So what, you dislike someone that genuinely deserves your scorn.. until you find out they belong to a ‘protected demographic’, that is.
I’m here to tell you right now. I don’t give a sweet flying fuck with a friday night whore if you’re male, female, gay, straight, black, white or anything else that could possibly occur on the earth. If you suck, you fucking suck. Full stop. Your gender, ethnicity, religion, lack of religion or sexual orientation do not make you somehow impervious to sucking.
See? Because unlike the rest of you around this retard city, I ACTUALLY don’t discriminate. I don’t hate OR like people because of their unchangeable traits and I certainly don’t make excuses for them because of their unchangeable traits either. How fucking offensive is it to these “protected groups” if you give them a pass on sucking because YOU are uncomfortable treating them like regular human beings? Because that’s what you’re doing.
If you suck, bitch… you suck.
—no excuse for sucking
This article appears in Feb 13-19, 2014.
Finally someone recognizes one of my many talents….sucking on boobies.
Op is right, we can’t discriminate against sucking boobies…. or was it klyde who said that… or a meld of both… i saw suck and boobies and i got side tracked….
Boobies? Did someone say boobies?
A GRAMMATICAL OR SUBSTANTIVE SOLECISM?
“The only criteria of sucking is to SUCK”
Excuse me but, at least at first glance, that should read, “The only criterion of sucking is to SUCK.” You see, “criterion” is the singular form of the noun “criteria” which is normally found in the plural since there is usually more than just one reason in terms of which a thing such as sucking is judged.
In the present case one can clearly see there IS only one reason in terms of which sucking is judged, that thing being something other than “unchangeable traits” such as race, sexual orientation and so on. The fact that this is the case reinforces the claim that the singular form – “criterion” – is grammatically correct and to use “criteria” is a solecism, a glaring grammatical mistake.
However, and this is important, the question turns on what is to be understood by “changeable traits,” those qualities in terms of which sucking is to be assessed. Are such changeable traits homogeneous, all being of one sort, or are they heterogeneous, being of radically distinct kinds? In other words, it all comes down to just how sucking is to be conceptualized.
If these changeable traits are homogenous then, of course, “criterion” is the proper form and “criteria” is therefore both a grammatical and substantive solecism. But if those changeable traits are heterogeneous, are individually distinct, then it would seem that the usage “criteria” is not misplaced. Indeed, depending on the degree of heterogeneity, “criterion” may well be a solecism, a glaring substantive mistake. I hope this has cleared this matter up.
New Avatar Alert: Wartime Star Weeklies (6)
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I really don’t like hearing people suck their teeth after eating.
I think your thug music sucks, Punk….
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-XoJQWgIbL90/UiFo…
I like the cut of OB’s jib.
http://i.huffpost.com/gen/1357969/thumbs/o…
Once again MM, the Star Weekly fails in the accuracy department. The jumper pictured in no way resembles a soldier of 1 Can. Para, who were equipped with British uniform and equipment, including a rimless helmet covered in scrim for the attachment of camouflage and camouflaged Denison Smock jump jacket adorned with the Canadian pattern jump wings:
http://data2.archives.ca/ap/a/a191135-v6.j….
The magazine cover was probably taken from a photograph of an American paratrooper, since, in addition to his distinctive uniform and helmet, he is jumping with a reserve chute – something that the British and Canadians didn’t bother with.
A BLAMELESS FAILURE
RSVP
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch – 95th. Rifles (02/17, 2:48PM)
Excellent points Ivan but the Star Weekly cannot be charged with a failure of accuracy in respect to the uniform of the 1st. Canadian Parachute Battalion. In its usual fashion it provided no comment on its cover which lets them off the hook.
In order to say something coherent I had to check out Wikipedia for some information on “Canadian Paratroopers in World War II.” This is did and the results appear in the commentary accompanying my avatar. But since Wikipedia made no reference to the uniform of the 1st. Canadian Parachute Battalion, they cannot be charged either.
As you can see I was caught somewhere in the middle. There was no way to turn, no access to the truth. As a result, it appears that I cannot be charged with a failure in the accuracy department either.
So what we have here is a blameless failure. I think we might be approaching the theological level on this one but I don’t want to be charged with a failure in that department either.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I forgot to add a bit of trivia that indirectly connect to you, MM. The first Canadian soldiers to receive airborne training were a small unit of volunteers sent to Fort Benning, GA under the command of a Major Hilton Proctor, Royal Canadian Corps of Signals. Prior to the outbreak of WW 2, he had been an engineer with Bell Canada in Montreal. In fact, he played a role in setting up Montreal’s phone system. Sadly, he a was killed on his very first jump when his parachute was collapsed by the propwash of another C-47 Skytrain, which was the military designation for the civilian Douglas DC-3 – the standard transport used to carry Allied paratroopers. British and Canadian servicemen referred to this redoubtable aircraft as the Dakota, and they served in various capacities in the R.C.A.F. until the early 80’s. Me Old Dad’s first jump was from a “Dak” sometime in the early 50’s. He, like Major Proctor was also R.C. Sigs.
RSVP
: Col. Ivan Sonofabitch – 95th. Rifles (02/17, 3:50PM)
Yes, well it’s too bad Major Hilton Proctor (are you sure he wasn’t in the Medical Corps?) wasn’t still at Bell as I’ve been having s spot of bother with their internet service. I have a “diary” of six visits made by Bell technicians to “fix” that little red internet light on my modem. It seems to be okay now but I felt like performing a little forceful proctology on each one of them.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Hey Mm. Fuck off about your new avatar war time star. No body gives a shit about your avatar.
HAHAHA! Guys and their booby-sucking! One of the reasons I like straight guys…
Great Value, I want you to kiss my ass, you shit-eating cretin. Why don’t YOU just fuck off?
Hey GV , just don’t bother wasting your time reading his posts…. a brief cursory scan is all most of them ever get from me & often they don’t even get that.
Hell if you haven’t realized by now he’s a narcissistic personality with delusions of grandeur, yer’ missing the point that this insane condition screams out from all of his posts.
And FYI , ‘fuck off’ is a term of endearment in the grip dept, so using that to try & insult me just makes me think your fond of me ~:D
Maybe insult my mother , or something
good day folks & please all of you … go fuck yer’selves
More, you smelly little man, where did you learn that wonderfully original expression, “a narcissistic personality with delusions of grandeur?” I’m sure people don’t speak that way in your smelly little shack in the woods.
Hmmmm good Bitch!.