We starting dating exclusively. Early on in our relationship, I told you I didn’t like cats, that I was more of a dog lover, when we were talking about pets. You knew I didn’t like them, but what you didn’t know was that I actually hate them.

Four months into our relationship, we decided that I was going to move in with you. Then one time I went to visit you, I discover you have a new roommate–a fucking cat!

When I mentioned again that I cannot stand cats, I also said it’s a deal breaker. I wanted our relationship to grow, but if we can’t live together, things won’t work. I can’t live with a cat.

I said, “It’s me or the cat”. You chose the fucking little feline asshole! You kidding me? You knew I didn’t fancy them! Who came first? ME!! So why you dumped my ass instead of giving away the meowing fucker, I don’t know…

I predict you will die a crazy cat lady if you’re gonna choose a friggin CAT over a guy. Have fun cuddling with some shedding, clawing animal that you can’t even have a conversation with. I’ll be off and find myself a girl who prefers dogs! —Cat hating SWM

Join the Conversation

145 Comments

  1. Perhaps the cat saw you for what you are – a roid-rageing australopithecus displaying 2 sides of the homicidal triad.

  2. OP’s gonna get flamed but I agree with him 100%. Doesn’t matter what it is, your S/O, especially if you live together, tells you “I don’t like ___” and you go out and get it without checking with them first, knowing that they aren’t fond of ____ and then say you’re choosing _____ over them, you’re a d-bag and don’t deserve to be in a relationship.

    Maybe they wanted an excuse to get rid of you OP?

    Cat loving females: before you rail on OP, imagine if it was the other way around and instead of a cat it was say.. a motorcylce, or a big loud scary dog that drools and sheds everywhere, or just basically anything you don’t want in your house. You’d feel the same way he does.

  3. I’d keep the cat too after reading this rant. Who needs the aggro of a cat hater?

  4. I bet the cat didn’t make the same altumatum. If a friend ever said “it’s me or xyz”, chances are, I’d choose xyz because xyz didn’t think him/herself to be that entitled that I’d have to choose.

    Plus you kinda sound like a dick anyway.

  5. four months is not enough time to just start living your life for someone else.. If you are deathly allergic I can understand your feelings.

  6. You stupid fuck. Four months is early on in the relationship. You in fucking highschool or what. She picked a dumb feline over you, hell I’d bitch about it too. Dogs shed and scratch shit like cats so fuck right off. Gonna spend the rest of your life with one?

  7. I can see some of your point OB, but the rant makes you look like of a Dick, maybe she saw this part of you and figured a cat was better companion.

  8. Op, did she have this cat before she knew you or before she knew you hated cats?

    If so, you’re a piece of shit. To a good pet owner, that pet is like a member of the family. So if she already had this cat before all this came up, it’s essentially like you just said to her “Fuck you bitch for having a kid. I should come first.. wahh.. wahh…. i hate kids and therefore i fucking hate you for not planning your life around the possibility that i would one day walk into it.”

    If not… well i wonder why she got a cat knowing you two were moving forward with your relationship. maybe she was trying to get rid of you.

  9. I agree with everyone else in any case.. You strike me as an angry, controlling brat.

    To me, that would be a MASSIVE red flag. I’m guessing she was too scared to say “Dude, I think you have an abusive, mean streak” so she got a cat to scare you off.

  10. hey crayons, read the WHOLE bitch before commenting. All of the answers you seek are in the post, the one you obviously didn’t read.

  11. in fact, the more i read this the more i want to warn all dog-loving women out there to LOOK OUT. There is an abuser who is targeting you.

  12. I did reread it. She was clearly trying to run you off. She’s got good sense. How she went about it was a bit shitty, I agree. But quite honestly, your general attitude probably left her terrified. You seem to be completely controlled by anger.

  13. Good job crayons! Can we get another double post? You clearly have good sense.

  14. “You clearly have good sense.” – Does blip believe that they have good sense?

  15. i know lots of people that don’t like cats but if they don’t like dogs, i assume they are cereal killers^^

  16. Well, OP, she obviously liked the cat more than you, that’s apparent. And I agree with TJ on this one, if she truly respected you and wanted to be with you, she wouldn’t have went out and got a cat.

    But, if you weren’t willing to accept living with a cat in order to be with her, then you probably didn’t like her that much. She still should have consulted you first if you were in a committed relationship and sharing a living space. Not just common courtesy but respect. Without mutual respect, there is no relationship.

    Sounds like a bit of a power struggle on both of your parts.

  17. well, I mean, naturally painey. NO serial killers have ever been dog people. That’s a true fact.

  18. I think this is less to do with her choosing the cat and more about her rejecting the ultimatum. Putting conditions on a relationship, especially only 4 months in, can rarely end well. Even if she had chosen the OP, the fracture lines would have only grown.

  19. You’re not even allergic, you just wanted her to give up part of her family because you didn’t like it? That’s what pets are: family. I don’t even like cats and I think you’re a doooouuuuche. 🙂

    Whoever dumped this dude’s ass: GOOD JOB HUNNY!

  20. Just another woman who thought if they went behind your back, they could change you. The only cats I like are big cats but if you BBQ or sweet and sour them, I’ll have a go at it. OB, thank the cat, you dodged a big bullet. God knows what she’d try next.

