Be the first to know about breaking news, articles, and updates.
The Coast | News, events, restaurants, concerts and Burger Week for Halifax, Nova Scotia
Home of the Best of Halifax Reader's Choice Awards, the award-winning independent newspaper covers the Halifax news, politics, events, concerts, movies, restaurants, and nightlife scene.
Your profile said you were looking for something short term and a good time. This gave me the impression that you were up for a fuck on the first meeting. I later found out you didn’t give it up right away! You wasted my fucking time. —Loves getting laid
This article appears in Pop Explosion.
20 Comments
A hooker would have been guaranteed instead of the flounder forum.
I just went on the flounder forum, lol. You’re an idiot OB! There’s a very clear difference between “isn’t seeking a relationship or any kind of commitment” and “short term”. The “good time” part is open to interpretation from anything like getting a coffee to having a massive gang bang though.
I think this is fictitious and the only reason I’m responding is because I’m bored.
I also think this is fictitious. Because given the number of killers, thieves and rapists out there, to say nothing of the number of people you just plain have zero physical chemistry with, nobody would EXPECT sex on the first date, regardless of intent. Sometimes it takes longer than that to know if somebody is a safe human being or not. This person doesn’t know you op. They have no clue if you’re a rapist, serial killer, thief, clingy bastard or what.
At least you didn’t rape your date so, you know… full marks for not being completely unreasonable.
…and I’m sure she was thrilled by that tent in your pants. Go find yourself a slab of raw beef liver to pop your pudding in, you insensitive fucktard. You and the liver would share about the same emotional capacity, OP, so why look for a living and breathing cum dumpster who will only disappoint you?
Now, if only someone could nail your saggy balls to your forehead, you clueless Neanderthal.
NSCAD will be trying this next?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-24…
Lol, looks like it’ll likely be the same crowd condemning the author for being an asshole for this bitch but, agree with a woman not dating a guy because he doesn’t have a car.
Without even knowing for sure if this bitch was written by a man OR a woman!!!!
That’s my prediction.
Commenting on your sexuality Andy?
BF, not at all, merely pointing out the crap that can fall under that umbrella called art, which is really an excuse for being unemployable. Please don’t follow up by saying this statement is my position on slackers and other assorted parasites.
whoa whoa whoa
Who says a guy wrote this bitch?
Girls are just as guilty for looking for sex on a first date
I should know 😉
Next time, message to see if they want to fuck on the first meeting. That will clear up that bit of misunderstanding.
Harper, if you have expectations then you should make them clear. That is all. If a guy said to me “I expect sex on the first date” I’d then say “Well that may or may not happen. It really depends on whether or not you have a car (and for the more… rustic elements here.. that is sarcasm based on harper’s post and fuck you for making me have to explain it)”
And then can make their choice from there.
Also to compare a car with the risk of catching aids or being murdered is the dumbest thing i’ve ever heard.
What’s with you lately dude? Did you have a stroke?
And for the record, this is all coming from someone who DOES sort of expect some level of sexual activity on the first date.
But here’s the thing. If i like the dude and he doesn’t put out, I’ll gladly invest more time instead of publicly lambasting him for “false advertising” or “wasting my time” because sex is not the ONLY thing i enjoy about a date.
Whether or not he puts out is not always or even often indicative of his lifestyle at large. It is simply indicative of that moment in time.
However, a guy who has no assets, no savings, nothing to show for 25-45 years of life on earth? That’s indicative to how he approaches life in GENERAL.
I’m bored with this place lately. I wanna feel the warm enveloping hate that used to be the bitch board.
They may have been, just not with you!
TRUTH IN ADVERTISING
“You wasted my fucking time.” Loves getting laid
I believe that the issue here is truth in advertising. While “Loves getting laid” believed that he was going to fuck on the first date his beliefs, as events transpired, were false. He was to be disappointed. Is there no respect for truth among those who post advertisements aimed at forming relationships and having fun? Can there be no truth-in-advertising legislation which will remedy this?
A further question relates to “Loves getting laid” use of the term “fucking.” In one sense, of course, it can be seen as a generic adjective – usually of a derogatory nature – in this case modifying the noun “time.” However, it can also be seen as a substantive in its own right. In other words, there is a certain amount of time which “Loves getting laid” devotes to fucking. While the duration is not specified, he simplifies the concept by calling it his “fucking time,” that is, the time he actually engages in fucking.
I find the ambiguity in his use of the word “fucking” equally as disturbing as the absence of legislation governing truth-in-advertising. Can there be no legislation enacted to regulate the proper use of the word “fucking?”
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
All uses of the word Fuck are proper, montrealman. Its the most versatile word in the English language – so much so that you can create new definitions and uses for the word as you go along
and nobody would fucking care
SHITD- Do you miss Wogdog and Blow Me?
Be honest.
MORE ON “FUCKING”
RSVP
: fool (10/29, 9:58AM)
“All uses of the word Fuck are proper, montrealman.”
While it all depends on just what you might mean by “proper” I would, as expected, take issue with your claim. By “proper” I would mean, at the very least, “meaningful.” Are, then, all uses of the word “fuck” meaningful? I would argue not.
Ordinarily, “fucking” is used as a present participle (the past participle would be “fucked”) and is used in the adverbial sense to emphasize an adjective. For example, one might say, “That movie was fucking good” where what was intended was simply to emphasize the adjective “good.” Were he not a member of the Halifax Underclass he would probably have said, “That movie was very good.”
However at other times the word “fucking” is used to modify a noun. For example, one might say, “That fucking woman” where what was intended was to draw attention to some negative quality of the woman in question. But – and this is important – the noun described must be delimited in scope. It must be specific. If it is too broad or too amorphous, then the adjective “fucking” loses its purchase. It becomes meaningless.
So we look at the example of Love getting laid. He claimed that, “You wasted my fucking time.” The difficulty here is that the function of “fucking” is opaque. What can it possibly mean? Indeed, how can it possibly have any meaning at all? It must be obvious that “time” in the assertion has no specificity, it is too broad or too amorphous. In other words, it is not something that can be emphasized. It just is. The same might be said, for example, for space as in, “You’re in my fucking space.” “Fucking” here also loses any meaning. It adds no emphasis to “space.” As George Orwell once remarked in another context, “It is an empty rotating limb.”
So fool, I would take issue with your claim that all uses of the word Fuck are appropriate. However, you might have another concept of what it is to be “appropriate” where the word Fuck would be proper. I await your response with keen anticipation.
A pleasure as always.
Cheerio!
I thought this Bitch was pure hilarity– almost Pythonesque 😀 Thanks for the chuckle OP!
@Reg: excellent solution–simple, concise….possibly even sleek and def a little hot, if well articulated……..think about this OP.