You paint a nice picture, doll, ya really do. But I see you as clear as day, and no amount of pet names (which, btw, are fucking annoying) will make me see you as anything less than a narcissistic, cheating scumbag. I hope she finds everything out. I want to see you crash and burn. Don’t worry, though. Your dirty little secrets are safe with me. For now. -How’s that for Dark Matter?
This article appears in May 22-28, 2014.
Wow, all that anger and wanting him to crash and burn, yet his secrets are safe? You my darlin, doll, dear, hunny, babe, boo and beloved are a walking oxymoron!
And on a side note, WTF does dark matter have to do with this?
If I wanted high school drama, I’d watch Degrassi.
http://youtu.be/p4pfWxjoc6w
They TOTALLY deserve each other. Hopefully they’ll end up with more than just another funny story to drink to 😉
http://www.funny-games.biz/images/pictures…
Couldn’t have said it better Haz and Michael, OP is a fucking dog.
A QUESTION OF IDENTITY
“But I see you clear as day, and no amount of pet names (which. btw, are fucking annoying) will make me see you as anything less than a narcissistic, cheating scumbag.” How’s that for Dark Matter?
This, of course, is a perennial topic for reflection in philosophy. It concerns the grounds for the assessment of another’s identity. How is the determination to be made and, by extension, is there any way of determining the accuracy of the assessment?
Other than his use of pet names for her such as “Peach,” Dark Matter specifies no particular grounds for her claim that he is a narcissistic, cheating scumbag. He may be, but she has not demonstrated the veracity of her case. For example, would she be able to support her first charge, that he is narcissistic?
This is a very common criticism – an omnibus criticism if you like – which can mean nearly anything. The narcissist, according to the Concise Oxford Dictionary, refers to one who has a “Tendency to self-worship, absorption in one’s own personal perfections” but, for the charge to stick, Dark Matter must accurately diagnose such tendencies and absorptions. In other words, Dark Matter’s assessment that he is narcissistic requires that he is, in fact, narcissistic and that her assessment in fact corresponds to his identity. But rather than specifying her criteria of narcissism, Dark Matter simply levels the charge and so gives us no reason to suppose that her assessment accurately depicts his identity.
In the same way, her claim that he is a “scumbag” amounts to little more than empty fist-shaking. Indeed, beyond a general term of verbal abuse it is not even clear what a scumbag is. It is not listed in the Concise Oxford Dictionary so one has doubts that it actually exists in nature. Are scumbags found hanging from trees? From people’s chins? Even if they were, the viability of Dark Matter’s analogy itself is open to question. We just don’t know what we’re talking about when we talk about scumbags and so the charge that he is a scumbag falls flat.
That leaves Dark Matter’s charge that he cheated on her which, at first glance, might lend empirical evidence to support her claim that he is a narcissistic scumbag but, even here, she fails to give grounds. She might have specified documented instances relates to his purported cheating but she has given none. Even the cheating charge itself is open to interpretation. Perhaps Dark Matter is unduly possessive and claims that a mild, momentary flirtation amounted to serial cheating. We just don’t know and so Dark Matter’s cheating charge remains in abeyance.
One can only conclude that not only has Dark Matter failed to prove her case that he is a narcissistic, cheating scumbag but she has also clearly failed to give grounds that she has grasped his identity “tout court.” Case dismissed!
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I’m a little fuzzy on the peach part. Get it? (snicker)
OP isn’t necessarily cheating with this guy. He could be sidling up to her with intentions quite obvious using pet names. Plus she may know he’s cheating with someone else as well. These types tend not to be exclusive. If she is engaging in extracurricular relations with him, she’s a hypocrite so I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt.
As far as the dark matter is concerned, I think OP is just trying to reconcile the entire geometry of the universe as is quantified with what has been measured to date. She sees gaps maybe “darkness” but something’s there, it just can’t be measured. It remains fuzzy.
See how I finished this post like a complete circle.
Its bitches like this one , that explains why the revenge porn vids are such a problem now …. they’re making it into the news
THE PEACH
We have already seen (Montrealman, 05/24, 9:17AM) that Dark Matter failed to satisfactorily demonstrate her case against her boyfriend who is in the process of leaving her for another girl. We saw that Dark matter failed to demonstrate that he was a narcissist, cheating scumbag. But why was Dark Matter so incensed? The question nagged at my mind. Finally, the answer occurred. I submit that the answer is to be found, so to speak, right under his nose. In other words, we need look no further than the Peach. But why did the boyfriend call her “Peach” in the first place?
As is well known, the shape of the ripe peach bears a striking resemblance to the pudenda of the thrusting pubescent female. Glowing with a rich honey colour, the peach displays a delightful cleft encased between two throbbing, magnificent labia, all lightly dusted over with enticing fuzz. One eats the ripe peach slowly, first gently biting at the skin and then sucking on its intoxicating juices which start to trickle down the cleft.
One then proceeds to explore the inner dimensions of the peach, moving one’s tongue in increasingly wider circles until the hardened, dimpled pit is encountered. One then gently tickles the pit with the tip of the tongue. The peach becomes noticeably aroused, its flesh quivering, demanding still more vigorous activity.
It opens its cleft wider, spreading its magnificent, throbbing labia in the process. Unable to restrain oneself further, one extends one’s tongue fully into the welcoming cleft, lovingly licking the dimpled pit. At length, both peach and sucker fall back exhausted, their resources drained.
Now we know why Dark Matter was so incensed. Now we know why she showed such resentment at another girl taking her place of the tip of her boyfriend’s tongue. That is why he called her “Peach”. She knows that another will be the object of her ex-boyfriend’s lingual artistry.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
http://brittanyknowsbest.files.wordpress.c…
Oh Dear God!!!
Loulou, what have you done?
Your “fantasy porn” is the most awkward, poorly written crap that I’ve ever had the misfortune of reading, it couldn’t get published as filler on the back page of Spank-Time.
Yet, at the same time, it is unquestionably your best work ever.
Anyway, no guesses at the title of the book about Loulou? 🙁
Somebody posted the “Dead Parrot Sketch”, that’s a clue.
I didn’t get the idea that op was having sex with this guy/gal – it was my understanding that he/she was trying, and she/he wasn’t buying.
if someone comes on to you, and you know he/she is in a relationship, then you can safely make the assumption its not the first time for them, ergo they are cheaters.
only idiots think that someone is so smitten by their charms that they cannot help themselves and will fling away a lifetime of morals/ethics, and after winning said fair maiden/lad, will once again become completely monogamous.
as to why op would be willing to keep his/her dirty little secret it could be because op believes in MYOB up to a point. if the scumbag keeps pestering, that may change.
If he/she is willing to fuck around with you, they will fuck around on you..
Correction!
Paragraph 5, Line 3: “on” for “of”
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
It sounds like these two were/are fucking and the chick wants the guy to leave his gf/wife and he ain’t biting so the chick is all pissed off.