Ok we get it, you’re not heterosexual. We also get that there has been discrimination against the LGBT community since the dawn of time. Would you agree that in the last 20 years there has been a massive movement of acceptance? I was raised in a very open-minded and tolerant family who never said an ill word about anybody, and I still feel that I exemplify my upbringing today. Today I pick up a certain school newspaper and one of the articles is about lesbians rubbing vaginas together?! Seriously, if it was about heterosexual sex, this shit would not fly in any university newspaper. Because it would be considered derogatory or discrimination to not let this article be posted, it gets posted anyways. As accepting as I am, this is not kosher with me or probably a lot of other people (including some of the LGBT community). I know you’re trying to be as risky and out there (no pun intended) because you can get away with it, but I think that for people who haven’t already accepted the LGBT community, this is going to cause an aversion and get the unwanted response. Oh but wait, you can say what you want, walk in dominatrix clothing downtown, and talk about explicit vagina rubbing, without consequences but how dare heterosexual people do the same. We just have to have your allegorical cock down our throats over and over again until you guys stop being so damn insecure and realize that you can help the progress of acceptance and realize this isn’t the way. —Doesn’t Want to Know How Anyone Bumps Uglies
This article appears in Oct 13-19, 2011.
http://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/userc…
I’d be okay with a heterosexual person walking around downtown wearing “dominatrix clothing”. 😀
Feel better?
Lolz Ivan. Then there’s “pillow friends”.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2195/578662…
This bitch reminds me of a Pride Parade on TV from years ago…guy screaming “we’re queer, we’re here, get used to it”….Dude, it’s Fire Island, we get it.
I, for one, could hear about explicit vagina rubbing alllll day. 😛
we always feel better when you’re around trinkster
I second that Tron
Got a link to the article OP?
Those vaginas rubbing together probably sounds like suction cups. Gross.
That’s outrageous OP! What newspaper was that in?
I fail to see the problem. There was a whole episode of South Park about ‘Scissoring’ for Chrissakes. Have you never read Cosmopolitan? I would rather read that article than ’10 things your Va-jayjay is dying to tell you’
“for people who haven’t already accepted the LGBT community, this is going to cause an aversion and get the unwanted response”………….are you fucking kidding me?
You think for one moment people who have not accepted the LGBT community are going to have MORE of an aversion because of an article in a STUDENT newspaper?
Gezuz fist-me-with-your-leather-strapped-arm………my mind is boggled……if censorship were alive and well, perhaps the editorial staff would have thrown this article out the door…….but, thought provoking as it is, it generates discussion and both sides of this issue can weigh in…….about the topic itself not about how your narrow-mindedness thinks or categorizes people.
I really don’t give a sweet flying fuck if the ladies want to bump clams but leave your fucking private life private. It’s not about acceptance – it’s not wanting to know the intimate play-by-play, straight or gay.
“Certain School Newspaper” Says it all. Some Naomi Klein wannabe is going to totally rock your bourgeois worlds by rubbing your uptight middle class faces in the cheezy love taco. Then she graduates to “serious” journalism – like comparing Stephen Harper to Hitler.
This is like Joey finding Rachel’s romance novel…..
It deserves to be ridiculed…
but alas, today I have not the energy.
considering this paper prints dan Savage
-whom I deplore by the way-
who goes into every detail imaginable… I’m kinda shocked you chose this forum to express your discontent.
so stuff off
Kapitan made me laugh out loud.
Absolutely right, OB! I’m tired of the double standard the ‘mos have where it’s okay for them to say whatever they want about us so-called breeders but it’s hate speech if we say the same thing in reverse. Excellent bitch!
is that a mule, critter guy?
well.. yeah OP. It’s either all okay or none of it is.
Oops…Shit! Thanks OB. You just reminded me I have a couple of movies that I gotta take back to the rental store today. Thanks.
ahh man.. awesome friday bitch.
I’m guessing a ‘zette’ that’s ‘gaga’ without the extra ‘ga’.
Their theme this week was GLBT stuffz.
This is an awesome bitch, well written my friend.
OOHHH Imma have to pick up the Dal paper today! I’ll let y’all know.
We want full descriptions, Donk. Maybe even some illustrations…ya know, for clarity of explanation. Maybe some (ahem) “pie” charts?
(wakka wakka)
And on THAT note….hope e’rebody has a large weekend.
Read said article online. Was rather dull, offering little insight. The titillation factor was present for a moment, but passed. Article came across as little more than a fart shared between friends, under the covers, causing wrinkled noses and giggles. Nothing to see here. Carry on.
big brohaha for nowt
Agree with your stance 100%. Society is getting to politically correct.
It seems to me the article in question was about debunking a myth about how lesbians predominately have sex. As someone else said, I didn’t find it overly titillating – in fact, it was a little dry (no pun intended), if humourous at times. Despite being raised in such a fabulously “tolerant” family (wow, you “tolerate” me, thanks), you seem to be eager to jump on any perceived faux pas of the gay community as an excuse to rant and rave about how LGBT individuals shockingly dare not to tiptoe around silently in the backdrop of real (straight) people’s lives. And what magical fairy managed to wipe out homophobia in the last 20 years, if it’s been going on “since the dawn of time?” Wow, I guess my generation really won the acceptance lottery there. Ok, that’s enough sarcasm for today. I need to go make some cornbread.
——-
Ok, that’s enough sarcasm for today. I need to go make some cornbread.
——-
Sarcastic cornbread?
Here’s the article, Bitches:
http://dalgazette.com/opinions/cutting-int…
They don’t even use the correct terminology, either. It’s a labia/vulva/clit that’s being ‘rubbed together’ not a vagina.
FFS.
No Wheelie…..I like my cornbread sincere.
Totally valid bitch. We need to define what the differences are between discrimination and charging a person for public indecency.
K. Um. I read the article and besides this phrase…:
“It is the act of pressing or rubbing each other’s vaginas together by sliding between each other’s legs, thus making a pseudo-scissor shape.”
the article makes no mention of the mechanics — just the politics and some info surrounding it such as statistical information, for example.
On top of that, it’s not like the article was featured in the news or features section — it was in the S-E-X section.
I’ve read FAR racier things in other university papers that OH HAY *did* include heterosexual activity.
The fact that you needed to point out how ‘non discriminatory’ you are, OB, along with your displeasure of this ‘explicit’ article (which, besides getting the anatomical terms a little mixed up), is actually quite clinical in its description and then makes no mention of the mechanics of the act — just research findings and stats, etc… (I could see bitching if it said “rubbing two pussies together,” but it doesn’t. It uses ‘vagina,’ which is not a slang term — it *is* a proper term), makes me really wonder if you are as ‘accepting’ as you claim.
Fact is, lesbian, trans, gay, etc… people have sex! wow! It’s a fact. of. life. And if the ‘non accepting’ old fucks out there don’t like it, well that’s on THEM. I’m sure the lives of the LGBT community really centre around whether or not some old bigot fuck ‘accepts’ their ‘lifestyle.’ *hugeeyeroll*
So here’s a little tip: next time you pick up a newspaper with a sex column SKIP. THAT. SECTION. Obviously your sensitive little prude self can’t handle a mature discussion about a sexual issue. Grow up, OB.
*grins*
If a hetero act is rated R, the LGBT community has no business making a similar LGBT act PG 13 or worse yet ‘child friendly’
I say that the only fair way to enforce public decency, is if we do it equally, in a non biased way.
Yes bread lady, it is.
If a certain university newspaper has a sex column, I do believe the writers of this column can write anything sex-related that they want, if it’s legal. It’s a magazine written for and by university students I think and it’s certainly for adults.
As PK pointed out, if you’re offended by explicit sexual description, stay away from sex columns.
If y’all want some awkward Dal. grown erotica on paper, I’m selling copies $5!
😉
if fair is fair, then print this:
It is the act of pressing or rubbing the woman’s lips against the male peni, sliding back and forward in a pseudo-woodpecker motion.
LOL, I already posted the article, Donk.
And did you even read my post, GV, or are you just thick or something? We’re not talking about an article in a ‘pg13’ publication, we’re talking about a publication in a sex column in a UNIVERSITY PAPER. Last time I checked the vast VAST majority of the university community was 18+. And as I pointed out, the supposed ‘explicit’ part of the article is one phrase and it is described in clinical terms. Perhaps clicking on the link and giving it a look-see might make your commenting look less ass-like?
Also: during my time at other universities, I have read articles in their papers that have gone into blow job techniques, making a sexy game out of shaving each other’s genitals, anal sex, etc, etc…. And no one seemed to have an issue about that. Funny how OB picks out THIS particular issue when it involves *gasp* same gender sex!
Usually when people have to point out how un discriminatory they are…. they usually reek of eau de bigot.
hey girls, i’m in for a threesome, or even more if you are up to it.
Let’s giv’r
OB, really stupid bitch…the double standard is in your head you poor downtrodden dipstick
Yes but a hard copy is necessary.
pk, or something.
Yeah but if an article was printed about an equivalent subject for straight people, who would be the one doing the bitching? A few uptight straight people. (not that I want to make this or any topic a “straight” vs. “gay” thing)
And how do we all know that the dominatrix walking down the street is even a lesbian? Is it that every person that doesn’t fit within a certain social norm is probably LGBT? I’m sure there are just as many “freaks” that are straight proportionately than are gay. Don’t assume. Unknot your panties.
——-
Yeah but if an article was printed about an equivalent subject for straight people, who would be the one doing the bitching? A few uptight straight people.
——-
http://www.savagelove.com
“Usually when people have to point out how un discriminatory they are…. they usually reek of eau de bigot.”
So the more calls I make for equal and unbiased enforcement of a universal standard, will just dig me deeper and deeper into the bigot trench? Geez, now I am getting a better idea why apathy is path most travelled.
Just kids acting out when away from home.
Some day they’ll grow up and have a mortgage on a house in ‘a nice part of town’ and an RRSP and send the adoptees off to french immersion or Shambala school.
Just regular folk. Ignore them.
Calling for equality and having to point out how un-discriminatory you are are completely different things.
You really REALLY don’t have much of a clue, GV. Not just from reading your comments in this bitch, but your overall posting.
It scares me how dense you seem to come across and how little you manage to connect dots in your head. Are you slow or something? Because I’m beginning to wonder.
HOLY SHIT. YOU FOUND AN ARTICLE ABOUT SEX IN THE SEX SECTION OF A UNIVERSITY NEWS PAPER.
GO AWAY NOW.
GUYS, yesterday I read the SPORTS section… and there was an article about HOCKEY.
Shocking.
http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/compl…
ahhh… pseudo-woodpecker motion… oooohh..heh,heh,heh,HAH,heh
Sorry,that was the Woody talking.
I didn’t even realize it was that much of a stereotype. *shrug*
pseudo-woodpecker motion …..
or…
http://webdebris.com/70s/wp-content/upload…
Hay Agent 195 – The most recent book by that athiest who was plonking Mrs. Garrison is available for $12 (less than half original cover price) at that bookstore near us. The one where you can get pop and ciggies and show tickets.
You, Knighted? One in the window and a couple more on the racks.
Spassibo, Comrade Ivan. I might have to check that out, even though I should be saving money for Hal-Con.
N.K.V.D. – (Nerd Konvention, Very Delightful) >; )
I’m with You OP, and as mad as you are, imagine the idiot editorialist working that one into their professional resume ” dear editor of new york post, here is an article I wrote in university about vaginas rubbing together” Yup, they are paying to go to school for writing and vaginas rubbing together is the best they can come up with…wow…applause.
A 15 year old Ontario boy just killed himself. He was the only openly gay person in his high school, and in combination with the bullying he endured, it made him miserable. That makes me so sad.
There is so much obnoxiousness in the straight world, it’s everywhere and so fucking over the top, in-your-face. Do you bitch about THAT, OP? My hunch is no. Instead you bitch about a harmless detail featured in a UNIVERSITY paper. Meanwhile us straights have to use OUR sexuality to sell everything from mops to furniture!
Heterosexuality is expressed everywhere here: to an extreme. It’s used to sell everything and to entertain. Does that bother you, OP? Do you ever write bitches about it?
In my mind, if it helps even one gay kid to see adult gays revelling in their sexuality, that’s a good thing.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article…