Halifax is known for its recycling. In the world of wasters, we’re among the best at cleaning up after ourselves. We don’t bury all our old toys underground anymore. Half our junk is diverted through composting, recycling and shipping it to the Chinese countryside.

Our municipality also has one of one of the highest recycling rates of construction and demolition waste in the country. Companies bring their C&D waste to one of three depots, which are legally required to recycle at least 75 percent of it.

The problem is, like our run-of-the-factory plastic waste, no one knows what that means. “It goes to all privately run recyclers and who we send it to always changes,” explains Shari Dillman, who works in C&D at HRM.

Dillman is uncertain how the material is used after that, but a “small amount does get landfilled.” When a building is demolished —flattened without any attempt to sort the materials—things like gyprock become useless. While usable metal is pulled out of the rubble, plastic and vinyl are ground into landfill cover, which is considered recycling.

Thom Oommen co-wrote a guide to ecological C&D for the Ecology Action Centre called Waste? Not! He says that, post-demolition, some materials are too contaminated to recycle, though they could be re-used by a do-it-yourselfer. “If wood is treated or painted it’s landfilled.”

Much of the usable wood is chipped up and burned for energy. It beats landfilling but burning a perfect building material can’t be called green.

According to EAC’s guide, “Asphalt shingles, clean wood, drywall, metal, painted and composite wood, plastics, aggregates, drywall and treated wood are estimated to make up 25 to 30 percent of all solid waste in Nova Scotia. This translates to between 175,000 and 200,000 tonnes in the province annually.”

Much of that waste could be avoided if companies practiced deconstruction—the methodical taking apart of old buildings and sorting the materials. But, “you can demolish or deconstruct any way you wish,” Dillman says. “There are no rules on that.”

There are, however, incentives, in the form of reduced tipping fees—charged by weight at the C&D depots—for companies that pre-sort their waste. “But demolishers usually have the upper hand,” says Einer Christensen, an engineer with Solterre Design, a Halifax firm specializing in green design. That’s because the lowest bidder almost always gets the take-down contract, and demolition is quicker, cheaper and easier than proper deconstruction, despite the higher tipping fees.

“It’s all reusable and recyclable but, with the cost of labour to remove plaster and nails, it’s not profitable,” adds Jennifer Corson, an architect at Solterre and owner of Renovator’s Resource, a store selling used building materials.

Yet, contractors and do-it-yourselfers’ demand for loved-again materials has kept Corson’s store going for 17 years. They come to save money and energy and find unique items that stand out from the made-in-China mainstream.

Corson argues that a major cultural shift is needed in the construction industry. “It’s the disposable era,” she says—a time when products, even buildings, aren’t designed to last. “Conservation hasn’t been the norm since World War II. Buildings from the ’80s are hard to recycle; there’s just not a lot of quality material in them.”

Oommen calls it a “culture of demolition: demolish and rebuild.” Little thought is given to embodied energy—the energy invested in creating a building, which is wasted and spent again when a building is replaced rather than renovated. That waste is what architect Carl Elefante was getting at when he said, “The greenest building is the one already built.”

The good news is that Corson, Christensen and Oommen have all seen progress in the industry driven by the rising costs of material and disposal. Corson loves EAC’s Waste! Not? guide and says it’s a small example of the kind of education the industry needs.

Oommen adds that HRM could extend its regulatory teeth further on this issue. “If when you applied for a demolition permit you were required by law to sort the waste it would really encourage re-use,” he says.

Chris Benjamin is author of the novel Drive-by Saviours.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Maybe it’s just me, but if demolition + tipping is still cheaper than deconstruction + re-use + much less landfill, then maybe tipping fees aren’t high enough. Rather than create a bunch of new laws, simply use the market to adjust behaviour. People will start sorting and re-using what they can because it’s cheaper for them to do it that way, rather than because they are required to do it.

  2. It seems to Smee that HRM (we) should be doing much more towards conquering waste management. We only seem to have scratched the surface. We really pat ourselves on the back a great deal concerning our spearheaded position on the subject, but it’s purely only relative to doing nothing, not relative to what can and should be done.
    Through private & public resources or licensees, every f.ing thing should be steamed into a useful resource. Nothing should remain as ‘garbage to buried’. Nata!

    Sadly, if everyone had to take a “recycling exam”, I bet 15% MIGHT get a passing 50% grade. Test results on actual whole-populous implementation of the current recycling protocol would be even more dismal.

    Seriously, stop patting those backs, we suck!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *