We get it, your hubby is going away for work for two weeks, you don’t know what to do with yourself without him joined at your hip. But must you go on about it every freakin day on facebook?! You’re pathetic. It’s just 14 days in NFLD. My good friend’s hubby is in the military and went overseas for 6 months and she only mentioned missing him ONCE! Your man’s 14 days is NOTHING, so stop going on about it as if he died. I get why you might mention this once (well, not really, it’s only two weeks…). Is it cause you have to go all that time without his awesome cock?! One word: vibrator. You’re the same annoying twat who said you were complete once you married him and when mentioning him on FB, you ALWAYS refer to him as my HUBBY. Woo, you’re married! Congrats, you did something that millions of people do every year, big fucking whoop! Well, I deleted you. I don’t delete people often, but you were the first I booted off since 2010. I hope the rest of your friends whose delete buttons you likely flirt with will follow suit. —Deleted your needy ass and don’t miss you one bit
This article appears in Apr 9-15, 2015.
I wonder why the friend with the husband who’s away for 6 months mentions missing him only once… that’s some vibrator! I’ll bet he has a name…
That’s some nasty shit goin’ on out there in the FaceBook, man, some nasty shit!
….you know there’s an “unfollow” button to remove their stuff from your news feed right?
You ranted on this forum about FaceBlock? Wow, you are really torn over this issue. Whatever does the rest of your world lack that made this so important?
THE AWESOME COCK VS. THE VIBRATOR
“Is it cause (sic) you have to go all that time without his awesome cock?! One word: vibrator.”
This is an interesting theoretical question. Does the vibrator compensate for the absence of
an awesome cock? While, for obvious reasons, I have no first-hand knowledge to offer any persuasive insight into the dilemma, to say noting of resolving it, I believe that I can offer some clarificatory comments.
The issue as I see it resolves into one of control. Those who favour the vibrator tend to be more autonomous, more in charge of their own destiny. They are more imaginative. They do not want to be at the whim of one who might, both literally and metaphorically, fall short in this regard. The vibrator-user is active, not passive. For her it’s not a matter, as the old saying goes, of lying back and thinking of England but rather vibrantly (!) engaging in the carnal delights afforded by an up-to-date model with multiple settings. She is self-sufficient. She is her own woman.
The only reservation relates to just what is meant by an “awesome” cock. Is an awesome cock awesome by virtue of the fact that it mimics the vibrator or are there criteria of “awesomeness” specific to the cock itself? What could these be? My guess is that the criteria relate not so much to the actual cock itself bur rather to intangibles provided by the male attached to the cock, things like mood, intellectual engagement and so on.
But then, as I say, I have no first-hand knowledge to offer any persuasive insight into the dilemma. Perhaps others who do might want to take it up.
A pleasure as always,
Cheerio!
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
http://www.condenaststore.com/-sp/How-Much…