[Image-1]
Ugghhh… I am so SICK of this whole “babies having babies” syndrome. Seriously, girls, we are supposed to be the most progressive country in the world, but you make Bristol Plain and Jamie Lynn Spears look like “Mom of the Year”. You can’t even raise yourselves, how the hell are you going to raise a kid(sssss) on your own? Did you learn ANYTHING in Sex-Ed before you dropped out? And of course, Daddy is NO WHERE in sight (five will get you ten he’s got a tattoo across his throat). Get some birth control… Get your GED… Get a clue… Get your shit together. —Jer-REE! Jer-REE! Jer-REE!
This article appears in Oct 23-29, 2014.
And one comment I overheard some girl say “I don’t have to worry about raising the baby by myself, my Mom & Dad will help.” Words fail me…..
These prosti-tots believe the boy loves them. Oh yes, how many of these boys are around after the baby arrives? Not to blame sex-ed in schools, or lack of it, but the lessons of life ought to be taught at home. Parents have a responsibility to teach their sons and daughters about life. Real life. Many send their child to school with the expectation the schools will teach their children. Teaching begins at home. Turn off the TV that you use as a babysitter for your child while you surf FB. Every child has homework. Reviewing lessons with your child each night is a requirement not a task that can be neglected because they tell you they have no homework.
And your governments’ in waiting are promising subsidized day care. Words fail me also. “Parents” want to have children and tuck them away like puppies during the day while they carry on with their career. I will reserve any judgement on this method of rearing (including animals) … but now these self same baby mills are demanding subsidization so they can get back into the work force to support their unplanned/planned spawn.
Where is my subsidization to go to work? This is worse than affirmative action in the work place; now we are going to subsidize people too stupid to manage their own bodies.
WHAT IS SEX ED?
“Did you learn ANYTHING in Sex-Ed before you dropped out?” Jer-REE! Jer-REE! Jer-REE
Where education necessarily involves the cultivation of critical thinking in a subject domain having sufficient interpretive depth to bear the weight of such critical thinking, how can “Sex-Ed” be properly conceived as education at all? Presumably the content of Sex-Ed involves the judicious use of contraceptives – one thinks of the condom drawn carefully over the banana – and so is more properly called “training” than education, something like Drivers-Ed with genitals. But unlike Drivers-Ed which has no further subject domain, Sex-Ed is only a part of the much larger subject domain of principled moral behaviour. In other words, Sex-Ed, to be education properly conceived, must be incorporated into the domain of Moral Philosophy. It is a further question of course whether a critical understanding of the principles of Moral Philosophy acquired in the classroom will issue out into reflectively moderated sexual behaviour.
A pleasure as always,
Cheerio!
(Avatar #59: A $10 Bank of Nova Scotia Note)
Each kid rings up $$$ with welfare. If you expel enough critters, you don’t have to do anything other than sit around, drink beer, smoke cigarettes between hits of crack and maybe slap around a kid or two. That’s the reality I’ve seen with too many young welfare mothers.
The preteen uterus has become a Weapon of Mass Destruction, or, at the very least a cocked Blunderbuss aimed at the public purse.
“Dennis Moore, Dennis Moore – I don’t know this bit….”
Mandatory birth control would solve this problem starting at age 13. I can’t wait for that reversible needle that makes a guy sterile until he takes the counterdrug. So much better than the pill i’ll be getting it immediately
I had the extreme displeasure a while back of overhearing a conversation between two young “gentlemen”. One was informing the other that so-and-so was not his girlfriend but simply his “baby mamma” and that another more fortunate gal was, indeed, his girlfriend.
I feel most sorry for the children who are the progeny of such ne’er do wells. To paraphrase Karl of the movie Sling Blade, “Poor little feller, never had a chance.” On a lighter note, here’s a South Park parody of that scene from Sling Blade:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsbLGbbfR14
Aww jealous cause your still a virgin?
OB sounds like a divorced sad sack who be lookin at seurious child support payments n prolly mommy-issues. Mandatory birth control is getting into nazi/genocide territory. Start letting da guberment legislate our bodies as Brandon Wilcox suggests and mandatory sterilization won’t be far behind. Maybe you’d have a different opinion on the matter if your nuts were in jeopardy of gettin lopped off. Why is it always the woman’s responsibility? You had one job to do, put a rubber on your chubber. If you can’t do dat, pay up bitch!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAfw0IE2DV8
It’s the dame’s responsibility because she’s was the one who got the free dinner and drinks. Or, if in Highfield, she took a hit off the dude’s pipe. She’s the one who gets fat. She’s the one who craps out the future young offender. She’s the one who has to answer to Child Protective Services. She’s the one who cries to CBC at the sentencing about how the cops set up her devilspawn, how society failed him and how “snitches gits stitches” while glaring at the family of the victim.
And you call yourself a fymynyst. Ivan shakes head sadly*
Bet you can’t even put up your own toilet seat.
Mo’fool – “Dafux a turlet seat?”
“…education necessarily involves the cultivation of critical thinking …” – Is that why you gave up teching for Philosophy?
Oh my fucking god. I reaffirm the commenting ilk in the shit rag are total assholes. Judgemental and ignorant. Some young women have had children as a teenager and are not fucking crack addicts on welfare. The comments here and on other posts is a cross section of the frankly stupid, arrogant and cowardly culture of this sucky city. Why don’t you folks epose yourselves to the same critisizim? Because as I’ve pointed out YOURE COWARDS and posting troll comments in the coast (again shit in print) and you do it because you’re bitter motherfuckers with dried up bitter hearts. I hate halifax and I hate the people living here.
Jian?
DO I DETECT A SELF-REFUTING PROPOSITION (OR TWO) HERE?
: DickKicker (10/31, 7:12AM)
“The comments here and on other posts is (sic) a cross section of the frankly stupid. arrogant and cowardly of this sucky city. Why don’t you folks epose (sic) yourselves to the same critisizm (sic)? Because as I’ve pointed out YOURE (sic) COWARDS and posting troll comments in the coast (sic) (again shit in print) and you do it because you’re bitter motherfuckers with dried up (sic) bitter hearts.”
While waiting for a new Bitch to be posted (in order to post my latest avatar) I thought it might be an idea to apply a litte critical thinking to Dick’s comment, specifically that involving the self-refuting propsition. So what is a self-refuting proposition?
A self-refuting proposition involves one asserting the very thing which one claims, as in the present case, is stupid, arrogant and cowardly. So by posting a comment here Dick is condemned to stupidity, arrogance and cowardice. As the old saying goes, Dick “has hoisted himself on his own petard.” Get it?
Further, Dick claims that those who never expose themselves to the same criticism as they dish out to others are COWARDS who post troll comments on The Coast which, in any case, is shit in print. But clearly, Dick has not exposed himself to the same criticism he heaps on others. In other words, Dick’s trolling comment on The Coast which he claims is “shit in print” in any case is of necessity itself COWARDLY and so condemns him to stupidity and arrogance. The consequence is that Dick is a bitter motherfucker with a dried-up bitter heart. Get it?
Dick will never get this since he is cowardly and arrogant but most importantly because he is STUPID. He doesn’t know this of course since that is what it MEANS to be stupid.
Time to get those new bitches up.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Just putting it out there, but DickKicker has a good point.
I mean we even blame people for getting their cars broken into on here, lol. However the internet provides us with an outlet to be the inner assholes we truly are. How many of us would talk to someone in the same way we post an anonymous comment?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Spelling it with a “K’ might confuse the moderator and delay the inevitable purge. Love your grasp of irony. Really, top drawer. Keep it up.
I saw a book once. And sorry but you’re mistaken. All the Trolls have been banned. Right TT and GDM?
Refurbed Lappy? Little do you know how much of an Apple fanboy I am.
For the most part I have agreed with the new change in moderation on this site. However banning and deleting all activity from the poster formerly known as Mr K. Hammer strikes me as extremely double sided and sexist. If one sex can have their genitals kicked why can the other sex not have their genitals hammered?
If I do not receive clarification from the moderator I will not, WILL NOT, take a temper tantrum and claim to be leaving this site while calling the moderator numerous childish names. I will merely attribute it to reverse discrimination and my opinion of the Moderator will be changed….. for whatever thats worth, lol.
Exactly so, Nukka. Every once in a while I like to hold a hammer out at arms length and let go of it, knowing that it will fall but still revelling in the beauty of science and nature’s laws.
