This weekend my partner and I were attempting to cross the road at a crosswalk. We pressed the button, waited for the lights to flash, the sounds to chirp, and began crossing. You, in your van, decided that you could drive through the crosswalk. In doing so, you were oblivious to us crossing and all other traffic in the intersection. You almost hit a woman in a car who was going to make a left turn after we had passed. You honked your horn at her, made some gestures, said some indecipherable things. The three of us knew you were in the wrong, and my partner and the driver made it very clear that you could have caused a serious fucking situation in that intersection because of your inability to follow the rules of the road. When I recognized it was you, I wasn’t surprised — this sort of half-wit action isn’t surprising coming from someone as infuriatingly illogical as yourself. Pay attention. You’re supposed to stop at a crosswalk. —safety first

Join the Conversation

50 Comments

  1. I’d like to see the corner of Barrington and Duke cop car patrolled for the self-involved twats who jam down the gas thru a red light – this seems to be a daily occurrence and one day someone crossing is going to be an unintentional hood ornament.

  2. see my bitch a few doors down. Halifax drivers need some bitch slappin’ before someone gets killed…again.

  3. “my partner and I were attempting to cross the road”

    Bert?
    I hear Alec Baldwin drives a Lexus. Use caution.

  4. A MATTER OF LOGIC?

    “When I recognized it was you, I wasn’t surprised — this sort of half-wit action isn’t surprising coming from someone as infuriatingly illogical as you.” safety first

    Is this a matter of logic properly conceived? Whether in terms of formal or informal logic it is difficult to see how. Aristotle, of course, laid down the rules of formal logic. There were three:

    (1) The Law of Identity: A is A. The half-wit driver is the half-wit driver. But it is not clear how the Law of Identity could apply in the case of the half-wit driver driving through the crosswalk since his identity was never in doubt.

    (2) The Law of Non-Contradiction: A cannot be both A and non-A at the same time and under the same aspect. In other words, the half-wit driver driving through the crosswalk while driving through the crosswalk, could not both be and not be the half-wit driver. As with the Law of Identity, the Law of non-Contradiction does not obtain in the case of the half-wit driver.

    (3) The Law of the Excluded Middle: If p then q; p, then q. In other words, where p is any proposition and q the logical consequent of p, if p then q. But what is p? What is q? Who knows? So the Law of the Excluded Middle also does not apply to the half-wit driving through the crosswalk.

    On the other hand, informal logic relates not so much to matters of strict logical deduction but rather to matters of legitimate inference. But what is being inferred in the case of the half-wit driver driving through the crosswalk? Is the inference that he is being illogical a legitimate inference from his behaviour? Stupidity, perhaps. Ignorance, possibly. Rudeness, no question. But illogicality? That does not seem to be a legitimate logical inference.

    Unless he can demonstrate that the half-wit’s driving through the crosswalk was illogical, then safety first himself become the victim of illogicality. He is hoisted, as the old saying goes, on his own petard.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  5. Does The Coast even HAVE a mod for LTWWB, anymore?

    This site used to be updated every day or so, but no new bitches since last Tuesday?

    I’m probably going to get banned again for criticizing, but seriously. What’s the point of even having this site if no one’s going to bother updating it?

  6. Oh dear, maybe there are no new bitches for the the over worked Moderator to post. The bithces are submitted not written by the Moderator.

    Get a grip guys……… I guess this site is all that some of you have. Its a pity really.

  7. RSVPS

    : CPO Ivan Sonofabitch (07/07, 9:22AM)

    Very interesting link, Ivan. I never usually click on links as I find them very boring but this fellow Pat was very thought-provoking. I watched three and plan to watch more. Reminds my of myself. Thanks again.

    : Cassandra Hill (10″20AM)

    “I guess this site is all that some of you have. I’s a pity really.”

    Then what are you doing on here, you mutt?

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  8. Oh MM, are you a snake in the grass by any chance?

    I simply came on here once this week, unlike the others and yourself, and made a few simple comments. You can partake in the useless back and forth banter, and critisisims of the moderator, but I am above that.

    I do expect an apoligy now honey;)

  9. Sister Cassandra – I do not wish to interfere in the quabbling between you and the Man of Montreal but, there is a story from the life of the Prophet Muhammed(PBUH), related by the Grand Vizier to the Caliph of Constantinople, Al-Shouf Murad Inya-Ras in 1526, which seems apporpriate.

    It seems the the Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) heard tha one of his wives had decided to divorce him. he returned to his tent to find the willful one sitting in front with her abggage packed waiting for her brothers to fetch her home.
    The Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) sat down beside her and gently asked “Now, my wife is this true? Tell me, why do you wish to leave me?”

    She replied “It’s the other wives. They claim that you are a paedophile”

    “Now Ayesha, that’s an awfully big word for a nine year old to be throwing around. Are you absolutely sure you know what it means”

    Ple4ase draw the appropriate lessons from this, Sistser Cassandra.

    Salaam Alaikum.

  10. RSVP

    : Cassandra Hill (07/07, 10:35AM)

    See the last comment on “Waste of Money.” Read it over slowly to yourself. Try not to move your lips. And learn to spell. That should be “criticisms” for “critisisms,” you dogsbody.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  11. MM sweety- don’t be so silly to me;)

    I always misspell a few words for SHITman. It makes him feel smart. Those typo’s are not for you honey.

    You know I love your posts, but that whole not moving your lips line is getting really old. You’ve used it so much that it just doesn’t have the results you would expect.

    Now can we go back to being on the same team? I don’t need you of all people to turn around and bully me like an ignorant thug would do.

    Think about what I said honey… I’m thinking about you;)

  12. RSVP

    : Cassandra Hill (07/07, 11:10AM)

    Sorry dear, I didn’t know it was you. And I’m thinking about what you said. It’s all true, particularly about moving the lips.

    Blow me a kiss.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  13. It’s baaaaaaccccckkkkkkkkk…

    Hello, wogdog/twinkle/blipblip aka Casssandra Hill – where did you come up with that name? Off the cover of a steamy Harlequin novel? You’re just trying to stir the shit stew as usual and you keep failing as usual. Better luck with this persona, sweetcakes, but you are as transparent as glass.

    Beware of kissing MM’s gnarly yellow toenails, you may get hoof and mouth, Sassy Cassy With The Big Ol’ Chassis.

    Now let’s hear your spasms of denials – we could all use a laugh on such a warm day!

    By the way, are you still obsessing about tubunits, toads, diabetes and cookies? You really ought to have a doctor check that out, Cass with da Ass.

  14. There you go again with the toad comment, something blip nip and her descendants did all the time – you just outted yourself, you silly twit!

    The only loser at this board is a middle-aged cross-eyed woman who repeatedly changes her moniker but doesn’t have the basic smarts to make each persona distinct. Who’s the loser now, Assie Cassie?

    And the religion thing – so tiring, so boring, so repetitive – another dead giveaway, blimpblimp Cassie.

    You really are going to try much harder, silly sausage.

    By the way, wishing AIDS on someone is a threat. If you continue, you will be reported to the moderator and banned like you have been so many times before.

    Go to hell? And where might that be, Cass Ass? Your van down by the river, perhaps?

  15. gLory be ,Brenda bOom boOm mArtell has returned.

    ‘ I simply came on here once this week, unlike the others and yourself, and made a few simple comments. ‘

    sHe said ,posting most d ays .

  16. I have never been banned, Cass-Ass, I have no idea what you’re wittering on about. Check the archives, silly simpleton, there’s no other TT there other than TT Fonebone. You really do have an overactive imagination, don’t you?

    CAPITAL T – CAPITAL W – CAPITAL I – CAPITAL T – RAH-RAH-RAH-SIS-BOOM-BAH!

  17. iF every one will please read ‘ assandras’ profile and read her post s ,you will see a few post s down the name change s to blip blip#1 ,exposing the dumb cooze for who ‘she ‘ is .

    stupid brenda .

  18. Eh. Last mod had no problem updating more than once a week. *shrug*

  19. I guess it’s back to the persona drawing board, huh, Assie/Twankle/Blob Blob/Wigpig?

    ROFLMAO!!!

  20. ‘…I also wish that you’d get hit by a car, get herpes on your toad face and have burning hot runny shits for a year…..’

    BAHAWHAWHAWHAWHAW – TELL ME HOW YOU REALLY FEEL, ASSIE!!!!!

    Here’s the thing – I wouldn’t wish that on a wharf rat, Assie, including your beloved rat hunny – I hope your rat babies aren’t exposed to this bubbling bowl of hate you insist on projectile vomiting. Maybe you stopped breastfeeding dem babies too soon.

  21. o r maybe before changing her persona name s she should start a new profile so its not obvious who she is /was .dumbass .

  22. Well, well, well, you just gave yourself away punky. I know your sonictroll now you stupid little man. I would suggest you remove that picture and stop using that persons name immediately.

    Its now a matter for the police to deal with you little, little man. This behaviour is downright rude, threatening and an invasion of my privacy. Go to hell and have fun with the police, you too toady.

  23. y es you found me out brenda .send your husband over as well .your threat of him was a crime as well wasnt i t ?fukcyoursel f .

  24. wait do you mean the police you c alled the last time t en people shared your photo from your boy fiend gary ?r i i i ight .

    if that isnt you and not you r name then why would you be callin g the police ,bullybitch ?

  25. Thanks for the belly laugh, Assie – as usual, you’ve made another spectacular fail.

    So call the cops, you silly nincompoop. Wasting our tax money over your whimpers and whines won’t endear you to anyone, dear heart, especially the fuzz.

    And there you go again with your toad remarks – is that your nickname for your rat babies’ nanny? You really should be more respectful to your help.

  26. THIS IS FUCKING DISGUSTING!!!!!

    How dare any of you post someones picture like that! I am simply sticking up for that bullied individual, much like the police will too.

    And for the record, I have never threatened or insulted anyone on this site. You can try and smear me in your mud, but it won’t work.

  27. ‘…..I have never threatened or insulted anyone on this site….’

    This is a couple of posts after you stated: ‘….I also wish that you’d get hit by a car, get herpes on your toad face and have burning hot runny shits for a year….’ – so is this an insult or a threat? Or both?

    Inquiring minds want to know, Assie.

    Punky, crossed eyes are the sign of the devil, doncha know?

  28. I was simply stating the obvious TT. It was neither a threat or insult, those were not my intentions. But hey, anyone can take anything out of context. I am above that and always will be.

    Goodness, the mods gonna have a busy morning. Anyway, I’m off to a potluck supper and then choir. Have fun stirring up trouble while I’m gone.

  29. ‘….I always win. Your responses make it that way. My goodness sweety, you are so stupid its hilarious…. ‘

    Nope. Those remarks were both insulting and threatening and the above response from you to SHITD only reinforces that notion. I would tread very carefully, Assie.

    Potluck, huh? Or is that just a code for a pot smoking club? You certainly write like you’re stoned out of your gourd. Choir probably includes more than sanctified red wine – I heard about all those wild tequila parties you Jesus freaks have weekly in Dartmouth.

    Meanwhile, I return to the company of my lovely family, basking in the sun and worshipping small shrubs.

    When you’re gone, Assie, this is a near perfect board. Your return is akin to having fecal skid marks wiped across the screen. Enjoy your illegal pot and booze. Ciao!

  30. BRENDA MARTELL ha s been here for months and m onths bulliyng and threatning people ,and i remember her ex posing poeples information .of couse this is al l archived by several form member s .if she stopped trollin g there would be no raeson to say her name .she bruoght this on her self .

  31. Sister cassandra. To me you sound like aperson filled with anger, malice and hatred, seeking insult in the actions of others and blaming everybody but yourself for the problems of the world. Clearly, you are Muslim in all but name.
    I will illustarte with a story related by the Imam of my Mosque, Apul M’Diq u-Wauch.

    A very pious man was walking on the beach and was startled to see an older man engaging in fornication with an obvious younger woman, but he could not recognize them as they both had their backs to him. In a fit of spiritual outrage he began to hurl stones at them but then he grew frightened and ran from the beach. After Friday prayers he related the story to the Imam and asked “was this a moral action that I have taken?”

    The Imam replied “Son of Jackal! That was YOU!”

    The point of this lesson is that ignorant khufar whores who live in glass houses should not throw stones at mirrors, for surely, some Muslim, somwhere is bound to take offence.

    Salaam Aleikum

  32. Looks like Assie is back to the drawing board. Soon a new vulture will rise from the bong ashes of wogdog/twinkle/boomy/blip blip/cassandra. Any wagers to what her new name will be? Busty St. Clair perhaps?

    The funny thing is that the lifespan of her personas get shorter and shorter.

  33. I do believe the moderator of this board has fled the building screaming after yet another irate communique from the loathsome troll known as wogdog/twinkle/boomy/blip blip/Cassandra – that old girl knows how to wield the exclamation marks!!!!!!! In the meantime, please enjoy the following:

    http://www.ominous-valve.com/images/indian…

  34. WHAT? Idle No More has taken over the Coast’s website?

    No wonder we haven’t had a new bitch in a week.

    C’mon Coast – just give back that stolen land and live up to your treaty obligations so we can all get on with our lives, otay?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *