Why the &$^# are you not only manufacturing but AGGRESSIVELY MARKETING whore costumes for little girls? As if it’s not bad enough that you MAKE them, shops put LEWD photos of scantily-clad CHILDREN in your flyers.
8-10 year old BABIES should not be depicted in midriff-baring tight shirts, booty shorts and fishnet stockings wearing teased hair wigs and red lipstick. It’s DISGUSTING, and if you didn’t make or advertise these costumes, people wouldn’t buy them.
Make something age-appropriate, and less likely to get cut ouf of the flyer and posted on some sick pedophile’s wall. —Threw Up in My Mouth a Little Looking at a Flyer Yesterday
This article appears in Oct 13-19, 2011.
Gypsies, Witches and Pocahonti are considered to be culturally insensitive.
That pretty much leaves prostitots, no?
Besides, not every little girl actually wants to grow up to be an MP like Vegan Lessmeat:
http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/3/…
I’m so sick of people/parents getting in a fuckspin about what’s appropriate for children or not. They’re YOUR children, not the world’s children, why should the world cater only to children? You’re the parent with the money, don’t buy them skanky clothes. Also, don’t let them watch Family Guy and South Park instead of trying to get them off the air.
But, but, but…OP, haven’t you noticed? We live in a world where children are sexualized!!! Why not? The kiddies all get to watch sexually age-inapproriate scenes in film and tv. Why shouldn’t they want to imitate what they see? It’s what children do. Not content with flaunting their own sexuality, adults jump to cater to children who are too young to understand that their 7 year old chest should not be sporting padded bikini tops as they totter along in their little high heels. Children dressing like miniature adults? The paedophile must be rubbing their hands withn glee. Or maybe they’re the ones running the show. We should be protecting our children, not offering them up on a platter. I say let kids be kids. It’s such a brief, but critically important time of a human’s life and development.
“if you didn’t make or advertise these costumes, people wouldn’t buy them.”
Chicken or egg argument. If people weren’t buying them they wouldn’t be making them.
In this case, I think it’s probably safe to say that most people wouldn’t go out of their way to put together this type of costume for their child on their own, but then again, since people seem to think “Jersey Shore” is the height of intellectual programming for their children to watch, maybe they would.
One of my biggest gross-out moments was watching a troupe of prostitots perform ‘This Land is Our Land’ at the multi-cultural festival.
if you think those costumes are bad…
you should pop into the X-Citement Video store and see what trash they’re peddling!
I actually consider child molestors & pedo’s to be worse than murderers.
Unfortunately I live in a country, where the majority Governement believes pot growers are a bigger problem & deserve more jail time than a child molester.
I wouldn’t have a problem with child molesters going to prison for only a couple of months…if it was in general population like in Renous or Millhaven
~;)
SOBova was on the Dartmouth waterfront last summer and saw a day care counselore leading a troupe of toddlers in a rousing version of Katy Perry’s “California Girls” Cute, until they got to the line about melting your popsicle. Some wino on a park bench contributed Snoop’s vocals.
The storespace next to Chapters at Sir Edward Cornwallis Mall hosted one of those cheezy costume stores that sprout up like mushrooms every autumn. The kind of place you really do feel like you need a shower after leaving.
The “Long Knight” outfit was not a spelling mistake. FML. >: (
Kinda like that ridiculous activity that seems to be so prevalent down in the States, southern States in particular, (maybe Canada, too? I dunno), the whole Toddler and Tiara crap. Child beauty pageants. I can’t for the life of me fathom why this is not considered child abuse. You’re taking pre-school kids, dressing them up and making them parade and flaunt around all so “loving mommy” can fulfill her life long unrealised dream of being a beauty queen herself, get the bragging rights for having the “most beautiful” child and, of course, the prize money. (You think the kid get’s to see any of that cash when they turn 18? Not charming likely!) It’s like they are treating their kids like living, breathing little Barbi dolls. Mommy gets to play dress-up. Spending thousands of $$$ on costumes, (most of which you wouldn’t find on a Vegas show girl), and traveling and making these kids go to endless dance and modeling lessons, rehersals, spray-on tans and make-up. YOUR KID IS 5 YEARS OLD FFS! And from what I’ve seen, the majority of the kids don’t want to be doing that shit. They want to go and play and have fun like normal little girls. It’s well and truly fucked. And all I can see whenever I hear or see anything about these so called beauty pageants is some waste-of-skin pedophile just drooling over these innocent kids dressed up like strippers. It’s a fucking field day for those pieces of shit. IMO it’s nothing but child exploitation.
Yeah I’m kinda glad I don’t buy costumes. 😛
lol…awww Tron, if you really want to dress up like a hooker, you go ahead, Bud. We won’t judge. lol (j/k)
I saw a woman taking photos of her 4 year old daughter in Montreal this summer, and she was telling her to look ‘more sexy’. There are parents out there who love that type of shit for their kids, as sad as that is.
… and they cahrge you an arm and a leg for the costumes! Friend of mine blew away 90 bucks + tax on something that barely covered her vag. I literally thought “give me the money, I can’t sew but we can work something out” … … I REFUSE to pay more than $40.00 for a Halloween costume. I’m making my own again this year … and no it won’t be out of the scantily clad female catalogue!
Well Donksturbia, a whole bunch of your cis-male Bitch-Buds have retreated to their bunks and are weeping like little girls at that bit of news. I hope you’re happy. >: (
Lulz.
Oh Ivan, I am a lady in public.
This is a complex problem which deserves closer scrutiny. On the one hand, there are the mothers looking for vicarious glory if their little girl looks smashing in her “booty shorts and fishnet stockings” but on the other hand there is the peeper, the one who is attracted to the general idea of “chicken sex.”
The only thing I can see is to get someone in authority to speak to this phenomenon. Do you think Xenophilia would give it a whirl on the basis of her exploits while camping with the Girl Guides?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Ditto that OP … from a mama that still wants her child to look like a child.
Yes avast. Toddlers in Tierras is sick. Even more sick that it gets enough ratings to still be on.
Those parents should be arrested.
Of that, Donkster, I have no doubt.
More tea?
http://paroxysmornews.files.wordpress.com/…
Disclaimer: Tongue planted firmly in cheek>; )
yeah avast, everytime i think of little joan bonet. there are some sick motherfuckers out there. and beware the biting suckster, y’all. you too donk.
It’s disturbing but less business for them. We buy our non-sexy ones over the web.
Fuck. I actually agree with More-on 100%.
FML.
Also: take a look at the little bathing suits available for infants, all the way up to tweens. WHY does a 4 year old need a little triangle string bikini?
FFS.
That’s nasty PK…I knew of toddler bikinis, but not string ones.
i’m glad the boy is not a girl
Screw buying costumes — my mom MADE my costumes when I was a kid. And I’d always win the school competitions for best costumes 😉
haha, suck up^^ my ma made our costumes too. my playing card outfit…we lived in the burbs in ottawa. two pillow cases full o stuff
Aren’t they dressing like this the other 364 days a year anyway?
BAHAHAHAHA I’d get that much and maybe a bit more, bread lady. I’d go out with my cousin and we’d go back to my place, mah ma and pa would check our shit, and then we’d go to her place for a sleepover where we’d proceed to eat pretty much half of our loot, pass out around 4am from the sugar high and wake up feeling like shit from a sugar hangover.
It was *awesome*!
Thank fuck my small child years were diabetes-free.
I agree with mel. We don’t live in a nanny state, nor should we. You’re essentially asking the advertising industry to be responsible for YOUR KIDS.
Another question OP.. why aren’t you using some of the energy you put into this bitch and instead directing it at making your child’s costume by yourself?? Or better yet, why not give your kids a lesson in ingenuity and creativity and telling them to make their own costumes?? We never had store bought costumes. That would have been a major let-down. at least 75% of the fun of halloween was going to frenchy’s or value village and building our own costumes. Making your own costume for hallowe’en is akin to trimming your own tree for Christmas.
You’re doing it wrong!
So… it no longer Takes a Village? I didn’t get the memo… :/
Relax everyone. Halloween is at the end of October and we live in Nova Scotia. The moral objectionability of those costumes greatly decreases once you have to slip it on over a snowsuit.
why the fuck, are lefties surprised/shocked at any of this shit..you push the envelope…
Wow, Marty, you were quick on the draw on that one, eh? You must miss me.
I hate to break it to you, but the abundance of bible-thumping southerners that like to dress their daughters up like mini sex dolls seems to contradict your theory that “lefties” are behind the sluttification of little girls. If it’s any consolation though, I’m sure there are lots of other things you can blame on the weirdo commie feminist queers 🙂
yea otay..them hillbillies are like in charge of national tv and ad campaigns and movies and etc..etc..typical …take the minority and make them the face of social conservatism..heard this argument like a million types toots..:)
I paid $100 for a costume once.. it was an Alice in Wonderland costume and it was just perfect and I wore it for 3 Halloweens in a row (and on some other occasions ;D) before getting pizza all over it last year. I’m not sure what to be this year. My friend and I were going to go as Walter and Perry from Home Movies but we probably won’t be going to the same parties making the costume kinda dumb. There is no Walter without Perry.
I’ve yet to decide on my costume as well.
2nd year uni I had a kick-ass Rommel outfit. Ski goggles on one of me Dad’s old uniform caps, tan leisure suit jacket (Yeah I owned one – wha’ you think you’re better’n me?) jackboots, riding crop.
It was so good I even wore it for Halloween.
>; )
‘Unter die lanterne, vor der grossem tor…)
hay meow *waves* the best costume the boy had was mr spock. remember those pj’s that had lightblue with dark blue on the cuffs. i made a comm badge out of tinfoil and dyed his hair black and did his eyebrows, got some fake ears and he looked great. nothing worse than some dear old thing asking “what are you supposed to be?” that year everyone knew what he was. meow is correct, costumes loose their edginess when they’re covered with parkas or raincoats
This one gets my vote for probably one of the coolest and ingenius costumes. Awesome!
http://www.comicsninja.com/wp-content/uplo…
WOW – that is effin’ amazing. M-14 and everything. Hella Kule!
RSVPs
: Scrotum (Oct.14 8:25M)- “Ski goggles on one of me Dad’s old uniform caps…”
Well, they say that the weather at the Treblinka site was warm and dry at the time, so it’s not suprising it held up well.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
that is cool, i remember the backs of comics “a thousand army men”
It’s funny to see some of the same people that defended slutty cloths as having no bearing on how a woman should be perceived, or promoting a sexual message, tripping over themselves to condemn advertisers for promoting slutty costumes for children as acceptable. Why is that if slutty dress is not sexualizing for adults is it sexualizing for children?
I 100% agree with this bitch, and would say that slutty costumes do sexualize children and perpetuates the message that being accepting to everything we are sold by advertisers is not intrinsically moral or right. We are solely responsible for how our children view themselves, and how to make responsible choices in order to protect themselves against a multitude of dangers and predators of any type (“don’t talk to strangers”, “don’t get in vehicles with strangers”, don’t take candy from strangers”, etc), and if you think that dressing your child up like a slut and sending them out in public is protecting them, you need to give your head a shake. Oh wait, you can’t protect yourself against predators, even saying it is attacking the individual and taking away their right to be anyone they want to be. Just because things are sold and advertised does not mean we should flock like sheep to retailers and buy, buy, buy without any thought to consequences or perceptions.
BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA. Well played Annie. Well played, indeed.
A string bikini…for little girls !
That’s just f’in wrong.
http://www.mamapop.com/wp-content/uploads/…
I luuurrrvved how they got R. Lee Ermey to voice this guy in Toy Story:
http://proneblock.com/pics/toystory2.jpg
NSFW http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUc62jD-G0o
Supposedly he ad-libbed much of that scene. Kubrick didn’t know what a reach-around was. Gunny explained and Stanley said “Keep it”
I’ve got the hair, now all I have to do is decide between
http://www.lvbeethoven.com/Portraits/Image…
-and-
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-OGJUFPZC9x8/TZsk…
—————————–
http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivation…
i vote for this guy http://movieactors.com/photos-stars/sam-el…
I abhor the prostitot thing as well–like the dance pole that was on the market last year for little girls. That being said, the annual Halloween party I attend is an opportunity for me to have a different look than I do the other 364 days of the year. This year I am doing extra time at the gym so I can look buff as Vindicator (man, white shows EVERYTHING)
However, on a practical level, I may have some cognitive dissonance. I did more than camp with girl guides, Moman; I was their leader for 8 years. And while I showed them how to be strong and independent, I wasn’t above exploiting them. This example sticks in my mind: one time we were doing a car wash (the girls were about 15 then) and there was a lull in the action. I looked at the girls and saw strings around their necks. “Are you wearing bathing suits underneath your shirts?” I asked. They nodded. “If you want, you can take your shirts off” I remember saying.