So it is with progressives. One cannot help but be impressed at the consistency of their hypocrisy and double standards. There is a marvellous symmetry at work in such predictability. It should be appreciated for what it proves. To be angered by it, is to take personal offence at the turning of the Earth.
Conde naste ^
Haha, well put.
Just to let you know I take what you write and work it into my daily conversations to look smart. Conde naste…. googled it!
I also think I may have to end my relationship with one of the mods over this.
MY INCREDIBLE AVATARS
Well, no new bitches today so it appears that I’ll have to wait until tomorrow to post another of my incredible avatar photos together with their literate, thoughtful and frequently humorous descriptions. You see, I’ve resolved to post my incredible avatars only on the occasion of a new bitch rather than in the course of an extended bitcherly and often boring dialogue such as we have at the moment. I can give you a hint though. It’s a knockout tour of Europe, but I’ll say no more.
I must say that my deft unveiling of the self-refuting proposition appears to have brought Dick low as not a peep has been heard from him since. No doubt he has finally grasped the force of my intellect and has wisely declined to engage it in public debate. Oh hum.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
montrealman,
I suspect that Master DickKicker (assuming the male gender) has retired to his regular table at the back of Tim’s to scratch his head in wonder at your witty post while sipping on a large double double and using his other hand to scratch a few lottey tickets.
^That, and her (yes, assuming the female gender because of the lust for kicking dicks) comments have been deleted for mentioning female genitalia in conjunction with a hammer.
Did I hear my name mentioned?
Heh-heh-heh. You aren’t anyone if you aren’t banned from LTWWB at least once.
I’ve earned my cojones.
I would like to point out, its not ‘reverse’ discrimination on the ‘hammer genitalia ‘ comment verses’ kicked dick’ …just plain ole every day discrimination like we see constantly be it black , brown ,gender, ginger, religious, white etc etc etc.
RSVPS
: ZippyZigZag (10/31, 3:14PM)
How can Dick scratch his head in wonder at my witty post, sip on a large double-double, and use his “other” hand to scratch a few lottery tickets? Does he have three hands?
: Nukka (3:27PM)
The reference to a hammer was made by Ivan Sonofabitch (2:11PM) and so your claim that he is not only Dick in drag but is in reality of the female gender is intriguing. Perhaps he might want to re-direct the hammer for use away from using it on female genetalia to male genetalia generally and on to yours in particular. But we must wait and see.
: Tee Tee Fonebone (10:00PM)
As a matter of fact I was wondering what happened to you. Changing your signature from “T.T” to “Tee Tee” was a stroke of genius. However it does make one wonder about the intelligence of cybernetic communication. There is a flat, literal quality about it which renders it incapable of grasping humour, irony and the like. Anyway, the difficulty in commenting on banned bitchers resides in the fact that we (the so-far unbanned) never see the relevant comments. Nukka (10:31, 1:11PM) claimed that both you and GDM were banned and she has not appeared lately either. Normally, since neither of you post virulent comments about other commenters it is unexpected unlike, for example, Waldo (10/28, 7:13AM) for whom, combining both virulence and stupidity as he does, one does expect it.
It appears that in the absence of any new bitches my latest incredible avatar will have to wait to make its appearance. As I previously mentioned (10/31, 2:48PM) it concerns a knock-out tour of Europe but, also as previously mentioned, I can say no more at this time. I feel there is a critical mass of anticipation building up which, not unlike Masters and Johnson’s “plateau stage of sexual excitement,” can only be released by a massive collective orgasm.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Waldo appeared at 10/28, 3:28PM. Sorry.
montrealman,
“How can Dick scratch his head in wonder at my witty post, sip on a large double-double, and use his “other” hand to scratch a few lottery tickets? Does he have three hands?”
I believed that a rational person would infer that Dick was using his non-lotto-scratching hand to alternately sip his beverage and scratch his head since it would be very unusual for someone to scratch their head continuously for more than a few second. However, my presumption of rational thinking might have been irrational on my part.
“When’s Waldo” – you might be on to a new trend, MM.
Copyright that idea, post haste.
“You aren’t anyone if you aren’t banned from LTWWB at least once.”
Shit, Tee Tee, I got banned so many times (in a 24 hour period) that they blocked my IP!
heh heh.
And, naturally, you changed your IP address, right?
As I’m not comfortable with the ‘Tee Tee’ moniker, I will revert to my former ‘TT’ signature without the benefit of periods. ‘Tee Tee’ looks too much like ‘Pee Pee’, ‘Wee Wee’ and the most wretched of words: ‘Tee Hee’. Just can’t do it to myself.
So what’s been going on around this pit anyhow? Wasn’t it a great summer?
RSVPS
: ZippyZigZag (11:01AM)
Not necessarily. Dick may have been using his non-lotto-scratching hand for completely different purposes. Clearly, Dick is one busy boy.
: Ivan Sonofabitch (12:04PM)
Consider it done. How about “Where’s Waldo?” How about “Who cares where Waldo is?”
: The Monstercock (1:32PM)
It might have had something to do with what you were doing with your non-lotto-scratching hand.
: TT Fonebone (2:02PM)
Good thinking there, TT. Another stroke of genius.
I think we have now passed Masters and Johnson’s plateau stage of sexual excitement and are now on the verge of a massive collective orgasm. Unless there’s going to be a large sticky mess, something has to be done, and done soon.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Honestly, MM, I’ve come full circle with this board.
I’m currently engrossed in Judith Fingard’s ‘The Dark Side of Life in Victorian Halifax’, her study on the ‘Underclass’ in Halifax – a word, if I recall, that you used in your first missive to this board.
This study has made me ponder over the migration of the said underclass from Barrack St. and Albermarle St. – where did their descendants disperse to? How much did they assimilate into other classes? Most importantly, how many of these descendants currently have Twitter accounts?
Ah, Halifax history, nothing like a little Victorian Class War to keep the old blood pumping. With the odd Catholic bishop and Protestant temperance movement thrown in.
I’m spent.
apparently some of the underclass were tossed from the ramparts of the Halifax club after pleasuring an esteemed burgher with a dicky heart
Then there was the segment of the ‘underclass’ that prospered quite nicely – former British military personnel turned barkeeps helped keep Barrack Street dancing with liquor ‘n ‘oars. And who were their finest customers? The military, of course. Fascinating study. If you were poor and a repeat criminal offender, you either housed your ass at Rockhead prison or the poor house – for most, it was a better option than sleeping outside. Child abusers were treated to cat ‘o nine tails which I’m starting to think wouldn’t be a bad idea today.
Reportedly, rear Admiral Edward “Big Ears Teddy” Bear enjoyed a good flogging from time to time.
http://fast.swide.com/wp-content/uploads/M…
Ive actually heared from a girl, ” yea, have a baby, get child support and welfare, the laws always favor the women anyways”.
Sooo, thats not femimist, thats not femanazi, what is this fematerrorism? femaselfvictimizing?… im not going to blame the girls, I blame a selfish sickness and loss of family honour in society.
what would have been considered ‘child abuse’ back then TT
RSVPS
GOOD NEWS! AVATAR #63: “THE GRAND TOUR” IS UP!
: TT Fonebone (11/01, 502PM & 7:22PM)
The name Judith Fingard rang a bell. A fast check on my back issues of the “Journal” of the Royal Nova Scotia Historical Society (of which I am a member) showed her as the author of “The Ritchie Sisters and Social Improvement in Early 20th. Century Halifax” (Vol. 13, 2010). Your reference must be her latest – her blurb refers only to her “Protect, Befriend, Respect: Nova Scotia’s Mental Health Movement 1908-2008” (208) and “Mothers of the Municipality: Women, Work and Social Policy in post-1945 Halifax” (2005). You might be interested in joining the Society.
As is so often the case, I anticipate social movements in my comments on this site. You point out that the central question of Fingard’s book was the degree to which members of the Halifax Underclass “currently have Twitter accounts.” I claim that a more sociologically penetrating inquiry might engage the question of how many of the Halifax Underclass currently appear on Bitch. You realize, of course, that the content of your comment immediately raises you out of its ranks. Congratulations!
P.S. Isn’t Barrack Street now Brunswick Street and first known as “Knock-Him-Down Street?” Your reference to the Barrack Street barkeeps rings true. It was claimed that the business of half the poipulation of Halifax was distilling rum while the business of the other half was to drink it.
: Bad dog Molly (5:33PM)
Surely this cannot be the same Halifax Club presently located on Hollis Street which boasts a membership drawn from the Halifax elite. I myself, of course, have never engaged in throwing members of the Halifax Underclass off the ramparts although I must say at times I have been tempted.
GOOD NEWS! AVATAR #63: “THE GRAND TOUR” IS UP!!!
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
My Acadian roots start in New Brunswick, MM, so if there were barkeepers in Cocagne, I’m sure my family was trying to reform the drunkards by poking them in the eyes with a hot metal crucifix.
I have studied Halifax history for a number of decades, through my work and as a personal interest – you and I might have more in common than you think, MM. In fact, I can attest to this but, in the spirit of privacy, won’t post details on this board.
I think you’d find it quite amusing.
‘Child abuse’ in this particular case, BDM, was sexual abuse. Hitting a kid is one thing (and not a good one), but stripping she/he of their innocence is something a cat ‘o nine tails could address. How many of these child porn dandies would cower if they knew they’d be punished in such a way?
I’m shocked the feminazis aren’t here calling everyone sexists and haters for the so-called “slut shaming” going on!
RSVP
: TT Fonebone (11/02, 10:15AM)
Very interesting TT. I’m not sure exactly where Cocagne might be but, in your honour, my next avatar (#64) will feature a very nice note from The Westmorland Bank of New Brunswick which lasted from 1854-1867. Possibly your ancestors, the barkeeper or the evangelist, might have handled it. It is domiciled in “The Bend of the Petticodiac.” Any idea of the current name?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Where is MM’s cocagne?
Alongside the crack in his bum. >: )
Marybore – my guess is the feminazis still haven’t fully processed the attack on Parliament to respond adequately to the attack on wimmin’ going on here.
Hay, if it works for Elizabeth May, why not………….
Cocagne is in Kent County, MM, on the coast of the Northumberland Strait. My ancestor was an interpreter, translator and merchant as well as a former Jesuit. Since he was married three times, it’s hardly likely he was an evangelist. Becoming a barkeeper after three marriages is a distinct possibility.
RSVP
: TT Fonebone (11/02, 4:18PM)
A former Jesuit? I have considerable acquaintance with the Jesuits (“The Society of Jesus”) as my first degree was obtained at St.Mary’s University in Halifax, at that time only for boys and under their complete control. Founded by the Spaniard Ignatius of Loyola, a soldier who on experiencing a vision of God on his gradual recovery from his wounds, vowed to create the Jesuits known also as the “Soldiers of the Pope.” They always wore a Roman collar, a full length black soutane with a wide band at the waist which was often used to support a large crucifix. Recidivism among the Jesuits was largely unknown and so your ancestor must have been a man of powerful, um, urges.
Cocagne appears to have been on the other side of New Brunswick from Moncton but I’m sure you will agree that my avatar came close. (Didn’t you enjoy Ivan’s comment? Wasn’t it profound? The Jesuits would have made short work of him.)
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
(AVATAR #64: THE WESTMORLAND BANK OF NEW BRUNSWICK)
“I have considerable experience with the Jesuits”
Must. Resist. Uncontrollable urge to make another link to MM’s fundament.
Your restraint is more than admirable, Ivanski.
My ancestor had 36 children and his second ex-wife tried to kill him. This former Jesuit was, obviously, a prolific breeder.
Well, at least he made the Dictionary of Canadian Biographies, the randy old rogue.
RSVPS
: Ivan Sonofabitch (11/03, 10:09AM)
My reference to “experience with the Jesuits” was, of course, purely academic rather than carnal. However, as I have previously pointed out, as with your “profound” comment above, they undoubtedly would also have made very short work of your fundament as well were they so inclined which, being disgustingly repellent as it is, they would never have been. Of course, unlike you, I cannot speak with any authority about fundaments, repellent or otherwise. I leave that to you since, clearly buggery has always been uppermost in you thoughts. You old sod.
: TT Fonebone (11:43AM)
36 children? Once again it appears that my comments have anticipated real-world events. Indeed, he must have been a man of powerful, um urges.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!