A press release from the Ecology Action Centre:
On March 24th HRMbyDesign’s plan for downtown Halifax was presented to the Committee of the Whole. The Ecology Action Centre (EAC) is concerned that despite HRM’s contribution to Nova Scotia’s total CO2 emissions, there is no demand for the reduction of greenhouse gas levels within the Downtown Plan. The EAC is advocating that sustainable building practices be made mandatory in the Plan—at present they are not. Alec Brown, Co-Chair of the Ecology Action Centre’s Built Environment Committee states, “HRMbyDesign promises a rush of development, but before we open the door to this, we first ought to establish the kind of development we want to see”. Without the addition of mandatory sustainable building practices, the EAC cannot support the Plan.
The first principle identified by participants in the initial HRMbyDesign workshop is that development must be sustainable. The EAC agrees. However, the EAC feels that in order to address this first principle, mandatory building requirements must be included in the Plan.
HRM has stated it cannot act until the Province makes changes to the Building Code. The EAC disagrees that HRM does not have the authority to take action. Under Section 197 of the Halifax Regional Municipality Charter, Council has the power to make by-laws concerning “the health, well being, safety and protection of persons”. Jen Powley, TRAX Coordinator states that “environmental health certainly falls within this provision”. Recognizing that sustainability is fundamental to the ongoing health of the community, the EAC calls on HRM to adopt a by-law requiring that all new or newly renovated buildings in the municipality adhere to a certain level of energy efficiency, water conservation and sustainable building practices.
The Plan should require that all new construction and renovation projects meet a standard such as LEED Silver with a provision that energy points have been awarded for building design, construction and operations. LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is an internationally recognized set of criteria for environmentally sustainable construction and energy efficiency. HRM would not be setting a precedent with such a provision. The city of Vancouver’s Eco-Density Guidelines require a standard of LEED Gold or BuiltGreen BC Gold. While HRM is willing to wait for the Province to act, the EAC wants action now.
The EAC feels that the Plan does not ensure sustainability but instead depends on developers to implement it based on the lure of additional height. The Plan allows all developments to reach a height of 70 per cent of the maximum without regard for the building’s conservation attempts. Developers can only build the additional 30 per cent if they provide certain public amenities that may or may not include green building standards.
The EAC contends that sustainability should not be optional. Ecological sustainability must be a require-ment for all development across the municipality, whether a building is two storeys or ten. The EAC recognizes that the Downtown Development Plan is relevant only to a specific area, but feels that it sets a precedent for the municipality as a whole. Powley states that, “if HRM desires to be sustainable, they need to start demanding it, not merely hoping that developers will opt for it”.
The EAC would like HRM to stand up to the Province and necessitate that all new construction downtown meet responsible standards of sustainability.
Related Stories
HRM By Design goes to Halifax council for approval
This article appears in Mar 26 – Apr 1, 2009.
Yawn. Since HRMbD calls for something other than mud huts with grass roofs to be built downtown it is no surprise that the extremist EAC types would be opposed. Of course, it escapes them that this is a municipal planning document we are talking about here. Things like energy efficiency and even LEED standards are the stuff not of municipal plans, but rather of BUILDING CODES. Ooops.
*yawn* what a shocker.
First, the fact that “Keith” believes that sustainable building practices are limited to “mud huts with grass roofs” shows their lack of knowledge on the subject. Second, if you knew anything about HRM By Design, municipal planning documents, building codes or anything planning related you would know that your second statement is false. In fact, the entire point of exercises and documents like this ARE to influence building practices, among other things. Next time you want to comment about something you know nothing about, maybe you should do a little research first.
I’m with EAC on this. Someone has to demand sustainable building practices in Halifax. Considering that our council is too busy widening roads left right and centre and dumping raw sewage into our harbour.
Here is the fact sheet on HRMBD sustainability initiatives and proposals:
http://www.halifax.ca/CapitalDistrict/docu…
It clearly states that it advocates the creation of a functional plan by HRM and the Province to address “Mandatory sustainable building & public space design guidelines”.
The document suggests that its outside the jurisdiction of HRMBD to make LEED mandatory, but that it supports it and sets provisions in place for the discussion to happen at the appropriate bodies that have the power to make that happen.
Given this information, it would seem that EAC’s opposition is, at best, misdirected.