But, in addition to the distance there are other reasons I would not attend, even if I lived in Halifax. It comes down to the reasons one goes on this site.
Obviously, in the case of the members of that “incestuous little clique” there is the motivation of acquiring acquaintances, even friends, but this has never been my motivation for posting on Bitch. My motivation, as you might guess, is complex and layered – just like me!
Primarily, it provides the opportunity to structure my thought on a variety of issues coupled, of course, with the opportunity to phrase it in suitably acceptable language – even on occasion to phrase it in an academic idiom to enrage the rednecks which, of course, abound on this site.
Connected with this is my focus on the thought-content of the commenters’ comments – where, of course, such thought-content may be said to exist at all – and this requires that personal, face-to-face contact be excluded since it would muddy the waters of pure reflection. I mean, how could I possibly critique, say, The Scholar, when I continued to see her heavy, bovine features before my mind’s eye?
Finally, of course, there is the pleasure to be had from spanking those who, whether from simple ignorance or conceptual confusion, reveal themselves to be without philosophical resources. This, of course, ties in with the questionable reception I might receive on appearing at a “summit.” Violence, Paingirl, might be done to my body.
However, Paingirl, I want you to know that I am certainly amenable to your withdrawing your severance of communication with me. Since no harm was intended, I think that this would be the way to go but the decision, of course, is yours. I look forward to your views on this matter if, in fact, such views are to be forthcoming. (My God, the wording, the wording!)
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
RSVPs
: Oceanchick (Oct. 4, 3:51PM) – Really, Oceanchick, is that true? Read these two sentences of yours and come to what is clearly the unavoidable conclusion:
(a) “Men are like dogs. They sniff the butt of any female who attracts their interest.”
(b) “I am the observer, not the perpetrator.”
Now, Oceanchick, do you detect any failure of logic between (a) and (b)? In other words, how can you assert (a) and then logically assert (b)?
I would be very interested in hearing your explanation, Oceanchick. Take your time, think it over, and report back if, of course, you are not simply defeated by Montrealman’s logic.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
i am a big sap monsieur, and for some reason you are appealing, in a way. perhaps it was only the dogs
OC, don’t you feel special now. LOL.
lol MM took the bait.
OC .. it is my experience that women who generalize all or most men to be pigs generally don’t give good, honest men a chance.
It’s funny, a lot of scumbags never have trouble finding female companionship. Meanwhile hard working honest loving men don’t get a second look. And you wonder why douchebaggery prevails.
We could argue all day about which gender is more disgusting, I think it comes down to this:
Good people are hard to find. Male or female.
If most men are like dogs then most women are like cats. They love you (or pretend to) until you have nothing left to offer them.
But it’s not women, it’s people in general who are greedy and self centred and don’t care about anyone else.
our rectangular table proved that men are not pigs and women aren’t stupid
If you haven’t got trust, you’ve got an uncommited dick in your hand. Good luck with that – and, oh – you might want to tuck in your reeking insecurity.
lol sounds scientific enough for me PG
Gotta side with MM on this.
RSVPs
: Paingirl (Oct. , 4:39PM) – Am I to understand that you are withdrawing your “severance of commnication” with me, Paingirl, or just with the dogs? If the latter, I will pass on your thoughts. I don’t know how they will respond. They were not happy with your orginal severance.
: Dim Bro Tim (6:01PM) – Well, Dim Bro, we don’t know whether Oceanchick feels “special” or not since she hasn’t replied. Will she? Won’t she? Watch this space.
: tommyjules (6:30PM) – Tommy, I’m nominating you for “The Blandman Of The Month!” I mean, does it all come down to, “Good people are hard to find, male or female.” Tommy, I nearly puked when I read that. You must try to get to the second stage of thought, Tommy, that is, one step above nauseating cliche.
: Paingirl (6:44PM) – Paingirl, you have made a “category mistake.” A rectangular table cannot “prove” anything at all. Neither can any other-shaped table. An object has no conceptual categories, Paingirl, logical or otherwise. You must not invest inanimate objects with with conceptual or spiritual qualities. That’s called being “totemic.” Disabuse yourself of the notion now. Write back when your thoughts are clearer.
But where’s Oceanchick? Where is that bull dyke?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
“Violence…might be done to my body.” – That raises an interesting psychological question.
Why is Montremoleman afraid of being attacked, if he were to attend a Summit?
Put this statement together with everything else he’s said about spanking, degradation, S&M…etc., and the answer is obvious, he has Polycrates complex. Sméagol feels that he deserves to be punished for his rude and unscholarly behaviour.
Thanks for that insght into your psyche, annie 😉
BUT BUT SHE LOVES HIM!!
