[Image-1]
It really sucks being a journalist these days. That’s more true than ever at the Chronicle Herald. Beleaguered newsroom staff at the daily paper are facing another blow as management walked away from the conciliation table late last week after asking unionized employees for aggressive cuts.
The paper’s latest offer to newsroom staff will not only roll back the current contract, but the size of the union as well. The Herald’s management has told the union it will lay off 30 percent of newsroom staff no matter what deal is signed. It also wants to put non-unionized staff on equal footing with unionized workers, and if union members are locked out, scabs already stand ready to replace them.
“The contract is all or nothing,” says Halifax Typographical Union local president Ingrid Bulmer. Even if the Union accepts everything contained in the Herald’s offer, Bulmer says 18 newsroom employees will still be laid off.
A release from the HTU, which represents the Herald’s 61 unionized newsroom workers, says management tabled a contract offer with significant wage cuts made through decreased pay, reduced benefits and increased working hours.
The paper’s management also wants to change the current contract’s job security clause, which right now bans non-union workers from performing the same tasks as newsroom employees.
That would in practice eliminate the very reason the union exists and open the door for any outsourced, non-union or freelance employees to do the same work as the Herald’s current reporters, photographers and editors.
“The company very much wants to see this [clause] relaxed to the point where the company has full control over when and where and how we work and whether it’s a unionized position or not,” Bulmer says.
It’s an extensive rewrite of the existing agreement, including the elimination of a clause that stipulates equal pay for equal work between male and female employees.
“The contract that they’re proposing would set us back almost 20 years in the fact of job security, of wages, management rights, those sorts of things. The company wants to be where it was pre-union.”
The 18 newsroom workers that management wants to lay off could also see their positions outsourced to the paper’s ‘custom content’ advertorial department, or simply re-created as non-union positions with lower pay.
Bruce Wark, a retired professor of journalism ethics at University of King’s College, is aware of the financial problems newspapers are facing, but says cutting jobs is not the answer. He’s also skeptical of what long-term gain there is for young journalists in accepting non-union work that replaces a unionized job.
“I have sympathy for young journalists who might need work coming out of journalism school,” he says. “At the same time, in the long term all journalists are under pressure.”
Bulmer says that the Herald’s management left the bargaining table on Friday before the union could prepare a full response to the offer. The company is now calling for provincially appointed conciliator Peter Lloyd to file a report with the Labour Department, while the union is preparing a counter.
An additional meeting is scheduled in January, at which point contract negotiations will either progress to the next stage or turn into a lockout. Sources have told The Coast that the company has already been contacting potential scabs (including former Chronicle Herald reporters) to write for the newspaper in the event of a lockout.
Freelancer writer Rebecca Rose has been organizing Halifax’s communications and media freelancers on behalf of Unifor, Canada’s largest private-sector union. She says that should newsroom staff at the Herald be locked out, the freelancers union will be urging its members to stand in solidarity.
“We would encourage members not to cross the picket line but it’s our job as a union to explain why that is,” Rose says. “We have to have discussions about…why that would hurt us in the long term.”
Last winter, the Chronicle Herald lost 17 newsroom jobs through layoffs, buyouts and early retirements. The HTU voted in favour of employee concessions—including a reduction in mileage pay and increased employee contributions to the pension plan—as a way to stave off more job losses.
At the time, CEO Mark Lever told The Coast the cuts were about positioning the paper for the future.
Lever also predicted that there would be more people working at the Herald by the end of 2015 than at the same time last year, though cautioned that “they may be doing different things than people that are working for us today are doing.”
With files from Jacob Boon
Related Stories
Chaos at the Chronicle Herald
How is the Chronicle Herald still being printed?
Herald lays off 20 workers
To my former bosses at the Chronicle Herald
The Chronicle Herald is getting snippy on Twitter
Update: Chronicle Herald has a reason for dropping that wage equality clause
Striking Chronicle Herald workers file complaint to the Labour Board
What the fuck does Jesse Brown know about Atlantic Canada?
Chronicle Herald buys all TC newspapers in Atlantic Canada
Layoffs and wage cuts in tentative Chronicle Herald deal
This article appears in Dec 17-23, 2015.
The story is unintentionally(I hope) offensive to freelancers, recent journalism grads and former Herald employees, already cast as villains. Most of them probably have no desire to be drawn into this unwinnable war between the Herald and its union. And yet the word “scab” is being tossed around casually, tarnishing them all. This is not their battle. It is a battle that started at the Herald back in the 1970s when Graham Dennis made it clear he did not want a union, and had his hatchet men fire ten staffers. The situation is worse now because the newspaper industry is in a freefall.
unions can’t help A dying industry. Canada post will be hit by the same thing in their next contract hard. Especially if they follow through on the bring back door to door stupidity
I wasn’t aware “scab” was a term people still used today. Striving for excellence as always, Coast.
Like it or not, a scab is anyone who performs union work during a strike or lockout. Some places even have legislation outlawing this — and it is called “anti-scab” legislation. It is a dirty word indeed…..for a dirty deed.
Scab is the word for non-union employees who replace unionized workers during a strike. There’s nothing wrong with it. I don’t see how mentioning that a job opportunity for non-union members to replace unionized employees on strike would make the replacements “scabs” could at all be offensive. It’s an ungendered, non-racial, appropriate term.
The model is dying and needs to be changed out. We all see that but some are uncomfortable with change. Ultimately, it will happen irrespective of a flood of tears or angry rants. Let it happen and you’ll not experience any additional pain.
“It really sucks being a journalist these days.”
How would anyone at the Coast know that?
I used to be a proud subscriber of the Chronicle Herald because of their independent status in the face of media ownership concentration. I changed my opinion after the newsroom decimation following the closure of the News and the Heralds’ increasingly adoption of Mainstream Medias’ anti-union position.
Unions are the sole organization trying to protect the safety of our workplaces and our quality of life. There is a direct correlation between the declining size of the Middle Class and the falling ratio of Unionized workers as a portion of the overall workforce. A livable wage, health insurance, 40 hour work weeks, overtime, equal pay for equal work, skill certification requirements, paid vacation time, anti discrimination rules, sick leave, pregnancy leave, pensions, job protection for pregnancy, military service, disability leave, are just a few worker rights that were pioneered by Unions and every single earned right increases the employer’s cost of doing business.
Slogans like ‘United we Stand’, ‘Look for the Union label’, ‘in Solidarity’, etc need to be taken seriously if the continual erosion of our Canadian quality of life is to stop. A quick look at countries where Canadian manufacturing jobs have been relocated, thanks to Free Trade agreements, provide us with an excellent idea of how many companies would like to operate; no environment rules, no safety rules, child labour, no health care, no retirement, workers physically worn-out before their 40th birthday, indenture to the company store, etc. More ethical companies will drop their standards with the excuse of staying competitive. Here’s hoping we or our children won’t have to experience an era of Multi-national Corporation Dark Ages.