When are you going to get off your ass and do something? Stop blaming others and your past, put on your big girl panties and grow the hell up. You have all kinds of time for hanging out, no time to raise your kids and no time to look for a job. People can only listen for so long before they have to stop caring. Stop saying you’re working at getting your life on the right track and actually DO IT! —Tired of your moaning
This article appears in Aug 15-21, 2013.
You can’t talk to her like that, OB. She’s a mother, she made a miracle in her belly.
PUTTING ON HER BIG-GIRL PANTIES
“Stop blaming others and your past, put on your big girl (sic) panties and grow the hell up.” Tired of your moaning.
Do you think she might need any help putting on her big-girl panties?
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Sounds like someone had an easier life…
Praise The Lord! The first two comments nailed it. And MM, I’ll wear panties for you.
Careful Nukka.
Once a hitter; always a hitter.
http://gifs.gifbin.com/042009/1239955217_k…
Ivan, I like it. I’ve often wondered what it would feel like to only wear a belt with a tail and a beret with two goat ears. Then someone could throw garbage at me and call me Mr Cato. I also envision being tied to a post in my basement throughout the endeavour. I would also have the option of eating the garbage like a real goat.
What about the baby-daddies? Are they raising the spawn?
Nukka, I’m pretty sure that’s exactly what a young undergrad named Dennis had to go through at the Law frat, I Phelta Thi in the early 60’s. He wasn’t a pledge, he just offered them 50 bucks and they were happy to oblige.
MORE ON “BIG-GIRL PANTIES”
RSVPS
: Nukka (08/19, 10:30AM & 10:17AM)
You must seek out professional help. You must do so immediately.
: Ivan Sonofabitch (10:43AM)
I found your “they were happy to oblige” ambiguous, both literally and metaphorically. Perhaps you would like to clarify your meaning.
But the distinction between the literal and metaphorical usage is important. In my post of 8:44AM in which I made reference to helping the lady on with her “big-girl panties” (grammatical note: “big-girl” is an adjectival phrase modifying the noun “panties” and so hyphenation is required) I was, of course, speaking metaphorically and not literally, a distinction many on this site clearly fail to grasp. Although not averse to literally helping her on with her big-girl panties – one envisages sliding her gossamer panties up over her magnificent thrusting thighs (oh, God!) – it was in its metaphorical sense that my post was intended, ie, in helping her to attain a certain level of maturity that would put a stop to her juvenile moaning. That was the focus of my attention. You must struggle to understand this.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Right as always Montreal man. Always a pleasure to read your posts! These idiots on here are nothing but helpless bullies except for my honey klyde of course!
why, oh why, did someone have to use the word panties in mm’s range of sight?
RSVP
Montrealman, please look over the timings to my posts. It seems you have them confused with another posters comments. You buffoon!
RSVPS
: WHATACROCK (08/19, 8:39PM)
Thank you, Crock. I’ve just finished reading your masterful defense against some outrageous comments made against you on “Worst Sex of My Life” and can add nothing to your eloquent rebuttals. Congratulations!
: Good dog Molly (10:29PM)
An interesting point Good dog. What is it about panties which excites my concupiscence? Of course, like everything else where I am concerned, appropriate distinctions must be made. How, for example, is one to distinguish those panties that do it from those that don’t? Not all panties are created equal, as I am sure you would agree. And then here are those variables which relate not just to the panties or the even the wearers themselves, the latter being an extremely important distinction, but the circumstances in which the panties are contemplated. A contextual approach, if you like. And then there is the functional approach. The attractions of the female in the mind of the male spring not so much from vulgar display but rather from concealment, the intimation of the beauties beneath which, however, are never to be revealed. In my view, that is why the appropriate female in the appropriate pair of panties in the appropriate context – as opposed to her being stark naked – conspire to work their magic. Perhaps you might like to contribute to my musings. Perhaps we could jointly articulate a theory of panties, something like “Panties and their Role in the Male Imagination.” I think it would be a best seller.
: Nukka (12:20AM)
Yes, Nukka, I see that mistakenly entered the time of 10:30AM instead of 10:03AM. However, I did not confuse your comments with another poster’s, you buffoon!
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
RSVP
Montrealman, I’m really not worried about it. I just wanted you to address me directly. I like that. And of course, I accept your apology.
RSVP
: Nukka (08/20, 11:31AM)
You must seek out professional help. You must do so immediately.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!