If he backed up HIS phone onto YOUR computer he wanted you to find out…
He’s just not that into you… or, JUST you as the case may be!
Hey listen OP. My fiance works for a courier company. He is courteous and nice to other employees. He doesn’t flirt with them. But he knows lots of people who have had relationships at work, and a. your bf will probably go there and b. one of them will probably get fired in the end (if not both). So either you dump him, set him straight, or prepared to have an unemployed cheating bf on your hands. Don’t blame the girl, she’s an adult and she won’t listen to you.
OP, it is most likely your fault. Men need plenty of sex and you are probably not putting out enough. Don’t blame anyone else for your failings.
Montreal Man used to live here
until his mouth led him astray
and people with threats instilled fear
so off to the west he will stay.
Cheerio indeed.
i’m here for you o.p., just yank my chain.
He’s probably fucking her.
Or’s AT LEAST fingered her.
heh.
RSVPs
: The Turd (Oct. 4, 8:15PM) – A “Polycrates Complex?” Well, Turd, you can just blow that out your ass.
: If not for you (10:10PM) – Thanks for the poem, If. You got that right about the west.
No sign of Oceanchick yet. Too bad really, as I wanted to ask her what brand of cigars she smokes.
But the topic of male-female homosexuality raises some interesting questions.
We all know that female homosexuals range from the masculine dyke at the one extreme to the feminine “fem” at the other. Speaking as a heterosexual male, I find both to be puzzling. The fem, I suspect, is probably a shrew where males are concerned but, and this seems paradoxical, she is attracted to the “butch” qualities in another female. If you ask me, this points to sexual schizophrenia. Am I right about this?
On the other hand, for the male heterosexual who appreciates feminine beauty, the dyke poses a different problem. In spite of being female, she has rejected the ideal of feminine beauty which, in effect, amounts to rejecting femininity itself. She caricatures those male qualities she sees as definitive of a certain sort of male, those of self-assertion, physicality, even brutishness. Rather than being a sexual schizophrenic like the fem, she occupies some sort of sexual no-man’s land (no pun intended) where she is neither one or the other. For the heterosexual male, the dyke borders on being, if not an object of revulsion, then one of derison.
For the range of male homosexuality things are different. At one extreme is the “queen” – is there a more moderate term? – who is also a caricature but this time of what he sees as quintessential female characteristics – and is viewed by the heterosexual male with a range of reactions. For some he is an object of ridicule and even of violence – he is, after all, a threat to their masculinity – but this has not been my experience. I have always found queens to be very intelligent, sensitive and artistic. An extreme queen, on the other hand, puzzles the heterosexual male. He – the hetero – is not sure who the queen is at all.
Is there a name for the masculine homosexual male? How is he to be distinguished from the usual heterosexual male in manner, speech or appearance? There must be something there to identify the masculine homosexual male who prefers other males but I can’t think of it. Well, that’s the best I can do.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
she’s not the only one that got fingered.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c…
daddy would you like some sausage?
A POSTSCRIPT: THE UBER-MALE
I have had only one experience, non-sexual let me assure you, with the masculine homosexual male so I know they do exist. It occurred in Provincetown, Mass. which, as we all know, is a hotbed of artistic but also homosexual activity. They seem to go together. Anyway, some time ago I was wandering alone down the main drag and spotted an interesting bar/tavern called “The Atlantic Bar.” I thought it might be a good idea to go in and observe the natives at leisure.
At the bar Montrealman, clear of eye and clean of limb as usual, began to be mobbed by some “Uber-Males” whose interest was clearly unambiguous.
I never really thought about how females felt about being a “sex object” before but now I knew. These Uber-Males were, um, focused. Montrealman had, unknowingly, wandered into a GAY BAR! My gender reactions were scrambled. What the hell was going on? Quickly, I downed my beer and headed to the exit.
No more gay bars for Montrealman. Check the scene before entering. No females, stay out! Of course, Montrealman never had to hit on females since, as I said, he is clear of eye and clean of limb. But, of course, it is always his superior mind that draws the females like flies.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
“draws the females like flies” – Lolz Sméagol, you couldn’t get laid in a whorehouse.
The Atlantic Bar – Let me guess, you asked for Amanda Love.
“you can just blow that out your ass” – No thank you, I’ll leave the blowing and ass-werkz to you. Polycrates, struck a nerve eh?
