To the bylaw enforcement officer who gave me the $222 ticket for have my harmless 12 year old, 30 pound mutt (that’s 65 in human years – a senior citizen) off leash in the Commons and “at large” (though he is always not more than 10 feet in front of me). Good to see you have an eye out for dangerous animals.

Good on ya too the useless council who bring a blanket law in like this to criminalize lord knows how many more dog loving, council hating citizens.

Well at least I’m generating revenue for the cash strapped municipality for their other useless cat bylaw.

Needlessly Hounded

Join the Conversation

14 Comments

  1. Awesome Michael, too true! That by-law is there so the rest of the city doesn’t have to pick up after you Needlessly Hounded, if it is such a chore to do so then get rid of your dog. Can’t do that you say? Then stop bitching and pay the damn fine and bring baggies next time for crying out loud. Oh and there are plenty of off leash parks you can take your 30 pound mutt to.Stop bitching about people just doing their jobs so that the rest of us can enjoy life instead of spending it scraping off YOUR shit of OUR shiny boots.

  2. Hey Needlessly Hounded, it’s definetly a dissapointment to get fined for having a well controlled, harmless, ageing dog off the leash in a park. As the owner to a placid, gentle, well-trained dog, I’d feel the same way as you. Shittily enough though, these are the risks we have to take as long as it’s illegal. This part is for Christopher: where the hell do you see anything written about poop in ”Needlessly Hounded”s bitch??? Still traumatized from the other bitch, are we? Don’t assume that people who lets their dogs off leash dont clean up after them! And not everybody is within walking distance to an off-leash park. I myself am not even within driving distance, I’d have to spend $800 on a flght every time I want to let my dog off the leash, I dont live in a dog-friendly country. But you know what, wanker? I still let my dog off leash in quiet parks, because he deserves a little freedom! Christ, you and your fucking rule book.

  3. Let’s see. You chose to ignore a by-law. You got caught. You got fined. Now you’re pissed. I fail to see what went wrong here. The fact that you don’t agree with the by-law doesn’t give you the right to break it no matter how useless said by-law may be. You are probably the type of person who who gets mad at the cops when you get a speeding ticket too.

  4. Ha Leo you are a laugh, why don’t you read the title of the bitch, tuck your tail between your legs and scamper off…AGAIN.Oh and sorry but it’s not MY rulebook moron…it’s the Provincial and Municipalities rulebook, if you can’t deal with it go to China and see what they do to you after a minor infraction. You are such a whiney little crybaby…ohhh I don’t like this rule or that bylaw…waaaaaa! Get into politics…they love ineffectual, do nothing, head in the sand idiots like yourself.

  5. When did I ever scamper off Christopher??? I dont recall. I admit I didnt notice the title of this bitch, I just went for the actual content. And, being a rational person, I wouldnt take the title that seriously, as I think the writer was just letting off a little steam.So I’m ‘such a whiney little crybaby’ am I? Good put down. How old are you again?? China’s a communist country, like North Korea, so I think you and your camera would be more suited to it than I.

  6. Ps: I’ve been to China, Christopher.Furthermore, the above bitcher did NOT, I repeat, did NOT mention poop as being a reason to recieving the $222 fine.

  7. Hey Christopher: For someone who is just sooo keen on abiding by the rules,”…Oh and sorry but it’s not MY rulebook moron…it’s the Provincial and Municipalities rulebook, if you can’t deal….” you sure know how to insult those same rulemakers when it’s convenient for you!!”…Get into politics…they love ineffectual, do nothing, head in the sand idiots like yourself.”I’d say you’re an idiot yourself, Christopher, but there’s no need to, as it’s already abundantly clear.

  8. If the title of the bitch includes referencing that the NEXT time her dog poops it will be on the bylaw officers shiny boots…I think it is safe to assume that he only approached her because heshe witnessed the poster not picking up said poop then noticed after that the dog wasn’t registered…I say this because the $222 fine is exactly what you get for unregistered dogs. It’s unfortunate she got caught because they will now try and prevent her from letting her dog off leash in off leash parks, on top of the fine they punish the dog. If you don’t believe me check here:http://www.halifax.ca/legislation/bylaws/hrm/index.htmlCheck under “Dogs”Yes you Leo you are so right, it’s so abundantly clear that I am an idiot for following the rules and laws but don’t actually like the municipal and provincial governments presently sitting in office, they made ALL those rules and laws in the few short years they have been at the helm…especially considering it takes them 6 months to push one cat by-law through, right? Man you can be such a tool at times and then have some real input at other moments…what’s up?

  9. Having read the bitch and the title that goes with it, it was my interpretation that the threat of poop on the shoes ‘next time’ referred to the next time said bitcher received a $222 fine for having her/his dog off the leash. If bitcher had been fined for not picking up after dog, it probably would have been mentioned. All it said was that a fine was issued because the dog was off leash, there was no other reason given. So why are you assuming shit was involved?When I say you are an idiot, it is because, as apparent in your comments here and elsewhere, your praise for authority and adherance to the ‘laws and bylaws’ seems to border on the obsessive, hence your judgemental little attacks on people like ‘Needlessly Hounded’. It’s just so hypocritical of you. As if you havent forgotten a baggie once in your life as a dog owner, as if you wouldnt teach your kids to physically attack racists!

  10. Man.. the bitches start nice then people get personal!! What’s wrong with you guys. Back to the subject. Sorry to hear about your fine. True there are no parks that allow that in the city anymore. Mind you, going to work at 7am through the commons, I see quite the amount of off leash dogs, and i’m not talking 30 lbs. Full grown german sheppards we’re talking. Having experienced a dog attack myself from a dog that was off leash in a zone where he was supposed to have been leashed, I understand the ticket. Had someone else been there with a dog, they would have questioned the officer’s action about not giving you a ticket. I love animals, but i’m not a huge fan of dogs, or some dog owners i should say. Some of them turn out vicious. In the city, where there are a lot of people, leash at all times. Doesn’t matter the size and age of dog. All animals can be harmful of provoked, and in some cases, not even provoked. They could just snap, as the one that jupmed on me because it was off leash. It was in a park where they were supposed to have it on a leash.

  11. Hey Coyote, is it less ok to let a German Sheppard off the leash than it is a Jack Russel terrier? I understand why you’d be nervous of dogs after having a bad experience like that, and I also understand people tend to be more nervous of big dogs..but statistically speaking, it’s small dogs who attack much more often. And there are good reasons why German Sheppards are used by the police, military and guide services; it’s because they’re extremely intelligent, quick to learn, loyal..and most importantly, trustworthy! I hope I’m not overboard on this reply, but I’m a huge German Sheppard lover and I am really tired of people stereotyping these brilliant dogs.

  12. Small dogs might attack more frequently but I wonder what the stats are on how much damage they do Vs. larger dogs. I like my odds versus a jack russel more than a larger dog that can fit my face in its mouth. I love dogs too, especially larger dogs, but not everybody out there trains them properly, or at all. I think leash laws are important to protect people from irresponsible owners.

  13. Hey Miles, you definetly have a good point there, I’d much rather have my knees disfigured than my face! It’s the irresponsible people that ruin if for the rest of us. My poor dog was recently attacked while on leash by a starving, nursing pitbull, who was roaming free on a downtown street. Although she’s a sheppard, my dog was terrified and too bewildered to defend herself. I had to kick this pitbull whenever she went in for my dog’s throat, which was awful as well because it’s her scumbag owners I wanted to hurt, not the dog. it was terrifying. Fortuntely aside from a few cuts, there was no real damage to my dog, but that was because we were allowed to escape into a McDonalds restaurant. We called the police after Animal Control (which is closed on sundays!) but they never showed and the pitbull eventually wandered off. Nice!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *