
Big odour problems at the Otter Lake landfill are at the heart of a nasty bureaucratic showdown in city hall, with a city commission charged with overseeing landfill operations taking the unusual step of hiring a lawyer to fight CAO Richard Butts.
Back on Sept 28, 2010, city council agreed to a no-bid contract worth $820,940 with Dexter Construction to construct a 1.5-kilometre road from the landfill to a nearby clay drumlin. The clay was needed, explained a staff report, in order to cap Cell 5 at the landfill and start construction of Cell 6. Urgency was called for because “if the road is not completed this fall and ready to use in the spring of 2011, Cell 6 construction may not be completed in the 2011 construction season, which would interrupt the fill plan for the landfill in early winter 2012.” That, in turn, would mean that HRM would have to send its waste to Chester and Queens County, costing the city untold millions.
But even though council agreed to a no-bid contract in the interest of urgency, it took city staff more than a month to apply for a permit for the road construction from the provincial Department of Environment—that application was submitted on November 3, 2010, department spokesperson Lori Errington tells The Coast. And the permit wasn’t issued until June, 2011—nine months after the urgent call to action. Actual construction didn’t begin until August, 2011. October saw construction delays due to unprecedented rainfall, and so installation of a gas management system on Cell 5 was delayed into November. That installation required removing some of the clay topping already in place, and as a result odour complaints soared; a staff reports lists 28 complaints received between October 31 and December 25.
The continued delays and subsequent odour complaints irked the Community Monitoring Committee, a group of councillors and citizens appointed by council to monitor the landfill. The committee kept asking city staff to provide documentation for the delay, but after repeated requests, the information wasn’t forthcoming. Exasperated, the committee, which has an annual budget of $65,000, hired Halifax lawyer John Merrick to research what rights the CMC has, and on February 21, 2012 Merrick sent an opinion spelling out those rights to CMC’s executive director, former CAO Ken Meech.
Merrick’s opinion was then used by the CMC as the basis of a sternly worded demand for documentation from CAO Richard Butts’ office—including correspondence between the CAO’s office and the department of environment, minutes of meetings and even inter-office emails. Butts’ deputy CAO, Mike Labrecque, responded to the demand with a letter of his own back to the CMC, “in order to clarify and solidify our mutual understanding of what CMC’s roll [sic] is”—that is, Labrecque disputed Merrick’s read on the committee’s rights, and refused to hand over most of the documents requested.
See the exchange between the CMC and CAO’s office, as well as Merrick’s opinion, here.
This bureaucratic fight is happening in the context of some astonishingly big money. Construction of Cell 6 was budgeted at $16.6 million; with the addition of the road, that price tag rose to $17.4 million. Mirror Nova Scotia, the firm that operates the landfill, is associated with Dexter Construction, the firm that that was hired to build the road. Last year, Mirror was awarded a 14-year contract to operate the landfill; that contract is expected to cost the city $392.8 million dollars, which includes a guaranteed profit of 20 percent annually. By way of contrast, the Harbour Solutions sewage system, the largest public works project in Nova Scotia history, cost $330 million.
At the request of the CMC, the full city council will discuss the issue next week, at its April 17 meeting.
This article appears in Apr 12-18, 2012.


“At the request of the CMC, the full city council will discuss the issue next week, at its April 17 meeting.”
Likely in an in-camera session, so we won’t get to find out what’s going on….
20% profit?!? And I thought the economy was crap… Oh wait, it is, just not for the public purse…
It would be most beneficial if ALL levels of government spent taxpayers money as if it came out of their own pockets. These people have no concept of reality, especially fiscal responsibility.
And we all know what a big success Harbour Solutions was…
Still, I can’t believe there are only three comments on this article!!
“Wet” waste or “dry” waste, it’s time to clear the air. Really the wetness is not the real issue, since all the waste in a landfill gets “wet” due to rainfall. I have made the mistake of saying wet waste myself; when the term I should have used was just unacceptable waste, also known as active organic waste and other toxic materials. The real issue is about how stable are the waste materials that go into the landfill waste storage cells. Landfill sites like Otter Lake have operational processes such as Front End Processing (FEP) and the Waste Stabilization Facility (WSF) that are designed to limit the amount of active organic waste materials from going straight into the Residuals Disposal Facility (RDF) otherwise known as the landfill storage cell. Therefore if you like, one can say all landfills contain “wet” waste, but only landfills like Otter Lake are optimized to store stabilized waste materials. Gassing and toxic leachate production is minimized through good FEP/WSF performance. The closer the landfill site is to residential areas like Beechville, Timberlea, Lakeside and Goodwood, the better it is to have lower gas production due to the unacceptable odours produced. When the landfill is within a kilometer of the major water resources like the Nine Mile River and Prospect River Systems it is better to lower the toxicity of the leachate produced, and to have an excellent waste storage cell liner in place to protect the environment. The FEP process also is designed to weed out other bad items from entering the RDF, such as toxic waste materials, dead animals, and a myriad of other unacceptable waste materials. Luckily the Otter Lake facility has all of these protective features functioning at this time, but that will not be the case if the recommendations of the January Stantec report are approved to be implemented at this facility. Please attend the Regional Council meeting that is scheduled for Tuesday, April 23, 1pm – 10pm to be held in Council Chambers, City Hall, and let the Regional Council know that you will not tolerate them breaking the Agreement between with the public and HRM that states that the above protection measures are to be used for the 25 year life span of the Otter Lake facility.