[Image-1]
The potential lives saved by truck side guards isn’t enough of a reason to install them on municipal vehicles, says HRM staff.
That’s the recommendation from a staff report going to Thursday’s meeting of the Transportation Standing Committee which recommends “no further action” be taken on the idea of side guards on all city-owned heavy trucks and plows, as well as on vehicles belonging to long-term HRM contractors (such as garbage trucks).
Side guards are barriers attached to the sides of heavy trucks that are meant to reduce the severity of collisions by blocking the space below the vehicle, causing any colliding cyclists and pedestrians to bounce off rather than being crushed underneath.
Their use has long been required in Europe and Japan, and they’re growing in popularity in North America. Ontario’s chief coroner has called for the mandatory use of side guards after reviewing the deaths of 129 cyclists since 2006, and cities like Montreal and Boston have started requiring side guards on city-owned and contracted trucks. New York is also phasing in side guards on 10,000 public works vehicles by 2024.
There were renewed calls for the use of side guards in Halifax after the death of cyclist Johanna Dean. The 30-year-old elementary school teacher was biking on Windmill Road in Dartmouth two years ago when a truck turned right, colliding with her.
Thursday’s five-page staff report acknowledges side guards helped reduce cyclist fatalities in the United Kingdom by 61 percent (and pedestrian fatalities by 20 percent), but claims there is no way to accurately quantify their potential to help reduce violent accidents. The author of the report, Beate Shannon from Transportation and Public Works, practically dismisses the guards as being any help at all in improving road safety.
“Side guards alone will not eliminate serious injuries,” Shannon writes. “City buses have lower built-in side skirting than side guards found on most trailers yet there are still incidences of pedestrians and passengers being killed as they slip and fall under the wheels of moving city buses.”
We are extremely disappointed @hfxgov staff recommend NOT saving cyclist and pedestrian lives. More to come. https://t.co/729Qeu8Ikj
— Halifax Cycling (@IBIKEHFX) March 20, 2016
Sam Austin has written about this very issue for Spacing Atlantic, and he’s critical of staff’s flawed recommendation.
“The HRM report cites the UK data, but it doesn’t convey the whole story,” Austin writes in a letter sent to the Transportation Standing Committee and shared with The Coast. “After the UK introduced side guards in 1986, the number of deaths and serious injuries from side-impact collisions fell dramatically, while the number of minor injuries increased. People were still getting hit by trucks, but more of them were walking away.”
Transport Canada disputes those UK findings, though. In an email sent to the Toronto Star, communications advisor Mélany Gauvin says the transportation regulator doesn’t support the need for side guards in Canada and “has been unable to find any European studies that conclusively demonstrate the effectiveness of side guards in preventing casualties.”
A Canadian study on side guards was conducted in 2012 by the National Research Council, but scrapped before it could enter its second phase of testing. Transport Canada claimed the initial research showed no evidence the guards were effective and so there was no reason to continue the study, but internal reports obtained by the Globe and Mail found otherwise.
Thursday’s staff report estimates that installing the guards on the roughly 100 heavy-duty trucks in HRM’s fleet would be a one-time cost of $350,000–$400,000, along with any increase in annual maintenance.
Related Stories
The simple fix for saving cyclist lives
A new bike lane might be rolling onto Almon Street
This article appears in Mar 17-23, 2016.
Gauvin from Transport Canada is not giving the facts. The study was snapped because of budget cuts there are NO reports negatinv the effectiveness of sideguards and many showing they save lives. After my daughter was killed then Minister Cannon wrote to say that TC had no research showing they were needed. A right to information filing showed that in fact the question had never been raised. Ever since we and others have been pushing to have the facts made public report after report shows that sideguards save lives. I am proud to be looking out my window today to see the garbage truck, recycling vehicles and snow plows all fitted voluntarily with sideguards. Shame on the city council who made this I’ll fated decision. I met with councilors in Halifax in 2007 they then said they had no instances where a sideguard would be necessary. Had they followed suit back then. We may not still have to apologize to this young ladies family Hope they’re embarrassed next month when the FCM again votes to support sideguard legislation Shame on them pedestrians walkers and Truckers should write to your councilors They are certainly the first in Canada to put the strength of lobby groups ahead of research and facts which would save the lives of their constituents
You know what also saves lives? Not wearing your earbuds while cycling on busy city streets. This is voluntary and costs nothing, yet 90% of cyclists I see on my commute every morning have them jammed in their ears.
Sad that farking donairs seem to be more imprtant to this burg than possibly saving the lives of people.
Hey Poprah. Bullshit.