In the wake of the UARB’s decision to trim the bloated carcass at City Hall down to a more manageable amount, sadly the same cast of characters appear to be re-offering, can’t have everything I guess?
Might not now be a good time to apply the same rationale to the amount of MLA’s, according to a poll in the CH 81% are in favour of this. Considering that the amount of governance is way out of whack, coupled with a $22 for $1 platinum pension package, now might be a good time to get out the shredder. How can they justify this, especially as Mr. Zinck has crossed the finishing line and is entitled to his entitlements. —Guy Fawkes
This article appears in Aug 4-10, 2011.
Hear, hear Baz. You’ll never catch me saying good things about Stalin, but there’s no denying that he had an effective and highly original way of trimming the size of government. >: 0
I think CBC should make a reality show “Big Brother” style, to decide who gets to keep their constituency. That I might watch, unlike the real series.
Oooh, I’d watch that show! On second thought, the sleaze factor might be a little too much for family viewing. Believability/credibility might be pushing it, too.
Make it like “Battle Royale” and I am totally there.
http://www.horrorgoreandmore.com/wp-conten…
Right, ‘matron?
Can we apply the same to HRM’s homeless and welfare population?
We should offer to send Kelly and the Council over to London to sort out those rascally rioters/looters. Naturally, the rioters torched their own neighbourhood, along with a few cop cars and a bus, time to send in the troops with orders to shoot on sight any looters.
Fix bayonets and time to do as Lance Corporal Jones of Dad’s Army used to say “They don’t like it up ’em!”…..