This is for all the people who come from bad gene pools – please don’t go swimming. For the love of all things ugly you will only make uglier offspring than what your own parents created. Had they realized before they went swimming the outcome of that union I am sure they would have rethought the whole dive into the gene pool disaster and went with oral. Let that shit swim to the bottom of the digestive system and flush it. At least for the sake of all mankind find someone not so close to your own genetic make up. Stop telling yourself ‘well we have so much in common’ that’s because you’re related. Try different postal codes or better yet different province. I know it’s hard to hook up with cute when you’re are so damn ugly but go to a bar where the lights are dim and people (prospects) are drunk. Hook your ugly claws into someone there. I have no idea what your chances are in having offspring that are decent looking regardless of who you breed with but I bet your chances are better if you are not a close cousin. People won’t tell you to your face if your kids are ugly anyway cause most people aren’t that mean to kids and let’s face it some of the really really ugly kids out there, well they are so ugly which is what makes them cute. This of course stops being the case when they grow up and then ugly just becomes ugly again. Vicious cycle really. Remember – if you chose to go swimming in your own pool – wear a lifejacket. If you swim in someone else’s pool – wear a lifejacket. If you forget the lifejacket – let’s hope someone drowns. —Pretty Lifeguard
This article appears in Jul 28 – Aug 3, 2011.
Jesus Tittyfucking Christ!Is it a full moon tonight? It’s not just Norway that has psychopathic assgrapes farting out bullshit manifestos on the interweb. I never thought I’d say this but thank whatever God you believe in for canada’s pussywhipped firearm laws.
Go teabag a luchadore O.P.
Bird – lol @ the tag 😉
Had to google, Ivan
http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/imag…
OB – take a few deep breath, and slow down.
Now, I’d rather be surrounded by fugglies, than asshats with an overinflated sense of self-worth.
I’ll take homely over stupid any day.
Beauty fades, stoopid is forever and ugly frequently keeps panhandlers and Hairless Krishnas from bothering you.
Bird: What Hugo said. >: )
http://cdn.vidilife.com/image/2006/3/16/44…
ok, I’m a little confused..
because she’s about as eloquent as a drunk suckster gargling sebastien’s nutsack…
if she’s (in a very vague and roundabout way) saying not to fuck your own family…
ok, yes, that makes sense.
If she’s saying ‘ugly’ people shouldn’t get together because they could have ugly babies…
well that’s just fucking retarded and crazy rude. hoping their gene’s drown…
wow… that’s quite hitler-esque there you bitch.
http://www.ioffer.com/img/item/157/015/518…
You sound like you probably have herpes.
What a malicious twatflap you are – who determines ugly? You, OP? The person you may find repulsive might be the moon and the stars in someone else’s life. You’ll get yours, sweetcakes, when your naughty bits drop to the ground with a resounding thud and your face looks like a dozen vaginas groping for a mini-bullet vibrator.
Trooooooolllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Bitcher,I’m damn sure you are a 14 on the 10 scale.You have to be either the most pompous ass, or just an ignorant cow.
I hope this bitch is fake otherwise OP is a piece of work.
Too bad OP, you were born 40 years too late, you missed out on the whole eugenics program. Hitler’s Germany was working on creating a “beautiful” race of people, handsome German men and women would procreate a master race of fair-haired, blue-eyed titans, which was his ideal of beauty. Your blinkered attitude reminds me a bit of that unfortunate era. Of course they were Nazis which begs the question “What are you OP?” besides a pretty lifeguard.
Go back under the bridge trollman before I inflict fire damage on you to negate your regenerative abilities.
Ok, Op, we see you’ve got your own special modification of Hitler’s eugenics theory. Are you even real? If you are, I really hope you’re infertile. It’s not the “ugly” people that shouldn’t procreate; it’s you. The world has enough problems without the likes of you spitting another vile fucking asshole into the world. I bet your dating life is just fantastic; you’ll get really far in love with that sick, shallow, vacuous, single-dimensional personality of yours.
Nobody will ever genuinely love you; because even if you’re ‘good looking,” the only type you’ll attract is one like you; someone so preoccupied by the outside they’ll NEVER give a shit about your inside. You’ll get cheated on and dumped as soon as your face starts to sag. Good luck in hell.
Op, if I ever barfed out the vain, shallow sewage that you do, my mother would have smacked me in the face, thank FUCK! Some people grow up learning that decent looks are NOT a fucking talent!! They don’t make you funnier, cleverer and they don’t guarantee a happy love life.
Superficial beauty is only skin deep and very fleeting. Inner beauty is lifelong. It’s not hard to tell which end of the gene pool from which the OP comes. The shallow end. If it were only ‘beautiful’ people of this ilk being successful breeders the world would be a sorry, scary place indeed. Vive les differences!
If there were no ugly people, would beauty still exist?
Discuss.
As Brendon pointed out this is undoubtedy a troll; but sometimes the kukris need to be unsheathed and washed in blood. Have at her, lads (& lassies)
http://www.gurkhakukris.com/Themes/categor…
Fuck you, OP, even though I know you’re a stupid troll.
I’m guessing you’re talking about fatties in bathing suits, amirite?
Well, there are A LOT of ugly skinny people out there. FYI.
Also: I knew a guy once and to look at him he wasn’t uh… well, he was really kinda homely…. but to be around him… holy jesus. That guy got more ass than any guy I know. I also have a friend who knows this guy who’s ugly as sin but got more ass than you could shake a stick at because of the way he “was.”
Watch this y’all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CY2n0tcErPU
“Inner beauty is lifelong.” – well shit. 🙁
“If there were no ugly people, would beauty still exist?”
that reminds me of the saying, “if every day were a sunny day… then what’s a sunny day?”
I think I’ve said it before but that was many moons ago.
had the doctor check me out…
http://thepsychokinetic.files.wordpress.co…
turns out my inner beauty isn’t so pretty….
http://www.moonbattery.com/alien.jpg
Hugely disappointed Eugenics didn’t take off aren’t ya OP?
Reading the bitches today, I think it was Computer Day for the patients at the Nova Scotia Hospital. Some of the whackiest/disturbed bitches in a while.
A boy who is no Adonis has won me over with his charming ways ;D but shhh, he doesn’t know it yet!
Giggity!
THE PRINCIPLE OF SELECTION RECONSIDERED
The bitch “Poor Gene Pool” advocated the principle of selection based on physical appearance and drew the usual and expected expressions of outrage. This is because physical appearance is, for the most part, a subjective judgement. But is the principle of selection based on other criteria equally subjective and otiose? What about other criteria which are not so subjective? There are obviously two contenders which come to mind.
The first is the economic criterion: Should a randy prolific sperm donor be allowed to reproduce regardless of his ability to economically support his multiple off-spring? Is there no justifiable limit to restrain the potency of his testicular emissions? Similarly, should an unmarried mother of ten be given absolute freedom to reproduce to the full extent of the reproductive powers of her ovaries?
But why not? Doesn’t their freedom to reproduce trump the common good?
The second criterion is that of intelligence: Should the psychologically certifiable “idiot” – a distinct psychological classification in addition to the “cretin” and the “moron” all of which purportedly indicate severe psychological gradations of sub-normal intelligence – be allowed to reproduce with others of their kind without hindrance? Doesn’t their freedom to reproduce also trump the common good?
The principle of selection works in all social contexts – economic, academic, inter-personal and so on. Society functions on the principole of selection, to distinguish the able from the less-able. The question is, of course, on what basis is reproductive selection banned? Why is it an object of offended outrage? No reasons are given. Now is your chance: Tell us why those who are economically and intellectually deficient banned from reproducing their kind?
As the question is often put on this site, “just askin.’
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
nevermind, So insightful. OP. Either you’re a fake or anybody is not good enough to fuck you. Hope you live and perish alone.
I believe, monsieur, that the entire human race should be working towards population reduction, that is the “common good”. Save for China, there are no legislated brakes on human reproduction. As far as restricting certain individuals from procreating due to I.Q., criminality or whatnot, I would have say I would be against that despite my leanings toward population reduction.
How, without trambling human rights, can society actually execute something like this? Reproduction is a basic human right despite the individuals involved. Limiting family size might be a possibility but that’s tricky as well. Chinese society and the favortism towards boys is an example of that. I would think education and the impact of overpopulation on our planet and inevitably, our lives is the best way to go. Maybe it’s already taught in sex education in some way,I don’t know.
So, in a nutshell,no, no legal restrictions on procreation whether moron, welfare mother whatever. I would just like to see a general awareness created through schools, TV ads etc. aimed at the young. Hammering home just how dangerous uncontrolled population growth is, in the long run.
… and I was just trolling!
critter guy for premier, i already made an x for mayor
Eat a fat ugly dick you egregious skank. May your children be fat, ugly, soul sucking beasts.
What i find ironic is that a moron like you is talking about the gene pool. Here you are bitching and moaning about how ugly people shouldn’t breed when what you don’t realize is that an idiot like you has four, maybe five years tops where you can play the gene card before you get too old for people to humour anymore. You’ll be a giant, entitled douche, oblivious to how obnoxious you are, until about age 35 at which point people will stop telling you you’re funny.. interesting.. smart.. because no one will want to sleep with you anymore. And you will realize, too late, that you have about as much personality as a hair dryer. But by then it will be too late. It will be too late to cultivate a strong mind, an interesting personality or decent character. I foresee you marrying someone who will love you long enough to wear you out and once you’re wrinkled and knackered, will run around with your asthetic betters while you sit at home and contemplate the most dramatic way to commit suicide.
People like you age terribly. So enjoy your shallow vain well of stupidity while you can. It won’t last very long and then you’ll be relegated to the pile of angry old ladies, bitter at time and hateful of the estuary of prettier, younger (and likely smarter) girls you will suddenly find yourself in competition with.
And… did it ever occur to you that you’re not even as pretty as you think you are? Maybe you’re just easy.
In short, i recommend you stop talking and spend the precious time you have left as a worthy human being jumping up and down and giggling moronically until people shift their interest toward those ten years your junior.
Troll or not, you’re a pathetic turd. We have enough of those already. Please do not breed.
I have to assume the fatty fatty bitch and this one were written by the same person – same writing style, same judgy, smug tone. My only comment other than that is to say that, personally, if I’m physically attracted to someone, and then I find out they’re a self-worshipping douchebag who’s wierdly preoccupied with who’s “winning,” looks- and weight-wise – yeah, not so attractive any more.
I fully believe that OP thinks that skinny always equals attractive and beautiful.
Well, I’ve seen some REALLY ugly skinny chicks out there.
My guess? OP’s a classic butterface.
“Nice legs… shame about the personality” PK?
So true OP. Two uglies fuck and 9 months later a fugly baby slips out. Hey, you could replace “ugly” with “ginger”…. hell knows they fit in with ugly.
O rly, mel? Do I know this person? 😉
RSVPs
: Troondonk (9:02PM)
“As far as restricting certain individuals from procreating due to I.Q., criminality or whatnot, I would have say (sic) I would be against that despite my leanings toward population reduction.”
But the question is not Troon’s take on “population reduction” which was never at issue but rather the legitimacy of restricting the “right” of certain individuals to reproduce regardless of their economic inability to support their offspring and/or of failing to satisfy minimum intellectual standards. So why would Troon be against proscribing this “right?”
He writes that proscribing the “right to reproduce” would involve “trampling human rights” which, of course, is simply to argue in a circle. In other words, Troon invokes the global concept of “human rights” to support his position on the “right to reproduce” of the individuals concerned. However, the question is whether this “right” absolute or are there other factors which come into play? Does the right of, say, the cretin to reproduce trump the rights of society at large?
The other commenters failed to address this question but merely continued to harrangue the OP. Maybe they should take the intelligence test to determine the level of their intellectual attainment. Failing to meet the minimum standard, of course, will result in the withdrawal of their “right” to reproduce.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Yes I think you may have met once, B. He isn’t the flake :P.
http://community.imaginefx.com/forums/stor…
Who’d a thunk that I’d ever agree with mm.
You should need a licence to have a child.
This is Nova Scotia – you can count those NOT in the bad gene pool on one hand, and still have a finger left over for your nose OP
PS MM, 147, hope that’s ok
lolz I didn’t figure it was. 😛
The flake also likes boys 😛
Rly? I would never have noticed.
HAHA, totally, Rosie!
Also: there are plenty of hot gingers out there. Mind you, they tend not to have the orange hair, but this one ginger I spent most of my time with when I was away…. rwar!
Brilliantly smart… AMAZING personality… freaking adorable all around… tall… so hot in a suit… and even hotter in a pair of jeans…. *isitgettinghotinhereorisitjustme?* *sigh*
In the course of two days, four separate ladiez told me they were into him. Plus my mom was all “if i was thirty years younger…” LOLZ, mamma PK!
So you can suck it, sebastard. My ass, that is.
I don’t get why people pick on gingers ???
My lover is a ginger & she’s a fabulous person. She certainly wouldn’t be a candidate to wear spandex, but she’s intelligent enought to know that.
Which is one of the things that attracted me to her in the first place, her mind is beautiful… which makes her beautiful to me . TTFN said it best with post here IMO.
compatibility shouldn’t & in my experience will never work if looks is the basis of the attraction. Because beauty fades, gravity takes its toll over time but similar interests, caring & respect for each other lasts.
I don’t get it either More. Discrimination based on appearance is great for exposing shallow-minded individuals and little else. I also take exception to the term ‘ginger’. I have yet to see orange or red ginger root. If one were to equate the aromatic rhizome with hair colour, wouldn’t blonde be the logical choice? Oh wait, blondes have enough to deal with refuting the stupidity assumption.