After censuring one of its members for retweeting a white supremacist group and leaking confidential information, Tony Mancini is politely suggesting Halifax council take another look at this whole code of conduct thing.
The Harbourview–Burnside–Dartmouth East councillor is asking for a staff report at council’s meeting next week looking for recommendations on improving his colleagues’ understanding of and familiarity with the municipality’s code of conduct for elected officials.
As part of that ask, Mancini wants councillors to review the document and sign a “statement of commitment” to its values every year in hopes of improving trust in local government.
“Regional council has recently debated a few high-profile incidents involving the conduct of elected officials,” Mancini writes. “It may now be time to implement a process for an annual review/reminder of the code of conduct for all members.”
The councillor suggests the annual review could help “build a spirit of cooperation and confidence in council’s integrity” by demonstrating a commitment to ethical workplace culture and help increase public trust in city hall.
It’s the second time Mancini has brought forward the idea, and comes after a record-breaking number of public complaints about councillor behaviour that’s already resulted in council ordering itself into sensitivity training, a smorgasbord of public apologies and councillor Matt Whitman being removed from board and committee work.
Last fall, Mancini floated an annual code of conduct review along with a proposal to hire an integrity commissioner and plans to strengthen administrative penalties for those found in violation of HRM’s ethics.
The idea was not well received.
“I personally find it insulting,” said Dartmouth South–Eastern Passage councillor Bill Karsten at the time. “It’s my good name and my reputation I will stand on—not signing a piece of paper once a year.”
Ultimately, Mancini’s motion was split into separate parts. Council approved a regular four-year review of the code of conduct, but the annual sign-off and integrity commissioner ideas were both defeated.
Which takes us to last month, when council spent nearly three hours in-camera debating Whitman’s endorsement of a white supremacist group’s pro-European message along with other complaints against councillors Waye Mason and Shawn Cleary.
Afterwards, mayor Mike Savage told reporters he was “prepared to revisit” the idea of an integrity commissioner.
“There is frustration that we end up back here too often,” Savage said, about the in-camera complaint process.
Halifax’s code of conduct for municipal officials—otherwise known as Administrative Order 52—expects “the highest standards of professional conduct from members elected to local government.”
Councillors are expected, at all times, to enhance “the credibility and integrity of council in the broader community” and treat everyone “with dignity, understanding and respect.”
Related Stories
Mayor “prepared to revisit” integrity commissioner after Whitman debate
Council finds Whitman breached code of conduct, released confidential information
Matt Whitman worries #MeToo climate could impact how politicians hug
Matt Whitman stands by white supremacists’ message
Cornwallis statue is history
Councillors spar over plastic bag ban
City councillors square-off over Segways on the ferry
Halifax council to undergo cultural sensitivity training
Tony Mancini wants stronger sanctions for disrespectful HRM councillors
Matt Whitman is sorry if he offended anyone by using the word “negro”
Halifax councillors keep fighting about racism on Twitter
David Hendsbee surprised Halifax didn’t use a red tarp to cover Cornwallis statue
This article appears in Mar 15-21, 2018.
There’s only been an onslaught of complaints in the recent past. There’s a reason for that and it has nothing to do with Tony Mancini or Matt Whitman. Some of these complaints are not even a complaint but are addressed by Council anyway; and mostly because they don’t have the balls to say, “Stop crying and put on your big girl panties” or because of childish playground behaviour and a hatred that Matt Whitman enjoys his job, speaks his mind and is his own person. Kids, Matt is not Rob Ford. You are not in Tranna. Cats roam. City chickens attracts those big sewer rats and racoons. Building things attract big business with big money. You need not be afraid of your shadows. Who cares if you can’t see the harbour from the Hill; no one goes there to see it and you are unlikely to hit the French because the cannons are too old to fire.
Any other issues you need dealt with?
Yeah! You need to go the hell away. Deal with that for me?
That’s a request; what’s your issue?
Not a request! My issue is your sad, troll-game opinions on almost every single bitch or article on this site. You seem diametrically-opposed to everything this site posts, so why are you even here? :3
(Though my other issue is that I’m actually wasting my time on you now. For shame, self.)
So, having an active interest in my community means I a troll? Or is having a different perspective dictates trolling? I see. And is the purpose of having a comments board not to discuss the topic at hand, by sharing opinions and hearing those of others?
Rather than discussing the idea of a code of conduct for Council or the underlying reasons the idea is being brought forth, you think I should go to your Hell (a construct which does not exist; go live Life and and enjoy yourselves) because you think I’m a “troll”.
So I propose to you dear Kiki, that YOU are the troll.
“Well Kyle, no! No, no, no! I’m Mr. Hat! You’re on my turf! You hear me?! You got to Hell, you go to Hell and you die!” ~ Mr. Hat