
As senior brand strategist for Revolve, Phil Otto helped usher in Halifax’s “be bold” branding. He was one of three author’s behind a recent full-page newspaper ad imploring Heritage Trust to stop obstructing the city’s new convention centre. Otto spoke over the phone with The Coast about being “bold.”
The Coast: You helped create the “Be bold” campaign for the city.
Phil Otto: I wouldn’t necessarily call it a campaign. It’s not a campaign. It’s more about a brand platform. A brand strategy…
C: What’s the difference?
O: Well, a campaign would be an advertising program to influence behaviour, and a campaign may come out of this. But I would say that we step back a little bit, and a strategy or platform is really about changing the way people think.
C: Why, in your opinion, should Halifax “be bold?”
O: We did really, really in-depth stakeholder consultation during the process of collecting and gathering insight on what Halifax means to people, and we received, you know, there’s an undercurrent of negativity in the Halifax culture that’s quite off-putting to a lot of people. What was bubbling, and we had some of that during our consultation, but what was bubbling up from below the surface was a real desire to put a stake in the ground and move forward. Not be a sleepy, seaside town, but actually stand for something and put our best foot forward. If you go back to the Ivany report and many other, the RP+5 regional plan, and a lot of other research and strategies that have been put together, it’s just status quo is not an option.
C: I was almost hoping we could get through this without mentioning the Ivany report.
O: It didn’t influence our thinking to a large degree. It was just one of many elements that helped inform what we need to do.
C: So why is there that negative undercurrent? I’d think some could argue there’s good reason to be negative. There’s a lot of problems in the city, with homelessness, health care, racism…
O: Yeah, I don’t know that’s it’s just a Halifax culture, or if it’s actually a Maritimes and Atlantic cultural element, but it’s there. It’s prevalent. It’s discouraging. Halifax actually is a great city to live in for its population and the amount of services that we have. Halifax would stand out as one of the best places in Canada to live and raise your kids, but there’s this voice of, this depressing voice of negativity that just finds its way in every time an opinion is sought, and people listen. “Be bold” is about trying to celebrate success, celebrate the people taking risk in the city and moving forward, not getting stuck in a paralysis of negativity.
C: At a certain point, I think you can argue “being bold” is about standing up to the majority. It’s about asking tough questions and confronting problems and not ignoring them.
O: Yes, absolutely. I would absolutely agree with that. It’s not about status quo. It’s taking a tough stance and asking the tough questions; giving the tough answers at times as well. Just having a dialogue that is not meek or mediocre.
C: Wouldn’t something like, to change topics a bit, the full-page Herald ad, which you were one of the architects of, that seemed to be saying don’t ask questions.
O: No, no, that wasn’t about don’t ask questions at all. In fact, I feel bad if that came across as anti-Heritage Trust or pro-convention centre, because it was never about that. The issue around that ad was, Joe Ramia, and again, I’m not pro-convention centre or anti, and I barely know Joe. We weren’t trying to promote what he was doing. The issue was that development has gone through hoops. It’s gone through all the approval processes, and then Heritage Trust, who is a pretty, you know they’ve got some money and power behind them. There’s a feeling that they’re misusing that somewhat when they get into arguments around sight lines. There is no old building to protect on that site, so you ask the question. This wasn’t, it’s gone through all the public debate. All the questions, the opportunities were there for the questions to be asked. Why rehash it again and cost somebody who’s investing a tremendous amount of money, millions more in holdups for frivolous reasons? It’s not about not asking questions. It’s knowing when to stop asking questions and just let stuff happen.
C: Though the process Heritage Trust has asked for, that doesn’t stop construction on the Nova Centre. Is that really holding that project up?
O: No, but it has others. So, it could delay some parts of that project as well. There’s another element. We had 14,000 construction workers in Nova Scotia, of whom many more every year are having to travel to other cities to work. So what happens after they travel back-and-forth for a period of time? They just, it’s easier to move their family there. And Alberta, the oilsands is a big player in that, as we all know. One of the largest, single-largest air flights into Alberta is from Halifax. There’s a direct flight now, because there’s so many out-migration of workers. So, in my opinion, as a consumer and a resident of Halifax, what “be bold” means to me is to think different so that we’re setting the stage and an economy for success down the road. I have four children. I want them to bring their own families up here. If they want to go off to university somewhere and come back, I will certainly promote that, but I want them to grow up in their home town. Right now, there’s a feeling of loss around the prospect for good employment. That’s gotta turn around or we’re gonna continue to have out-migration. The amount of university, the small amount of university students that come to Halifax that actually stick to the city is quite depressing. It should be way higher. A lot of them are leaving because of attitude, and attitude is what creates prosperity and jobs. And “be bold” is about attitude.
