See ya later, Benny Boy. Off to the dementia ward with scrambled eggs in your pointy golden hat. Mister Pope, your antics finally sunk in with the boys who control the Holy Smoke. Time to shut this whole gig down, fellas, this 14th century shit don’t fly no more. No matter how you slice it, Vatican Vacuums, you will never give up your hate-on for women. You’ve always been just another brainwashing cult. —Detests The Catholic Church So Fuckin’ Much, I Spit Through My Eyeballs
This article appears in Feb 7-13, 2013.
Although the short list is quite long, I’ve got a pretty good idea who wrote this (God Bless her smutty soul)
http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/B/7/…
wasn’t me, i am extremely grateful to the cat-lick church. source of so many favourite movies. exorcist. damien. legion. plan 9 from outer space, heck that was the rosecrucians.
Amen!
woof grr roo, twas not me
Maybe it’s time for the Vatican City to be put up for sale. I wonder how many disadvantaged people could be helped with all the treasures they are hoarding. But no, they would prefer child molesters have their own private club, to be protected by riches and a cloak of silence.
PS; Birth control is the devil!!!!
It’s because of birth control they couldn’t keep the ranks up. Not enough reproducing. That’s why they were against it…….they could see that coming. That and the lessening choice of children to molest. Slim pickings.
biggest scam in all of history & after 1800 years still goin’ strong !
i’ve been saving this, no quarter given http://i.imgur.com/sWGSRBc.jpg
But I thought Pope Benny forgave those children for leading all those poor, vulnerable , sexually confused priests astray.
Gotta count for something, no?
Bellows in Ivanski’s ear: ‘Well, it ain’t Wendell Willkie!!!’
http://i.imgur.com/VPn94tC.jpg
…and this is why I luvs ya, Painey!
It’s why I luvs ya both. >: )
By the way, was last week’s summit cancelled due to two feet of snow?
http://i512.photobucket.com/albums/t323/ou…
Aw, come ‘ere, my favourite Ivan, and I’ll give you a lovin’ noogie.
Get thee behind me Satan and push.
I heard Benedict gave up the papacy for lent. Could be mistaken.
As a result of those sick FN child rapist priests, generations of dysfunctional families exists.The abuses and sexualized trauma’s done to those children at the hands of priests,brother’s and nuns,doesn’t end at that person’s specific young victim.It is passed on to the victim’s children and so on.The mental hospitals,clinics and jails(where they don’t receive proper care for most of their issues) are full of the children and their children,etc of the victims of any denomination,not just the Catholic church.
IMO Abolish organized religion,period.
I’d hate to play “devil’s advocate” here (I’m not religious by the way), but the entire church isn’t like that, and the American Military industrial complex has done much worse this century in my opinion. The outraged comments towards the military establishment are nothing compared to what I hear about the church. Just a perspective.
Of course you’ll have to include all Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and every other religion out there. Pedophiles gravitate anywhere children are, schools, scouts, sports, etc. So should we shut all those institutions down also since most of them have also denied these sort of things happening, until they were pressured to do so.
Daniel, the the American Military industrial complex hasn’t been around for a couple of thousand years. Read the history of the RC church sometime and it’ll make the the American Military industrial complex seem like a team of the pinochle players.
Daniel, it can also be argued that the American Military Industrial Complex has done a lot more good, on the global scale, in the last century than any organized religion. They do tend to be first responders whenever a natural or man-made disaster occurs, which is a fuck of a lot more important than offering prayers, IMHO. Of course, having lived under their protective umbrella for all of my natural life, I do tend to have a skewed opinion.
>; )
now that is scary. wonder if that lightening was part of the wrath of god. these are obvioudly the last days so anything is possible, wow
And thank god for that.
——-
last days
——-
(eyerolls)
P
Wogdog:Can I have all your money? That filthy lucre won’t help you in the afterlife. Free yourself from these earthly bonds!
furious if i had a lot of money yes you could have it.
Slide me a ten, pimp?
[Lemmy] As my first official proclamation, I declare today to be Whiskey and Whores Day! Now go forth and drink and fuck, my children. Amen. [/Lemmy]
Bring back the Spanish Inquisition, Monty Python Style…..Cardinal Fang, the comfy chair, nice red uniforms.
IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH MISOGYNISTIC?
“No matter how you slice it, Vatican Vacuums, you will never give up your hate-on form women.” (Detests the Catholic Church So Fuckin Much…)
Well, I think it does matter how you “slice it.” I think the poster protesteth too much. Contrary to what she says, women in the Catholic Church have always been venerated since the time of Mary, the mother, so it is maintained, of Jesus Christ. Indeed, more than any other organized religion, the Catholic Church has always had what some call a “Marian Cult,” a devotion to Mary in particular and to all women in general.
It is true that women cannot be priests and that the structure of the Church is patriarchal in general but it was a creation of its time when society itself was patriarchal. But some would maintain that, in addition to matters of theological faith, the continuity of the Church depends on tradition and tradition, in the present case, is just that patriarchal structure of the Church. Play with the structure and the institution collapses.
Some would also maintain that in today’s “godless” society where it’s every man (sorry, also every woman) for himself and let the devil take the hindmost, the Church has been a force for good. Yes, there have been abuses in the past and also abuses in the present, but to reject the institution out of hand appears to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
It is assumed that the poster detests the Catholic Church “so fuckin much” on feminist grounds. That’s fair enough. No one is forcing her to be a member. As the Church has always maintained, everyone has free will. Otherwise the concept of sin would be incoherent. So, as they say, “PAX VOBISCUM ET CUM SPIRITU TUO!” – PEACE BE UNTO YOU AND WITH THY SPIRIT!
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Let’s not forget that despite the fact that it’s command structure is male, the most zealous of it’s foot soldiers have traditionally been women. You know the kind, black clad old signoras who cross themselves and go tsk, tsk whenever they see someone in a wheelchair. In literature and canadian movies, at least, it’s always the mothers who try to steer their sons to the priesthood. What father would try to deny his son a life of nookie?
It’s interesting that some of the most fervently religious people are women & minorities, who more often than not are the ones most systematically opressed by it.
Joan of Arc had a dildo named Jesus
Made of wood from the cross of it’s namesake
She considered the splinters atonement
When she came it would fill her with light
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PpJKdH_We8
Wogdog’s family started
When Honey BooBoo sharted.
She came out re…..ally special.
Lord what a tragedy.
*snap snap clap clap*
Okay, so what if Furious’ song was better than mine. That’s what happens when you smoke reefers at work.
>: (
PAX VOBISCUM
RSVPs
: Ancient Ivan Theorist (02/14, 10:20AM
“Let’s not forget that despite the fact that its command structure is male, the most zealous of it’s (sic) foot soldiers have traditionally been women.”
Well, actually the military metaphor – the “command structure” and the “foot soldiers” – is false. With the exception of the Jesuits who taught me in high school and in undergraduate school – the “Soldiers of Christ” – where the metaphor really does apply, one could hardly call the nuns and sisters “foot soldiers”. In the case of the “command structure,” the Mother Superior (I’m thinking particularly of the Mothers of the Sacred Heart who taught me in elementary) certainly had field rank. It is true that the mothers were the ones who tended to “steer” their sons to the priesthood for the simple reason that it was indeed a “saintly” calling. Of course, the fathers did not do the same since they did not want to deprive their sons of a life of nookie.
: Pope Orgasmatron (11:31AM)
No chance you could support that assertion by any chance, is there? Did you want to start with a conceptual analysis of “systematically oppressed.” No, I didn’t think so.
: Furious Styles (1:09PM)
An excellent post, FS. Just excellent.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I wasn’t referring to the penguins MM, although they have a very special circle in the hot place awaiting them. I was talking about Catholic Moms – Recruiting Sergeants for the Vicar of Christ , from the most dismal Newfie outport to the most teeming immigrant slum – who pushed their sons into being choirboys and altarboys and who didn’t think twice at sending them up to the manse at 2:00 in the morning, because “Fodder Bill needs ye!”
TTFN
Yes, the American military complex hasn’t been around for thousands of years, but the relevancy or distinction of the last 100 years is in humanities more advanced conceptual and scientific knowledge that has been more efficiently widespread through systematic institutional education, and technologically advanced mediums. Before that there was basically the Church and people just didn’t know any better. On the other hand there also wasn’t massive corporate fascism. The issue here to me isn’t religion, but that people fucking suck (destructive assholes) anyways.
Jeeze-Ass Cripes, Ivan, your last remark was priceless and I have the piss stain on the floor to prove it.
TT my dear, there are times I almost regret that you and I are both in happy marriages. >; )
My sentiments exactly, dear Ivanski!
If by some chance we should each happen to wind up widowed (knock wood it never happens) let us at least contrive to wind up incarcerated in the same old folk’s home.
And wogshite can be the floor attendant. >: )
We’ll daily re-enact the Battle of Britain with our Depends.
Can I be a Stuka?
Wag Jag’s on diaper duty? It’ll be chili and corn every night, boyo.
watch your words they just might come back and bite you on th ass. no pun intended.
Fuck you.
p
Vindaloo Night – ole Nurse Wretched’s gonna get some of that christian karma she likes to dribble about. In spades. “By the pooey knickers of Sister Brenda of Rhimmlapp, I swear this to be so.”
Vindo Looooooooooo!
P
PAX VOBISCUM
RSVP
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch (02/14, 3:25PM)
I wasn’t referring to the “penguins” either Ivan, although I am sure you are quite right in your thoroughly documented assertion to the effect that they have “a very special circle in the hot place awaiting them.” One can only stand in admiration at your knowledge of what lies ahead for all of us “on the other side.” No, I was also referring to those “Catholic Mums – those Recruiting Sergeants for the Vicar of Christ – in respect to which your knowledge is clearly both profound and unerring.
As it happens I was an altar boy at Saint Mary’s Basilica for a number of years but my mother, who was neither from a “dismal Newfie outport” nor from some “teeming immigrant slum” – a few of your prejudices showing there, Ivan? – never pushed me into becoming one. Of course, as you so accurately point out, she didn’t hesitate to send me up to the manse at 2:00AM because “Fodder Bill needs ye.”
At the moment I’m reading another biography of Hitler and I couldn’t help being struck by the similarity between the hysterical anti-Semitism of the Nazis on the one hand and the nearly equally hysterical anti-Catholocism expressed by some “bien pensants” on this site on the other. While in the one case it was the money-grubbing Jews who were at the heart of all iniquity, in the case of the Catholics it is the shocking pederasty of every priest who is unquestionably the Devil incarnate. Yes, every one! Damn them all!
At one time, sadly no longer, I was on the “inside” of a particular belief system which gave meaning and purpose to my existence and which is embodied the injunction from the Gospel of Saint Mathew – “Man does not live by bread alone.” As I say, this is sadly no longer the case – pale philosophy has to do duty for robust belief – but nonetheless I feel obliged to counter the crude accusations of those who are on the “outside,” who view that belief system merely as an occasion for ridicule. It is something similar for you when you counter those who bring accusations against the stupid soldier and mock oxymorons like “military intelligence”. Further, rather than your military metaphor for the Church – “command structures,” “foot soldiers” and all that – I think, given the centrality obedience to orders, it is rather the ecclesiastical metaphor which is more applicable for the military.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Hail Mary, full of grace, forty chickens in a race. Even Frank magazine calls Mudder Mary ‘The Wanker of the Week’ for her sporatic, half-hearted visits to service station bathroom walls and Tim Horton faux brick exteriors.
As far as words biting one’s posterior, Slag Bag – that’s rich coming from someone who’s ass is literally an elbow.
>: ( I am duly chastened Montrealman. What should my penance be? I am reminded of the story of a young Joseph Smallwood, who, in the course of a youthful lark, purloined a sizeable amount of lumber from a local sawmill. At confession that week the priest asked “My Son, do you know how to make a novena?” Joey replied:
“No I don’t, Fodder. But if you gots da plans, By Jayzuz, I gots da lumber”
And, lest I be accused of harboring anti-popish prejudices that could lead to mass pogroms of innocent catholics being rapped soundly across the knuckles with steel rulers or condemned to a life of feudal servitude in sweltering laundries, it must be emphasized that some priests are capable of great compassion and even wisdom:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56HzuoajN5g
laugh it up you two while you can. you are both foolish in your assumptions. thank god we sereve a merciful and forgiving god but if i were you two i wouldn’t tempt the lord thy god. no i would not.
All I can say is, thank god this thread isn’t about moslems, or the Mod would have shut it down 2 days ago. >; )
‘Just what we need – anlaugh it up you two while you can. you are both foolish in your assumptions. thank god we sereve a merciful and forgiving god but if i were you two i wouldn’t tempt the lord thy god. no i would not.’
Just what this board needs – an evangelical wool floor polisher – get it through your thick, stupid head, Pog Nog, your imaginary world of gods and goblins will give you more nightmares than they will me.
Didn’t our man Biscuit see the Blessed Virgin’s image in a tub of donair sauce, once? Didn’t stop him from eating it, though.
“Mmmmmmmmm – sacrelicious”
RSVPs
: TTFN (02/15, 10:10AM)
An excellent rejoinder. I stand in awe of both your insight and humour. Is Frank magazine the bedrock of your belief system? Don’t write back.
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch (10:20AM)
Your penance will be laying off stupid Newfie jokes.
(10:34AM)
Back at it again, I see. Must be an addiction or perhaps something worse.
: wogdog (10:41AM)
“laugh it up you two. You are both foolish in your assumptions.”
Are you referring to me as well as Ivan? If so, (a) I wasn’t laughing and (b) can you reveal now how we are “foolish in our assumptions” in contrast, of course, to your own? Write back soon.
: Col Ivan Sonofabitch (10:47AM)
An excellent point, Ivan. Whatever do you think it might mean? Do you think it might mean what I think it might mean?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Montrealman:
(10:20AM) Harsh but fair. I shall.
(10:34AM) Sad, but true. I haven’t yet reached rock bottom.
(10:41AM) Myself and TTFN, I should think.
(10:47AM) Indubitably.
“By the pooey knickers of Sister Brenda of Rhimmlapp, I swear this to be so.”
Don’t dis Frank, BB, their accuracy is, at times, uncanny – let’s just say I’m in a position to know of such things.
Should have typed MM, not BB – must stop taking those honking big gulps of Southern Comfort at 11:00 a.m.
mm no not you. those other two foul mouthed heathens. the big talkers till they need god, then they are the ones who cry loudest. ttfn, i wont get your garbage talk through my head. i have the truth and feel sorry 4 you.
mm what i meant by foolish asumptions for the two heathens is the way they talk about our mighty god. they sound so stupid and talk so foolish. they cant even breathe on their own let alone think for one minute that they are running their own lives. who do you think keeps your ungrateful hearts beating. exactly. now show some reverence for our mighty god.
——-
“By the pooey knickers of Sister Brenda of Rhimmlapp, I swear this to be so.”
——-
I miss the Fabulous Froodle. Such a witty (and real!) person.
——-
augh it up you two while you can. you are both foolish in your assumptions. thank god we sereve a merciful and forgiving god but if i were you two i wouldn’t tempt the lord thy god. no i would not.
——-
I’m going to laugh it up until I die. After I die there will be nothing, so laughing or not laughing won’t be an issue.
Oh, were you meaning to say the Comrade and I had better shut up because your chosen Invisible Friend is going to pour hot lava down our throats while assfucking us on the flaming plains of whatsis?
People like like who use threats of Heavenly Retribution are no better than spiritual terrorists. You bypass doing actual good works and helping the poor and downtrodden, to instead spend all your time filling the gullible with fears about the Red-Pyjama’d One and his Point Pitchfork. And people like you ALWAYS have the very specific path to the Happy Place, right?
I’m am very content to not attack genuine people of good will who use whatever their deal is to be better people, but people like you can take a long, hard suck on my arse, WogSatan.
——-
if I were you i wouldn’t tempt a
——-
Do you masturbate with a crucifix-shaped dildo? Do you wrap the bible in plastic to not get it all covered in your unholy issue?
Would you be willing to videotape it for us?
p
vengeful god doesn’t deserve our attention. It’s a bitter and jealous creature, made up as a reflection in the sick minds of dimbulbs and assholes to scare little old ladies and children and discourage true Free Will.
“i have the truth and feel sorry 4 you.”
FFS wigpig, just drink the frickin’ “Kool-Aid” already and give it a rest.
you christers have had your centuries long reign of terror, it’s our turn now
Hey wuglug:
http://t.qkme.me/3rswe4.jpg
Poor ol’ Jog Log – clinging to her desperate belief system – operative word here: ‘BELIEF’ – the only higher power I need is the top setting of my hair dryer. Don’t feel sorry for me – when I’m ready to boogie to the Eternal Yawn, I won’t be pleading with some Biblical myth to save me from a place that doesn’t exist and, even if it did, it would be the most tedious place to spend eternity. Wormfood we’ll all be, Fog Nog, even your natty yellow yarn hair will be chomped to dust. Get over it.
‘…i have the truth and feel sorry 4 you.’ – who’s truth, Bog Tog, yours? You’re a pretty scummy representative of the Laird Jebus H. Crackerjacks – even for a fucking ditzy sock puppet.
I find Wogshite’s weltanschaung to be a hypnotic combination of the “Left Behind” series and The Crazy World of Arthur Brown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eawL6aJ2nBc
I also find it incredibly sexy and want to F*** Her Like An Animal.
Is that so very wrong?
omg, memories ivan! used to have to play 1 hour of prerecorded bible thumper show on sunday evenings when i was doing that shift & always, always came hard off the back of it with this song.
thank god no one was listening. hahahaha
BWA HA HA HA – that’s magnificent.
may god have mercy on your souls you poor ignorant people
ivan i know i can be very irresistable but try to control yourself. its not going to happen. E.V.E.R.
I’ll try but it’s very hard.
‘may god have mercy on your souls you poor ignorant people’ – well, ya know, Flog Clog, igonorance is bliss and I am, indeed, blissful.
Beware of cotton twat flaps, Ivan, they are actually a portal to the 1980s PTL club and you’ll have to be whipped into a frenzy by Tammy Faye’s wet fake eyelashes. 😉
Did anyone else notice the pic of the Pope in the CH? He looks like the Emperor in Star Wars.
http://thechronicleherald.ca/sites/default…
——-
may god have mercy on your souls you poor ignorant people
——-
lols
If *this* is a representative of *anything*- be it Amway, AA, hassenfeffer Inc, or imaginary Bro- I want no part of it.
Here’s Woggie selling Fuller Brushes:
“You’re going to hell, and you can fuck yourself- now how many toilet brushes can I put you down for?”
P
http://i.imgur.com/d3Xbriq.jpg
piss paul remember…the day job thing…agin not funny hunny
PG, in his defence, he is German and a lot of them just look evil.
he has no defence, he is a relic for the middle ages
eek, bro tim the image you posted he looks like hannibal lector describing liver with fava beans.
Uh, Woggy? If you’ve been beseeching the almighty to smite us from the face of the Earth, in your next prayer please tell him that although my name is Russian, I don’t actually live there.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity/2013/…
Because if he was aiming for Sodom on the North Atlantic, he forgot to compute windage, bigtime.
“I’ll try but it’s very hard.” I see what you did there, Ivanski.
Subtlety is not a Slavic trait.
More’s the pity.
A SECULAR CRUSADE?
Compare the following:
(a) “Detests The Catholic Church So Fuckin Much, I Spit Through My Eyeballs” (The Bitcher)
(b) “may god have mercy on your souls you poor ignorant people” wogdog (02/15, 2:10PM)
Notice any difference? That’s right, the first is a hate-filled smear against the Catholic Church but it could be against any form of organized religious belief. It shows that hard, bitter edge of fanaticism, worthy of any rabid anti-Semite during the Hitler period. Give the Bitcher power and watch the churches being smashed and ransacked. Watch the priests being beaten in the streets. The Bitcher would “spit through her eyeballs” at them.
The crucial difference is that wogdog does not hate. She does not want to smash the objects of her loathing for the very good reason that she does not loathe anybody. Whether it is misdirected or not, she shows pity and compassion for those “poor ignorant people”. She wants them to see the light.
But even this suffices to enrage the commenters. The fact is that the very existence of religious belief itself is sufficient to blind them with choler but to have someone actually proclaim her belief is beyond endurance. “Fuck you!” they scream. “Get it through your thick, stupid head, Pog Nog!” they shout. “Do you masturbate with a crucifix?” they wonder. “You christers” yells another. Clearly, the movement from initial ridicule through insult to eventual physical persecution has begun. If only they could spit on her through their eyeballs! If only there were a stake at which she could be burned!
It appears that, under the purported appearance of a tolerant skepticism, the leering face of a fanatical dogmatism reveals the beginning of a new secularist crusade, one in which the true believers in a god-free world will put the idolaters, the christers, to the sword.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Someone say Secular Crusade?
Count me IN LIKE FLYNN!
mm thank you at least you see i hold no hate for anyone. god is love and tolerance and when you have the love of god in your heart it is impossible to hate. anybody. like the bible says when a candle is lit and placed in a dark room, darkness has to go. i had all that darkness inside me too before christ. but hate and love cannot co-exist. you are a smart man to have picked that out. my hat off to you.
I already have my rank picked out – Paedophinder General. Bring on the auto-da-fe.Heh heh heh.
When we’re done, Vatican City will be a giant theme park for disadvantaged kids – FATHER TED LAND. The kaaba will be a genuine Southern BBQ joint. Salt Lake City will be home to world’s largest Coca Cola bottling plant. Jerusalem will be moved brick by brick to Tibet and any self-entitled twats who think they have a god given right to it will have to join the Buddhists in taking it back from the Chinee. On April 1st , Scientology will be declared the One World Religion and then that night, we’ll break the news to them at a special screening of Battlefield Earth. “Sorry Tom,it was all just a wind up”
so wogdog, what about your hatred of men, dogs, atheists?
——-
A Secular Crusade
——-
Meh. Pretending to confuse message board trolling with real life is a fun diversion from walking whippets on windy days.
p
‘mm thank you at least you see i hold no hate for anyone. god is love and tolerance and when you have the love of god in your heart it is impossible to hate. anybody. like the bible says when a candle is lit and placed in a dark room, darkness has to go. i had all that darkness inside me too before christ. but hate and love cannot co-exist. you are a smart man to have picked that out. my hat off to you.’
You are such a fucking hypocrite, Bag Tag – just like every other sanctimonious Christian I’ve encountered. Your hatred and intolerance simply seethes in your posts. You can whitewash your words all you want but the message still smells like shit.
i should have listed the 4 commenters who would post after my last post. oopps forgot the imposter posters, paul and ivan. you’re not on the ball today are you. you guys are sooooo predictable its not even funny. what do you expect from haters.
pg.. i don’t hate any of those 3 things. like i said before many times, they are great, i just don’t want any of those 3. hate. no. just dont want them. next…
piss paul, no comment since your post is rather incoherent today. may i suggest less futile attempts at humor and more rest. yeah that would work.
i’m watching the re-broadcast of the westminister dog show, the whippet was lovely but i love all the hounds
You’re right on the cube today, Slog Frog.
——-
no comment
——-
Which is a comment.
