[Image-1]
“I love misogyny,” he told me in the morning while he put his shirt back on.
“Why?” I, an idiot, asked.
“Because as a man, it benefits me.”
Wrong, grasshopper. You mean the patriarchy, not misogyny. And you’re still wrong. The patriarchy hurts everyone. —Out of your league
This article appears in Jan 15-21, 2015.


Pretty sure he meant misogyny.
Mod – shouldn’t the header for this bitch have read “Female Tears”?
I know, I know – two wrongs don’t make a right.
But three, do.
Think about it >; )
I’m with Koda.
OP – you and your fuckboi are both wrong. The term he was looking for is “masochist”
Patriarchy serves me well! No harm, no foul… Penis-on!
“I’m out of your leaugue!”
“Yeah but I already fucked you so….”
Gawd you look hot this morning, BreakfastSandwich.
THE MISOGYNY LOVER
Can one, on pragmatic grounds (it “benefits him”) love misogyny as a theory without being a committed misogynist? Although unlikely, I see no necessary contradiction. Similarly, must patriarchy necessarily embody misogyny as a guiding principle? Cannot patriarchy, in other words, be inspired by protective motives as opposed to sexually exploitative ones? In still other words, can the concepts of misogyny and patriarchy be viewed contextually rather than simply verbally? Can they be viewed philosophically rather than simply linguistically? I ask these questions, of course, on purely speculative or philosophical grounds.
A pleasure as always,
Cheerio!
Listen grasshopper…. when you can snatch the misogynystic thoughts out of your mind, only then can you come back, till then….. Practice till you get it right. The grand master has spoken.
Gotta stop spiking my cafe with Irish cream.
“The Patriarchy hurts everyone”
Wrong. I’m going to tell you a little story based on personal experience and how I view it.
Warning: The following screed is going to be heavily based on my own semantic interpretation of certain socio-political buzzwords, so please spare me the Inigo Montoya “I do not think that word means what you think it means” links. I’ve seen ’em all.
The Patriarchy gave me TWO parents to be incredibly proud of.
My Dad’s father was a mongrel who abandoned his family in the Dirty 30’s. Patriarchy meant that my Dad never, ever felt the obligation to follow in his footsteps. Quite the opposite.
Patriarchy gave an 8 year old boy , delivered into the clutches of the Church of Rome, the strength to survive until his mother could re-unite the family. Any boy who ever had to be warehoused by the Vatican’s Penguins could be forgiven for growing up to be Ted Fucking Bundy, IMHO.
At 16 my Dad chose to follow that most patriarchal of career paths – the defence of others. Partially to support his family, partially because he didn’t want to work in the railyards like so many Winnipeg boys. He did it for 4 decades and he was damned good at it, so spare me the “recruitment by famine” or “workfare for the unemployable” arguments used so often by “progressives” to dismiss those in uniform.
Patriarchy meant my Dad was away a lot growing up which did two things. It allowed me to be raised, frequently by some very strong, very loving and very resilient women. It gave my Mom, a hard-headed rebellious little hellion the opportunity for independence of thought and opportunity. Mother, housewife, bank teller, community volunteer. She’s done it all and still does. The absences made me appreciate my Dad all the more. Time has granted me the wisdom to appreciate the sacrifices he made, for us. Puts the missed birthdays and graduations into perspective.
Patriarchy, and the affect it had on my upbringing, gave me the strength, when adversity came up to NOT run, like creep who fathered my Dad. It gave me the fortitude to help carry someone at her most vulnerable and to see, that in those times, she also was helping to carry me. I wouldn’t swap it for the world.
I know, I know, – what I’ve described isn’t “Patriarchy” as described by fymynysts. Tango Sierra. Just as “Feminism” allegedly isn’t the dirty word a lot of men think it is – neither is Patriarchy.
Winnipeg??? I didn’t know you were a pegger….I grew up there.
Not me, Dad’s half of the family though. We spent 3 years at CFB Rivers, a couple of hours drive away. His Mom and his 2 sisters lavished a lot of love (read: spoiled me rotten) on the family’s first grandchild. I have no recollection of my first Christmas with the 12 meatless dishes, but supposedly the honeyed buckwheat was a big hit with my young self.
Honeyed Buckwheat is No Fool’s stripper name. It is known.
probably because you have to throw it to the ceiling to see if it sticks – indicates good season ahead.
I meant – throw the buckwheat, not no-fool. although I am not saying there’s anything wrong with that
Tell me about it. Do you know how many Lauriers it cost me to learn that? The season ahead, not the stage name.
Madame Cleo drives a hard bargain and the exhange rate between CDN dollars and chicken tenders will kill ya.
Well said Ivan! I’m sure you are proud of your old Dad and his “patriarchal” values, beliefs and actions. Unfortunately, those who do not learn the lessons of their fathers (and grandfathers) will always believe that Patriarchy is a bad thing.
And I didn’t take you as the pegger-type, buddy.
LOL >: ) Never too old to try new things…
Wait…what…you want to stick THAT exactly where?
OHDEARGODCINNAMONCINNAMONCINNAMONCINNAMONCINNAMONCINNAMONCINNAMON
And look at what I found: http://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/Profile/Comments?oid=4506639&display=comments
Still on the “you-may-not-post-URLs list”, eh?!
I like cinnamon…
Noted, for next summit >: )
#thingsthatdidnthappen
Speaking of Summit, brunch, soon?
Sooner the better, baby!
I would love to get the whole conversation OB, not just what was thrown back in your face.
And what FS said
Guys will continue to act like this as long as you keep fuckin’em. True story!!
Ehh, you may be out of his league, OB, but from the shirt buttoning, it sounds like he already got what he wanted from you anyway.
http://www.thecoast.ca/halifax/Profile/Com…
sorry, i tried
So, I’m just guessing that Tinder isn’t the best way to meet quality people.
Is that a surprise to anyone?
Ew. Just Ew.
breakfast sandwich looks hot and tempting every morning, and in a cheesy kind of way, which I prefer. wouldn’t mind sinking my teeth into those buns I tell ya.
@ Ivan, not diminish your experiences, or your family, or their careers, but you clearly don’t actually know what “patriarchy” means.
@ OB that is what happens when you fuck randoms based only on the slim evidence an app (or 60 minutes chatting) provides. I mean really.
zuke knows what’s up.
and op you need better vetting questions before you jump into bed with trash, can’t decide whether you deserve better or he deserves nothing at all. ever. until the end of time.
Zuke, I appreciate your respect to my family, so I will respectfully agree to disagree on this one.
I think a key term is “Daymare” – was this a real event, or was this someone day-dreaming of living the “tinder dream” of random sex that got jumbled up with the hot topic of misogyny
The women will define Patriarchy, and the men will define Feminism.
Equality shall reign.
Wisdom of Solomon from The Captain.
http://i.imgur.com/Ktqy0MT.jpg
DEFINITIONS
RSVP
Captain (01/24, 8:18AM)
To say that the women will define “patriarchy” and the men define “feminism” is both factually incorrect – the terms appear in the dictionary which, one supposes, was not written exclusively by either gender – and incoherently pre-supposes rather than establishes the pervasive existence of inter-sexual hostility. It’s analogous to the Islamophobe defining “terrorist” and the Jihadist defining “infidel.” Linguistic definitions must be distinguished and kept separate from connotative associations.
A pleasure as always,
Cheerio!
Sarcasm alert! – next time I shall include one for your benefit, MM.
Or would it be satire…? The Captain cannot even understand his own humour anymore – such is the ‘Wisdom of Solomon’ 😉
And I can not understand it either. But keep thinking.
I go on Tinder just fer da hoes.