
Efficiency Nova Scotia could be in trouble, say critics of a new plan proposed by the incoming government. Ratepayers currently support the non-profit organization, which aims to reduce the amount of energy Nova Scotians use. However, the Liberals want to table legislation that would make Nova Scotia Power shareholders responsible for the organization’s funding.
During the election, the Liberals committed to removing the Efficiency Nova Scotia fee from ratepayers’ bills with the goal of cutting costs for low-income Nova Scotians, says Liberal spokesperson Kyley Harris. But the Ecology Action Centre says the plan could backfire.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation is the country’s leader in energy efficiency because of its independent structure, which allows it to compete with Nova Scotia Power, EAC energy coordinator Catherine Abreu wrote in a report released in August. ENSC expends approximately $46 million a year—a flexible budget overseen by the Utility and Review Board. That translates to a fee of about $5 each month on ratepayers’ bills.
Though the Liberals’ proposed plan is not yet clear, if the independence of the organization and its accountability to ratepayers suffers, so will its programs, Abreu tells The Coast over the phone. Investing money to save electricity costs on average three cents per kilowatt-hour saved compared to on average 11 cents per kilowatt-hour to burn fossil fuels, Abreu says. That’s why it’s helpful to view the organization itself as a source of energy.
As Nova Scotia shifts from coal and fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, increasing energy efficiency can do a good job of “cutting off the fat of our electricity system,” she says. Efficiency NS makes the energy system cleaner during the transition, and allows the province to strategically plan for investments in renewable energy.
Worldwide, electricity costs have been increasing due to the rising costs of coal and fossil fuels, Abreu says. Renewable energy might cost more during the transition, but in the long run these costs will stabilize. In the meantime, efficiency will lower power bills due to lower consumption, Abreu says.
Abreu acknowledges ENSC could do more to improve low-income programming, but says its still a new organization and needs time to work on its goals.
At town halls during the election, ratepayers were in favour of the proposed funding change, newly crowned energy minister Andrew Younger says via email. The plan would also limit overhead costs for Efficiency NS, he says. The independence of ENSC would not be compromised because NSP would not take over management or operation of ENSC, Younger says. The UARB would remain in charge of regulating the organization. The Liberals hope to move on the ENSC plan in the fall session, but since it will be a short session, they may table the legislation in the spring.
The money spent by ENSC has created a new economy in Nova Scotia, Jim Simmons, a senior engineer and associate at Stantec, tells The Coast. “The programming allows us, Nova Scotians, to essentially buy energy from ourselves and not write cheques for offshore energy sources.”
The profits stay in province, the employees doing evaluations and installations are young people—a demographic NS must retain—and the energy savings are also great for the environment, he says. “[ENSC] is doing what it is set up to do and is highly accountable to those paying for it.”
Full disclosure: reporter Hilary Beaumont’s partner’s firm has previously represented ENSC in regulatory proceedings.”
This article appears in Pop Explosion.


Nova Scotia power should really be paying for efficency NS. They aim at reducing power consumption which happens, but with NSPs guaranteed rate of return if they sell less power they make less money therefore they have to jack rates to meet the percentage needed and we end up paying more for less. It should be a NSP backed program
Instead of viewing the ENS fee as an extra charge it could be seen as an alternative fuel source. I think it would be much more useful to break out the fuel charge into more line items on a power bill which show how much we pay per fuel source($ for coal, $ for wind, $ for biomass, $ for conservation, etc). Shareholders don’t pay fuel prices, they pay for power plants and transmission lines, so why would they pay for an organization that reduces the need of those two investments?
a) Isn’t charging it to NSP just charging it back to us in the end? I mean, NSP’s money does come from the ratepayers…
b) The current ENS structure seems to be working. Why change it?
c) If I was going to see a change at ENS, I’d like to seem them expand their programs to be available to us condo/apartment dwellers.
I gaurantee I pay way more than five dollars a month for this program. I never agreed to pay it when I signed up with NSP years ago, it was yet another tax (called a fee) that was forced on us without a say. It should have been a referendum question nit up to the moronic board who keep approving rate hikes instead if letting NSP absorb certain costs when they hey the prices of fuel wrong . This whole NSP deal needs to be revisited.
I gaurantee that I pay more a month than five dollars my average is around fifteen a month. I NEVER agreed to pay this FEE (extortion) it was just foisted on us because the usless and brainless review board along with government decided they knew what was best for me. Our home is seven years old and built with electric thermal storage units (supposed to be cheaper than fossil fuels) in an energyy efficient home. I shouldnt have to pay extra to teach other morons to be energy efficient, it is everyones responsibility to be environmentally friendly. This fee needs to be paid for by the profits of NSP and not charged back with another fee increase, judt like our rates should never have gone up to pay for NSP’s 54 million dollar headquarter’s!
I don’t give a fuck where my power comes from, they can burn kittens and bunnies for all I care, I just want the cheapest power possible. Leave the saving the world for the people who can afford it.
Does anybody know where Bono is? Help us, Bono! You’re our only hope!
An “efficiency” program that charges low income residents a monthly fee is a cruel joke. The utility NSP should pay for efficiency programs, like utilities elsewhere, because it saves the consumer, the environment and the UTILITY. If the utility can avoid new capacity construction it saves millions. It does this by PAYING for efficiency improvements to homes and industry, understanding this is a win, win. win. NSP/Emera as a protected monopoly is only interested in increasing the rate base, big expensive projects like the Maritime Link.
And we all pay for “efficiency programs”. See BC Hydro as a model.
I personally feel that the small fee I pay per bill is nothing compared to the benefits it can give to low income friends and family and I know each and every one of us know someone who is in need..the fact that the ones in need have to pay as well is really not a big deal,it’s not a lot to pay for the services they provide..once this fee is gone there will be another perhaps you all would be happy if it went over seas or to NSP themselves
or maybe to the liberals and not to help our own..very disgusted by the attitude of the liberals and the NSP customers that don’t give a damn about the less fortunate.
they get 9 10 percent pay back to them no matter what that was part of the promised deal they would receive that each year on their profit margin each and every year then decided to tax us again with the efficiency letter we pay to get mailed to us it is and was a fiixed buy from the beginning
Remember when the Port Hawkesbury mill went offline? In most provinces, a major reduction in energy consumption would be a good thing. Here NSPI was threatening rate hikes because they wouldn’t be able to meet their 10% rate of return. What the hell!
We save money and ENS accomplishes their mandate when we use less power. Emera and NSPI make money when we use more power. When ENS is transferred to NSPI, they will turn it into an organization that exists to push paper around with a few sinecure positions at the top, just like the old Conserve Nova Scotia.