Dumbass. Bitter old dumbass Wagslog.
Try another trolling strategy? 🙂
Maybe go back to how you’re running the board. It’s been awhile since that one.
lols
p
THE SECULAR CRUSADE
Well woggie, it looks like the rabid secularists are turning nasty but, of course, this was to be expected. Let’s have a look at a few of the comments, shall we?
RSVPs
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch (02/16, 10:49AM)
Ivan crows that he’s IN LIKE FLYNN! on behalf of the Secularist Crusade and I believe him. I forgot to include his previous comment (02/15, 1:05PM) where he remarked that he found you “immensely sexy and want to F*** Her Like An Animal. Is that very wrong?” I suppose he wanted to say “FUCK YOU LIKE AN ANIMAL” but, modestly, used asteriks for a few letters. Now woggie, don’t you think his discretion is wholly admirable? And, of course, from a rabid Secularist perspective, fucking you like an animal is not very wrong at all, is it? No, of course not.
(11:16AM)
In standard fashion, Ivan goes off into one of his fantasist/masturbatory soliloquies which, I guess, he finds enormously satisfying on both counts but woggie, don’t be misled. Underneath the whimsy lies the apoplectic rage of the Secularist Inquisitor.
: p1 (1:08PM)
Who’s pretending? Were you pretending when you screamed “Fuck you!” at woggie? Of course not. And I’m not pretending about the Secularist Crusade either. In case you missed it, my point isn’t so much the secularism itself – I’m one myself – but rather the venomous fanaticism in terms of which the secularist comments are couched which I find disturbing.
: paingirl (11:38AM)
Well, no problem there. Woggie has replied, very courteously I thought, at 2:09PM.
: TTFN (1:17PM)
Now here’s one for you woggie. “You are such a fucking hypocrite Bag Tag – just like every other sanctimonious Christian I’ve encountered.” What do you think about that Woggie? In her wisdom TTFN presumes to judge all Christians. They’re all sanctimonious and that’s the end of it. Doesn’t that sound a bit, well, sanctimonious to you woggie? I know it does to me. That, of course, is the irony of Secular Fanaticism. While purporting to strike a posture of tolerance and rectitude, the Secular Fanatics really want to spit at you through their eyeballs.
Well woggie, it looks like we’ve put them in their place, wouldn’t you say?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
mm i think you are right on the mark. i knew you wouldn’t get a lot of ‘likes’ when you made your analysis, which was again, right on the money. ttfn is stereotyping to the max. not sure why, maybe a bad life experience has turned her bitter as gall. no matter. i realize this is a spiritual battle and for that reason i don’t take any of their remarks personally. as the bible says, the battle belongs to the lord. i just come on here to witness my belief in jesus and to have a little fun. if you cant have a laugh it is a sorry life. i answer as respectfully as i receive but there are some serious haters on here. i feel bad for them. and believe it or not i pray for each one of them that god will comfort them. but that;s my belief.
Oh, MM, you pontificating old windbag, you are freakin’ hilarious! This new found alliance between you and Rag Slag is the best knee-slapper I’ve had all day! Proceed to entertain us all, oh Most Holy St. Joseph’s Orafice.
…and, yes, I know it should be ‘orifice’, MM – no corrections necessary.
MM i believe you have misinterpreted ttfn’s comment. “just like every other sanctimonious Christian I’ve encountered.” she did not say that all christians are sanctimonious, just that all she had met were, and that wogdog was one of them.
it is possible that ttfn believes all christians are sanctimonious, but she didn’t say that.
if there is such a thing as recurring existence, i may have been a guest at the auto da fe, i actually cannot enter a catholic church, not even the tourist hot spot on moloka’i. i get the acme earthquake pill syndrome. so i have no love for them but can’t condemn the entire crowd. i am sure there must be dedicated, sincere and gentle people in the flock. i met a very nice jesuit priest once.
and i once knew an extraordinary person who embodied the christian ‘christ like’ qualities. he died when his horse kicked him in the head. he was a no-bricks n boards church christian.
and 2 old dears who were jehovah’s witnesses. really good people. so they are out there.
i believe the salvation army christians are good people. sure not in it for the money or the fashion.
i just can’t wrap my head around the idea of a supreme being of any kind. i may cock an eyebrow at anyone who believes in god stuff, but ‘whatever’, to me it is not important enough to argue about.
Moleman is back to trolling. I’ve missed that! 🙂
p
Thanks, Molly – you got it spot on – I would not be so stupid as to make a blanket generalization of ALL Christians. I’ve just had the misfortune to meet many Jesus wingnuts over the years, the Baptist and Catholic contingents absolutely the worst. Actually, I was quite surprised MM didn’t pick up on this, being the Eternal Beacon of Rationale and all. However, I must question this lofty title now that he has sided himself with our favourite sock suckit, Bat Gnat, the Jeeze-Ass Fly Trap.
ttfn that is priceless. trying to intimidate mm by your name calling. give it up, i can’t see him biting on that one. you can always tell when a person is losing ground in an argument. they start name calling and attacking their opponent’s personna. that’s low ttfn, even for you. you sound like you are grasping at straws. sad really.
THE SECULAR CRUSADE (II)
Good morning woggie. It seems that the Secularists, at least those who have not retired from the field, are now in a fall-back position which, tiresomely, will require further rejoinders from me since I have re-directed their venom from you onto me. At this stage woggie, the experienced debater begins to anticipate flanking attacks on his person which can assume various forms since rabid, aggressive Secularism is not a homogeneous, stand-alone ideology. Rather it should be conceived in the form of a multifaceted globe which, depending on the direction of the light beam, displays now one facet, now another. One thinks, of course, of things like thorough-going materialism, narrow pragmatism, skin-surface hedonism and the like which cohere with the Rabid Secularist stance. So woggie, it’s back to work. I chose your comment as an opener.
RSVPs
: wogdog (02/16, 5:20PM)
“I knew you would not get a lot of ‘likes’…”
Yes, woggie, this is true and I knew it too. But it doesn’t matter. I have always thought that the the “likes” are simply bland and empty while the “dislikes” are posted by those who, lacking the ability, are unable to respond in any substantive and extended extended fashion to a comment. In other words woggie, I see “dislikes” as little more than sad, impotent exercises in intellectual masturbation.
: TTFN (5:29PM)
Ah, here it comes. Here comes the name-calling. I’m a “pontificating old windbag.” Now woggie, let’s get to work on this. Do you remember my “All discourse is self-referential’? Do you see the application here? Right! TTFN’s charge applies to herself in spades but with the difference, of course, that I have something of substance to say and she doesn’t. Always keep the self-referential rejoinder in mind, woggie. You won’t go wrong. Note TTFN’s next move. She goes to “faux” humour – “faux means “false” in French, woggie – but it’s really meant as sarcasm as we all understand. Her reference to “the best knee-slapper she had all day” does duty for her “faux humour” and I hope you enjoyed it as much as I did. Keeping to the sarcasm, TTFN next invokes a reference to “Most Holy Saint Joseph’s Oraface” (sic). Do you get it, woggie? Rather good, don’t you think? Now woggie, how would you respond to TTFN? Right! There’s nothing of substance, is there woggie? Now, and here comes the kicker, woggie, what do you call those who blow smoke but without any substance? Right woggie, they’re called “WINDBAGS.” Did you notice how I returned to TTFNs original charge? That’s called “circularity,” woggie but should only be attempted by debating adepts in respect to which you show good promise.
: Good dog Molly (5:46PM)
Well yes, Good dog, I realize that TTFN didn’t say all Christians were sanctimonious but that was never my point. My point was the ideological absolutism, the Secularist Certainty if you like, that prompted the remark, so in effect – I hope you’re taking notes, woggie – it is YOU who have misinterpreted MY comment. Secondly, you continue with your misconception of what the debate is all about by recounting your personal encounters with different religious groups. The debate – I’m sure you might recall – is about the Secular Crusade and not about your personal encounters, positive or negative with such groups. Thirdly, you continue your misconception by claiming that the existence of a supreme being is “not worth arguing about.” That may be true but the debate – I’m sure you might recall – is about the Secular Crusade and not about the existence or non-existence of a supreme being. Woggie, I hope you’re taking notes. A standard tactic of the Rabid Secularist is to side-track the debate topic. Don’t fall for it.
: TTFN (8:41PM)
Now woggie, what do you call this? Right! It’s called “circling the wagons.” TTFN is attempting to bring God dog on side in support. Don’t fall for this, woggie. It’s a standard tactic of those in a weakened fall-back position. TTFN takes another sarcastic swipe with her reference to my being “The Eternal Beacon of Rationale.” I think she meant “Rationality” but it doesn’t matter. Always pick up on these egregious solecisms, woggie. (“Egregious solecisms” means “shocking mistakes” TTFN.)
: wogdog (02/17, 7:47AM)
Excellent woggie. Name-calling is the last refuge of the scoundrel. But try using the Latin form, woggie. It cuts more ice. In Latin it’s called the “ad hominem” (“to the man”) argument where it is not the topic of the debate under discussion – here The Secular Crusade as some might recall – but rather the opponent’s (i.e., my) character which is the target. Never fall for this one, woggie. Stick it back to them, hard.
Well, woggie, I think you’ve learned some important debating tactics this morning. We should drop by this afternoon to see if anyone else requires spanking. Keep your hair brush handy.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
‘…ttfn that is priceless. trying to intimidate mm’ – Intimidate MM? Sounds more like I’ve intimidated you, Fog Hog. MM is playing you like a finely tuned fiddle, you silly twat, and you’re too fucking thick to see it.
MM, thanks for the best laffs of the morning. You and Lag Bag are the 21st century’s version of Abbott and Costello – bravo! So who’s on first – the intellectual or the sock puppet?
——-
you can always tell when a person is losing ground in an argument.
——-
For you it’s when you switch strategies.
Like you just did there.
P
——-
THE SECULAR CRUSADE (II)
——-
He’s arguing against his own “side”, proving what he said a couple years ago that his whole online persona is an intellectual exercise and diversion.
——-
I see “dislikes” as little more than sad, impotent exercises in intellectual masturbation.
——-
This is how everyone sees your posts, including yourself, Dennis.
Weetabix!
By the shining beard of Dennis Cato I swear this to be true.
P
What is absolutely hilarious, Paul, is ol’ MM’s initial posts on this board about his distaste for the Halifax Underclass – now he’s teamed up with HRM’s Underclass Queen, that venerable cockpuppet, Bag Shag. Dementia is a terrible thing, isn’t it, Mr. Cato?
Even funnier, Paul, is Bog Clog thinks I’m trying to intimidate MM – as if anyone could penetrate that huge pumpkin-like brain on the end of his neck. MM has such a superior opinion of himself, my remarks are merely farts in the wind, I’m sure.
And, I must admit that I find great amusement when Pog Rot takes shots at me – they get weaker and floppier by post – suppose it’s due to a woolly colon and IBS (Imbecile’s Bitchy Sarcasm).
i guess ttfn doesn’t like to hear the truth. she’s back to the name calling and character assasinations again which makes me chuckle. i smell desperation, not to worry tt your friend the impersonator hasn’t abandoned you. yet. mm once again your analysis is right on. i saw a couple of those points myself but with my broken arm i must limit my typing and could stick only to the broader picture. thank you for handling the finer more obscure points. you have an excellent mind. bottom line is the mob mentality has backed off a bit and ttfn is feeling a little insecure. tt it looks like you lost this one, among many others. time to go rest your noggin. you’re burning the brain for naught. your done honey. exposed and lying naked and spent by the best.
Flail away, Nag Hag, you’re sweating desperation in buckets. Sweat sock, get it? No? Fail.
Wag Slag has a new “All Is Lost” strategy.
Though her imagining TTFN naked by a bed, “naked and spent” is curious…
😀
P
piss paul where in my post do i mention a bed. get your mind outta the gutter. it is a picturesque way of telling tt she’s cooked. now go put your specs on and try again. looks like your cooked as well. two peas in a pod. lol
——-
What is absolutely hilarious, Paul, is ol’ MM’s initial posts on this board about his distaste for the Halifax Underclass – now he’s teamed up with HRM’s Underclass Queen, that venerable cockpuppet, Bag Shag. Dementia is a terrible thing, isn’t it, Mr. Cato?
——-
Montrealman is Dennis Cato’s online persona. The persona doesn’t have to “be true” to anything. His self-stated reason when he showed up was as a diversion for himself, and to troll. Nothing he has ever said has actually bothered me. Having an imaginary friend tell me I’m stupid is as effective as having another imaginary “person” claim they are running the board”- it’s a non-existent creature claiming something not in evidence.
The only reason the online persona Montrealman is supporting #1Woggie is to troll. He has also claimed to be a secular person(Dennis Cato has, the actual person behind the Montrealman online persona). Dennis Cato finds #1Woggie to be as stupid as we do.
And that’s okay.
By the shining beard of Dennis Cato I swear this to be true.
P
THE SECULAR CRUSADE (III)
Good afternoon woggie. Sorry to hear about your broken arm but I’m sure things will okay shortly. It appears that the opposition has thinned out considerably but there are a couple more debate pointers I would like to share with you. So, let’s get to work.
: TTFN (02/17, 11:33AM)
“MM is playing you like a finely tuned fiddle, you silly twat, and you’re too thick to see it.”
All right woggie, what’s the appropriate response to this one? Right! TTFN is trying the old “Divide and Conquer” tactic. In addition to insulting you she’s trying to drive a wedge between us but – and this is important woggie – as the equally old saying goes, “United we stand!” So that was pretty easy. What’s next? Hello, who’s this? Why it’s TTFN again!
(11:40AM)
Okay woggie, here’s an easy one. What do you think about the Abbott and Costello crack? Right again, woggie. She’s just spinning her wheels. No substance, only (increasingly) feeble sarcasm. You’re batting a thousand, so far, woggie. Oh look! It’s P/!
: P/ (12:18PM)
P/ is mumbling something about “switched strategies” but, as expected, reveals neither what that previous “strategy” might have been nor how it has been “switched.” Now woggie, what do you think this gambit might be called? Right again! It’s called “Obfuscation,” “Smoke-Screening” or even “The Octopus,” you know, when the octopus squirts out a cloud of ink to escape from predators. Pretty sad, don’t you think? Who’s next? Wait, it’s P/ back again. Wonder what he wants.
(12:22PM)
Well woggie, P/ is really reaching here. He’s mumbling something about what I said a couple of years ago! Can you believe it? Woggie, be sure of one thing, I don’t look upon either “The Secular Crusade” in general or you as a persecuted believer as “a mere intellectual exercise and diversion.” On the contrary. But, P/’s incomprehension notwithstanding, it’s very simple. Then “The Secular Crusade” was not an issue but now it is. Clearly, P/ has difficulty understanding this. He’s spinning his wheels in times past. What would you tell P/, woggie? Right! Get With The Program! The remainder of his comment is, of course, just the usual bluster. Who’s next? Why it’s TTFN again!
: TTFN (12:42PM)
Well woggie, here’s an easy one. TTFN is trying to link my old comments about the Halifax Underclass (which of course are still valid in view of the present exchange) and you – she calls you the “Underclass Queen.” Can you imagine? Okay woggie, what’s your rejoinder? Right! It’s TTFN who’s the real “Underclass Queen”! There’s no mistake about that! Who’s next? I don’t believe it! It’s the Underclass Queen again!
(12:52PM)
Well, woggie, TTFN is really windmilling now. It seems I’ve got “a huge pumpkin-like brain on the end of my neck” (how does my rather delicate neck manage to support it?) which, no doubt, is the origin of my “superior opinion of myself” (a condition, of course, from which TTFN is entirely free) and her remarks, as a consequence of my pumpkin-like brain and superior opinion of myself, are “merely farts in the wind.” Well woggie, she’s right about the last part but if only, if only, she was able to supply some substance to her remarks then, well, who knows? Assuming, of course, that there was no wind.
: wogdog (1:55PM)
Well woggie, you’re absolutely right about the name-calling and lack of substance. I smell desperation too and the smell – what is it, six posts from TTFN since my last? – is pretty strong. I think the smell might originate with the “mob mentality” which you have correctly diagnosed. So that’s it for now woggie. Keep your hair brush handy in case its needed tomorrow.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I’m with you, Paul, just one troll piggybacking another – this odd (and mostly fictional) pairing of trolls is so sitcom formula. It’s so easy to tell who’s Oscar and who’s Felix.
So, MM, what’s in it for you? Oh, right, entertainment value – goodness, it doesn’t take much to do that, does it?
By the way, MM, you can save your keystrokes – I rarely read your epistles because, to be perfectly honest, I really don’t give a fuck.
So, Paul, think Nig Nog has a hot clam for ol’ TT? Well, it can steam dry for all I care, bahawhawhawhaw.
I have specified several of her strategies in other posts, Dennis. Do try and do your required reading before jerking it all over yourself.
Sorry, “obfuscating” all over yourself.
Is your bathrobe open, Dennis? Tissues, or a handkerchief?
P
and now both posters resort to obscenities and filth. so predictable. you’re both outta gas, face it like a man or…woman or whatever you pretend to be.. MM i am learning so much. i hope you will consider me as your understudy. how do you nail those points so well. wow, i am in awe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_4fTs5cIqk
I used to have a “Pope on a Rope” for my shower.
Pox Rox has finally found a penny loafer to worship. Too fucking funny!
Anyone who defends the monolithic belief systems presently in place, who all have no idea what they are in fact worshipping is a deceitful theology. One based on a pagan solar diety system, that was hijacked to serve a new group of rulers .
Would be laughable if it wasn’t so pathetic. If you could only find the time to read other books besides the
B ig
I mbecillic
B ook of
L ies &
E mbellishments.
You just might learn some actual truths !
FYI the ancients look up into the night sky & called what they could see the Heavens ….. That word heaven ring a bell ?
——–
and now both posters resort to obscenities and filth
——–
Yes, *finally* we have “resorted to obscenities and filth”.
You have driven us to the point where we have finally, at last begun to use obscenities and filth.
Unlike you, who has NEVER used dirty talk.
Lols
Next strategy, #1 Woggie.
🙂
P
Great post, More!
Nag Bag ran out of steam a long time ago, Paulie, she simply flails, spits and farts in futility when she can’t best an exchange. As for MM, I can’t think of a more tedious exercise than reading his plumped up posts. I’d rather make Virgin Mary statues out of earwax.
the bible says that when you try to witness the gospel of jesus and they receive you not you are to shake the dust from your feet and move on. why cast your pearls before the swine. the lord never wanted to be the topic of fighting; he is love. so i think i’ve said enough to clarify my position. you 2 can fight on if you want. youre both outta gas and you know it. the battle belongs to the lord.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/if-i-hadn…
Lols
People like you use Jesus to troll and to try and piss people off.
The problem with that is, I know plenty Christians who are great people and their faith is a part of the wonderful life they live.
You’re just a troll, so you think we hate all Christians.
It’s just you, dear hypocrit.
P
The Bible says – the Bible says – the Bible says – is that all you can parrot, Wad Snog? So take said Bullshit Bible and shove it up your thready nostril, you cotton-socked twit. Thank fuck all Christians aren’t like you – your Christ must hang his head in shame knowing the likes of you represent him.
“I’ve done everything the bible says. Even the stuff that contradicts the other stuff” – Ned Flanders
Brilliant, Ivanski! Nothing like a good ol’ Flanders quote with the morning cup of joe.
Ivan Sonofabitch -ned flanders quote
For the first time ever, I wished I could do a dozen or more likes on something that’s been posted to this site .
Thanks for the morning laugh –
My pleasure TT & Mr. More. Although our resident Professor Emeritus disdains any and all elements of “pop culture” , there are few issues in the world that cannot be made better with a Simpson’s quote. >: )
This was on SNL last weekend – fucking hilarious – I’m sure Wig Leg would love it!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/artic…
THE SECULAR CRUSADE (IV)
Good morning woggie. You mustn’t worry (02/17, 6:34PM) about the “obscenities and filth” of the Secularist Crusaders. They can respond only at the level first of ridicule, then of contempt and then, as we have seen, at the level of verbal violence, i.e. that “obscenity and filth.” I suggest rather that you extend your Christian compassion. Emphasize that while you do not love the sin, you continue to love the sinner.
The reason for that verbal violence is, of course, obvious. Since the Crusaders are unable either imaginatively or even intellectually engage the issue at hand, i.e., what I have called “The Secular Crusade”, such violence is sadly their only recourse. However, reading over a few of the comments since my last post, I think that the meaning of The Secular Crusade needs repeating since the comments are not directed at the issue. I am not against secularism since, as I have previously noted, I am a secularist myself. What I am against is the “Crusade,” the dogmatic and violent crushing of all dissenters from the Secularist Orthodoxy. In other words, the Secularist Orthodoxy is just the flip side of the religious Inquisition following the Reformation. It flows from the same bitter wellsprings of hatred and violence. But what, exactly, is that Secularist Orthodoxy? In a word, it is the denial of “Transcendence.” But what is Transcendence?
Transcendence is that dimension of human life which goes beyond the everyday and which bestows meaning upon it. It is that which “carries us away” to a higher level of meaning in which we come to indwell, a level in which we “come home” and are truly alive. Usually it takes the form of Art however conceived but it is not so limited. Indeed, it can come in many forms of which your religious transcendence is only one. For example, Paul’s transcendence is his music; Ivan’s transcendence is his Wehrmacht; mine is philosophy, and yours is religion but, lacking the element of hate, it is not a dogmatic religion aimed at purging other belief forms. It is not a narrow Religious Orthodoxy giving rise to a Crusade as in the past. It is important to understand what I am talking about when I speak of “The Secular Crusade”. Otherwise, the comments miss the mark and are rendered irrelevant. So, to the RSVPs.
: TTFN (6:34PM)
No TTFN, this is not one troll on top of another. This is not just an intellectual diversion. I mean what I say because – wait for it – I think the issue is one of fundamental importance. The Crusaders have usurped the position of the old Religious Inquisitors. I’m sure woggie is genuine as well but, even if she doesn’t even exist, the issue would still be valid. It seems that your skepticism is so ingrained that are unable to recognize another’s honest assertions. Moreover, the puzzle is that if you don’t read my “epistles” because, as you so eloquently put it, you “don’t give a fuck,” then why are we deluged by the avalanche of your comments? One could only imagine the tsunami if you “did give a fuck.”
: P/ (5:24PM)
Why bother replying? No content, no substance, no nothing.
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch (6:58PM)
I don’t respond to (idiotic) attachments.
: TTFN (8:20PM)
See P/ above.
: More (10:35PM)
See my introductory clarification of “The Secular Crusade” above. It was intended for people like you. After you have understood the issue, try to make your comments relevant. However, I want you to know that if you are unable to understand the issue, I will understand. I will understabnd your inability to understand. I hope you will understand that.
: P/ (02/18, 12:08AM)
Do you see it woggie? Do you realize that it is all your fault, that you have driven the Secularist Crusaders beyond the point of endurance which, of course, legitimizes their use of obscenities and filth.? By ironic coincidence, I’m now at the point in Hitler’s biography where he launched his unprovoked attack on Poland. What was his excuse? Polish “provocations,” according to Hitler, had driven him beyond endurance. Armed invasion was the only possible reply. You have provoked the Radical Secularists, woggie. “Obscenities and filth” is their only possible reply.
And so on an so on.
Have a good lunch, woggie. We’ll drop by this afternoon to see if the quality of the comments has improved but something tells me it is not to be. But keep the hair brush handy.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Whose biography of Hitler are you reading, Professor?
Have you have your daily orgasm yet, MM? Sounds like you’re getting ready for it and Wag Bag is bent over. Have fun this afternoon anticipating the activities of this board – and don’t get those nice brown brogues spattered with MM jizz.
ttfn apparently with your mean testy post you definitely did not have yours. o yeah i forgot your hormones are shot by your own admission in a past post. wait a minute that explains a lot of your miserable life. lack a nookie. you should really take care of that tt, it is hurting both yourself and us. mm thank you once again for putting some sense to these posters ramblings. it helps. a lot.
You know fuck all about my life, Pig Wig but I can tell you one thing – I’m a very happy camper with a loving husband of 30 years, wonderful daughter, a beautiful house, a great job and good friends. Say what you want all you want, Stig Fig, I know the truth and it ain’t the reflections of some bitter old wool sock who doesn’t even know what I look like. Bahawhawhawhawhawhawhaw!!!!!
Lols
Nice one, Dennis!
(you do realize that #1Woggers has *no idea* what you’re saying, right?)
P
As far as sex goes, better with someone I adore than your battery operated turbo-crucifix, sweetcakes. Maybe, Cog Log, you need a ‘double-header’ to fill that vacuous cavern between your thighs.
ttfn sorry if i struck a nerve and apparently i did just that. i was thinking of some of your past posts and remembered a few tidbits that might help you out. first and foremost stop stuffing hub tub with those friggen cookies. yes there is a sugar high i can see your point there however women of a certain age, hmm,,hmm,, cannot possibly get in the mood during that small window of opportunity before his blood sugar plummets. the brief sugar high is immediately followed by the drop in blood sugar. at that point honey he is totally useless to you and himself. notice how he slumps in that lazyboy and cant even find the remote control let alone the things pertinent to our conversation. i cant be vulgar but u know what i mean. number 2 – STARVE EM OUT for a week or so that always works, but maybe not in yiour case but worth a try. number 3 – if he finds your vulgar mouth has made you unattractive in his eyes there is always the brown paper bag you can haul down over your head. well, thats about all i can suggest for now but mm can supply the medical documentation to this to substantiate my advice, if you will mm. perhaps he might even be able to offer you some other tips. his knowledge is vast but i am not so sure he would be kind enough to do that after the way you used such obscecities towards him. what say you, mm.
MM is a twit and you’re a twat – it’s quite simply, really. Have fun imagining my ‘horrible’ life, Plod Wad. You following MM just shows what a weak-willed, silly woman you really are. Will you now make him your Lord and Master? Should we expect ‘Fifty Shades of Sycophant Shit’? Do you even know what ‘sycophant’ means, Keg Leg?
no comment huh. no surprise there. back to the boring name calling when you have been hit between the eyes with the truth AGAIN. baaarrrmppp…. out of gas…. AGAIN. mm i think i am a pretty quick study with your help of course. I am getting a lot better and quicker at diagnosing the problem and supplying the solution. TTFN DIAGNOSIS; long term boring marriage with low to non existemt hormone level. hub unit suffering from blood sugar fluctuations mostly self-induced. due to this and apathy on both paties, sex is now non-existent. what an empty boring sad life. no wonder you are so bitter. that’s just not fair. period.
Notice the strategy, TTFN?
Little bit of personal info and she thinks she’ll try and use it.
You can tell how hard she’s trying in this case by the length of her post and how much effort she put into this troll attempt.
Lols
P
piss paul don’t try to sugar coat ttfns problem. she knows i hit it on the head. she also knows the cure. but some people choose to stick their head in the sand and live in denial by saying how great their life is. the only problem there is it comes out in other ways like verbal aggression and bitterness. but hey piss paul you above anyone else already knows that from personal experience right. misery loves company right paul and ttfn.
The truth is, Sag Wag, you’ve got the hots for ol’ TT – you’re a wine-swilling clam bumper, dearie, it’s SO OBVIOUS! You’re probably creaming yourself every time you think of me.
You want me, Crag Bag, you know you do. I’m every sock puppet’s dream girl. Unfortunately, I’m straight, Skag Nag, so you don’t stand a fart of a chance. But I’ll betcha you can dream, can’t you? You’ll be dreaming of me all night long, I’ll wager.
dream on tt. i know that when you feel sexually undesirable especially by a man you’ve invested 30 years into coming onto anyone, even women can seem to ease the hurt. sadly for you i don’t roll that way. sorry to disappoint you. wow you’re just batting 100 today in the rejection department arent you. nothing personal tt. i’m straight sorry. but thanks for the interest you’ve shown anyhow.
Oh, Log Bog, you know you want me. Don’t try to deflect from the ‘real’ issue here. You’re just itching for ol’ TT and you know it. I can hear your clam sweat pouring on the floor in excitement.
Now, go find yourself a fire hyrant to impale yourself on, dearie, you sound soooo frustrated – bahawhawhawhaw!!!!
Poor ol’ Fig Pig – boo-hoo-fucking-hoo, no TT for you.
THE SECULAR CRUSADE V)
Good afternoon woggie.
I’ve taken note of your excellent replies (12:19PM, 12:51PM, and 1:24PM), particularly to TTFN whose problem, at least as far as I can determine, is not so much “lack a nookie” or “fluctuations in the blood sugar levels” of her husband” but something much deeper. However, I will not go the RSVP route this afternoon because your replies have met her head-on at the level at which she operates and also, of course, I because would prefer to avoid the tedium of responding to each of her empty, banal comments.
TTFN is a classic case of the obsessive, narcissistic, psychopathic personality. It is the only possible explanation for the unending stream of her vacuous comments. For she is, on the one hand, devoid of any coherent ideas. She is clearly unable to engage the issue – that of “The Secular Crusade” – since any theoretical topic is beyond her ability since she is a completely self-absorbed narcissist. She does best, unsuprisingly, at the level of obsessive and vicious personal vendetta and insult. Her obsession springs, as is so often the case with personality disorders of her sort, from confusing what she takes to be her profound “wisdom” with what is in fact little more than a thorough-going bitter cynicism in respect to everything and everybody with which or with whom she disagrees. She is unable to distinguish her “wisdom” from her cynicism. This is not uncommon among psychopaths of this sort who continuously engage in her sort delusional behaviour. Of course, she will read this and attempt to turn my comments against me because, lacking any intellectual resources of her own, that is all she can do. Watch this space.
In a previous comment I made reference to Hitler who was the champion obsessive, narcissistic psychopathic personality of all time. His bouts of furious psychopathy involved reactions to what he perceived as threats to his “prestige” which, in turn, derived not so much from any real achievements – except if you want to call World War II an “achievement” – but rather from his profoundly self-absorbed, egocentric narcissism. His egocentric narcissism was off the scale. Now clearly, TTFN is not in the same league but the psychopathic personality type is of the same broad generic sort.
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch (10:18AM)
It is the second volume of Ian Kershaw’s “Hitler 1936-1945: Nemesis.” I recall mentioning that I had read Kershaw in a post to you some time ago but the reference was to his “The Hitler Myth: Image and Reality in the Thjird Reich.” One never ceases to be amazed, to say nothing of frightened, that a psychopath like that could rise to absolute power in a country of such magnificent artistic achievement, but there you go.
: P/ (1:51PM)
Perhaps you should try putting a little more effort into your posts rather than being locked into your mindset of trolls who are maliciously loose in the land.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Lols
She’s definitely fixated on you, TTFN.
P
For sure, darlin’ Paul, it must be my winning smile.
MM, you voided your creds by twin-trolling with a sock puppet. Major fail for the ‘great’ intellectual, like that is worth anything to the masses. Then when I see para upon para of text on my good self, I can only think – how sad a man in his twilight years with so much education spends his time trolling around a bitch message board when he could be doing something much more productive. As for me, I don’t know any better – BAHAWHAWHAWHAW!!!
Forget anything about religion, not looking within ones’ self, or certain forms of politics or ideology being the problem.
The problem is, and always has been with, “success” driven people. The attitude that one MUST be “successful”, taught by certain parents through the ages, and THAT attitude towards upbringing happens to be related in narcissistic cycles. People can’t just let things be, and go to the river to catch fish and live. Someone has taken something away from them, or there is a problem that has to be addressed with a whole new complex more “successful” system.
Soon there won’t be any nature to return to and survive.
Here’s a theory – MM is Wag Slag, picking up the persona that had been disposed of by another poster and having a big ol’ Goofy guffaw at the poor stupid underclass.
Check. Mate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_x8l2Xh7BC…
p
MMs new persona – in honour of his new apostle (possibly on his right fist):
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1fZejnsZfpI/TdKP…
tt so now i’m mm. ok what happened to me being gary. stop grasping at straws you are looking really pityful. the rest of the posters finaslly got the picture that we are separate people all except you. why are some people always the last to know. piss paul that cat was the first funny thing you ever posted. nice morning chuckle,
I dunno TTFN. ED the Sock was the only journalist in this country with an ounce of integrity.
Linking him to out two favorite Schmoos seems a bit disrespectful >; )
I loved the tribute song Blink 182 sang for him.
“Don’t waste your time on me, you’re already the voice inside myyyyyEd.”
Actually, Log Rot, I really don’t give a sweet shit who you are. As far as I know, you might be a steaming coil of dog turd with the ability to articulate. Maybe I’ll start calling you Dog Log. Seems like a perfect fit to me.
I’m sure your buddy, MM, will be along any second to defend your honour since you obviously can’t fight your own battles.
I don’t care who Dog Log is either. I know *what* Dog Log is though.
Bitter old crone.
Poor old Dog Log.
p
ttfn yeah you do. you care. but y oh y are u always the last to know…
THE SECULAR CRUSADE (VI)
Good morning woggie.
I’m glad to see that you haven’t been intimidated by TTFN’s vindictive slurs and insults. Your question, “Why are some people always the last to know?”hits the nail on the head and confirms my previous diagnosis (02/18, 4:45PM) to the effect that she has a profound obsessive, narcissistic, psychopathic personality disorder. Note that she has posted four additional slanders since that time. Sadly, she has the exact personality profile suited to a site like Bitch. Her personality profile and the concept of continual bitching are a perfect match. Like a perfectly fitting glove, they cohere without remainder. In the present context, she is the perfect embodiment of the “Secular Crusader”.
But woggie, it is pointless to continue to engage with someone who is clearly mentally ill. Although I haven’t yet read it, I note that there is a current bitch to the effect that no one should make fun of those with “personal issues.” While my diagnosis of her personality disorder was never meant as “making fun,” I intend to follow what I assume its advice will be and to end all further communication with her.
By pure coincidence in this morning’s Gazette an article entitled “Study finds we can benefit by giving silent treatment,” Misty Harris writes that while the silent treatment is almost universally acknowledged as negative but, “Turns out, when somebody is so obnoxious that it’s exhausting just to talk to them, cutting conversational ties is actually a positive mental health strategy – one that allows people to save their cognitive capital for more fruitful activities.”
Take Misty’s advice woggie, like I am going to do, and cut those conversational ties. Let’s save our cognitive capital for more fruitful activities. We both realize, of course, that she will see this as a resounding victory but let it pass. We both know that her preening and posturing will be little more than a manifestation of her illness.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
The old mental illness ploy – oh, how very lame of you, MM – you have nothing of substance in your argument so you pull out the ol’ ‘obsessive, narcissistic, psychopathic personality disorder’ schtick. I think you’ve actually described yourself very nicely.
mm thank you. i totally agree. such postings from her are mentally unbalanced and i guess that is why when you think she is finally hitting on something constructive she reverts back to the only thing she knows, bitterness and slandering. i think your diagnosis is once again most accurate. i, like you, have better things to concentrate my energies on. have a great day mm.
Montreal Mumbler wrote …mumble….mumble….mumble, mumble.
What a stellar conversationalist you are . Must be an awful burden, going through life attempting to put forward yer some philisophical wonder, & finding so many that rank those mumbles you attempt, to nothing more enlightning than those offered up by a Tourrettes Syndrome patient.
Please respond, not that I’ll read yer crap, but the mumbling will prove my point.
This is awesome, just awesome. I’m also starting to want Woggers more than I should, only because I like sloppy seconds and montrealmans gotta be a dirty bastard.
So, let’s see… what did I miss?
holy shit.
The inmates are now in charge….
‘Take Misty’s advice woggie, like I am going to do, and cut those conversational ties. Let’s save our cognitive capital for more fruitful activities’ – well, well, MM finally took MY advice in a previous post:
‘Then when I see para upon para of text on my good self, I can only think – how sad a man in his twilight years with so much education spends his time trolling around a bitch message board when he could be doing something much more productive.’ You take instruction very well, MM.
Massive fail for you, Cranium Boy.
THE SECULAR CRUSADE (VII)
Good afternoon again, woggie.
Yes, you are absolutely right (10:14AM) about being disappointed when you thought that the crone had hit upon something constructive but soon reverts to the only thing she knows, bitterness and slandering. But did you notice that she did (10:13AM; 10:58AM & 12:58PM) precisely what I predicted she would at the end of my last post? It seems that she is not only a cynic but a stupid, predictable cynic as well.
Speaking of stupidity, did you notice More’s laughable post? He talks about “Montreal Mumbler” but how can he detect mumbling in a printed message? One is written and the other is sound. What a simpleton! As with so much else (see my previous reply to him on this thread) he doesn’t understand this. The only mumbling the simpleton can hear is the sound trickling through the fog of his own stupidity.
I too was also disappointed, woggie as I had previously thought Sonic (11:24AM) showed some signs of incipient intelligence but look at his debased sense of “humour.” But, woggie, we must always go with our initial impression and my initial impression of Sonic, it appears after all, was on the money.
I was, of course, not disappointed in The Dribbler (11:45AM) who I’m thinking of re-naming “Benny” because, well, because it suits him. He’s the one who keeps on gives me a “Dislike” regardless of what I write since, being without intellectual resources, he is unable to do otherwise. Benny didn’t disappoint me, woggie. He was a noob then and he’s a noob now.
And so it goes, woggie, and so it goes. You have a great day too!
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
RSVP:
montrealman (02/19, 04:19 PM)
My debased sense of humour was merely an attempt at that type of writing. Much like your repeated attempts at writing pornography. My incipient intelligence remains intact, quite like your own at this point. You also really don’t need to fabricate a “first impression” of me to satisfy yourself and Woggers, you are still impressed by me.
Next, and lastly, More had mentioned your mumbling similarly to your assumption that I move my lips when I read. How can one detect either accusation from a printed message?
Screaming Fields of Sonic Love
Jesus must be rolling in his grave after this bitch.
Actually, Jesus is spread-eagle over a huge boulder with a bottle of Irish whiskey hung loosely from his fingers.
So, soon to be Pope Emeticus, Joey “Ratso” Ratzinger opines, in his last official address, that “sometimes it seemed as if the Lord was sleeping” on his watch.
That seems a bit harsh.
Lets just say that He was turning a blind eye. Surely the church hierarchy are comfortable with that concept.
This seems appropriate to this thread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cvKcMbzN_…
ooo, thanks agent 195, i’m gonna play that at the shop…really loud, until we have customers. then maybe some french calypso or nina hagen