C: You think it’s the attitude, that negativity that’s making people leave?
O: I think it’s helping it, for sure. There are developers in this city who simply are stopping investing here because of the attitude of people. Every time they try to do something, they get shut down. Something as simple, this negativity is ridiculous, the new graphics for Metro Transit were launched a couple of weeks ago, and the uninformed, I’ll go so far as to say stupid comments that were online, was both insulting and embarrassing.
C: Like what?
O: People suggesting that they were spending a ridiculous amount of money to just re-graphical the entire fleet of buses. Or that it was the need for Metro Transit buses to be re-painted that drove the new logo to be done. Anybody who listens to the news will understand that there is no new money being spent on rolling out that Halifax brand, or the “be bold.” It’s money being spent on maintenance as it goes along. It just happens that there was a lineup of buses that needed to be painted and the timing was perfect for it to be done. People saying, “look how much money we’d save if we just had white buses.” Well, that’s not very bold.
C: There’s a lot of, to borrow a phrase, assholes on the Internet, but there’s legitimate critiques that come up. Maybe not about those buses. When you have something like those 300 business leaders and people who sign that ad, if you’re drawing that line in the sand, do you then end up ignoring the critiques and actual complaints?
O: No, having good informed dialogue is healthy for a community. Uninformed, unintelligent, abusive dialogue, gets you nowhere.
C: There have been some very legitimate questions about the Nova Centre project, from everyone from the auditor general to media. You have other lawsuits, aside from Heritage Trust, happening.
O: Absolutely, and again, this wasn’t about pro-convention centre. I don’t know the business case on the convention centre. It never was what it was about. It was about, they have, and there’s a lot of really good people on the Heritage Trust group as well, but they are not about finding solutions. They’re about finding problems.
C: Can you see how an ad signed off by some of the wealthiest, the more elite in the city, sort of whining about negativity could rub people the wrong way?
O: Yeah, absolutely. There were a lot of people who are just consumers in Halifax as well. There’s some recognizable names; there’s a lot of names on that ad I don’t recognize. They’re not elite. They’re not business owners. That list came together in a day. If we took a week or actually had a campaign to get support around that, I think that would probably fill two newspaper pages. It wouldn’t be just business owners either. It would be people who just want this to be a great place to live; where people celebrate our successes and be positive and not constantly negative.
C: Do you feel victimized by that perceived negative bullying some people offer?
O: No, I don’t feel victimized. I find it embarrassing to the rest of Canada, when we’re constantly fighting amongst ourselves and not understanding the bigger picture of the impact it has on our economy if tourists don’t want to come here, or convention planners don’t want to have meetings, or businesses don’t want to move here because we are backwoods and negative and can’t get out of our own way. That’s the part that concerns me. As a business owner and a father, that’s my single biggest worry.
C: Again, the ad wasn’t, you’re saying it’s not specifically about the convention centre, but if you’re saying the negative attitude is what’s holding it back. We have a report this week that the vacancy rate for office rentals, Class A office rentals, has doubled and it’s going to get worse. You have convention centres in many other cities, both larger and comparable to Halifax, that are failing to attract business and turning into money pits. Are we really holding the city back with negativity to question those projects and wonder if they’re going to be of value to us?
O: Negativity, if a developer, the Nova Centre is different because there’s government money in it. But, if a developer is building a new building downtown and chooses not to because the vacancy rate is high, the reason the vacancy rate is high is because we don’t have enough workers in Halifax. It’s not so much space being built in other areas in Halifax. We have an outmigration of workers.
C: Wouldn’t it be better to maybe not build new offices, to maybe just try and fill what we have?
O: Possibly, yes. But the negativity isn’t around just a new office building. It’s just an attitude that every time somebody tries to do something different and think outside the box in Halifax, it gets shut down or there is an undercurrent of negativity that tries to shut it down. You see the online comments yourself. Like you say, there’s a lot of assholes on the Internet. This is about the assholes on the Internet, not people who have legitimate opinions or dialogue.
C: I think a lot of those people who do have legitimate criticisms or want to be in that dialogue, feel that door is shut to them, that this language of “be bold” and let’s not talk about it…
O: No, I think part of being bold is standing up and showing your view and your opinion. This isn’t about shutting down anything about anti-growth, or anti-development or people who have an opinion. It’s about stop being assholes.
C: If we were to fix the tangible things wrong in Halifax, wouldn’t that naturally create a more positive attitude?
O: Absolutely.
C: But doesn’t this look like we’re doing it the other way around? That we’re just going to think the problems away?
O: No, my attitude around “be bold” isn’t about just allowing development to happen, either. I’d say that the Harbour cleanup project was bold. City of Lakes business parks, whenever they were built, twenty years ago, was bold. Not allowing Skye Halifax to happen, wasn’t very bold. The garden Blooms project happening in the north end, that’s bold. That’s not about development or money. It’s about bold thinking. The bike lanes are bold.
C: So we’ve always been bold?
O: There’s always been an element of bold. I think to have a real change in reputation in Halifax, we need to be bolder. We need to think bolder.
This article appears in Aug 7-13, 2014.


Be bold. Give the Gottingen Street area residents money to re-generate the area after sitting down with small groups of residents and asking them how to make their lives better. Let the residents make the decisions and not some so called ‘community leaders/representatives’.
Forget ‘Votes for recent immigrants’ – get the mayor off his ass and get to work making the lives better for people who have lived here generation after generation.
At the risk of sounding like someone deserving of a vulgar epithet, it is possible to do several things at once. I think the mayor’s idea of letting permanent residents vote is an interesting one, worthy of discussion. I would also like to see an end to that dreadful CFA term. We do need young people, both those who are born here and those who come here to study, to stay in Nova Scotia. We also need more people of all ages. Neither the city nor the province can grow so long as we have out-migration. I’m so happy I moved back here – this is an exciting time to be in Halifax. We are at a tipping point and I hope we go in the positive direction. We must remember, though, that Halifax is not Nova Scotia, it’s the major city in Nova Scotia. We have to learn to work together to benefit the entire province.
Sorry to be an asshole, but I don’t know what was worse in this article. The awful, biased, one-track leading questions from the so-called interviewer, or the half-baked, evasive, one-track non-answers of the so-called strategist.
It’s as if the Coast took two slacktivists who don’t actually quite know what they are slacktivating for or against and recorded each of them in a room alone talking to himself, then spliced the two tapes together.
This splinterview is another embarrassing Coast fail. It’s as if they are actively trying to get worse.
Once again JoeBlow indulges us with his own special mix of xenophobia and racism.
Very nice to hear from Mr. Otto, and I wish him GREAT SUCCESS. It’s a hard road, because Hellifax is truly a vortex of negativity and repression. The majority of immigrants leave (or are driven out) two years after becoming landed. That’s nothing short of scandalous! Also, Dal grads (including in law) who are women and/or have ethnic-sounding names – even if they were born here – seem to find it impossible to get interviewed, let alone hired, and they don’t see a future here so they go to Toronto or Vancouver.
It seems to me the assholes should emigrate…
PS:
“one of three authors” not “author’s”!!! PLEASE!
Also, these two questions in a row – a bit strange!
C: If we were to fix the tangible things wrong in Halifax, wouldn’t that naturally create a more positive attitude?
C: But doesn’t this look like we’re doing it the other way around? That we’re just going to think the problems away?
One really GOOD brand change would be to STOP some self serving, small minded, power tripping city workers from abusing their own by laws and killing Halifax tourism & the economy! Stop attacking productive, tax paying, law abiding citizens, small businesses, home owners and even the kids, who would otherwise contribute. Halifax can start by doing one thing right that is DECADES OVERDUE. Stop allowing BULLIES to abuse their powers! Whether the former corrupt Mayor, other politicians, city officials, media people, outside interests, pushy lawyers or police!
The world saw how social media, school officials, local police, EVERYONE ignored the pleas of one bullied student, Rehteah Parsons for almost TWO years. How she was abused & abandoned & finally took her own life to escape the harassment. HRM preferred to cover it all up, the way they always do. Sweep it under the rug & hide the truth. Other well known cases of negligence, incompetence and indifference stand out for all the wrong reasons.
Like the negative campaign against Francesca Rogier. This entrepreneurial woman came to Halifax from the US with an architectural degree & expertise to contribute to the city’s development and bought a house with hopes of also building a new life in Halifax. Instead she found herself repeatedly duped and mired in a decidely negative & hostile campaign by HRM city workers to discredit her in order to cover up their own mistakes & violations. She was publicly abused & ridiculed, her reputation ruined for trying to save her dog’s life over a few minor scuffles with a neighbour’s dog! The city’s Animal Services manager and Prosecutor have made it their mission to KILL BRINDI for the past SIX years… vindictively wasting hundreds of thousands of tax dollars in the process to emotionally, physically and financially destroy Francesca and her dog, while lying to the courts and the media about the facts! BRINDI has served more time in dog years at Wyndenfog prison & with NO visitation rights, than serial killers do in this country!! Yet she has never committed a crime nor even bitten ANYONE. This gentle dog passed five independent evaluations, yet the city won’t release her, even to the many foster homes offered. An innocent dog being wrongfully held in solitary confinement over FIVE YEARS on death row because of a corrupt HRM and confusingly backwards court system.
With the malfeasance, negative & backward attitude of law enforcement and city authorities on these two cases alone, many people from all over will NEVER visit Halifax. It is too late for sweet Rehteah, but not too late to release Brindi before they KILL her. It is critical that Halifax do the right thing this time if only to save its own bad reputation. Then fire all the abusers involved and prosecute THEM. That would set a good example for changing the culture at city hall too.
Hey, Francesca/dmt, you should hook up with the Fincks.
Hey Happygolucky,
I don’t mean to be like, argumentative, but you’re wrong—about 75 percent (i.e, the majority) of immigrants STAY here, and immigrants in Halifax find work in their field MORE often than immigrants in TO and Van, who are more likely to be stuck in dead-end service sector jobs, etc. Immigrants here also earn more money than the Canadian average.
Anecdotally, my workplace just celebrated two of our colleagues earning Canadian citizenship. Both have found wonderful success here.
Halifax is not a vortex of negativity, but it sounds like YOU are.
I’m a CFA (Says it all).. I’ve lived here for six and a half years and I’m still eagerly anticipating the “Warm Maritime Welcome”..
I’m not cheering the endless parade of pointless construction, tearing things down and paying a handful of wealthy individuals to build ghost towers is hardly beneficial to the masses. That said, the small minded “We’ve always done it this way” attitude will eventually bury the province. Those qualified to comment have unreservedly agreed that the conference centre will be a drain on the taxpayer up until they demolish it..
Fund the industries that actually make money, the arts for instance. Encourage new industry. Maybe stop paying thousands of dollars to advertise Nova Scotia to Nova Scotians, advertise in the U.K. and Europe perhaps..
I’m not a Canadian citizen, I get to pay taxes but have zero say in how they are spent. Not that I would have much influence if I could vote, it’s not like I would get to decide which midnight parking lot the manilla envelope changed hands in..
I often wonder how anyone ever earns enough money to move away..
BE BOLD!!!!!!!!! Give back most of the several hundreds of thousands of dollars you charged the city with that rip-off price for the new logo. Revolve people should be embarrassed to show their faces in public.
Being bold is about standing up to the majority, eh? That might be fine in the corporate world, but dammit we are supposed to be a Democracy, not a Corporate Dick-tatorship!
Be quiet and let things happen? Isn’t that the mentality that led to the Holocaust? I am sick of hearing HRM referred to as Halifax. If they wanted to be bold AND accepted they should have remembered we are NOT Halifax. We are a group of municipalities who are very proud of their culture and do not want to become Halifax. There are better ways to use the money wasted on this to help out communities where needed. Slapping a new (and not very nice) logo on it does not make it better. If (and I am against the fact it is happening period) a new logo was going to help, one that all communities would have felt a part of and proud of would have made sense. Not one that drove a wedge between them and made leaving the municipality an attractive choice.