Listen up lady (and ladies),
I’m sick and tired of hearing you complain about guys being assholes. Of course they’re assholes. You keep going to the bars and spreading your legs for the next ‘hot shit bad boy’ in line, and then complain about it? What the fuck did you expect? If I was an asshole and kept getting laid this way, why would I bother to change?
Here’s a thought; If you’re going to sleep with bar dicks, be prepared for the inevitable; he might be an asshole. GASP!
Or do you just enjoy drama/pain/suffering/attention?
Get real. Either quit complaining or quit getting involved with these ‘men’. You know how to spot them, and they know how to spot you! —asshole looking at you
This article appears in Sep 5-11, 2013.
Yes… yes we DO know how to spot them 😉
You can’t say that, OB. Women like THEIR truth, not the truth!!! Women are genetically predisposed to having it both ways, so stop you’re “Slut shaming”.
Invent a D-cell that dispenses mojitos on request, perhaps?
As long as the science and engineering professions remain cis-male dominated, not too likely.
Valid bitch! I see this too often, some ladies need to have their mates selected FOR them because they’re attracted to the jackass like a moth to a flame.
I’m not talking about those societies where the parents select some 40 y.o. guy for their 14 y.o. daughter before anyone starts. Though sometimes I know where the spirit of that starts.
I love and respect women…but yeah, when it comes to this specific issue, some are just not that bright. You’d think after a few times they’d figure it out? Is this genetically hardwired into them not to figure it out? Or are we just speaking about a very immature cross section here? Seems to me that girls like ‘bad boys’ and real women like real men. Some girls just never figure it out.
You rarely see intelligent, strong and confident women with assholes. They can spot them a mile away and don’t suffer from low self esteem like the rest, so they won’t tolerate the behavior.
Don’t get me wrong, men are just as bad. I however think we’re more realistic about it. I hardly ever hear from my guy friends “Last night, I hooked up with this amazing girl at the bar wearing next to nothing and turns out she was just out to use me. Life isn’t fair.”
Lets face it; there are lots of immature people in the city, and you’ll more than likely find them sloshed at the bars. Add low self esteem to the mix and voila. Universal equation:
Low self-esteem + alcohol + perceptive assholes = this bitch
Sometimes I wish I was an asshole, but then I realize I would only be attracting immature and desperate girls. I’d rather spend my time with a real woman. Confidence and self worth is sexy as hell.
hey wait a minute….what’s wrong with that picture OP? asshole to asshole. let them have each other and just don’t listen to either sex’s whining about their lousy mates.
if women are ALWAYS ending up with jerks, they chose them. it’s her ‘type’
if men are ALWAYS ending up with manipulative cows, they chose them. it’s his ‘type’
let it be, let it be, let it be, then let it be. there will be no answers, let it be. let it be.
I always used to think I was missing out…
retrospect has shown me that I’m quite glad I did.
Good dog Molly,
Hmm…there’s a thought. Maybe they can all match-up, suffocate in their misery, and leave the rest of us alone. It would be nice…unfortunately I keep hearing women complaining about said assholes.
Why can’t they just accept that they’re insecure – low self-esteem wrecks – seeking said assholes for an ‘easy’ means of instant self-gratification, which they so desperately need to feel good about their miserable selves and stop complaining?
This isn’t rocket science!
well, why can’t anyone who has some emotional backpack accept it and toss it aside? (or at least shut up about the weight of it)
people complain. people stay in ruts. people blame other people, life, karma, whatever.
anyone I have had to listen to over and over with the same old complaints I just tune out in self defence. I am a ‘fixer’ so it drives me crazy to hear of a problem that could be solved, but you have to accept that some people will not solve themselves. they just won’t. or can’t. and they have a need to keep complaining. meh.
“ASSHOLE’S” POOR LOGIC
“I’m sick and tired of hearing you complain about guys being assholes … Here’s a thought; if you’re going to sleep with bar dicks, be prepared for the inevitable; he might be an asshole. GASP” asshole looking at you
But there’s something wrong with “asshole’s” logic. In other words, there is no obvious connection between his two assertions.
The girls who complain about guys being assholes are not usually the same as those who sleep with bar dicks. They complain, accurately given the locale, that the guys they meet are out for only one thing. That is why they complain about them being assholes. There is no indication at all that they actually slept with the assholes.
However, the second group, the ones who sleep with the bar dicks, are unlikely to complain about guys being assholes since the complaint would be after the fact. They have already slept with the bar dicks and so it is logically odd that they would then complain about their partner(s) being assholes. They would, as a matter of simple logic, place themselves in the same category. By logical extension they would then become assholes themselves. Does this sound like the logical thing to do?
“Asshole” should brush up on his logic.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I beg to differ mm. BOTH sets of women will complain about the assholes.
those that continue to go to the same place to meet ‘quality’ men where they have encountered nothing but assholes,
and those who actually boinked the assholes, because the asshole didn’t do a Cinderella pumpkin transformation into prince charming the morning after.
and since when do people who make poor choices blame themselves (put themselves into the asshole category) of course not! despite being the kind of person who will over and over and over choose a nasty asshole for a bed partner, they will consider themselves an innocent victim of an asshole.
Cheerio,
You’re making a simple mistake here by assuming that LOGIC plays any part of the equation.
Let me revise my equation:
Low self-esteem + alcohol – LOGIC + perceptive assholes = this bitch
It’s all about low self-esteem. Confident women don’t bother with this shit.
RSVP
: Good dog Molly (09/10, 10:44AM)
“I beg to differ mm. BOTH sets of women will complain about the assholes.”
Well Good dog, I was speaking from a logical point of view but, nonetheless, I believe my argument remains unhorsed.
Your first group, those that “go to the same place to meet
quality men where they have encountered nothing but assholes,” is indistinguishable from mine, those “who complain, accurately enough given the locale, that the guys they meet are out only for one thing. That is why they complain about them being assholes.” They might be guilty of stupidity but this does not affect the logic of my argument.
In addition to finding your real-life counter-examples to my logical analysis problematic, I also find it internally odd, possibly illogical itself. Your second group, “those who actually boinked the asshole, because he didn’t do a Cinderella pumpkin transformation with prince charming the morning after.” If I understand that correctly the asshole was a pumpkin the morning after and it was on that basis that she called him an asshole. This might well be true in a real-world sense but my point was logical, i.e., it factored in no Cinderella-pumpkin transformation but rather focused on the assertion itself. Assuming she was logical – admittedly a large assumption – she would have brought herself under her own interdict if, after the fact, she called her bar dick an “asshole.”
Your final claim, “since when do people who make poor choices blame themselves (put themselves into the same category), of course not” makes the same mistake, i.e., I was not speaking from a real-world perspective where this may well be true but rather from a purely logical point of view, in terms of the internal coherence of the assertion itself to the effect that, after the fact, she would consign herself to the same asshole category as the bar dick.
We must always attempt to distinguish the theoretical from the contingent, the real-world from the purely logical. You dwelt in the former while I adhered to the latter. As a result our arguments, like the proverbial ships in the night, passed each other without meeting.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
But it’s not the woman’s fault. They have the right to dress like a slut, grind on you, tease you, but the guy doesn’t have the right to be an asshole. Quite frankly idiots of both sexes deserve each other.
If you are a woman and don’t want to be considered a slut and get assholes, then don’t act that way and the same goes for the guys. You want better, then strive for better and go places where their are good, honourable people.
RSVP
: jhey (09/10, 11:18AM)
See my reply to Good dog Molly (09/10, 11:31AM)
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
montrealman,
Yes yes. Many of us have degrees and bags of big words. We’re dealing with real world here. No room for logic when it comes to this shit. People are crazy, and do crazy things, then want others to think they’re innocent. It’s all crazy. Happens all the time. No logic. None.
I know lots of women who routinely sleep with assholes and try to make me believe “he looked really nice and genuine” while knowing they just needed a self confidence boost but lying straight face to my face in order to save face. I usually call them out and they storm off.
Lets face it kids, some people have serious self-esteem issues which leads to messed up behavior. Denial works wonders for them until the shit gets real.
I’m under the radar. Stealth-like as it were.
well yes MM, and I shall be ever grateful we are not playing andrea doria.
RSVP
: jhey 09/10, 11:44AM)
“No logic when it comes to this shit.”
You appear to have adopted the view, very common on this site, that logic is irrelevant to “real life.” Not so. The use of logic entails thought and clear thought is what is required for such “real life” problems currently under review. The logical response to your position is quite simple: What’s your answer? What’s your solution? The answer, of course, is that you have none. In other words the “real world” is ruled by utter contingency, unfounded hypothesis and rampant speculation. Philosophically speaking, it’s a real mess. But you’re right: “There is no logic when it comes to this shit.” That’s because it is mindless. Philosophy in general and logic in particular is the only way.
” Good dog Molly (12:51PM)
And I shall be grateful as well Good dog, assuming the game “Andrea Doria” follows the plot line of the “real world.”
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Yeah, and then there’s the guys who always seem to end up with these ball busting whiny bitches who try to be their mother. Or girls who just want a free ride, or something. This is something you can talk to someone about until you’re blue in the face, they have to learn for themselves, and many of them don’t.
OMG I can’t believe I never noticed this before. Montreal Man is a vulcan! \//, Live long and prosper ole bean!
TJ, I hear ya, I used to date this girl that nagged about everything and one day she said “I’m not your mother.” To which I replied, “Praise Jesus, you finally get it!” That relationshit didn’t last too long.
But I’ll bet your look of satisfaction was priceless, Hoist. >: )
MM may be a Vulcan but he’s not a cool Vulcan. He’s probably like Sybok – lamest Vulcan ever.
http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/imag…
Don’t be too hard on Sybok, Ivan. That one was directed by Shatner – it wasn’t his fault! :p
I’m old, fat, and ugly, so I don’t have to worry about women anymore. LOL.
Kirk had a point though. Why would God need a starship?
RSVPS
: HoistThatRag (09/10, 5:38PM)
“Montreal Man (sic) is a vulcan.”
There’s only one Roman god of fire and it ain’t me. But I take it you’re referring to some sort of science fantasy film. You must not waste your time. You must study more philosophy. Then we can talk.
: Ivan Sonofanitch (5:54PM)
Sybok, the lamest Vulcan ever? In what way was he the lamest Vulcan ever? Did he lack a coherent philosophy? If that’s the case I agree. To be without a coherent philosophy is pretty lame.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Thank God…i don’t go to bars to drink anymore…I’d have more coyote syndromes than i care for…more i drink the worse my eye sight gets
MM,
STOP with the philosophy. I hope I didn’t sound like that when I was studying philosophy…
Anyways. Low self esteem explains it all OP. These whining females are not women. They’re girls with very little self confidence and the need to feel better takes on many forms, including asshole denial phase.
RSVP
: jhey (09/11, 11:11AM)
You studied philosophy? Can we talk? What area of philosophy did you study? Metaphysics? Epistemology? Aesthetics? Ethics? What approach did you use, analytical, dialectical or synthetic? Any particular names? What did you sound like when you were studying philosophy? Did you sound as learned as me?
Surprisingly, in view of the fact that you studied philosophy, I found your claim that “Low self esteem explains it all” as being quite puzzling. Do you think that low self-esteem is some sort of free-standing psychological state or, rather, do you think that there might be a philosophical angle on it? Do you think the application of an active analytical rationality as opposed to a passive, emotional and unknowing acceptance of totalizing psychological states might work to provide some egress from such low self-esteem? Do you think that by acquiring a coherent philosophy – not perhaps “logic” in a narrow or formal sense but rather in an informal sense, i.e., a sustained disposition to always give reasons for one’s actions – might constitute a first step on the way to a cure for low self-esteem? Write back soon.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
Dude,
You are completely lost – nobody cares about your rhetoric! Holy crap I also use to label everything when I was in Uni – thank god my friends could tolerate me. Is this Modern? Post-modern? WHO CARES.
ON THE EMPTINESS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPLANATION
RSVP
:jhey (09/11, 11;11AM)
“Anyways. Low self-esteem explains it all OP.”
I’ll skip your latest irrelevant comment and return to the one previous where you claim that “Low self-esteem explains it all.” But you gave failed to answer the implied question, “Exactly what IS low-self esteem?” Does it have any meaning or is it, like psychological explanation generally, empty of any meaningful content?
What about the contrast theory of meaning, you know, an apple isn’t an apple because it it’s an orange? What is the contrast for low self-esteem, high self-esteem? What would that mean? Who knows? Would girls with high self-esteem not frequent bars? Why not? And is low-self esteem a steady state condition? Does one who suffers from low self-esteem suffer continually or does low self-esteem come and go? It seems that having “low self-esteem” is nothing more than having an “inferiority complex,” another empty psychological grab-bag explanation. It can be invoked to explain everything which, of course, means that it explains nothing.
Sadly, in view of your claim to have studied philosophy. you appear to have fallen victim to an empty psychological cliché. Dude, I hope you are experiencing low self-esteem. You deserve it.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
MM,
Nobody cares about philosophy here. I feel sorry for you that you have to define ad-nauseum the “meaning” of everything.
Everyone here knows what low-self esteem means in this context. For the purpose of this conversation, we don’t need to write an essay contrasting theories.
Oh, jhey, don’t take MM so seriously – he’s like an ankle-biting dog with no teeth, essentially harmless.
We once offered him the prestigious LTWWB Golden Enema award but, alias, he was otherwise engaged.
THE PHONEY PHILOSOPHER, OR: HERE COMES THE STUPID DUDE
RSVPS
: jhey (09/12, 9:52AM)
Dude, for someone who claims to have been “studying philosophy,” you seem to be remarkably stupid. How do you know “nobody cares about philosophy here?” Can you support that assertion? You sound like you’re suffering from a mistaken sense of high self-esteem. Or maybe you claim to speak for you all the bitchers on this site. Is that right, dude? It’s called an empirical claim for which evidence must be provided but, of course, you provide none. Dude, in philosophy, that’s just an empty assertion. Rightly, it’s called just being “stupid” but you wouldn’t realize it because you were never “studying philosophy” as you claimed. I immediately recognized your stupidity from the outset, one that has shone through all your comments on this thread right from the start. I thought I’d just have some fun. And I wasn’t writing an essay “contrasting theories” of low self-esteem as you absurdly assert but rather doing what’s called “conceptual analysis,” something in respect to which you obviously are totally ignorant. Where did you say you “were studying philosophy” again? Come on dude, own up. You didn’t study philosophy anywhere, right dude? Say good night, dude.
: T.T. Fonebone (12:35PM)
That’s true, T.T., I was otherwise engaged. I was trying to pull the enema out of your ass but it wouldn’t budge. All I could do was make sure I was out of the way of your noxious, malodorous bowel-blasts.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
lol my stupidity.
I care about philosophy… but it doesn’t care about me 🙁
And yeah you are pretty stupid Jhey for engaging montrealman in a philosophy debate. He’s got that arena on lock down.
Try debating him in an area where his comprehension is weak… like everything NOT philosophy 🙂
Bravo, MM, for recognizing my outstanding flatulence skills! I specialize in ‘rolling thunder’ and ‘silent super stinker’ emissions, specifically designed for those management seminars that I host on behalf of large corporations. A squeak of the poo shute is being dispatched in your general direction, dear heart.
Amen, OB, a-fucking-men (no pun intended).
It’s true though. Dumb bitches go on and on and on about wanting a nice guy n’ shit but will gravitate towards the next available asshole like Bro Tim to a fresh bucket of KFC. Then when they’re treated like ass, they dare to act like they don’t know what is going on or instead blame all males because they spread their legs for assholes. This was the story of my life during my undergrad years and I would hear it every single Monday morning from the same bimbos from our group of friends.
And you can’t tell these dumb bitches to stop fucking morons because they make you look like you’re the asshole for calling them on their dumb shit. Meanwhile, all the other gals at the table point fingers at you for pointing out the obvious in front of the slutty bimbo but are talking shit about her when she’s not around.
I like this jhey poster already too. Props for telling your dumb bitch friends to stop acting like dumb bitches. The truth hurts them so they storm off because what you’re saying is accurate.
Fool,
No doubt. I saw all the big words. Imagine that! My point is that many of us know a lot about something but don’t feel the need to turn everything is an overblown academic jerkoff. Besides, drawn out writing blows. Hemingway showed the way.
TBBSL
It would be an interesting experiment if all men started calling them out when they start complaining about said assholes.
J
RSVPS
: jhey (09/12, 3:02PM)
Dude, you got that one right!
: fool (323PM)
An interesting comment but no, I don’t have the area of philosophy on “lock down.” Anyone can participate as long as they have a mind. I’d be delighted in debating anyone in an area in which my comprehension is “weak”. The difficulty is that, sooner or later, all such matters ultimately reduce to philosophy.
: T.T. Fonebone (3:47PM)
It would be extremely interesting to see how you integrate your obvious flatulence skills in those management seminars that you host on behalf of large corporations. Do you start off with chili for breakfast?
: jhey (9:21PM)
Did you see all the “big words,” Dude? Did you know that anyone who uses that phrase immediately reveals himself to be not only of low cognitive attainment but sub-literate as well? No, Dude, I suppose you didn’t know that.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
MM,
Please, teach us more!
RSVP
jhey (09/13, 10:28AM)
I would, of course, be delighted to “teach you more” but you must refine your request. In what specific areas do you think you need help? Ontology? Epistemology? Ethics? What difficulties in comprehension have you encountered? Have you attempted to to structure these difficulties so as to render them coherent and amenable to solution? Remember, thought without structure is like a body without a skeleton. Take away the skeleton and the body reduces to a shapeless mush. The same thing happens to thought. Write back soon.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
“Ethics?” – Says Smeagol.
I distinctly remember requesting your “ethical explanation” on several occasions, but for some reason you always declined 🙁
Example: “Annie why don’t you give Vandy the benefit of your greatness, and post a piece on ethics that will shame the thief into returning all the stollen goods.”
To which Muntremoleman replied: “my field, as I indicated in my previous post, is EPISTEMOLOGY, not ethics”.
So, really. What does a liar like you know about ethics?