You posted personal information in a public forum? You’ve devastated someone, made scathing and false accusations, and added even more bullshit to an already ridiculously stressful life.

Keep reading your books because you all have lots to learn about compassion. —Someone with an Actual Heart

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. The Captain will apologize on behalf of the entire internet… Sorry. Feel free to vent your frustrations me, I can take it, whereas you obviously cannot.

  2. If Justin Timberlake can’t take a little constructive criticism, he should probably apply for a job with F.E.M.A.

  3. ^^ yo! de niro!

    anyhoo, OP, while i have nothing but sympathy for your situation, if someone posted details of your predicament (whatever it may be) you have to consider the BITCH forum like a pinata.
    we all have these big sticks….well, some of them have little sticks, but we aren’t mentioning anyone’s initials, not even MM’s…and we are compelled to whack away at the shiny bright dangling thing until it spills it’s seed xxxxxx hang on, MM go away! …… gushes forth (dammit MM!) erupts with voluminous spewings of candied delights. prizes. and then our sticks are really sore.

  4. Comparing whacking a pinata to orgasm. Very good Molly.
    Notice the pinata traditionally looks like an ass. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

  5. RSVP

    : The Prig (11/15, 9:55PM)

    I knew it! You would eventually commence fantasizing about me! You couldn’t hold back! But you must try and exercise some restraint. I must say your imagery was evocative – “candied delights, prizes, and sore sticks” – but tended to be unconventional and, if I may say so, rather effusive. Structured restraint, as with so many other things, is the key to success.

    Speaking of structured restraint, I’m still waiting for that first sentence of our joint porn adventure and something tells me that it won’t be long. I know that you will soon be “gushing forth” so to speak but, once again, structured restraint is the watchword. Write back soon.

    By the way, a fabulous new avatar. I will entertain all your questions about wine!

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  6. ^^ you say ‘unconventional and effusive’ as if it were a bad thing…i’ve found it to be pretty successful

    not realy into structured restraint, bubbalah

    i have enlisted the aid of a feather to hold me back, sorry.

  7. I would say they should be adhering to wheaton’s law…
    but I’d be a pretty big hypocrite since I rarely follow it.

  8. A FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE UNDERLYING THE SUCCESSFUL WRITING OF PORN

    RSVP

    : The Prig (11/16, 10:39AM)

    “you say ‘unconventional and effusive’ as it it were a bad thing .. i’ve found it to be pretty successful”

    An interesting comment which bears further scrutiny since it touches upon a fundamental principle which underlies all successful writing of porn. What is that principle?

    In ordinary circumstances “unconventional and effusive” is generally considered to be a good thing since it attracts the attention of the reader. But, of course, writing porn cannot be considered to be something which is carried out under “ordinary circumstances.” Indeed, I think I can safely say that writing porn is carried out under “extraordinary circumstances”. How is this so?

    What we have here is a classic dichotomy which touches upon all successful writing, as for example, in the present instance. That dichotomy relates to the relationship between form and substance. Indeed, that relationship can be formulated in terms of an inverse relationship between content (substance) and style (form). Some call it Montrealman’s first principle of successful porn writing.

    You will have noted that the content of this post – the principles underlying the successful writing of porn – is somewhat academic, perhaps even dry. As a consequence, I have chosen to couch it in formal, some might say even flowery terminology. In other words, the style of the post obtrudes into the content to alleviate possible boredom and ennui in the reader. The style lifts his spirits, engages his attention so to speak.

    However, and now we come to the crux of the matter, this not the case with porn. With porn the content (substance) is intrinsically interesting and needs no further embellishment by a flowery style (form). The content of porn stands on its own and, indeed, such interest can be diminished by a distracting style. That is why it is imperative that the style adopted with porn be one I have called “structured restraint”.

    To write porn with a style that is “unconventional and effusive” – it will be obvious – distracts attention from the quality of the porn. The style must be unobtrusive, subtle, one characterized by structured restraint. It must never intrude upon the porn. So there we have it, Montrealman’s first principle for successful porn writing.

    Something tells me that the feather you enlisted to hold you back will soon be blown away by your obviously profound attraction with the content (substance) of porn in general and your tormenting erotic fantasies about Montrealman in particular. I’ll be waiting in my usual posture, one of structured restraint, before we commence our pornographic duet.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *