Leonardo DiCaprio, Ellen Page and Joseph Gordon-Levitt are Warriors of the Subconscious in Christopher Nolan’s Inception. Secret agent Cobb (DiCaprio) enters peoples’ dreams to steal knowledge and ideas. He’s then hired to try something considered impossible—implanting an idea (and one that can change the world). Regarded even before its release as the saving grace of 2010’s weak blockbuster lineup, the reality is ambitious if less flattering. Nolan has always paid generous attention to theme, and has a strength in uncovering buried ideas in genre tropes. In Inception, the plot’s labyrinthine contortions give him a lot of room to explore. But it’s essentially Neuromancer with cyberspace replaced by dream states—the screenplay plays as one based on a novel everyone says is “unfilmable.” Despite dazzling effects and a couple tight action scenes, over half of Inception‘s length is made up of characters explaining the movie to each other. Philosophical soundbites about dreams have humanist resonance, even as the subjects speaking them do not. Inception never quite makes the leap from willful mindfuck to adequate storytelling.
This article appears in Jul 15-21, 2010.


To be fair, this review requires explaining as well. Put your creative energy into your thesis, kid.
I think you seriously misseed the point of the movie. It wasn’t meant to be an action filled block buster but an intelligent movie that made it think. The only person who wouldn’t enjoy that would be one whom doesn’t understand it.
I’m going to go out on a limb and assume the movie is 5 times as good as the reviewer thinks…
Not surprising, the Coast is wholly against hiring a competent critic. Ms Titley is certainly worse, though.
Try watching it again. Maybe you’ll “absorb” it better the second time through.
SPOILERS AHEAD? … not really
The movie was dependent on a 30 second explanation from one of the characters. If you missed that part, then catching up and understanding the whole timing thing would have been a little difficult, but still doable. Either way it’s not as bad as this review would lead you to believe.
“… made up of characters explaining the movie to each other” I agree with that. If a movie must explain itself, I’m never too fond, but this was entertaining none the less. It currently has a 9.3/10 on imdb … I say 8.3/10 … like it matters, lol.
I thought this movie was excellent…
kinda matrixy in its suspending belief sort of way but quite good.
Chris Nolan is definitely my favorite director.