Boy

He won’t make you cry again if you close your brackets.

A pleasure as always.

Cheerio!

RSVPS

: fool (06/12, 3:56PM)

See Keg (7:24PM) you fool. Speaking of fools, why did you drop the prefix “no”? Did the realization that you were just a fool dawn on you after our last exchange in which I demonstrated your incoherence, i.e., your conclusion that I was a fool did not follow from your premise, i.e., that I thought those who looked at videos or read lyrics on attachments, were fools? I know you will not understand that, you fool.

As a further point, don’t you find that smiley or frowny faces, particularly on bitches but also on comments, infantilize them? Being your average adult, it never occurred to me that the mark on the bitch was a smiley or frowny face, just missing a bracket. Can you imagine an adult, after writing a letter, drawing a smiley or frowny face on it? Is this not the mark of a cretin? In other words, if one lacks sufficient articulacy to explain oneself without resorting to cartoons, shouldn’t one just shut up and go away? That’s right, “fool.” That means you.

: Keg (7:24)

You’re on to it Keg. My comment about brackets was intended as a metaphor for her legs. Of course, “fool” didn’t grasp it because, well, she’s just a fool. I suppose I should have been more blunt. I suppose I should have written, “He won’t make you cry again if you close your brackets and stop fucking him.” Mistakenly, of course, my subtlety escaped “fool” and, no doubt, many other fools on this site.

Reg LeCrisp (8:34PM)

I can see you’ve made a study of this, Reg. Of course, you’re right. “Girl” should have put a bit of space between “today”, the grimace and “I”. The question then becomes just how much space would satisfy the demands of accomplished calligraphy involving smiley/frowny faces. Of course, the question of adequate space, in the present context, gestures to the further question relating to the size of her boyfriend’s member and the consequent possibility of full-penetration, friction-free intercourse.

: Pretty Monstercock Kitty (06/13, 3:31AM)

You could be right, i.e., that no 14 year olds should be allowed to post bitches. But I take a more liberal view. I think the criterion should be rather the space between their lubricated labia such as to allow full-penetration, friction-free intercourse. In that case, boyfriends with small members might get the 14 year olds a free “get into Bitch” card.

A pleasure as always.

Cheerio!

RSVP

: zZz (06/13, 11:01AM)

Of course you didn’t read it, you buffoon. The question is why you thought your failure to do so was so important that you had to announce it.

I think I have the answer. It’s called mindless egomania.

A pleasure as always.

Cheerio!