  21. Wouldn’t it be funny if she borrowed the cat to see what your reaction was? I bet she was pretty happy to see your dumb ass walk through her door for the last time.

    Also…”Who came first? ME!!”- What are you, 8? Ya fuckin lunchbox!!!

  22. ^ Clever idea SHITD. Sounds like something a woman would do. If that was the case, OP screwed himself on that one.

  23. Whether you like them or not, if her having a cat was a deal breaker for you, she probably realized you weren’t worth it. You can’t expect someone to give up their pet (whether or not you came first) that they love just for you. Entitlement much? What if you bought a tarantula and she was scared to death of it, and gave YOU the “it’s either me or blank” routine? Would you give up the spider? Put your money where your mouth is!

    Judging by your bitch and way with words, my guess is the cat has more personality than you do. I would have chosen the furry critter over you too, asshole.

  24. A cat allergy would be a legitimate complaint, but the fact that you don’t “fancy” them, and considered a cat a “deal breaker” is a tad selfish. She must not have meant much to you if you booked over a cat

  25. Hoist ” Clever idea SHITD. Sounds like something a woman would do.”

    Male c*nts do exist.

  26. I agree with Scooter. She got the cat AFTER they agreed he would move in, she probably never wanted him to move in at all. Passive aggression all the way.
    The bitch is legit. This isn’t so much about cats as a cowardly way to end a relationship.

  27. Boru, I’m starting to think you don’t like me very much LOL. I am sure male cunts exist…I wasn’t trying to imply that the girl in OP’S bitch was a cunt if she did what SHITD suggested might of happened. On the contrary, I thought it would have been a clever idea. Now STFU.

  28. hey hoist. Maybe she doesn’t like you because of how much you fucked with Boru on here. You know, it might be the whole getting together for coffee just to toy with her then making 5 fake profiles to fuck around with. DERP DERP now STFU.

  29. LABIAL STRUMMING

    “I’ll be off and find myself a girl who prefers dogs!” Cat Hating SWM

    Clearly you have given up too soon. Strategy is required. Rather than just quitting the relationship, what you must do is to make her your psychological/sexual slave who will gladly give up the cat for you. You ask, “What strategy might that be?” and I reply, “Labial Strumming”.

    Labial strumming involves taking her magnificent labia between the thumb and forefinger of one hand so that they pop up to their fullest possible extension and, with the other hand, strumming them in a manner not unlike playing the Spanish guitar. It might be a good idea to be listening to flamenco music at the same time to increase both her concentration and pleasure.

    Labial strumming has been shown to make the female one’s psychological/sexual slave. After one or two sessions of labial strumming, she will have forgotten completely about the cat.

    Good luck and Godspeed.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  30. Blip, I think you’ve got the wrong guy. I never messed around with Boru, in fact, I was pretty good at ignoring most of that crap. And I’m not going to start getting dragged into it now, either. Get your facts straight.

  31. Wow…someone has way way too much time on their hands. I believe if you scroll down a little further in that thread you’ll also see me saying something about not sharing info on these threads and wanting to remain anonymous. I was trying to cheer her up, though it quickly became apparent that all I was doing was feeding into the shit. I’m glad I could teach you the word, ‘Derp’ though…you are getting a lot of milage out of it.

    I’m not going to be getting into a flame war with you though, bud. The extent of your butt-hurt is too severe and you’ve obviously got more time/energy to put into it than I do. So go ahead and find as many old posts of mine as you like, I stick by all of them 110% (including that one) but don’t expect me to justify any of them to you. Tool.

  32. Anyone saying that 4 months is too early to ask someone to choose between them and the pet, the same could easily be said to the girl, because that’s what she did. I’m sorry but if you’re living with someone, you dont just go out and get a pet without consulting them first.

    She’s the one who asked him to change, or to accept change, the first ultimatum was “if you’re going to live here you have to live with this cat” I’m sorry but each and every one of you would be pissed if you were in OPs shoes. This is his home, where he lives, presumably pays rent and his girlfriend just thinks it’s ok to get an animal without mentioning it to him at all, knowing that he doesn’t like this particular species of animal. I hope he’s not on the lease.

    You’re all telling me that if me and you were to get close, move in together and you told me “I really don’t like dogs very much” and then I went out and got a dog and brought him to live in the home we share and expected you to be cool with that, and then when you objected I said you could leave if you didn’t like it, you’d be all hunky dory with that? I don’t believe that for one nanosecond.

    OP dodged a bullet, this girl sounds childish as hell to me.

  33. Well, you being Ploopy and HoistThatRag really makes it clear that you are a Troll with many accounts. Now you admit to messing with someone…. dumb fuck. But heres a couple more quotes…DERP..

    “Boru, I’ll have supper with you sometime as friends”, “Boru, you wouldn’t be cooking a big meal just for you – you’d be cooking a big meal just for me!”, “Boru, you can make me lasagna right meow.”, “I know, I know – sharing is caring. Hands are for helping, not for hurting. I guess I’d let you have a bite :P”

  34. hey hoist, why did you give up being ploopy and create another profile? Trying to hide a burnt bridge? Or was it just to Troll people with?

  35. Actually, it’s the same account, I just changed my name. I didn’t even change the profile pic I had up as Ploopy when I changed the name on my account, so your theory about burning bridges or whatever is incorrect.

    And yes, I stand by all those quotes too, in the context that they were written in.

    I originally created an account here to respond to a commenter, I don’t remember what or when or why (I’m sure you do, since you know so much about my account) and I just pulled some letters out of my head. Thus, “Ploopy” was born.

    Any other questions? I always make time for my fans.

  36. Convenient story, but it doesn’t add up Hoistyploop.

    My only question now is why you have to be a hypocrite towards me. You did just say “Wow…someone has way way too much time on their hands.” Keeping in mind your on this site all the time and are obviously making the same amount of posts as I am today. Then you said “I’m not going to be getting into a flame war with you though, bud.” But thats exactly what you are doing. And you finished off with “The extent of your butt-hurt is too severe and you’ve obviously got more time/energy to put into it than I do.” I’d say we have the same amount of energy, but, I’m the pitcher and your the catcher.

  37. This reminds me of the time a hundred your old kettle called a hundred year old pot black. That saying is no longer relevant so I put the historic aspect onto it.

    So you claim to be above the petty arguments and claim to not care, but you keep responding in greater and greater detail. I don’t pretend to be above it all, you do. HERP A DERP A DERP you fucking hypocrite Troll.

  38. Valid points, I suppose. I guess I was surprised (and a little flattered) that you remembered my name as ploopy and wanted to clear up your assumption that I am a ‘troll’ with mulitple accounts. I’ve only ever had this one. But, sir Blip, you may feel free to think whatever you like. I will continue to do and say whatever I feel like doing and saying on here, with or without your approval.

    One final thing, at the time I wrote those posts to Boru, she was being quite hard on herself and catching shit on all sides from posters on here. I was trying to cheer her up by saying some positive things. After about a week or so of trying to cheer her up, I realized that it was pointless.

  39. I believe Ploopy made an appearance to call Furious Styles ‘a fucking idiot’ or somesuch. The post was made at 2 am while admittedly drunk. He also said he didn’t care if I WAS part of the ‘little clique’ I wasn’t part of.

  40. Thanks for all the responses, guess we both have way way too much time on our hands. The difference is I’m not in denial about it…..hypocrite troll boy. I didn’t even know who ploopy was, just read it in your comments and made the trolling connection.

    In closing hoistyploop, don’t ever call me out again, especially when you are wrong and should have comprehended the conversation before sticking your troll nose into it. And the whole upside down flag thing is American you dumb shit. Look it up! DERP A DERP

  41. I’m gonna pull another crayons with this double post.

    How the fuck do you fly a french flag upside down? You can’t dumbass! Its an American thing.

  42. I think it is pretty obvious that it was never an issue, or else I would have evicerated you current incarnation as a drunken slob doing his best to fit in long ago. But it’s all good. Hoist makes good posts.

  43. I’ll call you out whenever I feel like it, blip. I don’t care if people know I was ploopy, never tried to hide it. I also don’t care if you have nasty things to say to me such as ‘hypocrite troll boy’ etc.

    Flying a flag upside down is a universal symbol of a nation in distress. Not just American. Here, I’ve looked it up for you.

    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_it_mea…
    Have a nice day.

  44. You are dumb. I can’t believe anyone would quote a site with “wiki” in the title. Go to the Canadian Heritage Website you dumbass.

    And the only credible reference on the site you linked is “US Code:T36 Ch10.176”, the rest is just an idiot like you pretending to know what they’re talking about.

    Like I said, go to the Canadian Heritage Website you dumbass.There are no degrees of being wrong, but in this case you couldn’t be more wrong.

  45. hey Hammer boy. These sporadic appearances are convenient as well. But you used to be a regular but got tired of the trolls right? Your profile gives you away so easily DUMBASS!

  46. Trolls! Trolls everywhere! They’re all trolls blip and you are the only one that can see them or hear them!

  47. I usually just go after militant dykes but just found this site and some of the annoying people on it. I think your forgetting which account yor logged into, right hammerhoistyploop? But like you said, you used to be a regular and “Holy fucking shit you people are losers.” Just another quote….DERP A DERP. This is too easy HERP A DERP.

  48. And hoistyhammerploop, how was the Canadian Heritage Website? You linked me American references about the flag…. from wiki.answers……hahahaha. HERP A DERP DERP

  49. Fucking trolls just ruin what used to be a good website for flamewars. Grow the fuck up

  50. Hahaha, very convincing…….. NOT! On that profile your last 15 or so comments are insults and trolling attempts. You are such a fucking hypocrite hoistyhammerploopy. You deserve another DERP A HERP.

  51. Woah.

    I have only one profile, but go ahead and continue to make yourself look stupid. It’s entertaining as hell. 🙂

  52. Whoa, what happened to you leaving years ago because of the troll kay? This place used to be good according to your 2009 comments? Whats changed hammerhoistyploop? I love your archived comments the most, you hypocrite troll tool, oh and your a hedgehog. Whats that supposed to mean anyway? Summit clique joke about trolls? Fuck this is too easy, lmfao. DERP DERP

  53. My goodness theres alot of bullies on here. I’d be surprised but since your all anonymous theres no chance of repercussions. I wonder how close attention the moderator of this site pays to these threads and what his thoughts would be on all this name calling and bullying.

  54. Archived comments are fun! Especially those from 4 years ago. They really help prove an point in 2013, and you’ve impressed the board with your stealth technique. You’ve been promoted from useless idiot to useless dolt. Congratulations!

    Obvious Sonic is painfully obvious. Hurrdurrrr. 🙂

  55. I’m really confused now. Too bad I’m the bigger person and will let you have the last word. Does that make you feel better? Will you now return from the world of shadows now that your troll hunt is over and your satisfied with your accusations? But beware, the province is looking to hire five online bullying investigators and I would suggest they start here.

  56. What are you confused about, Sonic blip? Is it when to use, there/their/they’re, to/two/too, or your/you’re? Even the worlds top wordsmiths are perplexed by this. I understand that each English speaking country around the world, has sent two representatives to sit at a round table summit to solve this all elusive, grammar mystery.

  57. SHITTY,

    I’m confused by backing out of a driveway and the legal aspect of it, and whether or not pirating copyrighted material is illegal in Canada. Can’t speak for sonic though.

    It was funny when you pointed out to that troll Nukka that “who” and “how” were different words. Its kind of like that guy played you, and did it well. Its like he used the correct words sometimes and other times did not just to see who would bite. Its like everyone but you saw through it and you still think you have the upper hand. Its weird that that Nukka guy came clean and you still bit at the same old trolling attempts and still think you have the upper hand. Your smart Harper, is poop going to weigh in now for you? History does repeat itself.

    Its also funny how many things can be fabricated about ones life, then taken at face value by idiots like you, then of course the idiots like you then try to use it against them. Which of course makes no sense as its all fictitious.

    The funniest part though is that I believe Boomy has taken a creative writing class in the past. Who would’ve thought?

    Go smoke some more of your shitty Spry weed and keep guessing……..

  58. Now are going to threaten to leave again? Or was that just a childish temper tantrum after the Mod banned you for being a shit disturbing troll? You wear your emotions on your sleeve SHITTY, too easy.

  59. LOL, You mad Brah?

    Seems that history really does repeat itself. How many times are you going to bring up the driveway bullshit? Nothing else in your quiver?

  60. I may be incorrect,ploopy claimed to be a female and SHITD ‘s wife.

    I don’t dislike anyone on LTWWB/L.

  61. SHIT is married to POOP in harmony and you are Boru. This threads clear as mud now…. just need a creative writing class to record it all. Anyone know sonic so he can help out?

  62. Sonic, you and your fake personas are lame as fuck, and your tired, pretending not to be any one of your 26 profiles is just embarrassing. You are the only loser that has ever gone back to 2009 to produce quotes. Lol, what an assclown. I will give it one thing though, it sure is good fodder for a rainy Saturday. Best of luck on your “cooking classes”, Tugboat.

  63. LMFAO SHITTY, you edited your comment to include “Seems that history really does repeat itself. How many times are you going to bring up the driveway bullshit? Nothing else in your quiver?”

    Couldn’t one say the same to you about Sonic and “there/their/they’re, to/two/too, or your/you’re”. But of course your too high to realize this.

    Go smoke some more drugs you hypocritical fool. But next time you do get high, don’t do it behind a keyboard. DERP A HERP

  64. Thank you Montrealman, for bringing some much-needed sanity back to this thread.

  65. “You are the only loser that has ever gone back to 2009 to produce quotes”

    Nope again DUMBASS! I quoted last year (2012), what did I say about getting high behind the keyboard? You really are stupid man, or just high and imagining usefull (but made up) points to help you out when your trying to prove a complete stranger is stupid. HERP A DERP……hurrrderrr. U mad bra?

  66. The difference is, Tugboat, that I stand corrected. You just keep on makin the same mistake. Class is dismissed, back to your research into 2009.

  67. PS; Thanks for the fantastic idea, Tugboat. I’m actually in the process of rolling a big fatty. I think it will be wonderful addition to my morning (well… late afternoon) coffee. Cough, cough, passes to the left.

  68. Well I guess there were no “quotes” from 2009, but its clear that you went through them all.

    ” This place used to be good according to your 2009 comments”

    Who’s high now, bitch?

  69. Mod, I think it’s time for a sniping arena so some of the idiots can go there and snipe at each other all they want.

    I wonder what the OBs girlfriend would have done if the OB brought home a tarantula or a python as a pet? I bet the responses would be completely different as spiders and snakes aren’t cute.

  70. You know Bro Tim , its odd but when I read the bitch & then started scrolling the replies …I noticed quite a few on the theme of other pets, or the big drooley dogs & I thought about “How would she react to him bringing home say an articulated Python as a pet.
    Then I thought, once that snake got big enough, there wouldn’t be a cat problem ~;D
    IT was also nice to see mass murderers are’t dog people, seeing as I have always been a dog person & while I don’t Hate cats. I know they belong out in the barn ,not in our homes !
    so O.B.stay put & …. get a big drooley dog, or maybe a python !

  71. Montreal Man
    “You wouldn’t be having all this trouble…blahblahblah”

    Trouble? Am I having some trouble that I’m unaware of? Are you referring to blip thinking he’s gotten some kind of one up on me for realizing that I was using the handle ‘ploopy’ about a year ago? It’s no trouble, really.

  72. D’OH!
    It was supposed to be a picture of an articulated bus.

    “And that children is how I invented the information superhighway in 19-ought-6 by writing a filthy limerick on a potato and whipping it at an Irishman”

    Bedtime for Grandpa Ivan, methinks.

    Strangely enough, in all of the books I’ve read by veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan, I’ve yet to come across a positive comment about camel spiders.

    Nurse Hezz – for God’s sake – don’t click on Hoist’s link.
    You won’t like what you find.

  73. EXISTENIAL CONFUSION

    RSVP

    : HoistThatRag (06/08, 7:33PM)

    “Am I having some trouble that I’m unaware of?”

    I found that question philosophically intriguing. It strikes me as being quite existential, actually. Ordinarily one is aware that one is having some trouble in the same way that one is aware that one is presently, for example, looking at one’s laptop screen. It is not, in other words, some further state or condition in respect to which further questions might arise. It is just a commonplace, a truism.

    However, your question throws that truism, and presumably the entire class of taken-for-granteds, into considerable doubt. From what further perspective, in other words, are we to demonstrate the truth (validity?) of our immediate, commonsensical experiential phenomena or, alternatively, are we to simply recognize its essentially opaque quality, that there exists a deep well of uncertainty which necessarily undergirds all human existence?

    More importantly, I was startled to learn that “ploopy” was a previous pseudonym of yours. Since “ploopy” appears to a male name, this throws my prior conception of you as a female into question and, of course, undermines my advice for you to use a used Kotex pad instead of a shredded flag as a more appropriate avatar. This turn of events has thrown my immediate commonsensical experiential perceptions of you into question and, by extension, has worked to throw the entire structure of my epistemological taken-for-granteds into existential confusion.

    Write back quickly with your advice.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  74. I dunno, I would think that both ‘ploopy’ and ‘hoistthatrag’ would be rather ambiguous with regard to gender, wouldn’t they? If I named myself ‘mostercock5000’ or ‘ladyfistresidue’, then I could see how you would be able to draw a conclusion about my gender. You must find the context of my posts feminine, in that case? Either way, I would be happy to accompany you for an evening of fine dining and opera but I will not be putting out. And you’re paying, cause I’m broke.

    With regard to the ‘trouble’ statement. I supposed it’s really a matter of opinion or perspective than a matter of fact. Blip kinda lost his shit over a post that I directed at him on another thread. Said post was about 8 or 9 words in length. So, due to his angry and sordid posts directed at me on this thread, as a result of my earlier post, I can see how you would assume that I was having some ‘trouble’.

    In fact, I was more impressed than anything that he was able to recall a handle I had used about a year ago, as I, myself, had largely forgotten about Ploopy. Admittedly, early on, his name-calling annoyed me, but once I realized that he was talking to HoistThatRag and not the actual individual sitting behind the keyboard, I was quite content to allow him to rage on.

    I hope this clears things up. Also, I’ve included a link here at the bottom to the song “Hoist That Rag” for your review. I’m interested in your interpretation of what “Rag” might mean in the song. If you do not wish to hear the music, link (b) is the lyrics.

    Cheerio

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw3mFXOwRgw

    (b) http://www.oldielyrics.com/lyrics/tom_wait…

  75. ‘mostercock5000’ or ‘ladyfistresidue’,

    Lord Merciful Nelson – I’m dyin’ over here
    LMFAO!

  76. ….and for the purists:

    http://youtu.be/RXk8BTyiEXY

    Happy Sunday:)

    SheSang

    Ps

    @Ivan: LMFAO!

    @Hoist: LOVE your style man:)

    @Painy and BroTim: hope you guys, especially, enjoy the links–thanks for the reminder BroTim;P

  77. Bet those spiders are too Painy–uuuggghhh!!! Incidentally, the pic of the camel spider Hoist posted looks a lot like the monster that slowly descended from my garage roof center–inside (***shivvvvvvver***)! I could see him from where my side garage entry door should be, right after I retrieved the lawn mower from said garage, one very hot day last summer!! No joke, he was big enough to drive my car, and it’s a standard (vehicle, not spider…nope, def not your ‘standard’ spider!) YUCK!!!!!!! and EEEK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am sure each of his eight eyes was staring me down!!!!!!!!

  78. @Hoist: Interesting, from another thread (Carbon Footprint) I know that MM thinks I am a boy. I, as well, “would be happy to accompany you [both] for an evening of fine dining and opera” to perhaps clear up any questions or curiosities MM may have; but I actually may put-out, just not to MM–;D lol…alas, however, I’m broke too–alas and alack, so to speak, so MM can expect to also pay for my evening, and, I suppose, for the chance to imagine what we may, or may not, be doing together after we part his company. I suspect MM may find this an interesting way to spend his evening, perhaps even his money….and hey, we would each, at the very least, get a free meal and a night at the opera out of the deal!! Sounds fun, if not a little strange;)

    Hope you are having a great day:)

    SheSang

  79. Haha if MM agrees to take us out, SheSang, I’d find it hard to think of a reason not to go. What a crazy night that would be, full of philosophical pondering and free lobster. (Free for us, not for MM). I somehow doubt he could be convinced to be seen with two members of the ‘underclass’ though. 😛

  80. RSVPS

    : HoistThatRag (06/09, 11:16AM)

    Well, it seems that I have misconceived your gender twice, the first time wrongly thinking that the “Rag” in question referred to an article of female hygiene rather than the title of a song from which no such gender considerations might be drawn and, secondly, thinking that ploopy” referred to a male on the grounds that it suggested anal incontinence, a condition not usually discussed by females. So, as I pointed out, we can see the origins of my existential confusion which, as I further pointed out, has considerable epistemological repercussions.

    My confusion over the “trouble” statement did not refer to the actual fact of your having some trouble of whatever sort but rather to the theoretical or philosophical nature of the statement itself. In other words, it related to the question as to how could one be unaware of one’s own immediate mental states and had nothing to do either with Blip, whoever he might be, or with the content of those mental states, only the existential possibility of not being aware of them and the dire effect this would have on the validity of one’s entire epistemology.

    If you don’t mind I won’t bother with the song “HoistThatRag” since, as I have elsewhere remarked, perusing either videos or song lyrics results in serious and unacceptable brain drain. In other words, in watching videos or reading lyrics one feels like an idiot and for a very good reason: in that act one IS an idiot. Further, given the indeterminate nature of your sexuality, I must also decline the evening of opera and fine dining. I trust you will understand my reluctance in this matter.

    : SheSang (2:22PM)

    It is true SS that I thought you were a boy. While I originally thought you were a female – it’s not the sort of pseudonym one normally associates with males being rather romantic in nature – I reconsidered your gender assignment based on your avatar which, if I am not wrong, resembles Bob Marley. So we have a pseudonym/avatar problem which, as with HoistThat Rag, renders your actual gender problematic and on the basis of which I must also respectfully decline the evening of opera and fine dining. (You might like to correspond with HoistThatRag directly.)

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  81. Well Hoist, I guess MM is opting out of the opera and fine dining…given that we’re both broke, feel free to let me know if you feel like getting together to listen to opera–or ‘A Night at the Opera’ and a little Oi punk + Cali punkabilly, and share a home-cooked meal….I could even bake something for dessert, but the beer would be store bought–a great brew takes a while;P

    @MM: you are correct, my avatar is Bob Marley:) I enjoy both reggae and ambiguity immensely.

  82. Your decision to decline is regretful, as I was genuinely interested in how you would interpret the lyrics. Though there are no hard feelings, I must ask: how is someone an idiot for enjoying music or reading lyrics to a song? MM, your full-of-crap-edness (feel free to use this term when writing one of your essays, I think it’s splendid) is at once tiresome and endearing. Though, I’ve never had anyone describe my gender as problematic before hahah.

    I think the real question here is, since you’ve stated that it’s not the content of my posts that lead you to believe I was female, why the word ‘rag’ automatically conjures up images of used kotex pads for you. One could assume that the phrase ‘on the rag’ might come to mind. The sheer frequency with which you mention soiled pads leads me to conclude that you’ve a fetish with soiled pads. Indeed.

    Ploopy = bum sex? hahah I’m checking urban dictionary on that one.

    I’m sorry that you must decline my offer for you to take me out to opera and an evening of fine dining. I was looking forward to it. If you would prefer, we could just hit up a burger king and check out some monstertrucks? No? OK then. 🙁

  83. SheSang, there has never been an instance in which I was not prepared to enjoy any combination of punk, beer and/or food 🙂 But given the anonymous nature of these boards I don’t know how we’d arrange a hang out. Any idea’s?

  84. Urban dictionary: When you go to use the toilet and it already has poop in it from someone else.

  85. Email me at shesang@hotmail.ca if you feel like you have some time and wanna hang out Hoist:) Be forewarned though, I may try to drag you to the beach–one of my favorite places, and it’s been a while since I’ve been in the drink! Beer, food, and awesome tunes included ‘) <--pirate smiley 'D lol

  86. “In other words, in watching videos or reading lyrics one feels like an idiot and for a very good reason: in that act one IS an idiot”

    with such an ignorant statement montrealman has demonstrated that he is a fool yet again

  87. Just to clarify, Thomas: dude hadn’t moved in yet.

    I dunno, I think my love of kittehs makes me too biased to comment appropriately. I mean yes this chick was very inconsiderate, but I honestly don’t understand how someone can’t love teh kittehs!

    Though… I have met some asshole cats and I just didn’t like them, but who says this chick’s new feline friend isn’t just wonderful?… Then again, I’m not all that fond of dogs, but if it wasn’t for my allergy, a dog certainly wouldn’t be a deal breaker. So, in the end, I conclude that both OB and his ex chick are being childish.

    Regards,
    Pretty ‘MONSTERCOCK5000’ Kitty

  88. Hahah kitty, I like your new name. Agreed both OB and his girl were being childish but how can you not like dogs??????

  89. Kitty, that’s one ‘MONSTERCOCK’ of a moniker;D Love it!! lol….chuckles off…..

  90. SHIT boy, its really no surprise to come on here again and be bombarded with your violent, thuggish drug fuelled threats. A triple post with nothing but name calling and vulgar language nor could you understand my point as always.

    As I said before, the province is looking to hire five cyberbullying investigators. A bully like you should be worried, but the amount of drugs you smoke seems to have altered your opinion on how the world works and the repurcussions of your threats.

    Me, I started today off on a very positive note. I attended my local church with my husband then had a potluck lunch. I now forgive you for your shortcomings as you and your blasphemous wife can’t seem to mature past the highschool bully mindset with your endless childish name calling.

    Now my only hope is that you will not go on another hate filled quest to find and reveal my personal information as you childishly did to Montrealman. We’re all aware of you getting banned for that sort of repetitive behaviour, but you seem to circumvent the Moderators continued punishments and don’t realize you are not welcome here.

  91. Lol. Lame, lame, lame. Take all weekend to think up that gem?

  92. Maybe you growing up, has what I said sunk in yet? Have you accepted your shortcomings? I wish you godspeed in your newly found adult mentality. No whining or crying is a pleasant surprise.

    Thanks for the amazingly quick response SHITandPOOP.

  93. Man, oh, man, that patter sounds awfully familiar – I do believe we have a previously banned poster in our midst with a spanking brand new moniker and a big ol’ spoon ready to stir up the sh…I mean stew.

    Cosmic Muffin help us all. Hope we don’t have a plague of aggressive blueberries on the celestial warpath.

  94. Welcome back Toad. Let me guess….you’ve been making tubunit cookies all day? Oh, how that worries a little old lady like myself. I’m a retired nurse you know and I worry about overweight diabetics. Its the christian thing to do, and I forgive you for all the silly name calling.

    And what a shame too, a previously banned poster you say. You must be referring to yourself or wimp of a sidekick paul. Whatever he’s calling himself these days.And as it turns out, your henchmen thug is a drug addict with a made up wife. It really is the underclass of Halifax on here. MM is always right about that.

  95. I once invited myself to one of their crusader summits and told the khufar that the eating of bacon was haram. The cowardly zionists then perpetrated an Islamophobic hate crime upon me by never inviting me back.
    Salaam.

  96. Oh, no. You’ve seen through my ruse. I didn’t think anyone would pick up on the Poop-Shit thing. Oh well, it was funny while it lasted, so you may as well all know that I’m a single female.

  97. RSVPS

    : HoistThatRag (06/09, 4:30PM)

    My comment about being an idiot by watching a video about some buffoon warbling some tosh or reading the lyrics of the tosh to determine what was on his “mind” was self-referential. I pictured myself, drooling slightly, as I attempted to do both. However, on reflection, I believe my view may well have broader application. Your reference to finding my “crap-edness” as “endearing” puts the question of your gender affiliation once more on the front burner.

    : fool (5:13PM)

    See my reply to Rag above.

    : blip blip – What’s up? (6:14PM)

    Thank you for that blip, but he wasn’t the only one. In fact, there’s another one not far away, right on this thread.

    (10:59PM)

    Right again blip. However, I think that the way to go is not to engage them in heated debate – that’s just a dead end – but rather to view them and their “thoughts” as an interesting sociological experiment. Questions like, “Why do they say what they do?” or “What is their rationale and it is it coherently explicable?” and so on come to mind. Nice to see you back.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  98. Just me, that would be fine if the cat/dog or whatever was there first. But after agreeing not to have a cat/dog or whatever and then four months after moving in together, getting a cat/dog or whatever is absolutely wrong. She is trying to manipulate him and it won’t stop with a pet. Once again OB, be glad you’re out of it before it became too late.

  99. montrealman: Can you explain why someone is an idiot for watching a video?

    Guess what….? If you can it means you’re a fool!

  100. i think the only word he articulates with any semblance of precision is derp.

    Here’s a ball inbreed. Perhaps you’d like to bounce it.

  101. RSVPS

    : fool (06/10, 11:53AM)

    (a) See my initial reply to you at Montrealman (06/10, 10:19AM) or; (b) Struggle to explain your statement to me. I wasn’t able to understand it because, unsuprisingly, it is incoherent.

    : eats_crayons (12:47PM)

    If your post was directed at me, would there be any chance of a clarification? If it wasn’t, then ignore this one. Do you see “:eat_crayons” above? That’s why I address my posts, so that those addressed will know that they are being addressed. Do you find that very difficult to grasp?

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  102. Oh MM, how right you are. Just like always. These thugs and bullys just resort to their name calling and petty insults whenever someone of higher intelligence confronts them.

    I have to say though that I think you’ve got me confused with another poster. I am a long time reader but first time commentor 😉 I have admired you and loved your posts for quite some time now. I’m glad I finally worked up the courage to confront the hooligans on here and not worry about their silly name calling.

  103. RSVPS

    :blip blip – What’s up (06/10, 5:37PM)

    Well it’s true that you reminded me of someone else so please accept my apologies as it seems I was mistaken. In any case, you are completely right about the bullies and their “silly name calling.” I’ve previously mentioned a philosophical generalization to the effect that, “All discourse is self-referential.” When bullies engage in such silly name calling it doesn’t say anything about the target of their verbal abuse but rather about themselves. What does it say? It says, in effect, that they are intellectually bankrupt, that they are unable to engage the issue under discussion, and so must resort to personal insult. But they fail to realize that their insults are self-directed. They are, unknowingly, simply insulting themselves. They are not aware of this, of course, because they are without reflection. They are without minds. Al they have is bluster. Pay them no heed.

    : HoistThatRag (6:40PM)

    It seems we go from “endearing” to “charming” which works to further place your gender affiliation into question. That having been said, it raises the interesting point as to the possibility of correctly inferring such gender affiliation from the written word. Normally this can be determined with some degree of accuracy from the topic under discussion – think of PK’s obsession with her body, for example – but things get progressively more difficult as one ascends the linguistic ladder and its gender-laden intonations. Do “endearing” and “charming” fall under the concept of such gender-laden intonations? If not, they are certainly border-line. They say that while sex is between the legs, gender is between the ears. Perhaps, while you may be affiliated with the male in the first instance, you may be affiliated with the female in the second. Put differently, do you play for the “other team”?

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

  104. Nope, MM, I’m a straight male. Just comfortable enough with myself to pay a compliment to another person regardless of their gender. There was a slight bit of sarcasm to my comments, though, which you might have missed. Understandably so, as sarcasm is difficult to convey in the written word.

    Your display of camaraderie toward blip has kind of ruined any idea that I might have had about you being of higher intelligence than the average person, however. The fact that blip spews insults more than anyone is contradictory to your notion that the two of your are victims of ‘bullying’ and disproves your statement that “All discourse is self referential”, at least if you maintain that neither blip, nor yourself, are subject to the same philosophical rule of thumb.

    Furthermore, you continue to imply that I am a homosexual simply because I’ve said something nice to you, albeit somewhat facetiously. Assuming that you intend the implication of alleged homosexuality to be a subtle insult, that may be viewed as ample cause to place your gender preference under the same scrutiny that you place mine; all discourse being self referential and so forth.

    In either case, any sexual inference is relative to your own perception, not the result of anything I’ve posted.

    All that having been said, I will attempt to be straight forward here – No, I am not gay. Yes, I do find your posts to have a certain charm and entertainment value. I appreciate the thoughtfulness and well-worded replies, even when they are condescending and/or hypocritical. I like the ‘character’ of montreal man, you could say – the personality. It provides an interesting contrast to most of the other bitchers that frequent the boards. It’s the same way someone might enjoy the villain in a movie. I do jab a bit at you (ie ‘full of crapedness) but it’s really nothing hateful or hurtful. You don’t have to like me, you don’t have to think my posts are coherent, you can even think I’m gay if you want to. But as I’ve said previously, I am not putting out.

  105. No apoligies necessary MM. Its good to see that one poster on here has a maturity level that doesn’t mirror that of a five year old.

    “When bullies engage in such silly name calling it doesn’t say anything about the target of their verbal abuse but rather about themselves.”

    That is very uplifting and oh so true. You are a very intellectual and talented person, the world needs more men like you. I was beginning to feel down about the constant threats and insults, but you’ve really helped me feel better about myself.

    I hope this may shed a bit of positive light on these bullies and thugs, but I really doubt it. They must be products of broken homes but the church will still accept them, if they can accept HIS teachings first.

  106. RSVPS

    :HoistThatRag (06/11, 6:47PM)

    Some interesting points here, Raggy. (May I call you “Raggy”?) Yes, as you say, sarcasm is difficult to convey in the written word and I think we have one of the reasons right here. Had I known you were a straight male I would have known that your “endearing” and “charming” comments would have conveyed some sarcasm but, of course, I didn’t know about the first and, as a consequence, didn’t know about the second. So I think we may have the beginnings here of a theory of sarcasm: In addition to tone of voice and facial expression which are not available in the written word, some background knowledge about the speaker (writer) also helps considerably. For example, I was recently kicked off a social site recently for comments that I thought were only slightly sarcastic but the webmaster thought differently. (Anyway, I started up my own site along similar lines but, in my view, much superior as it went beyond the simple picture stage.) But as far as homosexuality goes, although I am not one myself I harbour no homophobia – on the contrary I find, in general, that they are more reflective and sensitive than theit heterosexual brothers.

    I’m not sure how you see that my “All discourse is self-referential” is undermined by my camaraderie with blip. I think you should take her “insults” as they are meant, i.e., as an attempt to help those who have fallen on evil ways rather than simply gratuitous and personal barbs. It’s all a matter of how you look at them. Also I never considered my self a “victim” of bullying but I did see her as a punching bag for some of the marginals on this site and simply wished to come to her support. So I think your claim that my “All discourse is self-referential” is misplaced in this case although, of course, since everybody, including me, is subject to that same rule of thumb it applies to me as well but in other contexts, i.e., this post itself is self-referential. It reflects my actual thinking. In the same way, your claim that my implication that you were a homosexual was a “subtle insult” misconceived my views of homosexuals totally. (See my reference above.)

    Of course, I whole-heartedly endorsed your assertion to the effect that my replies were thoughtful, well-worded and condescending – I do enjoy being condescending – but I was baffled – even taken-aback – by the claim that they were also “hypocritical”. I’m afraid I’m going to have to ask for clarification here, Raggy, as introspecting my consciousness has yielded nothing that I can identify as hypocritical. However, now that we have exchanged a few thoughts, I can say that I am coming to like you but, I have to add, I am glad to hear that you’re not putting out.

    : blip blip – What’s up? (7:08PM)

    Well, thank you blip. Kind words indeed. But you might have a look at Raggy’s post above. I think it’s safe to say that he’s not in that category of “bullies and thugs” of which you speak although, in the case of a few other individuals, you are probably right. I think the best path to follow would be to distinguish the two categories and, in the case of the former, perhaps a little Christian charity and love might be the way to go.

    A pleasure as always.

    Cheerio!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *