How is it that dog owners dog’s have more space and rights than non dog people in this city? I just love it when my 2 year old walks through a pile of shit. Even better, I loved watching some asshole’s dog almost bite her face off. There is so much of the park that is “off leash” that a lot of people don’t even bother putting a leash on for the short walks in “on leash” area. How is it that dogless people and kids get the shit end of the stick? Thanks douchebags; I hope your selfish actions ruin it for all of you and you all end up in small shitty “off leash” fenced in areas like the rest of urban North America. —Take back the Park
This article appears in Mar 20-26, 2014.


How is it that us childless people have to put up with your shitty kids in restaurants, malls, stores, etc…screaming, yelling, running around unattended and causing a disturbance? Oh wait, there are good parents and shitty ones, just like dog owners. Now shut the fuck up!!!
Ain’t he sweet? You were one of those shitty screaming, yelling running around unattended, disturbance causing kids also Sarge. You were that age once. I think you still are one of those shitty, screaming, yelling……. Just listen to yourself. He only talks to hear himself talk folks. Ignore him. You’re a joke without a punch line Shultz.
Yours truly.
You love when your kid steps in dog shit and when they are attacked by dogs IN AN OFF-LEASH DOG AREA…do I understand that correctly?
You don’t ignore me at all, Wheels. You comment on everything I write. Assclown!!!
Shitty is defensive, but I second him here. Child owners are just as obnoxious as dog owners, sometimes worse. There are many, many places for parents to bring children. Also, I’ve never encountered a dog at PPP that was aggressive to humans (or other dogs for that matter), so I’m guessing OB is just sensitive to dogs. Try going to Africville Park on a Saturday if you want to meet aggressive dogs.
God damn it… it’s taken a while but shitty seems to be hitting all the right cords lately.
I like clown ass…
Mr. Meaty. No, you did not understand. Walk down the main path; it is bordered by land mines. On or Off leash area doesn’t make a difference, pick up your dog’s shit period.
SHITMD You’re ignorant and a troll. You’re arguments are jammed packed with fallacies and bias. I do agree with your point though that there are ignorant parents as well as ignorant pet owners, etc, etc.
Fact of the matter is that your dog may be the nicest dog in the world, but it is still a dog. You cannot predict how it is going to react to different people and situations. And that happens in a spit second. If it’s your dog and my kid; your ass is going to get sued and your dog is going to be put down, period.
Unruly kids need a fucking good slap on the arse.
Two dogs maul and kill 7 year old girl. Nough said.
Yours truly.
Oooo…I’m skerred!!! Lol, you won’t ever see my dogs, honey, they don’t go to PPP or any other parks that have 2 year old’s running around with all the dogs, while it’s dumb bitch mother stands by yapping on her phone. So put your team of lawyers on high alert, nobody fucking cares about your dumb ass or your stupid kid!!!
Visionre, you hit the nail on the head when it comes to SHITMD. Guys like him come a dime a dozen. Guttersnipes, riff raffs, unhappy with themselves so they put down others to make themselves feel better. You know the type, no class.
yours truly.
Quite honestly I think PPP should be on-leash only except during specified hours near the beaches. I can’t bring my dog there because it’s a squirrel haven.
2 dogs maul & kill 7 year old girl….yes and…
2 people maul and kill 1 year girl, 2 year old girl, 3 year old girl, 4 year old girl, 5 year old girl and boys….. stranger people, relative people, parent people….. BY THE THOUSANDS, year after year, century after century.
so that’s just a meaningless remark. there are more humans than dogs and at any given time in public, there is probably one two legged who is looking at that toddler in a far more dangerous way than any dog nearby. you are more likely to be killed by your bedroom slippers than a dog. and kids are in more danger from balloons and marbles.
i don’t go to ppp either. i went couple times, it was full of snoots and untrained dogs running amok. but i didn’t see any aggressive dogs, just rambunctious ones jumping around. and no one picking up pooh.
To all the ignorant ones who like to equate being a parent to being a pet owner…read the complaint and get off your wanna be hipster douche sacs. Most of you are parasites who have contributed nothing to society as of yet. Community is built on people and families. There is a place for everybody – all creeds. Nobody is hating on dogs. But guess what? A 2 year old in the park won’t bite your defenseless face off. A pack of 2 year olds aren’t gang bombing your restaurant, unless you are in a family zone. Maybe I’ll start letting my 2 year old shit on the path instead of in her diaper. Enjoy that.
The fact that PPP has gotten out of control and turned into primarily a dog park is a shame. Eventually you will likely procreate, and when you do, you will realize that your entire perspective and priority in life is no longer relevant. But great job hating on kids – too bad your point of view wasn’t put in effect when you were running around pissing and shitting yourself in diapers, probably not bothering most decent and understanding adults in the process.
And I have to say….I love this argument from people like Good Dog Molly….that “I didn’t see any aggressive dogs”. Well I guess if you were there once and didn’t see it, then there must not be a problem. But if you ever have a 2 year old and see a dog get up in their face a mere inches away, barking, growling and showing teeth, your world will come to a screaming halt. And guess what? That owner will say the same thing everybody says….”he’s never done that before; he’s a nice dog”.
It’s simple. Create and enforce time-controlled ‘off leash’ areas at PPP that are off and away from the main pathways. Allow families with children the peace of mind that they can enjoy the park as it is intended. If you see somebody walking their dog off leash outside the designated zone, then ticket them. We do it for parking infractions, speeding, texting while driving, but some people here have an issue with protecting children – arguing it’s comparable to them having their brunch ruined? Get some perspective people. Use your head.
And SHITMD – just in case you don’t have anybody in your life who cares enough about you to point this out: you are too dense to realize just how wrong and ignorant you are. It must be bliss. I wish I could make it my superpower. Or you’re just a douche. Either way, we all lose. Especially you.
Just how many gazebos do you shemales need?
No, For Real, it is you who is wrong and ignorant. It’s not everyone’s job to give a sweet shit about your choice to take your child and put him/her in what you consider to be “danger”. If you don’t trust dogs, don’t put your child near them, ie: don’t take your child to a park where dogs will be. You aren’t happy with sharing the park YOU like with other people so you think you can tell everyone ‘how it is or, ‘how it should be’. Like it or not, there are other people out there that don’t think that the world and, everyone in it, has to bend and bow to those who have done the world a solid and, spit a child out into it. Go fuck your “time-controlled” horseshit. Like everyone should conform to your schedule, you ridiculous bitch. This just happens to be the park that YOU like and, don’t want to share with other people who pay for its upkeep, just like you. The entire waterfront of PPP is on leash and parts are no dogs allowed, period. Try taking your entitled ass there.
And another thing, its not ok to hurl threats around like “if your dog does something I don’t like, I’m going to sue your ass and have your dog put down”. That’s being a fucking bully, not to mention, a stupid bitch. For anyone to blanket threaten every dog owner with their pets demise is just beyond the pale, IMO, and is just nasty bitchery. Anyone who does this is just ignorant, rude, nasty, vindictive and deserves absolutely zero respect!!! You don’t see dog owners running around threatening parents when their kids do things that surprise or scare our animals, play rough with them, swing sticks inches from their faces. This has happened to me many times and guess what the parents say, “he/she’s only playing, they didn’t mean it”. Where are they gonna be when the vet bill is due? Yeah, that’s right, home, saying what an asshole I am for being pissed with their precious.
Being an owner of a pitbull, as you can see from my profile pic I just updated, I have heard it all from ignorant people in every park in HRM. My evil pitbull plays with my buddies 5 year old like a champ. The boy gives him treats and takes them away, plays fetch, climbs all over him, pulls his ears, runs around and chases him, etc…and never a sign of aggression. NE-VER!!! I have taught his boy to say “NO” in a sharp voice if he ever feels threatened or frightened and, my dog puts his ears down and mopes away with hurt feelings. He has never shown an ounce of aggression with any child he has ever come in contact with, and I highly doubt he ever will unless provoked, but that doesn’t stop asshats from being judgmental, does it?
OK.. Let’s make some observations here…
SHITMD… You’re the first to comment (I imagine there are a lot of threads in here with you at the top). After filtering through your BS, I will summarize that you have made the argument that Kids are as obnoxious as dogs, and people are more dangerous than dogs. It seems you have one or 2 fools in your playground.
Here are my 2 cents..
Dogs are more dangerous than young children.
Dogs can be difficult to control and unpredictable.
Dogs can hurt children.
Dogs can harm and cause fear and discomfort to many adults.
When people act irresponsibly and cause harm to others, they face repercussions. Example…
if you hurt or kill someone with your car, your hands, a bat, a gun, a dog etc. you will be charged with an offense and possibly be sued.
PPP is a public park.
Adults pay taxes that pay for a public park.
A public park should be a safe and inviting place for Adults and children and their pets.
Dogs do not pay taxes.
Peoples needs should come before dogs needs.
Designated times and/or areas for off leash will provide a safe environment for dogs and people.
As an aside. I find it thoroughly amusing that you wine about being threatened by legal action and claim to be offended when you started off comments on this bitch by saying “Now shut the fuck up!!!”
Now shut the fuck up!!!
I’m glad you didn’t say
New Avatar Alert!
You’d have lost all my respect.
Everyone needs to read through SHITTY’s rage and recognize his points.
For Real should get off the high horse. Communities are built on “people and families”. It sounds like For Real defines people as parents/children and families as biological parent-child units. All of this is indicative a horribly narrow worldview.
Visionre here is my rebuttal to a selection of your most relevant statements, line by line for your convenience.
“Dogs are more dangerous than young children.” In theory. Dogs are physically larger and stronger than young children, particularly infants. This makes them physically more capable of causing harm. However one might argue that the young child who is rough housing with a dog, without adult supervision, is more dangerous to themselves. Moreover, children, through their access to sympathetic and vengeful adults, are theoretically more dangerous to dogs than dogs are to children.
“Dogs can be difficult to control and unpredictable.” This is false. Many dog experts can actually predict when a dog will behave badly. Dogs communicate very little vocally, but you can often pick up predictive signs based on a dog’s physical communication. For instance, I can tell immediately when my dog is feeling uncomfortable or anxious based on his body language. If a dog owner is “surprised” by their dog’s actions, it is because they are not very knowledgeable about dogs or they were not paying attention.
“Dogs can hurt children.” Literally anything can potentially harm a child.
“Dogs can harm and cause fear and discomfort to many adults.” correction: to many adults who are afraid of dogs and should therefore visit on-leash public spaces, of which there are many.
“Dogs do not pay taxes.” Technically, this is wrong. Dog owners pay taxes indirectly through their humans, who pay consumption taxes on pet supplies and dog food. If the dog did not exist, such tax revenue would not be collected. Hence, it is the dog that generates the revenue. More generally, dog owners pay taxes.
“Peoples needs should come before dogs needs.” The bitch is about a public space. In Halifax, there are many public spaces that are available exclusively to humans, so one can safely say that human needs for public space have been met, at least in Halifax. Moreover, it can be argued that dogs are more productive than many humans are. They make people happy, reduce stress, and often perform community service (police dogs, search and rescue, etc). From a purely utilitarian standpoint, this world would be better off if some humans were replaced by dogs.
” A public park should be a safe and inviting place for Adults and children and their pets.”
Is that what ‘To catch a predator’ taught you?
Really SirMeow? I think I made the distinction clearly – inclusive of everyone, people (individuals is another term for this) and people with children. Nice try though. Keep projecting what you want…..while hypocritically telling everyone else we need to “read through SHITTY’s rage and recognize his points”. his point was to tell us all to ‘shut the fuck up’ because he loves his dog and that takes precedence over everybody else., and then hating on kids. And of course, we are the selfish ones.
In theory dogs are more dangerous than children? Bahahaha. In theory? Good perspective, because of course we are talking about unsupervised children in the park rough housing with innocent dogs, and thus it’s the parents fault. We are talking about having way too many off leash dogs to the point that you cannot comfortably let your kid walk next to you in the park because they will have multiple encounters with unknown animals (with good owners and ignorant owners), some of which can be very scary and potentially cause serious injury.
Literally anything can harm a child? So let’s not deal with the issue. Because they could choke on a carrot or get hit by a bus or die of measles….rendering the danger presented by dogs vs. children completely moot. There’s no issue. Let’s just move on. Anything can harm a child. Fuck vaccines. And I’ll stop holding my daughter’s hand while walking across the street. Throw caution to the wind, folks.
Dogs are completely predictable – all of them – all the time. By your account, DOG EXPERTS can predict without fail when a dog will act badly. Too bad 99% of dog owners are not experts. And I’m sure those experts will tell you that the likelihood of them acting badly goes up significantly when they are scared, surrounded by unknown people, and when somebody appears to act aggressively towards them. What do you think happens when they see a kid standing eye to eye with them on two feet? Sometimes this might scare them and they get worked up (happened this past weekend to my kid). And that poor scared child has no idea how to handle that situation. And if they scream, put there hand out, or make any gesture that could scare that dog – I think you can figure out the rest. The point being, in which I agree with you, is that dog’s off leash are not fully accessible to their owner – and their owner can easily be distracted while enjoying time in the park – and thus even if all dog owners were ‘experts’, you still cannot predict the outcome of every situation even if you can 100% predict when your dog might act badly.
So dogs do pay taxes. That’s awesome. Indirectly of course. OK. If that’s really the argument, then relative to a child, your dog pays next to nothing. But this is actually irrelevant. Dogs exist. Kids exist. Neither of them pays tax. But adults pay taxes – dog owners, parents, single, married, no kids, no pets, etc. So the park is for all people to enjoy. If it has come to a point where one segment is not able to enjoy it, because it has significantly changed and favours one group at the expense of the other, then this needs to be corrected. Nobody is taking away a dog owners right to access the park. So stop fucking whining and telling me dogs pay taxes.
You have made no correction in your point about dogs having ability to cause harm and fear. It was stated that they ‘can’ do this – which you clearly agree they can. For tax payers in this community, they have the right to enjoy PPP without having to be afraid of random dogs running up on them or their kids. Period. Excla-fucking-mation point. That’s it. Just like dog owners have the right to bring their dog to the park. So fuck off with your telling people if they don’t like it, they can go somewhere else. PPP charter is for the enjoyment of the community, not at the expense of anybody, and certainly not in favour of dogs. So open your mind to balance. You keep preaching that we need to listen to ass-clown SHITMD who tells everyone to fuck off if they don’t like it (great solution) – yet the actual conversation here is about having a place where everybody can enjoy the park. Instead, SHITMD and the like argue that kids should take a backseat to dogs.
Dogs are more productive than humans? Are we really having this conversation? That’s it – I draw the line here. I will not indulge.
I love dogs. I think most dog owners are decent people, including many of my friends and family, just like most people in general are probably decent. And I am a past dog owner and have lived with dogs for years as an adult. They are fantastic pets. But they are not humans. They are not kids. If my kid hurts somebody, even by accident, we will not put her down. We do that with dogs though, done so by the expert animal community, I wonder why? My view is not narrow – it’s actually inclusive. It states that I believe there should be controlled ‘off-leash’ areas at PPP. Right now, it’s out of control; people don’t follow the rules; and they are ruining it for you. It’s not people like me who are ruining it. It’s your dog owning brethren who are fucking it up – so focus your efforts on them and maybe we can fix the problem together. How is it that having off leash areas takes away from your enjoyment of the park? My enjoyment of the park, for which I pay a ton in property taxes and happens to be my local park, is threatened by an over abundance of dogs off their leashes and running up on my kid. There used to be an area of the park for dogs to go off-leash, and you could avoid that area. Now you cannot – it is everywhere – and the entrance area where it is not, dog owners no longer pay attention to the rule.
Your solution SHITMD is for my entitled ass to go somewhere else? Really? That’s your solution? And I’m the one who’s not inclusive? You clearly value your dog and your own interests over the entire community. Ahhh….but you don’t care as long as you can let your dog run free without worry about how this may affect anybody else. There’s a place for everybody – but right now – PPP is overrun with dogs off leash in areas where they shouldn’t be – and it’s having a negative impact on other people who also want to enjoy the park. That’s it. But clearly you take this as an opportunity to sell your position on hating children and not giving a shit about other people who raise the concern. It fucking sucks ass that we all have to keep playing to the lowest common denominator.
So SHITMD, let’s have a world with no laws, no police, no justice, no anything. And if somebody doesn’t like that, then they can fuck off, right? As long as you and your pitbull, who I’m sure is a very nice dog who would 100% never hurt anybody (because you can predict every possible scenario that may arise), are happy.
No perspective. Take from the world and give nothing back. Narcissistic fucks.
And SHITMD – trust me. If your dog ever hurts my child, then I will surely sue your ass and make sure it gets put down. That’s not a threat. It’s what holds you accountable as a dog owner. And it’s also what society deems to be the acceptable recourse. Just like you’d certainly sue me if I beat you with a tire iron. If you’d like, you can let me know that you’ll sue me if my 2 year old does something to bother you….like scare your dog or swing a stick. But I’m a decent person. I’m aware that it is my responsibility to pay your vet bill if my 2yr old girl harms your pitbull. Bahahahahahahaha. Great perspective, there.
Many dog owners treat their dogs as humans and or children and the dogs are royally fucked up. The poor dogs suffer from all kinds of ailments such as, separation anxiety, depression, excessive barking, jumping up on people, the list can go on and on. It is the fault of the owners if the dog misbehaves, just like the parents of uncontrollable children are to blame for their brats up to a certain age of course. That age depends on the intelligence and maturity of the child and his or her knowledge of right and wrong. A dog or child cannot know what is acceptable as behavior if they are not taught.
Yours truly.
Well, as a cyclist I feel the cycling rules should be applied to all users of the park.
Everyone will have predesignated times that will be strictly adhered to. If not you will face a fine and go before Peter Kelly, the new mayor just doesn’t care enough to get involved.
New avatart alert!!!
The fact is that there are shitty dog owners shitty child owners. We all have to co-exist somehow. Unfortunately
My comment about dogs paying taxes indirectly was tongue-in-cheek, meant to ridicule the argument that paying taxes should somehow result in proportional access to public space. That public goods are not private goods is an inherent fact that seems to be lost on so many of the capitalist zealots that appear on these internet forums.
It is also true that there are many spaces that are exclusively available to human, which makes me not take human complaints about dogs very seriously.
I should also point out that the rage with which FR delivered his/her comment makes him/her no better than SHITTY.
And let’s talk about the real fear of dogs. The primary fear is that a dog will cause harm to a human being.
A 2013 study published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association found that, in 87% of all reported dog bite-related fatalities in the United States (2000-2008), there was no able-bodied person available to intervene. In 85% of cases, the victim had no familiar relationship with the dog. Overall, more than 80% of dog bite-related fatalities contained four or more co-occurring preventible factors (no familiar relationship, able-bodied person, in-tact dogs, neglect, isolation, etc). Although it was not published in the abstract, I would surmise based on basic probability theory that the percentage of cases involving at least one preventible feature is close to 100%. A large fraction of cases can be attributed to lack of familiarity and/or lack of supervision.
http://avmajournals.avma.org/doi/abs/10.24…
The data published here confirms that most dog bite-related deaths are, in fact, predictable and preventable, contrary to some of the opinions (not based on evidence) reported in this forum. Unless dog bites causing injury are inherently different from dog bites causing death, one might rightfully conclude from these data that almost all harmful dog bites are preventable and predictable . Conditional on appropriate behaviour by child and dog owners alike, the likelihood of a child being harmed by a dog is relatively small compared to many other potential ways in which a child may experience harm.
Note that most of the above-listed co-occurring factors are grounds for exclusion from some of the existing dog parks (e.g. in-tact dogs, lack of supervision). The issue is not dogs, it seems, but rather the lack of proper enforcement of the existing park rules.
*preventable, woops
NO DOGS IN A DOG PARK!!!!
OTFLMAO at the “No Rules” camp. I have not heard one sound argument, counter argument or statement from the gun slingers. Good attempt though SirMeowalot. Major flaw quoting a Dog related death study and assuming those conditions and stats apply to bites in general. There may be similarities, but you can not make a strong argument on an assumption.
I’m going to refer to “Rules” vs “No Rules” camp as it seems that the individuals, myself included, in favour of dog control in the park are not against dogs in the park. The “No Rules” camp have the same odour of the NRA… DOGS DON’T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE!!!
News flash.. PPP is not a dog park, although you’d think it was if you’ve been there recently. It is a public park, a tourist attraction, a green space for everyone to enjoy. I hope HRM takes some action, because the narcissistic MF’s that let their dogs run and shit everywhere are ruining it for everyone, dog owners included.
BTW, I have been a dog owner most of my life. Have any of the “No Rules” camp ever had children? I doubt it, but that’s just an assumption. Just trying to dumb down my arguments a bit for you.
If dog aggression is what causes a dog to bite, then the categorization of dog bites by outcome (death, injury) is irrelevant. The issues are then what causes a dog to be aggressive and what factors permit a dog to successfully act on its aggression (regardless of the outcome). The co-occurring factors highlighted in the above study could very well apply to any bite. The reason the study focused was on dog bites causing death is because these causes of death are often reported in the media and to the Centre for Disease Control. You’re right, I have not provided you with data showing that this is in fact the case, but at least I’ve provided some reasoning to my hypothesis. You, on the other hand, simply hand wave whilst yelling “Blah blah blah! I Can’t hear you!”
Also, I’m very much in favour of rules. Please learn to read. Hopefully you didn’t teach your kids to read.
Last, I don’t bring my dog to PPP and I’ve already said that PPP should not be a dog park. I generally avoid bringing my dog to places where children are present. I don’t care that people have more access to public spaces than dogs. I just find it funny when parents whine about dogs.
Please accept my apologies SirMeowsalot. I did not thoroughly read your posts. Like most people, I don’t bother reading comment posts as they are usually written by a bunch of SHITMD’s. I YELL, I hurl more insults, therefore I am right!
If I walk in a dog park and get shit on my shoes, am I not at fault for walking in a dog park (where there is bound to be dog shit)?
If I take my kid to a dog park…
I have no “rage” and, I also have no problem with rules. You can’t put me in the “no rules” camp. I am 100% for responsible dog owners and following the rules. What I am not for is this letigegious attitude by FR in her frothing at the mouth, irrational, emotional response that a persons beloved pet must die to avenge her childs bite mark that will heal. Nothing else will do, the owner of said pet must bankrupt themselves fighting a stupid court battle that may or may not have any merit at all or, give up a kill their furry family member. It’s shitty attitudes like this that make the world a shitty place. Nobody can be adults about shit nowadays. Everything must be settled in court, and this is exactly why I don’t frequent public parks with my dogs, and it’s a shame that I have to be afraid to use a place that is considered “public”.
And you call me a rage filled asshole. I spend my days avoiding people like you, FR, because I can’t be bothered to put myself in a losing situation. There is absolutely no way to argue anything in front of a judge when you own a pitbull. I have been bullied out of public places because of peoples media fed, irrational, fear of pitbulls. Enjoy your PPP free of me and my furry family.
Oh my, SHITMD. I never once brought up suing an off leash dog owner for maiming a child until you started to complain about it. However, if your dog attacks somebody and you don’t have the decency to deal with that appropriately, then you should expect legal action. Go back and read the thread….you’ll see. If you and your dog don’t pose a threat, then why in the world would you be afraid of litigation, or afraid of going to a public park? This makes no sense to me. If you are truly not a threat, then what is to fear? I’m not talking about legal action just because you are there. I’m merely acknowledging your point that you should expect legal action if you cannot control your pit bull and it attacks my child. And I’ll tell you what – perhaps you should be able to empathize if that’s your position – because I can guarantee that the fear of my child being attacked by your dog is much more real and legitimate than your fear of being sued for simply taking your dog for a walk. Way to show your hand.
And to others. PPP is NOT a dog park. It is a public park. A little education please:
http://www.pointpleasantpark.ca/en/home/thingstoknow/dogs/default.aspx
Funny that one of the first lines is that you and your pet will be ‘sharing’ the park with adults, children, and so on. So this thread speaks to this – that is all. The ‘rules’ people in here are only stating that these conditions are not being respected or followed. It is not a blanket statement against all dogs and their owners. However, some dog owners in here, instead of realizing this and rallying to stop those pet owners from ruining the park for them and their dogs, instead take a stand against parents who are concerned that they can no longer enjoy the park with their family. What the ? You poor souls…
And then there’s the by-law:
http://www.halifax.ca/legislation/bylaws/hrm/documents/By-LawA-300.pdf
Do you think this kind of by-law exists for my 2 year old? No. And why is that? Because they are not going to cause potential physical or emotional damage to anybody. What is wrong with dog owners who cannot reconcile this difference.
Plain and simple. These rules are not being respected. It is taking away from the enjoyment of some people who want to enjoy the park – parents or not. But please, keep telling me how dogs are theoretically safer and more innocent than children everybody. Keep telling me that they pay taxes and have never done anything in which they should be held accountable (owner and dog), that any reason for fearing a dog is unwarranted. What the hell are you guys arguing? Do you even know what the topic of conversation is here?
Regardless of whether you are the world’s greatest dog owner/expert – and you do everything right – it doesn’t matter. Dogs running amok in the park can create situations that no person can diffuse. Case in point is my daughter, standing 10 feet away from me, having a massive dog appear out of nowhere and raise up on both legs, barking, snarling, frothing at the mouth, showing teeth and getting in attack mode, right in my poor girl’s face. It could have been tragic. We were lucky. MeowClown – you can quote any study in the world that you want – but you cannot eliminate the fact that this happened – and happens all the time. And some respect from dog owners who acknowledge that this can happen (decent dog owners do this without question) and simple regulation is what will keep this from happening to some other less fortunate person, God forbid innocent child. You are fucked up in the head if you cannot come to this conclusion – which clearly some of you have proven you cannot.
Godspeed.
Your anecdote appears to be consistent with the evidence – that the incident, much like most dog-related incidents, was indeed preventable, unless the park rules were not being enforced. Next time try to read/listen to what a person is saying rather than simply waiting your turn to offer a knee-jerk emotional response. Good luck to you and your daughter, I think you’ll need it.
Pardon? Are you even aware of the arguments you are making? The entire point of this is about enforcing rules so that all people can enjoy the park. Of course this could be preventable, if fucking rules are followed and owners are responsible. Even still, it’s not perfect – shit happens. That’s the point. Nothing is full-proof and I certainly accept there are risks in this world. Again, with feeling this time: This isn’t about hating on dogs. It is about enforcing rules and clarifying regulations so that all people can enjoy the freaking park. But from you we get diatribes about dogs being equal to or better than children. Dogs paying taxes. All dog incidents are preventable because dog experts can predict everything a dog will do. Holy fucking Happy Gilmore. We get it. Dogs don’t kill people. People kill people. Please, contribute something or move on. Or make my point for me. Whatever, dude.
And SHITMD – take a look at your original post, the one that set this off. All of a sudden you are about rules and enforcing responsible dog ownership – and you only got involved in this to protest litigation against dogs who seriously harm children. Unfortunately for you, there is a record here – and your initial involvement was to bitch about people who have shitty kids that bother you in restaurants, malls and stores. Eventually you mentioned litigation – because somebody had to point out to you that there is a responsible way to handle a pet that seriously hurts a child – and you cannot accept that outcome – and are nervous about it – while insisting that dogs are never a problem. So why worry, pal?
I’m a pretty open-minded person. But one thing that I cannot overlook is incompetence. I cannot stand that these arguments go to the lowest common denominator. SHITMD responds by hating on kids. We respond to that with ridicule and comments about him/her missing the point. Then dog lovers jump in without understanding the original argument and act like dogs are made of sugar and lollipops, and anybody who wants responsible regulation of the public park must hate dogs and blame dogs for everything. Good God – we just want shitty dog owners to take responsibility and follow the rules – and provide a park that allows all people to enjoy it as intended. Fucking trolls.
Wow, who let you out of the butterscotch palace with a sane stamp?
Welcome back Nukka.
If I lived in a butterscotch palace, I’d never leave. I’d just stay, plug into the candy cane internet connection and keep proving your arguments/pov asinine. And lick that sweet cotton candy of truth.
Since you failed here, I’m sure you’d fail there, sugar high notwithstanding.
See what I said of people thinking their PET is a family member. Sarge said it himself. It is not a member of the family Shultz. It’s a PET. People are family members, not animals. Dumdedumbdumb.
Yours truly.
%100 Wheels.
I was starting to feel sorry for the PET people; thinking they are so socially awkward and deprived of meaningful human to human interaction they value their PETs more than people.
But then they open their mouths…
I do value my pets more than your children. You couldn’t be more right.
Yes, Wheels, they are part of my family. Anyone who doesn’t think their pets are part of their family are just wankers, kinda like you.
Wow.. you are truly fucked in the head SHITMD.
If you ever make to old age, I’m sure your mut will take good care of you. With your attitude, I have my doubts.
Actually, my mut will be long dead in my “old age”, but that’s ok, I’ll get another one.
Good luck with your kid, after all, she could end up a meth addicted prostitute. Your first mistake is thinking she will want to “take care of you”, not stuff you in a home and waste your savings.
Thanks SHITMD for continuing to point out the fact that there is a need for more dog regulations and enforcement. Unfortunately for the many, there are a few individuals out there like you.
SHITMD keeps proving our point for us. I love it. True colours came out at the start…retreated….then came on strong again. We get it. You love your dog more than people. You don’t give a shit about anybody’s kids. Clearly you only care about yourself and your dog. And of course it is people like you that ruin it for everybody else. Most of us actually care about other people and their dogs. And if people like you continue to neglect the rest of the environment around you, then it will certainly come back to bite you, and you will ruin it for everybody else. Some of us, on the other hand, want it to work for everybody. Not you, though. Too bad for you narcissism is rooted in low self esteem. No self respect. So sad.
They are family pets, not family.
i you don’t consider pets part of your family, you shouldn’t adopt/rescue
^^ paingirl for supreme being!
merci mon cher, i have a finite amount of time to open my big gob
Looks like SHITMD and MeowMix has moved on to greener Trolling pastures.
681 posts and counting; not 1 meaningful comment. Posterchild for Pitbull owners… I couldn’t write it any better myself :/ I somewhat feel sorry for you, but definitely look forward to the day you and your breed are banned from NS too.
I also want to point out that just because your dog is good with a child – what does that have to do with the topic being discussed? The topic is about Point Pleasant Park – and making sure that rules are followed so that all people, not just dog owners, can enjoy the park. Just because you feel that your dog is perfect doesn’t change the issue at hand. And just because you tell a 5yr old to be firm with your dog doesn’t mitigate the possibility of a random child being hurt in the park. So I really don’t understand where the dog owners here are coming from – being so defensive about whether they themselves, and their dogs, are good people. Nobody on here knows your dog. And you and your dog are not necessarily representative of the population. Take a fucking bow and get over yourselves. Start giving a shit about other people and your community – and be part of the solution. Otherwise you are the exact same as any parent who makes excuses for their kid and acts as if they could never do any wrong, because clearly they are the superior parent and their child is an angel. Holy shit, crazies. Do the math.
But I guess when you’re SHITMD and you have over 700 posts on here, you don’t actually give a shit about anything – you’re just here to entertain yourself.
I’ve been to PPP about 3 times in the last 5 years. My main issue is the majority of people there are just plain ignorant of how dogs behave and react.
From owners who can’t control their dog or think that it’s just an accessory, to parents who have never taught their kid how to approach a strange dog. People are just dumb sometimes, and forget that dogs come from domesticated wolves.
PPP is also too small and close for a dog to get a proper run, there are a lot of great places near the peninsula for exercising Fido. Unless someone lives in the South end, I don’t see why the bother with PPP.
PS – The whole family member thing. Blue is considered family, and I’m the Alpha of his pack.
People who know me and Blue, know that the only way I’ll “save them first”, is if they have Blue in their arms. Not kidding.
Now if you all will excuse me, I’m going to take a bunch of dogs for some play time.
100% on board with the “Pet is Family” crew. Here’s the thing, I made the choice not to pollute the planet with offspring. I’ve also made the choice to take responsibility for caring for an animal and sharing my life with her. Cradle to grave. Is my cat more valuable than your child? To me, she is. Absofuckinglutely right. She is never going to vandalize your property for shits and giggles, play sucker punch with you, rape your daughter and bully her to death online, annex the Crimea, or any of a thousand and one worst case scenarios. And as long as you are never stupid enough to cross my threshold, you never need know how much more important my pet is, in the overall scheme of things.
As far as you Kuntbaya warbling tofu pukers with your “sense of community” – treat yourselves to a hot steaming mug of fair trade FuckOff. I want nothing from you except that you obey the laws and mind your own fucking business. And teach the fruit of your loins to do the same.
Just more comments from antisocial, hateful, Dog’s before people narcissistic MF’s. You don’t need me to paint the picture.
Can you read? The OP has nothing to do with how great of a person you are to adopt a pet and whether or not you think they are a part of your family.
Since you Dog fuckers keep going there.. How about the fact that ~17% of children in NS live in poverty? That’s roughly 30,000 kids in the province, roughly a million nationwide. Hundreds of kids that need a home never find one in NS, left in group homes never to be adopted; nobody to fall back on when in trouble once they turn 18; nobody to help them get an education or go home to for the holidays.
Take a good look at yourself. You’re not doing anything good for society. You are part of the problem.
Bottom line: SHITMD is a pit bull owner who doesn’t care about people and children – only his dog. He believes that because he trained a 5yr old to speak firmly to his pit bull, this defense then applies to all children that might come across his dog. Blatantly irresponsible attitude as a dog owner. Decent people respect others, especially innocent children, enough to protect them from their dogs. Simple logic concludes that if you don’t care about others, then there is likely nothing keeping you from taking responsibility as a pet owner. This is why society will expect you to put that dog down if it harms somebody, and if you don’t, society will step in, via the courts if necessary. But that’s just something for you to bitch about. I don’t think you get it. Scary that somebody like you is in charge of a pit bull.
Paranoid much there, Ivan? I think we can all agree that we put our kids and our pets ahead of people who want to do us harm or who threaten our homes/property. Way to make an argument. But if it ever came down to it, putting your pet ahead of an innocent child, that’s just fucked up. It’s probably the most selfish and narcissistic thing I’ve ever heard. Insane.
Hell. I put my cat as a family member too. Though the bugger never left home when he got older…..damn freeloader.
Paranoid? I prefer to think of it as being blessed with an excess of faith in human nature.
Insane? Quite probably although that has little to do with the fatigue generated by encountering parents who honestly believe that the world at large is obligated to appreciate the “gift” that they’ve given to themselves. Now that’s delusional.
+1 Insane^
If it means I don’t have to have some self-entitled twat coming to my door and asking me to help crowdfund Shambollocks School’s Spring Break trip to Lhasa, or Denver, then I can live with it.
I don’t ascribe to the conventional definition of a family as an organization of people tied together by blood, marriage, or co-habitation. This is a human construct. It is anthropocentric. Any family, IMO, involves a set of living things where a perceived bond causes an otherwise rational human being to treat another living thing as though it is family. I love my dog and I cherish our bond. This bond receives legitimacy through its recognition by people in my life. Consequently, I feed, care for, and shelter my dog just as I would a child. This makes the dog a member of my family. Of course, if I had a child, there would be a hierarchy of importance within my family. I would be more likely to euthanize my dog than my child (if I had to choose one), for instance, although one might argue that this is because of the current legal status of euthanasia.
In any event, whether or not a pet is a family member or not has nothing to do with the issues at hand:
(1) Is PPP a dog park? No, it is a public park.
(2) Should PPP expand or contract its off-leash zones? In my view, PPP should add limits on off-leash zones and time.
(3) Are people owners as capable as pet owners of being completely insane? Yes. Are FR and Visionre people-freaks? Based on the evidence presented here, probably.
“Since you Dog fuckers keep going there.. How about the fact that ~17% of children in NS live in poverty? That’s roughly 30,000 kids in the province, roughly a million nationwide. Hundreds of kids that need a home never find one in NS, left in group homes never to be adopted; nobody to fall back on when in trouble once they turn 18; nobody to help them get an education or go home to for the holidays.”
Another reason why some people should adopt dogs rather than have kids. Just sayin’
Ivan – this isn’t a conversation about self entitled parents. I don’t need you to validate my child as I’m sure you don’t need me to validate your pet. Any parent who acts like that is probably an ass – just like the ass dog owners who are causing the issue at PPP that is being discussed in this thread. Yes, there are annoying people of all creeds, parents or not. Some have kids and are obnoxious and nauseating about it. If you actually think those people present a problem in Point Pleasant Park, then make your case…but all your issues have nothing to do with WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT. It is loony tunes season when all you dog owners in here don’t realize that you keep making our point. It’s a conversation about Point Pleasant Park and the fact that it has literally gone to the dogs. Most people are annoyed by telemarketers calling and people knocking at our doors to sponsor their team/school/etc. Or dogs that bark into the night. But what does that have to do with FUCKING POINT PLEASANT PARK? You hear anything to do with a pet and you go ape shit. Crazies!
Did somebody abandon you MeowMan? That’s some pretty hateful shit. Pay it forward, that’ll stop the cycle:/
“I would be more likely to euthanize my dog than my child (if I had to choose one), for instance, although one might argue that this is because of the current legal status of euthanasia.”
I’d like to hear more… what do you consider a situation that would warrant euthanizing a child? Thank god you don’t have children!
Lucky for you (and unlucky for us), your mother didn’t think like that before she conceived you. Do the world a favour and get yourself neutered.
Fuck Point Pleasant Park! Seriously, it could get deconiferated in a windstorm for all the fucks I give. Dog shit – hobo shit, I don’t give a crap. I’m targeting the “Pets aren’t family members” and the “It should take an entire village to raise MY child” crowd.
And as for noobs who try to play bitch referee – go piss up a rope. Bitches grow, spread, diverge, evolve, and metastasize according to the whims of the commenters. Officious little prigs who whinge about bitches getting derailed are like the pushy businesswoman/soccer mom who shows up at school events with a clipboard and whistle and starts giving orders. Sooner or later they get shown a new way to blow the whistle, without using their lips.
vision, i wouldn’t be trying to cast guilt around about 17% of kids being homeless if i were a BREEDER. surely you adopted, right?
if not, shove that stat back up your ass where it came from. people who make the decision to NOT add to the world’s overpopulation are NOT part of the problem. the PROBLEM is selfish snots who believe their own dna is so precious it must be passed on, and that someone else’s thrown away kid is not good enough to be the beneficiary of their desire for a child in the home.
anyone who is criminal enough to deliberately BREED themselves should be ashamed to leave their house without a bag over their head.
“anyone who is criminal enough to deliberately BREED themselves should be ashamed to leave their house without a bag over their head.”
Good golly, Ms. Molly! I guess all parents, including your own, should be ashamed. Say no to having kids. Let’s build a world, albeit short lived, on pets only.
And if you read his post correctly, it is a response to dog owners patting themselves on the back for adopting a dog, although likely one that was bred, instead of having kids, and suggesting that anybody who has kids is contributing to all the worlds problems. That is some self-righteous, twisted BS. Have a dog. Have kids. Do both. Do neither. But stop praising yourself for having a dog instead of a kid. And if you do have a dog, don’t let it shit all over PPP without picking it up. Don’t let it off leash in a public space in a marked on-leash area. Respect the rules so that everybody can enjoy the park and stop ruining it for all the other dog owners who abide by them, and all the other people without dogs who rely on the space. Owning a dog is great. Loving that dog and taking care of that dog is great. But it’s what you’re supposed to do if you own a dog. And given that you hate on people in general, it just underscores the point that there is nothing more important than raising a child to become a decent person who contributes positively to society. And that definitely includes being a pet owner.
And if you knew anything about geography, political science and/or anthropology, Canada (Halifax in particular), is not overpopulated. It’s actually under-populated. We need more people to grow up here, live here, contribute to our society here, pay taxes here, take care of your health and your livelihood as you get old. Perhaps you think we just ship our kids off to India, China or Africa? We suffer from stagnant population growth and brain drain. You having a dog and not a kid serves yourself. Raising a child to contribute to society serves the community. I’m not bothered by people that choose not to have kids. I am bothered by dog owners who think buying a dog cements their place on Mt Pius. Now keep telling me how my point is theoretically incorrect because dogs pay taxes. Game. Set. Match. Go away.
Ivan – that’s actually quite hilarious. Although I am curious why you would be reading a post about PPP if you don’t give a shit about it. Why bother? Troll it up, brotha!
And I don’t think you’ll find a single comment from anybody in here stating the ‘it takes a community to raise a child’ argument. Your evolution of the bitch theory is really just you projecting.
How was that hateful? I was purposely vague about my actual likelihood of euthanizing a child or dog. I did not specify a baseline likelihood nor did I specify how much more likely I would be to euthanize a dog over a child. For instance, Bayesian priors of a 0.00000000000000000000001% probability of euthanizing a child and a 0.002% probability of euthanizing my dog imply that I am very unlikely to euthanize either a dog or a child. Given these odds it would take me about 1.000e+25 lifetimes at current fertility rates (~ 1 child per person) to euthanize a child. Perhaps this low likelihood is due to the fact that I care about human beings.
As for what situation would warrant euthanasia, for a human I think the choice should be up to the individual. If a well-informed adult is in chronic and severe pain such that their quality of life is diminished and they would prefer to die than continue living, then they should, in my view, be allowed to die. It’s a little more tricky with children since we do not grant children independence to make major life-altering decisions (except for allowing them to sign on to a life of debt slavery) without the guidance of the government or family. I suppose particular circumstances might still permit euthanasia but it’s hard to think of a specific example.
Does that answer your question?
And if you knew anything about geography, political science and/or anthropology, Canada (Halifax in particular), is not overpopulated.
Overpopulation should not be described solely in terms of population density. An alternative definition is based on the ecological footprint, which measures how much of the earth’s resources that a person uses up. Currently Canada’s (and Nova Scotia’s) ecological footprint is well above what is considered to be sustainable. The only way to become sustainable is to lower the population or dramatically alter how we make and consume things.
good heavens, you really just make shit up don’t you, gr?
where do i start?
why are you assuming that i, we, anyone here paid for a deliberately bred dog? i adopted all from rescue groups
why do you assume that i go to, much less let my dogs poop all over, ppp? i don’t and they don’t.
where did you get the notion that i said my dogs pay taxes? they don’t, but i do. income plus prop.
you should try to keep track of who said what and answer appropriately if you address someone by name. general lash-outs are fine if you cannot remember or don’t care to. i addressed my comment to vision
the planet is overpopulated. nova scotia having a few spare acres does not make up for the billions in china. nova scotia does not live under a bubble. you are focusing on expanding the economy by constant growth, and if you have any love for humanity, you would see that is short term gain for very long term pain. it has to end or we die as a species. each new human being contributes to the problem. adopt – don’t shop (breed)
you are only creating spurious excuses for your own self interest by saying that the greatest accomplishment is to raise a child to serve society. raise someone else’s child. adopt a homeless child. that’s how to serve society, not by insisting on your own get. or…stop bleating about the ‘good of society’ and just admit you think homeless children are unworthy of you.
and for pity’s sake, unless you grew up in a ghetto and have some legitimate excuse for speaking poorly, it is ‘hate people’ not ‘hate on people’.
Geez Molly.. You definitely don’t give a rats ass about horses, do you? It’s been dead for 3 days now. We get it; it’s you and your dogs against the world. You’ve contributed sooo much to society. Thanks for being intelligent enough to not reproduce (That go’s out to you SHITMD and Meow too).
TWEET TWEET, ORDER NOW!!!
Now let’s top this thread off with a Cherry… Mr. Meow, please feed us some more of your existential BS on child euthanasia. I’m running out of popcorn.
Existential: “I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means”.
I hadn’t been to PPP in years and took my kids there for a walk after a snow storm. It was crazy full of dogs, professional dog walkers, snooty south end dog owners and way more off leash zones than when I was a kid. It totally ruined it for us and I won’t be going back. I don’t know how the dog lobby got so strong but they should be limited to the main trail from the upper parking lot and the waterfront area only, perhaps even specific hours. A crazy bitch was worried a five year old girl would hurt her “5000 $” dog by sliding down a snowy hill. Is a dog stupid enough to get hit by a kid moving at 7 kph? Not going back and could now care less if they turn it into a stadium.
Molly. I didn’t assume anything. My comment about buying dogs was a general comment about dog ownership, not a direct comment about you. Once you made your stark raving mad comment about human reproduction, you opened that door. Most dogs are not rescues – but kudos to you for adopting. I have no idea how you went about owning a dog. Yet I believe you were the one who suggested that somebody here didn’t adopt their child and thus could basically shove their opinion up their arse. Nice assumption by you.
I have no idea where you let your dogs poop and whether or not you clean it up. But this thread complaint included dogs in PPP pooping and owners not cleaning it up, thus my comment. Read the thread. Don’t just jump in and troll your way into it. If you’d read it, you’d know. People read these posts – not every inch of it is dedicated to your narcissistic ass.
I know that it was Meow who made the comment about dogs paying taxes. But tongue in cheek, yes, it was actually fun to associate it with the same lame arguments coming from all the defensive dog owners on here who don’t give a shit about other people, just their dogs. That seems clearly to include you. And I was right in doing so as you just supported the argument yourself. You pay taxes – you own a dog….and thus. Good job. I’m enlightened. For the record, you pay more than income and property tax. Just saying.
Again, you can chirp about over-population – but we don’t live in an over-populated part of the world. We actually need more people to live here in order for us to survive here and maintain a standard of living here. The globalization argument doesn’t apply to whether or not a couple in Nova Scotia should have children. China? Maybe. India? Maybe. Nova Scotia. Get real. Focus on the problem. We’re not it. It’s not your call whether or not somebody wants to procreate, regardless of where they live, although often it’s a horrible idea for a lot of people. But it’s not up to you.
Another assumption by you about whether or not I care about homeless children. What is wrong with you? Holy f’ing hypocrite. You just ranted on about not doing this. Which one is it? What the fuck do you know about my thoughts on adoption, homeless children, what I’ve contributed to this world? Maybe I was adopted? Maybe my kids are adopted? And what does it matter? Whether I choose to have kids of my own or not is none of your fucking business. You make a point and then immediately tear it down. If you have a child, the greatest thing you can do is raise that child to contribute to society and not just take from it. Be there for your kids. Teach them. Nurture them. All this regardless of whether they have your DNA or not. If not, they’ll end up being a shitty parent or dog owner or criminal or schizophrenic troll writing nonsense in The Coast. Anything you infer outside of that just proves you are a complete mental disaster.
Your “ghetto” comment is fantastic. It just underscores the entire point here. You can’t follow your own train of thought. Care about people – adopt somebody underprivileged – you don’t think homeless kids are worthy of you – only people from the ‘ghetto’ have an excuse to speak poorly. Very sensitive of you. Very nice, that one. I type a mile a minute – maybe it was just a mistake – or maybe it’s what I meant to say. You can always tell when somebody has lost – they start grasping at straws, take one word of (I admit) many, and try to characterize a person as poorly spoken, uneducated, from the ghetto, inferring people from the ghetto have an excuse for the way they are. That’s some racist shit. Here’s how easy it is to do that, from your post:
“not by insisting on your own get. or”.
Hahahahaha….great spelling, Molly. Were you raised in a trailer park?
See – simple. Lowest. Common. Denominator. That’s clearly you. Diet nerd. All the intention of a nerd minus all the good stuff (ie: the intelligence). Way to show who you really are – ‘from a ghetto’????. Bahahahaha – ignorant piece of shit.
Alright meow, time to calm down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXPeLctgvQI
So…my wife and I went out to lunch yesterday with friends. We went to a pub, not a “family style” restaurant, you know, one with a bar, a bartender, etc…So when some stupid parents came in dragging their 2 year old with them, kicking and screaming, we shook out heads in disgust. Here we were having a nice, quiet meal. From the second that “family” came in, every eye in the place turned in their direction in scorn. the whole god damned time that stupid kid was loud and annoying. If it wasn’t crying and blubbering, it was yelling and trying to wriggle out of it’s seat. How much fun was that for the people directly around them that came in for drinks and a meal? Thank Jebus we were completely across the room from them, yet the scene was still loud and annoying enough to disturb the entire pub!!!!
You fucking parents think there is nowhere that is off limits to you and your screaming shit stain, but if you or your shit stain is inconvenienced anywhere you go, you have the right to try and impose new rules to accommodate you. Well, not everyone thinks that’s acceptable. You don’t like dogs or their owners, good for you. This was never about who’s “right” or “wrong”, it’s about YOUR shitty attitude toward sharing space with others. If you don’t like the policy at a certain park, go to another one. Nobody wants to listen to how important you think you are because you did the world a favor by making another entitled douchebag, just like you!!!
Shitty’n
Hateful
Is
Troll’s
Main
Directive
1000 Ways to Die ep. #### “Pit bulled to death”… That would be sweet irony. Kind of like the douche that was mauled by his pet tiger in London, ON. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/man-mauled-to-death-by-pet-tiger-1.914127
A little more extreme example of the same shit you keep spewing. I’m sure he thought his tiger was the friendliest tiger in the world. Tiger’s a tiger, pit bull’s a pit bull, and you’re a troll. I’ve never heard of anybody being mauled to death by a pack of 2 year olds…
Every 2 year old is a “potential” (as in, future) murderer/rapist, just as a pit bull (or any other animal) is a “potential” mauler. Fuck off already.
Let’s be clear Meow… It’s you and SHITMD that keep coming in here preaching your insane sermon of hate for mankind.
There is a dog problem at PPP.
There are irresponsible dog owners that frequent PPP.
Period.
Now go away and find yourself some antisocial nut cases like yourself to preach to.
What’s with the “mauled by a tiger” bullshit? Are you already drunk at 10:00 am? Now who’s going to teach your daughter how to suck dick for meth?
The particular case about whether PPP has a dog problem (i.e. are dogs menacing small children or vice versa) can be easily settled (we agree, ban/restrict dogs; fuck off already), yet your trolling of SHITD keeps turning to the more general case about the harm caused by pit bulls and other animals (Visionre on 03/31/2014 at 10:03 AM). I was commenting on the general case, not the particular.
To reiterate, I simply pointed out that children, as future adults, can be at least as harmful as any animal over the long-term. The devastation of the planet’s environment, and the fact that humans abduct, rape, murder and generally violently violate each other by the second, is sufficient to show that humans (and children, as future humans) are more dangerous than family pets. This does not mean that I hate mankind, or children for that matter.
OK – seriously folks. Sir Meow – listen, you seem like a nice person. I understand you are trying to take on some kind of devil’s advocate position here. But you are completely lacking context. Don’t bother arguing that a 2yr old human being can potentially one day end up just as threatening or more-so than a dog in a park. It’s not relevant. Everybody knows there are bad people in the world. My 2yr old isn’t going to hurt you. This is supposed to be a conversation about the guidelines at PPP, the reality of which is that people are not following rules, it’s making it suck for other people, and there is clearly a simple solution. People like SHITMD can’t hear this. They jump to ‘you hate dogs and dog owners’ – ‘there is no problem, you just want to complain so you can take away my rights at the park’, etc, etc. It’s exhausting.
And SHITMD – guess who it sucks for the most at that restaurant? The parents. Parents exercise judgment on a constant basis throughout the day, making a thousand decisions, and sometimes we’ll make some mistakes and our toddlers will annoy some people. That’s our problem, though, we made our own bed, the rewards of which far outweigh any superficial annoyances. Shitty dog owners make mistakes, and the outcomes can be horrible. Show some empathy – as I’m sure you were just as annoying as a kid- and still are as far as I’m concerned. Regardless, stop trying to make the point that this is about dog haters, etc. You say we have a shitty attitude about us sharing space? Really, that hilarious to me. This was brought up to address a problem – dog owners not following rules and it sucking for other people. It is those other people who have the shitty attitude about sharing the space. Our vent is no different than your vent about kids in a restaurant – oh wait – it is – because those kids aren’t breaking any rules and have equal rights to you. And it is you, ma’am, with the shitty attitude about sharing space – clearly stated in your last post complaining that a kid completely ruined your day at the pub (hilarious) and by posting the first reply here telling Visionre to “shut the fuck up – your kid is worse than my dog”. So why don’t YOU shut the fuck up already? Leave this place. Make fun of somebody else’s ‘dick sucking meth’ 2yr old. What is wrong with you, seriously? You just keep making the point for us – and you’re too stupid to figure that out. Crazy people don’t know they’re crazy…seems to apply here. You clearly don’t like kids – and you clearly believe that your pit bull has rights equal to a human being – and you clearly don’t think that rules apply to dog owners – or that if rules are being broken, then nothing should be done about it. I’m curious what kind of a storm you would raise if it were the other way around. I’m sure you won’t stand an inch for anything that might break a rule that violates your poor dogs rights.
SHITMD – one of the main reasons people are threatened so much by Pit Bulls is because the majority of their owners like you do not respect other people and refuse to acknowledge the potential threat. All they hear is that ‘my dog is nice – he wouldn’t hurt a fly – I trained my friend’s 5yr old to handle him’. It does nothing to address the actual issue – you all just deny that there is one in the first place. Their fears are reinforced and probably multiplied when they come across somebody with your shitty attitude who instead complains about 2 year olds. Keep it up and you’ll never break free of it – and your beloved pit bulls will no longer be allowed to exist in this country. Precedence has been set in Ontario; and you and your brethren will push everybody else to follow suit.
Me, my kid, my family, all people, are entitled to enjoy that park – which comes down to making sure that it is not overrun by dogs and owners who are breaking rules. That doesn’t make me entitled. It makes all of us entitled. Get it? City council will be enforcing fines/penalties this summer as they are aware that it has gotten out of control and are fielding too many complaints about it. You two clowns can keep swimming upstream, or you might actually do something positive and join in making it better for everyone. Would you ever setup at the park with your dog and hand out pamphlets to dog owners advising them of the problem – and reminding them to pick up the shit and of the allowed off-leash areas? I’m assuming no – because instead you’d rather sit in front of the pub judging parents and their children. Class act, pal.
This will probably not end well:
http://tv.i.uol.com.br/album/simpsons_conv…
R.I.P. Montecore
So I guess I can assume that you believe that ALL pitbulls are a threat. It’s nice to know that there are judgmental assholes out there like you that take media hype and bullshit, fudged stats as gospel. It’s clowns like you, and your unwavering, media driven hysteria that make me laugh. I did not get a pitbull so I could look badass or to intimidate anyone, but thanks for lumping me into your lame-ass stereotype. I got him to be part of my family, to give him a wonderful, love filled life. Its extremely offensive to me and many other people that you take something as pure and good as taking an animal into your home, providing everything I possibly can for him, and my other dogs and reduce it to ego driven, intimidation. I don’t see pitbulls as any different than any other dog. My yellow lab was his bestest buddy for 9 years, and it was heartbreaking to watch him search the house for her after she died. There is a difference between bringing a dog into your family and “owning a dog”, and thank Jebus you don’t “own” one.
As for PPP, you won’t catch me there. It’s full of douchebags like you. I take my dogs to places where they can run free without evil looks from assholes who don’t take the time to fully appreciate that a dog is just that, a dog. PPP is full of rich-bitch wives who don’t work and have nothing but time on their hands to ruin everyone’s day with their “it’s all about me” bullshit. So take your shitty park, with it’s soon to be shittier rules, and cram it up your watertight ass!!!
When you grow up and can separate good owners from stereotypical douchebags, by all means, write back. Until then, go fuck yourself!!!!
For the record, SHITMD… You’re the half wit that keeps coming in here telling people to fuck off. Post #1, etc. etc. Pehaps you should heed your own advice.
#2 Pit bulls have been bread for decades to be attack dogs and for pit fighting. You’re dog may never bite anyone in it’s lifetime. The probability of it biting/ mauling vs another breed is significantly higher. Is this why you’re afraid to take your pet to the park?
Here’s a little Wiki excerpt:
A 5-year (2001–05) review of dog attack victims admitted to the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia determined that pit bull terriers were implicated in more than half of the bites where breed was identified. Of the 269 patients where breed was identified, 137 (51%) were attacked by pit bulls.[29] The authors wrote:
the overwhelming number of bites involving pit bull terriers in this study and others certainly has some degree of validity when it comes to identifying bite-prone breeds. Pit bull terriers, German shepherds, and Rottweilers were the offending breeds implicated in our study, and have accounted for the majority of dog bites according to other investigators.[29]
Funny how some owners are just like their dogs….
Now that we’ve moved beyond the lame PPP issue, let’s focus on the fact that Visionre does not understand correlation versus causation and could not conceive to critically evaluate anything that he/she reads.
While there are many problems with your comment, I’ve focused on just a few. I’ve ordered them for your convenience.
(1) “Post #1, etc. etc”. What?
(2) “Pit bulls have been bread for decades to be attack dogs and for pit fighting”. In addition to pit bulls, breeds used as attack (guard) dogs include German Shepherds, Dobermans, and Rottweilers (just to name a few). Why the bias toward Pit Bulls? Who do you think bred dogs to fight? Answer: humans (specifically, assholes)! Humans bred in the fighting instinct, they can breed it out of the dog (this is ongoing).
(3) I visited your wiki and linked to the article. There is no statement in the abstract about how breeds were identified. A review of all dog bite-related fatalities in 2010 found that only 25% of breeds could be accurately identified (19% documented and 6% of identifications in incident reports deemed reasonable) – see link below. Of the remaining 75% most breeds could not be determined – likely mixed breeds, commonly known as mutts. Given this data and the fact that the vast majority of serious dog bites (especially involving fatalities) are caused by non-family (i.e. resident) dogs, many of whom are unknown and have no previous contact with the victims (see my link above and below in this comment), it seems at least plausible that victim-reported (and related media-reported) breed identification is, at best, inaccurate.
(4) The vast majority of studies on dog bites are based on retrospective cohort data. This includes the one you have cited. These studies are flawed for several reasons including the issue I raised in (1). A second more fundamental reason, is that there are many unmeasured confounding factors unrelated to the dog’s breed but which drive a dog to be aggressive. Pit bulls are well known for having awful “owners” (SHITMD excluded, based on what I can tell), yet ownership quality cannot be easily measured at baseline in retrospective cohort data, especially when the unit of observation is the patient (or bite victim). “But what about family pit bulls that bite?” More generally, the effects of “bad ownership” (neglect, abuse) can be long lasting – even dogs adopted into loving families come with excess baggage that can lead to aggressive behaviour. Again, this can have nothing to do with the breed.
(5) Perhaps the best evidence on the impact of dog breed and dog-human aggression comes from jurisdictional experiments with breed-specific legislation (BSL) banning certain breeds. These studies compare bite fatalities and injuries in BSL-initiation regions to neighbouring control jurisdictions (other studies do simple before-after comparisons with BSL-initiation regions). These studies almost exclusively find that bite fatalities and injuries are not impacted whatsoever by BSL. This could indicate one of many things: mean reversion, inefficacy of BSL in eradicating target breeds, or simply that breeds per se are not the “cause” of dog-human aggression. See
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/d…
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/u…
On balance, I would conclude (A) Visionre is an uneducated moron and a rabble rouser and (B) the evidence on pit bulls overwhelmingly suggests that “dog owners”, rather than pit bulls, are to blame for pit bull bites.
First of all Meow, I definitely don’t have the time to read, research and troll through 90+ comments to play he said/ she said to entertain you off topic arguments. Nor do I really care.
Second order of business… As long as you keep commenting off topic in this thread, I will continue to point that out. As long as SHITMD keeps coming here stringing a few sentences together between his fuck off’s and shut the fuck up’s, I will continue to point out that he is an asshole.
Third; If you are going to troll through the Pit Bull wiki and attempt to dissect the limitations of studies by the American Paediatric association, American society of Plastic Surgeons and Annals of Surgery, you are surely intelligent enough to quote results from studies published in a scientific journal as opposed to copying/ linking info from a special interest group. That’s no different than arguing against climate change using data/reports from groups funded by dark money.
Keep wasting your time. I’ll check in periodically.
Honestly it only takes a few minutes to come back here and comment. I really don’t mind. Plus it’s fun to educate the plebites.
Anyway, your criticism of my intellectual integrity is invalid for the following reasons. First, the link I posted in my last comment directed the user to a special interest group’s website, which provided links to academic peer reviewed articles. It was these peer reviewed articles to which I was referring in my previous comment. I hope you can understand that it was easier to post a link to multiple articles on a similar topic than it was to post several links for each individual article.
Second, your suggestion that I was cherry picking evidence is invalid because, unlike you, who only posted a single article in support of your pre-existing bias and prejudice, I posted several other articles and situated them against yours. Based on my expertise in quantitative methods (yes this is an area in which I have expertise, actually!), I was able to conclude that victim-reported breeds combined with retrospective cohort data is likely to be inferior to quasi-experimental evidence using before-and-after comparisons between experimental and non-experimental jurisdictions. If you would like to debate this matter further I would be happy to do so.
Third, critical research evaluation is not trolling, despite what you think. I suspect that the reason you resort to name calling (i.e. calling me a troll) is because you are unable or unwilling to follow basic logic and to synthesize and honestly critique data and evidence. You should really try to avoid these patterns of behaviour in the future.
Good luck in life, and good bye.
Woops, I realized that I erred in entering the second link to my comment dated 04/01/2014 at 4:59 PM
The correct link is:
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/d…
This will direct you to the journal articles on BSL (i.e. pit bull bans).
Happy reading!
You’re still on a tangent Meow; and I still don’t care about BSL.
I suggest you spend your time attempting to correct the public record with the fine folks at Wikipedia. I’m guessing a lot more people refer to the information there as opposed to off topic comments in a bitch post.
Do you know what a tangent is? I’m on point in that I was responding to your comment.