GASP! I’m positively gobsmacked! “…I downed my beer…” YOU??!! YOU went into a (gay) bar?? AND drank BEER??! Well…..psssst, hey MM…your ‘underclass’ is showing. LMAO
But wait. Me thinks there is more to this than meets the eye. Provincetown, Mass. according to Wikipedia, is, amongst other things, known for it’s status as a vacation destination for Gays and Lesbians. This begs the question, what (who)were you REALLY doing down there MM, Hmmmm? Don’t be shy. You can tell us. Even if you were just shopping for some art…”they seem to go together” right?
“…he is clear of eye and clean of limb.” – You sound quite metro-sexual, Nancy. (May I call you Nancy?) Maybe this coupled with referring to yourself in the 3rd person was “putting out the vibes” to these uber-males. Or perhaps, there is a deeper, pyschological element at work here. Maybe you have suppressed your true orientation for various reasons, (none of which, any of us care to know about), but it betrayed you by subconsciously “steering” or “directing” you into this gay bar. It would certainly explain why your “gender reactions were scrambled”. It also explains your usage of certain words in your post like “hotbed”, “drag”, “downed” and “headed” (in the same sentence no less), and the phrase “Check the scene before entering”….I’ll just leave that alone.
“But, of course, it is always his superior mind that draws the females like flies.”
Yeah. Either that or, they, like the uber males in your “vacation”, think your gay too. I mean, hey….if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck…..
Generally speaking, a lot of women will tend to hang out with their gay male acquaintances/counterparts when out and about town. Their fun, colour coordinated,they can dance, they always know the latest office gossip and are generally considered non-threatening or safe. Think about it.
As for the flies reference…well, you’re strong, Nancy, but smell isn’t everything.
Donk, not at first. The.. not relationship but sexualship got off the ground before he told me. But when he told me it continued. Eventually the guilt ate me up and i quit the guy. But as far as i know he’s still with his family.
Sometimes i wonder if i should have told on him.. but i never did.
Here’s something i learned VERY early on in life.
If a committed guy honestly wants to be friends with a girl outside the relationship he’s in, he will include the girlfriend in that friendship. He won’t text/call/see her without the girlfriend as a rule. They will be a friend group.
So OP if he’s saying “urhh.. we’re just friends” you know right off that’s a steaming pile of shit.
Why does someone hide their texts for no good reason? because they’re hiding their texts. it’s so obvious that that last sentence is almost funny in it’s redundancy. He has something to hide because he has something to hide, OP, sheesh…
He may have even told her he’s single and is lying to you right now. He’s been lying to you.. what’s one more?
Honey, ok, seriously? I get the sense you’re not going to leave him because you’re exhibiting the classic behaviour of someone who will continuously make excuses for asshole partners. But i’m just telling you. Nothing changes if nothing changes
(Sorry. Redundancy works well on people who don’t know what’s good for them.)
Except for maybe the Governor Bradford, I think EVERY bar in P-town is a gay bar!
Maybe it was the Player’s Navy Cut cigs that attracted the chaps…
“I nearly puked when I read that.”
I’d rather make people puke than fall asleep.
I’m happy you felt guilty and happy you left. For the other woman does nothing but help a married man stay married. Unfortunate situation it is but the other women have to take ownership sometimes. I understand that he can do as he wishes, yes, however if you know, and you start the relationship or continue it … that to me is wrong.
My uncle has a lady friend on the side … for 15 yrs. He had a child/children (we don’t know) with her and people frequently come up to his legitimate children and tell them hey you have a brother etc etc … my aunt just found out. That kind of deceit is repugnant … I don’t care what is happening in your married home … leave. Pick your balls off the floor and damn well leave. Don’t play that kind of bullshit. I would have hoped that one would have enough self respect to not mar their own life with such tom foolery. Now this other side ho … he built her a house … get this a half a million dollar home, half in the other woman’s name … When my aunt leaves I hope she takes half of his half and goes and decorates a few rooms in her style in that bitch’s mansion.
Eh … and the side piece knows … she knows. She’s known for 15 yrs … now tell me … should we feel sympathetic for those people … I just can’t. Ma tells me not to judge, but some people make it very very difficult.
“Generally speaking, a lot of women will tend to hang out with their gay male acquaintances/counterparts when out and about town. Their fun, colour coordinated,they can dance, they always know the latest office gossip and are generally considered non-threatening or safe. Think about it.”
That’s why I fake married a gay boy. ^_^
*sigh* I miss my gay husband SO. MUCH.
RSVPs
: Avasto (Oct. 5, 1:06PM) – Very unfortuanate Avasto, very unfortunate. The question isn’t whether I’m gay – I’m not – but rather with your obsession to demonstrate that I am. I detect strong currents of homophobia under your comments, Avasto. Has it gotten to the gay-bashing stage yet? Do you and your “chums” lurk outside the gay bars of Halifax at closing time waiting for some poor soul to pummel? Think of getting professional help, Avasto. This can only go downhill. Get help now!
: Xenophilia (1:22PM) – Xeno, how do you know that EVERY bar in P-town, except the Gov. Bradford, is a gay bar? Is this first-hand information, simply unsupported speculation or, still further, is your comment the result of rancour on having your advances rebuffed? Write back soon.
: tommyjules (2:55PM) – Tommy, you’ve got to recognize that it’s your superficial patter which is the boring one. To be honest Tommy, I think you should look into real estate or maybe used cars. Good luck.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Methinks the lady doth protest too much 🙂
“Ian’s encounter was more direct. One of the local whores called out: “Want something you’ve never had before, sonny?” Ian didn’t tell me what his reply was. The whores never called out to me. I wouldn’t have understood what they were talking about anyway”
The highlight of Annie’s trip to London , last year.
Pretty much first hand information, Momar. I grew up in Massachusetts and my summers were divided between Cape Cod and Canada. Growing up, P-town was always a highlight of my visits–I loved the penny candy, spin art arcades and street painters. I’m straight, but not narrow, and the Key West of the North gay infusion simply added another flavour to the atmosphere. In fact several years ago, I took 9 girl scouts (guides) camping on the cape and a day spend in P-town was definitely the highlight of their trip–we just happened to be there for Carnival and there was a huge drag queen parade down Commercial street. (I have the best photos from that trip!)
And who is rebuffing my advances, anyway? And what advances might those be?
Found something that might interest you, Momar:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-ho…
RSVPs
: Scrotum (Oct. 6, 9:29AM) – Don’t tell me that you are stalking me too, Scrotum. But, um, that incident wasn’t last year, not even close.
BTW, what did you think of my last reply to my other stalker, The Turd? I mean, in view of his pseudonym (the one I gave him), didn’t you think “Blow it out your ass!” was hilarious? I’m not going to bother this time. I mean, he has no intellectual resources. There’s no one “there.”
But anyway Scrotum, any more stalking and I might have to respond to you in similar fashion. You have been warned.
Xenophilia (9:58AM) – “And who is rebuffing my advances anyway? And what advances might those be?”
First of all Xeno, let me congratulate you on your work with the Girl Guides. Camping on the Cape, eh? Would that, um, have been all together in a single tent?
Who was “rebuffing your advances?” Well, Xeno, I was wondering about your previous statement to the effect that all the bars in P-town except one were gay bars and how you knew this. One of the possibilities, of course, was having your advances rebuffed but I’m not in a position to say exactly by whom. You could clear this up, Xeno. Similarly, I have no idea just what those advances might be. Different people have different mojos, Xeno. Write back with a full description of yours.
Thanks anyway for your link to the new girlfriend service, Xeno, but there’s really no need. As I said before Montrealman, being is clear of eye and clean of limb – in addition to his Adonis-like physique – drives the females mad with desire.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
“didn’t you think “Blow it out your ass!” was hilarious?” – I’m sure all the 10 year olds who read LTWWB thought it was a scream 🙂
Lets address your misogyny, shall we Sméagol. It’s coming to a head again, especially with regards to lesbians. Why such hate? Is it tied to your abandonment issues? Did your mother leave for another woman? I’ll bet that you’re an only child, right?
Moman–While your pretzel logic runs the gamut from somewhat diverting to annoying, I find your smarmy self-titillating little references to incest and pedophilia absolutely beyond the fucking pale.
If you want to debate something, fine. I have no problem with the give and take of public discourse this forum provides. Just keep your pervey thoughts to yourself, you skulking little filthy-minded wanker.
Stalking Annie? – no, just some tepid drivel I read in an on-line “Community” newspaper. Hilariously indistinguishable from the parody columns of “Jean Teasdale” and “Jackie Harvey” in “The Onion”. You are, of course, too highly evolved for anything as plebeian as “The Onion” but at a glance one would be hard-pressed to determine which was the satire and which was the genuine article.
And to add another chapter to “Homophobia and the Underclass”, I’ll bet your Eisern Kreuz makes them gasp at “Dungeon Night” down at “Le Coal Mine”.
But that’s only because you’re wearing it wrong.
RSVPs
: Xenophlia (Oct. 6:52PM) – “You skulking, little filthy-minded wanker.” Xeno, I think I might be developing physical feelings toward you. Let’s go camping. I’ll bring the tent.
: Scrotum (5:55PM) – “Tepid drivel?” Very hurtful, Scrotum. But you’re right, I don’t read “The Onion” and, of course, your other references were incompehensible except, of course, to the down-market end of Burnside. The question, as I see it, is there any up-market end of Burnside or is the question itself an oxymoron?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
How many awards are you thinking of handing out in total, MM?
Also, after reading your thoughts about ‘the dyke’, I’m curious what your thoughts are on ‘the fag’. Write back!
We had quorum at the weekend Summit.
A certain Montreal (self-defined) Philosopher(or “Philosoraptor, most accurately) was discuss for an award.
Pick it uo in person or have it delivered by a 10 year old alter boy?
Your altar boy reference may cut a little too close to the bone with Annie. (Heh Heh, dude said bone) This arcadian vignette from his boyhood hints at dark doings behind the ornate stone facade of the basilica:
“I was in my “Religious Phase.” I realize this now not because I can directly recall the intensity of my religious fervour but rather because of the shock I felt at the time at a particular incident. Mass was over and two of us, carrying the cruets containing the remnants of the wine and water that had not been used during the ceremony, preceded Father O’******** through the side door of the church into the sacristy where we were to take off out soutanes and surplices”
Someone open a window; it just got rather warm in here, didn’t it.
We had talked about an award – well, here it is. Let the nominations begin!
http://joustitout.com/pictures/douche.JPG
Don’t be comparing Annie to Philosoraptor. Philosoraptor actually raises legitimate questions.
RSVPs
: Donairious (Oct. 6, 8:41PM) – See my views on “fags” at Oct. 5, 9:09AM & 11:48AM. My views on “dykes” and what I have called “Uber- males,” i.e. the masculine player in the male-homosexual relationship, is less favourable but not aggressively homophobic. I have often (well, sometimes) wondered if there are intermediate stages on the dyke-fem and Ubermale-queen continuums or whether one is fully committed to one position or the other. I tend to believe the former merely on the grounds that, apparently, there are corresponding gradations on the heterosexual side of the gender divide. Anyone have any thoughts on this?
The Golden Douche Awards is still a work in progress, Donairious. For maximum dramatic impact I’m thinking of only ONE overall award in the same way as The Golden Bitch Award of last year. (Congratulations again Paingirl!) The nominations are, of course, still open.
: Wheeliep (Oct. 7, 12:27AM) – Very humbling, Wheeliep, very humbling. Was there a dedication expressing heartfelt appreciation and gratitude for Montrealman’s presence on this site?
I think I’ll go with the 10 year old “alter” boy, Wheeliep. (Did he undergo a sex change?)
: Scrotum (6:27AM) – Very good, Scrotum, but you must remember that the altar boys are fully-clothed under their soutanes and surplices. No hanky-panky in the sacristy, thank you very much.
: TTFN (7:16AM) – An excellent design for the Golden Douche, TT. I must admit that I was having difficulties at the design stage – an overhead water bag, rubber tubing, nozzles, and then more tubing down to the douchebag, all gold-plated. How was the winner going to hold up this contraption on Awards night? I was tearing my hair out, TT, but you have solved the problem. Many thanks.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Soutane is french for ball-gag; surplice is latin for anal beads. Is altar-boy training still woe-fully inadequate, ignoring such subjects as the importance of preserving physical evidence no matter how yucky.
——-
: Wheeliep (Oct. 7, 12:27AM) – Very humbling, Wheeliep, very humbling. Was there a dedication expressing heartfelt appreciation and gratitude for Montrealman’s presence on this site?
——-
In a manner of speaking… 😀
——-
I think I’ll go with the 10 year old “alter” boy, Wheeliep. (Did he undergo a sex change?)
——-
Why, yes he did. But only to discourage the priestly attention.
That was NOT a spelling mistake. Nope. Stand by every word.
🙂
So what sat, MMan. Want to attend a Summit next time you’re in town? In real life, online personas aside, it would be interesting. Probably in a good way, even.
Wp
And B-195: Philosoraptor *does* make good points!
http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/photos/wise…
RSVPs
: Scrotum (Oct. 7, 10:00AM) My God, Scrotum! I hope you’re not planning on taking any Boy Scouts on a camping trip!
: Wheeliep (3:12PM) – Re: Attending Summits – See my post of Oct. 4, 4:22PM for my position on this, Wheeliep.
“In real life, online personas aside, it would be interesting, probably in a good way, even.”
I don’t know about that Wheeliep. I would think that online personas may well be more genuine since one’s identity is secret and one is not under any social pressure to “make nice.” Of course, this is debatable. If you think otherwise, Wheeliep, I would be prepared to debate it with you. For me the question reduces to the grounds of one’s identity which, for me once again, is a philosophical rather than a psychological matter. But, as I say, you may demur.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!