LOL at that last one Hugo. I know I’ve posted this before but it never ceases to amaze/appall me
http://www.parentfail.com/wp-content/uploa…
it’s a classic commander. look at this poor dog http://images.cheezburger.com/completestor…
Here’s some real ‘winners’ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/05/t… NB: A friend of mine went as the whoopie cushion last year. Every time you squeezed her, she’d make a fart sound.
Hugo: That is my favorite image of Beethoven–used it to design a CD cover in college. PK: I loooove Sam Elliot!
Good post SHITD
just get a polo shirt, mess your hair up, throw on some shades, put a bag of baby powder or flour or something in a baggy to carry around…..
it’ll make the prostitute costumes make more sense to boot.
http://compare.ebay.com/like/290617935095?…
..I do the same costume every year…dora the explorer..:)
I think SHITD has got two issues confused. Blaming women’s attire as the reason for getting raped and the sexualization of children are not the same thing. Both are wrong.
The rapist, and only the rapist, is responsible for his actions, not the victim. Blaming the victim for her attire completely takes the onus off the rapist for HIS choice to rape. Sex without consent is rape. Clothing or lack of does not imply consent and suggests that men are not able to think or control their behaviour when presented with a woman who chooses to dress in what a man decides is a ‘rape worthy’ outfit. Bullshit! Men are adults who know the difference between right and wrong. Peelers wear very little at all. Does that mean they are asking to be raped? No. If it did stripping for a living would cease to exist. In actual fact, many rape victims are not wearing she-asked-for-it clothing, so blaming the victim is always inappropriate.
The sexualization of children is wrong on so many levels. I don’t have the time to explain the psychological, developmental and social aspects but I think just about every intelligent person can see why it is wrong on their own without my help.
Paedophiles don’t select their victims for what they are wearing and prey on defenseless children of both genders. Unlike rape, paedophilia is a sexual orientation.
jeez xeno, that took me a while. i think you may have given the brethren some ideas^^i liked the dog and holy shit
the toy soldier is cute, but hard to move around, no? Wings are also a bitch! It is very hard to move through a crowd with wings. Something to think about when planning a costume. Last year, Aesop went as Duff Man (from the Simpsons) and his beer belt was very handy!
Couple of years ago, we were in a shop, buying accessories for our costumes. The cashier asked us “how many kids do you have?” I looked at Aesop and said “just the one”.
lol zZz. Check out my avatar. I can see many a parent having the same conversation after seeing that costume. lol
Here ya go avast0 – Don’t forget the hooker for realism =)
http://images3.gossipcenter.com/sites/defa…
better than a bad tattoo http://stamptramps.files.wordpress.com/201…
Yikes! That tat is terrible!
lol, Thanks Hugo. I’ll keep that in mind.
The sad thing about the whole Charlie Sheen going batshit fiasco is, I honestly really liked those shirts. I dig the look.
http://www.globalrebels.com/davinci/?gclid…
i like those shirts too vastie^^ kinda krameresque http://www.abnehmen.ru/img/34/348/The_best…
OB, if you’re so concerned, contact the company and complaint. There has to be some sort of anti-pedophile group you can contact to get support to complain to the company. You should also complain about the women who dress like sluts in Halifax but claims not to be.
Xeno- Is that Aesop as in “Airborne Electronic Sensor OPerator”?
Ummm… Oceanchick, I didn’t say they were the same thing. I said that cloths that sexualize an adult will do the same for a child. You, not being a rapist or pedophile, doesn’t know what’s going through the mind of either, what choices that person will make or why. Who’s to say they wouldn’t pick a sluttily dressed child or adult? Is dressing slutty some repellant for sexual deviants? My point is why dip your toe in the water at all, and what are we teaching a 6 year old about appropriate sexuality by buying them a “snookie” costume. If you are going to go fishing for attention, you never know what you are going to catch (and we all know that dressing slutty, child or adult, is fishing for attention). It might not be politically correct to have my opinion but you know what? My daughter, if I have one will have the right to dress any way she wants, BUT, she will be aware that it is her responsibility to be aware of her surroundings, and make responsible choices for her own safety. I would be a complete idiot if I told her that she has carte blanche to do whatever she wants to do, consequence free, just because it’s politically correct to do so. I get sick and tired of people letting your right to do something prevail over a common sensual approach to personal safety.
Is it politically correct to tell a woman to keep her eyes on her drink? It’s her right to leave it wherever she wants, and with all personal property, she has the right to not have it tampered with. Does her right make it impossible for the drink to be tampered with? No, but it sure makes sense to take the extra precaution, just in case. Just throwin this out there, I doubt very highly that a pedophile or a rapist really gives a flying fuck wether the womans or childs right to do whatever they want is respected or not.
I think we all know what Sux is dressing up as….
http://www.halloweenplayground.com/images/…
any chance the pooch is going as cerberus, bread lady?
http://newscraze.net/wp-content/uploads/20…
ya know, some hounds like to get dressed up, ours does not. something like this might work http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_25xWLdPEMs0/SvJA…
Awww…that’s cute ….but cruel PG. I’m surprised that you of all people would stoop to the level of dressing your innocent hound as a soul-less ginger! Gasp! lol
I can’t believe this girl’s parents dressed her as a Harem Dancer, ffs.
http://www.i-mockery.com/halloween/bag/pic…
Why dogs bite 🙂
http://stupid-ideas.blogspot.com/2006/11/f…
haha, i have enough trouble getting his coat on in the winter. he runs back and forth and bounces, and it’s just a neck with one belly strap. they are fun for dressing up, if they like it too. you said *ginger* you better pray hard boy, the kapitan is always waiting for his chance^^
I hate to admit this but my cat is secretly a power ranger one day a year….
RSVPs
: Xenophilia (Oct. 14, 10:46AM) – In Freudian psychology there is something called “the compulsion to confess.” Similarly, in Roman Catholocism, there is the sacrament of Confession. Both, it seems to me, spring from the same source, the overwhelming desire to throw off the yoke of unbearable guilt. I believe we have an instance of that phenomenon today.
In my post of Oct. 13 (4:20PM) I asked, in reference to Xeno’s questionable behaviour on her camping trip with some Girl Guides to Cape Cod – she was their leader – whether she would give us an insight into the psychology of those who are attracted by pre-pubescent girls. Unable to suppress her guilt any further, she writes, “I did more than camp with the girls… I asked, “If you want, you can take your shirts off.” Need I say more?
I propose that Xeno be awarded a modest but meaningful token of our appreciation for her honesty and candour. I’m sure an enormous burden of guilt has been lifted from her shoulders.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
i looked for a kitty in a power ranger suit, no go, but i found this http://kittywigs.com/img/preview2.jpg
Theodor Reik, studied with Freud. But since he was ‘forcibly critical’ of traditional Freudian theory…I’d have to say that The Compulsion to Confess (1925), cannot be considered “Freudian psychology”.
Thanks for the freebie 🙂 NEXT!!!
Ukrainian
i looked for a kitty in a power ranger suit, no go, but i found this
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c54_1193459…
Y’know, Moman, I try to answer your question seriously and once again, you take it and run to your netherworld of fantasy.
I won’t even bother to explain what I meant, because you obviously know…your predilection of twisting my responses to suit your own depravity is just how you roll.
Bugger off, you steaming load of diddler dung–and your little dog, too.
See Xeno… we discussed whether we should warn you about him during the last Bitcher’s Summit… it was decided that you could take care of yourself… and you have proven us right!
LOL Rosie! This is not the first forum where I use the name Xenophilia. It’s funny, because on the other forum, people call me Xena. Y’know, for Warrior Princess?
predilection, i like that word. we can call you whatever we want, amazon lady^^
RSVPs
: Xeophilia (Oct. 14, 4:45PM) – “Bugger off, you steamy load of diddler dung – and your little dog too.”
Very hurtful, Xeno – “diddler dung?” And to think that you were discussing me at the Bitchers’ Summit with some nonentity like “Rosie the Riveter.” This is unsupportable, Xeno. And then to drag Wynnie into it as well! Very hurtful.
You do test my patience Xeno but, as a recovering pedophile, you have my full support. I’ll always be there for you Xeno, you know that, don’t you.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
hey cheerio!, I have always pictured you as a fruit loop or a puffed wheat.
Momar you write “as a recovering pedophile, you have my full support”
Recovered? ORLY? I don’t know anyone on this forum who thinks you are ‘recovered’. Whoever is telling you that you are clearly playing you for a fool. Hope you haven’t given that succubus any money!
Oh, yes..I found an appropriate costume for your little dog, given your proclivities:
“http://www.spirithalloween.com/product/sch…
whippet good, now!
RSVPs
: Great Value (Oct. 14, 8:02PM) – Ah, the cereal analogy again. But GV, my usage of “Cheerio!” does not refer to food but rather it is my Overclass way of bidding an upbeat and fond “adieu.” (That’s French for “goodbye,” GV.)
: Xenophilia (8:08PM) – Yes, it’s true Xenophilia that I did write, “as a recovering pedophile, you have my full support.” But, anticipating your retort, I was very careful. Note the word following “recovering pedophile” Xenophilia. Do you see it? The basic rules of grammar preclude your construction.
And thank you for the suggested costume for Wynnie but she is much larger than the (rather ugly) terrier modelling it. There is no resemblance whatever. Sometimes we refer to her, appropriately, as “The Great White.”
I do realize that those recovering from pedophilia can get somewhat defensive and testy at the beginning of the treatment and I have taken this into consideration. I am proceeding gently as I draw Xenophilia out of her pedophilia. (A little rhyming bonus there.)
Always remember Xenophilia, that as a recovering pedophile, you have my full support.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Monsieur Moumoune
Est-ce que c’est votre meilleur?
Ne patez plus haut que votre cul….crisse moi patience…
Cheerio! on October 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM:”Great Value (Oct. 14, 8:02PM) – Ah, the cereal analogy again. But GV, my usage of “Cheerio!” does not refer to food but rather it is my Overclass way of bidding an upbeat and fond “adieu.” (That’s French for “goodbye,” GV.)”
I find it interesting that you would use a pejorative word like ‘overclass’ to describe your own signature, especially when you are trying to pass it off as ‘upbeat and fond…’
BTW, ‘adieu’ is more correctly translated into ‘farewell’
“Ze French, zey are a funny race.
Zey fight viz feet, and fuck viz face.”
That’s the limit of my bi-lingual talents. Sorry. >: (
Yeah Xeno, get it right. Just like there’s no such thing as a ‘recovered alcoholic’, there are no ‘recovered pedophiles’. So like he says; Montremoleman is a “recovering pedophile”.
Hey Sméagol, here’s a new avatar for you, quite apt if I do say so myself 🙂
http://www.punditleague.us/wp-content/uplo…
Non-entity… me like… now I won’t have to pay taxes! Wheeeeee!
Xeno came up in conversation… the other word used was ‘trolls’… your name did not come up.
RSVPs
: The Turd (Oct. 14, 4:30PM) – Of course, I have had a copy of Reik’s “Compulsion to Confess” for years, a sign – if any were needed – of my youthful precosity. I think you might find Part III particularly relevant. It’s titled “The Shock of Thought” but then, of course, I am sure you have never experienced any such shock. As far as Reik’s connection with Freud goes, the latter wrote a blurb for the book’s jacket which, in part, reads as follows: “There are many ingenious thoughts strewn throught. Although true to my custom, I am avoiding pronouncing final judgement on a work I have just read, still I hazard the impression that you have produced something especially valuable.” You might want to research their relationship further, Turd. At least it will beat crowing over typos (i.e., “Ukranian.”)
(Oct. 15, 1:57PM) – After researching Reik and Freud, you might want to substantiate your assertion, “There are no recovered pedophiles.” I must say that I found the avatar in your link unintelligible. Perhaps after researching Reik/Freud and the question of recovered pedophiles, you might want to give an in-depth analysis of its psychological ramifications. You’ve got a lot on your plate, Turd. Start now.
G.V. (11:49AM) – Well, GV, you appear to be experiencing philological difficulties. Given the context of LTWWB, “cheerio” is definitely an “Overclass” locution. I found your reference to my “passing off” Cheerio as “upbeat and fond” unintlligible, GV. I thought it was but, in the unlikely event that I am wrong, I await your instruction. GV, if you prefer “Farewell” to “Goodbye” then Montrealman will gladly accomodate your wishes.
: Pedophilia (10:52) – Any more references to people’s asses, Missy, and I’m going to have to pull your panties down and give you a good spanking.
: Rosie the Riveter (3:11PM) – Are you calling Pedophilia a liar? Did you hear that Pedophilia? Are you going to take it lying down (or bending over)?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Cheerio on October 15, 2011 at 4:27 PM:
G.V. (11:49AM) – Well, GV, you appear to be experiencing philological difficulties. Given the context of LTWWB, “cheerio” is definitely an “Overclass” locution. I found your reference to my “passing off” Cheerio as “upbeat and fond” unintlligible, GV. I thought it was but, in the unlikely event that I am wrong, I await your instruction. GV, if you prefer “Farewell” to “Goodbye” then Montrealman will gladly accomodate your wishes.
I believe that you tried very hard to make your post sound amazing so I read it several times. mm, do you have any idea what the difference is between writing about problems with a personality, and having a personality problem? You try too hard to impress, mm, relax and chill a little.
save us jebus
Colonel (or is Kapitan-Leutenant a promotion? I don’t know military rank very well)
It’s pretty vulgar gutter French, actually. My first career was as a caterer, where I worked with real French chefs and some from Quebec…moumoune means candy-ass coward. I then say “Is that the best you can do? Don’t fart above your arsehole! (don’t talk shit) Go away.
The french I learned and spoke as a schoolgirl was Parisian French, not the northern patois, but luckily, I remembered these little bon mots: NSPBA! (Not So Pretty Bad, Eh?)
And Moumoune, although my Canadian family is mostly in Ontario, my cousin did marry a Sûreté du Québec officer who is now an RCMP. As someone who brings down diddlers, he has about the same sense of humor as I do with your slimy insinuations. How we shall laugh, though (comment nous allons rire!) when you log onto the wrong site and are tracked down like the chien you are!
Collis! Dat be some right good swear from you, hien?>: )
RSVPs
: GV (Oct. 15, 6:08PM) – “… do you have any idea what the difference is between writing about problems with a personality, and having a personality problem?”
An interesting question, GV. One wonders if, in fact, there always IS a difference. Usually those who write about problems with a personality actually have personality problems themselves. But, as I indicated in my previous post, I await your instruction in this matter as with all the rest. In the meantime GV, “Farewell!”
: Paingirl (6:58PM) – There is no otherworldly succour for our terrestrial problems, Paingirl. We must resolve our difficulties in the here and now.
: Pedophilia (8:28PM) – A fascinating account of your variable encounters with French scatology, Pedophilia. I mean, “Don’t fart above your asshole?” (You must have been a real charmer in your catering job.) But then I suppose the usage is metaphorical since it is difficult to visualize this in the real world.
But I must protest your reference to me as a “diddler” with his “slimy insinuations.” As you know, Pedophilia, I am only trying to help you emerge from that dark world of the pedophile. I am always there for you, Pedophilia. You must remember that!
: Scrotum (9:54PM) – Yes, Scrotum, that is the phonetic rendering but it is spelt “chalice” just as in English. You might also want to try “hostie” (“host” but don’t pronounce the “h”) and “tabernac” (“tabernacle” – the worst curse in Québecois French, so bad that the milder “tabernauche” is usually used). For the French, our curses involving copulation and evacuation have little impact, but clearly Pedophilia is the authority in these matters.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
So you don’t know. That’s a shame.
RSVPs
: Great Value (Oct. 16, 12:50PM) – You’re right GV, it is a shame. Clearly, in order to make that assertion, YOU must be in possession of the criteria distinguishing those who “write about problems with a personality, and having a personality problem.” As I previously indicated, GV, I await your instruction on this matter. Don’t disappoint, GV, by saying something empty like, “People having a personality problem are people like you.” That just begs the question, GV. You mustn’t do that. Give a substantive as opposed to an empty answer. I know you will, GV. In the meantime, farewell!
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Maybe it’s just a personality conflict… Jeeves has one and you don’t.
Best kitty costume ever
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_QP-Sq0tCmv4/RqrY…
haha, if you click on the j’yo’s cat avatar, it turns into that one
AIN’T THAT A SHAME!
: Great Value (Oct. 16, 12:50PM) – As expected, GV failed to reply to my request (3:38PM) for a substantive response to the distinction between writing about people with personality disorders and people actually having one. The next question, of course, is did “His tears fall like rain?”
“SLIMY INSINUATIONS”
: Xenophilia (Oct 17, 9:45AM) – Thank you Xeno. I assume you mean that Jeeves – is your reference to P.G. Wodehouse or some other down-market character? – has a personality disorder and I don’t. However, I must say that you’re right about your sense of humour being the same as your brother’s. Calling my insinuations “slimy” says more about you than it does about me. But I guess you already knew that.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/28/living/sexy-…