Jared Perry

Saint Mary’s University isn’t the only Canadian university that has a rape chant. The now-infamous “N is for No consent” chant has been “going on for many years” at the Sauder School of Business at UBC, reports The Ubyssey, the school’s student newspaper, albeit at UBC the last line was “Go to jail” as opposed to SMU’s “Grab that ass” version.

It will likely be impossible to unearth the origins of the chant. Former SMUSA president Jared Perry says he didn’t start the chant, and it’s been around since he started at SMU in 2009. To be clear: there’s no evidence Perry created the chant, but it seems to have been in his circle. Perry is a commerce student at the Sobey School of Business, and the chant was also at the Sauder School of Business at UBC. So it’s speculation, but not an unreasonable guess that the chant started at one or the other business schools, then crossed the country via a transferring student, or by way of some business student gathering. It wouldn’t be surprising if the chant turned up at other Canadian business schools.

SMUSA elections foreshadowed rape chant controversy

Jared Perry

In February, 2013, SMUSA held its annual election for this academic year’s representatives. The incumbent, Jared Perry, ran as the conservative business-as-usual candidate looking for re-election: “So why vote for me?” he asked in his election platform. “Besides having arguably the best Movember Stache, I’m a super personable guy.”

His opponent was Amanda Dickie, then the coordinator of the SMU Women’s Centre, which bills itself as “a rad feminist organization.” Dickie’s platform was substantive. “Our President, VPs, and Board are paid positions and the money needs to be earned by making real, tangible contributions to our campus, students, and community,” she wrote in her platform.

Amanda Dickie

Perry was first elected SMUSA president in spring of 2012. Today, Dickie tells The Coast that in the summer of 2012, SMUSA changed its policies in such a way that it effectively prohibited “special event funding” for two annual events sponsored by the Women’s Centre that had previously been funded by SMUSA—Consentfest and The Vagina Monologues. But, says Dickie, SMUSA neglected to tell the Women’s Centre of the change, and she had to fight to get retroactive funding. That retroactive funding was conditioned on the understanding that neither event will get future funding.

Oddly, the SMU Journal doesn’t give a vote total for the 2013 election, but Perry won reelection, having soundly defeated Dickie, we’re told. He was to continue to collect the $23,000 salary as president.

Had she won, she would have “absolutely” put an end to the rape chant, says Dickie.

Having won reelection, Perry penned a letter to students. “There are many important skills that students learn during their time at a university. Some are questionable and should not be spoken of,” he wrote. “This weekend one of my roommates and I were up late chatting about the first time we met. It was the first day of Orientation Week and before I knew him, I had already written something completely offside and immature as his Facebook status.”

In the wake of the rape chant revelations, Perry and SMUSA vice president Carrigan Desjardins have resigned. The University administration has announced that two students are facing disciplinary action over the chant, but has not identified the students.

Chronicle-Herald publishes op-ed slut-shaming rape victims

The rape chant is not an isolated event, of course, but rather a representative incident of a culture of misogyny that tolerates, even celebrates, rape. Responsible people, and responsible media, ought be concentrating on that larger culture, helping to educate and move the culture along a bit.

But then comes Saturday’s Chronicle-Herald, which contains a horrid op-ed piece written by Mary Bowen, a Granville Ferry resident. Headlined “Exhibitionist modern culture breeds excess,” the op-ed, yes, tries to connect Miley Cyrus to the rape chant, but it is far, far worse than even that. Read it yourself, but some of the most offensive lines:

At a time when hormones are raging, near naked young women are constantly on parade….

Back in the day when dinosaurs roamed the prairies and I was a teen, there were names (which can’t be repeated here) for girls who paraded their wares and talked the talk, then wanted to bail when the car windows at the drive-in were thoroughly steamed and boys couldn’t have walked to the concession stand for the popcorn if they’d wanted to.

“No means no” is a catchy slogan, but is it really fair to spread out the goodies and then snatch them off the table at the last second when the bait is taken and the hook halfway down the fish’s throat?

Is it fair to expect hands-off status when young ladies themselves are chanting, “Use us; abuse us; do what you will”? Is this fair play? I don’t think so….

…And while we’re at it, bring on the burka!

There you have it: young women get raped because they are cock teases. Men are incapable of controlling their lustful loins in the face of a woman who reveals too much, and so, really, the women are to blame for rape.

Do we actually need to respond to this disgusting tripe? Well, we do, because the attitude expressed in the op-ed is prevalent and is the very foundation of rape culture.

Thankfully, Ally Garber, who writes with the fashion blog Fashionable People, wrote a very good response to Bowen’s op-ed:

…Here’s the thing: it is not a woman’s job to “not be raped”.

We are not mandated to carry rape whistles.

We do not need to cover up.

We do not need to hide our sexuality.

I really hope all the young women who may have come across Mary’s article understand that.

We must say it until every woman is safe: It is not a women’s job to not be raped.

Even if Miley Cyrus came grinding out onto the stage wearing nothing but that foam finger: Miley Cyrus was not asking to be raped.

Also those names for girls who “paraded their wares and talked the talk”? We don’t use those names any more.

Because sex, if you want to have sex, is OK.

Rape is not.

And a word from me, to teenage boys and young men: Yes, it’s difficult navigating the wondrous world of sex. Welcome to adulthood! It won’t ever change: 40 years from now, you’ll still be confused and mystified by sex and relationships. That’s called being human. But taking sex, whether violently, or through coercion, or by false pretence or by taking advantage of intoxicated and/or passed out women is rape, first and foremost: a crime. But also, it’s a loser’s game, played by loser dudes who can’t meet women on their own terms.

Like you, women too are sexual beings, with their own desires, turn-ons, turn-offs. And good sex is mutual sex, when those wondrous, confusing and mystifying desires of two people meet. And, fellows, finding that, having a woman want you, is what makes you not a loser dude.

I’m talking in the context of heterosexual relationships, because the subtext of the rape chant is normative male power over women, but of course the same standards should apply to all sexual relationships, homosexual included: Mutual consent is good sex. Rape is crime, committed by asshole losers.

SMU Women’s Centre to rally

The SMU Women’s Centre has announced a “Chant down rape culture” rally, for this Thursday, September 12, at 2:30pm, outside the Atrium on the SMU campus. Says the centre’s press release:

Rape culture is defined as the attitudes, behaviours, messages, language, laws, media and other everyday phenomena that promote sexual violence. Rape culture normalizes physical, emotional and sexual assault against women, girls, transgender, and queer people. It disproportionately affects communities for whom oppression based on sex, gender, race, physical ability and mental health status is an everyday reality. It supports an environment in which sexual assault seems inevitable for the world we live in.

This rally is organized to speak out against rape and rape culture on campuses and in the city of Halifax.

We recognize that this culture is not created by or limited to St. Mary’s University, but is prevalent throughout society. The chants captured on video are a symptom of a wider culture that minimizes sexual violence, shames and blames rape victims and victims of assault, and promotes the normalization of rape.

We are tired of victims being silenced. We are rallying to speak out against rape and rape culture. We are rallying to support victims and to assert the right of all students, faculty, staff and members of the community to a safe campus, a safe city and a safe world. We are rallying to demonstrate that members of the SMU community and the city of Halifax stand in solidarity against any activity that promotes sexual violence.

We are rallying to demonstrate the visibility of survivors and allies, and to refuse to quietly accept the marginalization of victims and those who oppose rape culture.

Join the Conversation

18 Comments

  1. Thanks for making the time for this, Tim. I especially appreciate your words to the men and boys who read your articles.

    Pamela

  2. A brilliantly frank and straightforward response to the terrifying headlines of 2013. Thanks Tim.

  3. Great coverage Tim. Rape Culture will go away if we show some accountability. It is time SMU administrators tender their resignations after all who expects a frosh to be in charge? They are too busy buying markers to colour the ‘no means more beer’ signs.

  4. What and where in the name of heavens did self respect, self discipline, modesty, good taste, manners, civility and responsibility for self go?

  5. It’s too bad that student elections are more of a popularity contest than electing who is best for the job. I guess this is what you get- programs to advocate consent defunded, and a rape chat that no one thought was problematic. SMUSA should be supporting the Women’s Centre and school events to promote consent and address sexual abuse. There is a very obvious need for a strong and funded feminist organization on this campus.

  6. Thank you for saying rape and thanks for the refreshing read. Mary Bowen’s article is far more damaging than a rape chant. People think that a bunch of uni students chanting songs like that are bad..think about the Mary Bowen’s of the world who still feel that women cause rape to happen because men aren’t strong enough to control their urges…

  7. Splendid Idea. Next year, the large and diverse student body of Robie St. High can be represented by “a rad feminist organization.” Perhaps the frosh can chant about the joys of a drunken 13 year old being violated by a lesbian cougar.

    “Well, I say if it was rape, it was a good rape.” – E. Ensler

  8. “Had she won, she would have “absolutely” put an end to the rape chant, says Dickie.” What I don’t get is, why is this a problem now? This wasn’t in ANYBODY’s campaign. Until another school was caught performing this same chant most people were denying having ever heard this chant before and only now have to admit that this type of thing has been happening at Universities around the county. This is purely in the spotlight now because of the whole Rehteah Parsons situation. If people have a problem with the inappropriate attitude of students today make sure it gets addressed and move on, but don’t talk in retrospect about something that we weren’t even acknowledging as a problem at the time. This type of thing, maybe not the same chant but similar things, have been happening during frosh week all over North America.

  9. While I agree with those calling for radical change, the news of Rape-chants at 2 Canadian universities isn’t “new” or “shocking” to anyone who’s been paying attention. I’d be more shocked if there was any sizeable number of North American schools *without* some version of this chant; here’s how it was done at Yale: http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/10/17/the-men-and-women-of-yale/
    Not sure when/if our leaders plan to reform their “boys will be boys” stance, but in the meantime, why not give Amanda Dickie the SU post, and have all the misguided Ann Coulter-ites volunteer at rape-crisis centres and women’s shelters? what an opportunity!

  10. An interview question for any business school grads: “So, was there a rape chant during your frosh week? If so, did you speak up? Why / Why not?”

  11. Very interesting backgound to all this. The popularity contest mentality basically runs school student represented groups and organizations from the very youngest grades. It hold for much of sports, Scouts and all sorts of team activities. I degenerates into subtle bullying that those of us who were square pegs in a round hole world just learned to accept. Thankfully in adulthood you can find success with needing to be on the insider track of popularity. Not always mind you; in some cases you’ll experience it in job competitions and in watching the loud self-promoters climb the corporate ladder while the introverts just sit there. A lot of the time that popularity approach just doesn’t ‘work’ anymore. The SMU kids hit that point with this fiasco, and hopefully the students association will elect someone with a better grounded set of values and a somewhat smarter platform.

  12. People don’t, or won’t, take responsibility for their actions and the actions people take against them.

    People shouldn’t have to, but they do because of the world we live in. It’s the difference between what ‘ought’ to be and what actually ‘is’.

    If someone dresses provocatively, gets black-out drunk, takes some nefarious character home from the bar, and proceeds to ‘get fucked’ (in every sense of the phrase), we have to realize that a portion of what precipitated that situation is the victims fault. It’s not entirely (although it is mostly) the fault of the perpetrator. This obviously wasn’t the intent of the victim, they just didn’t understand the consequences of their actions and so blame unforeseen outcomes on exterior factors. By victims not admitting, and in fact denying, any relation to the cause of an incident they are undermining their ability to prevent further occurrences of the event. You cannot stop a bad habit (ie: the frosh leaders and students who were enthusiastically singing along with the chant) if you do not realize that it is a bad habit. Obviously, this isn’t the case 100% of the time as there are circumstances/predators that are entirely unavoidable.

    My parents always told me not to be out late at night by myself. If I was by chance, and got sexually assaulted, would I not hold myself at least a tiny bit accountable? Or would I just be shaming myself?

    I’m not ‘blaming’ anyone, just pointing out areas of improvement for how they operate in their daily lives… You can’t fault an individual for ignorance, only the group that they reside in.

    Many of you (probably the majority) read this post with a female victim in mind, but how many noticed that it was gender neutral? There isn’t some negligible amount of sexual assault and domestic violence towards males that it can so easily remain absent from the conversation. In fact it’s probably better to just teach everyone that sexual assault and violence against anyone/anything is bad, instead of teaching everyone that sexual assault against women is bad. We talk about changing so many things but fundamentally even the way we think as North Americans is flawed.

  13. How about instead of focusing on the “self control” of women who dress or act a certain way, we focus on the “self control” of guys that rape women/girls? It’s scary that women like Mary Bowen are quick to sympathize with and make excuses for men who rape women.

  14. I still can’t believe there aren’t almost criminal chsrges for such words. You’re not uttering threats though perhaps one’s general intentions. Though women chanted too which really baffles me.

    Though to talk about the criminal code, there are also charges for wearing too little, coming from the general sensibilities of us in society (yes, the evil majority, i know). But, in a society that takes everything to extremes, does some clothing, or lack of, constitute some violation of what a reasonable person thinks is right to wear in public? Just asking. Sex is ok, for sure, but almost no one agrees it should be performed on a public street.

    It may like the Supreme Court ruling that women can go topless as men always do. Yet, I hsve only seen it done once in the decade or so since the ruling. Just a thought.

    And, I think the rape culture is not the fault of the boys, it’s the fault of the men, who help teach it to new generations. In media, attitudes, and learned dialog as boys grow up. One chant does not make a culture. It is a symptom of a larger systemic and societal problem.

    As I always say, environment (society) our greatest campus. From a very young age.

  15. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY? Here’s my two cents: It is perhaps wise to take some responsibility for my own safety. So I try not to put myself in situations where I might be harmed. Walking home by myself at night might be one of those situations. To be sure, however, if I am raped on my way home, the fault of the rape rests squarely upon the rapist. I cannot stress this clearly enough: I am not responsible for the actions of others and nor will I ever be. While taking measures to ensure my individual safety (not walking home late at night by myself) will perhaps help me stay safe at night, my actions in no way affect the actions of my would-be perpetrator. In other words, if I’m not out there, the rapist is just going to find someone else to victimize. I might stay home because it is prudent for me to do so – it does not mean that I should have to though. The same goes for my wardrobe choices, whether or not I choose to have a few too many one night, or the like.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *