I’ve had a whole weekend to stew about Chris Brown coming to Halifax for Energy Rush. By now, there’s been petitions for, petitions against, sponsors pulling out left, right and centre, discussions of art for art’s sake, discussions about race, statements from Mayor Mike Savage and straight up plain vitriol for the abusive Brown.

 
It’s doubtful that the show will be canceled, because sponsors or not, the ticket sales will be there. Team Breezy is adamant and obsessed with Chris Brown. Energy Rush has had more publicity than ever (and there’s no such thing as bad publicity).

It’s easy to speak against this choice. The stomach-churning photo of Rihanna’s beaten face is burned into our memories, even making its way onto a poster decrying the event, featuring just the event details paired with the image, a tactic that was first used in Sweden, in an effort to get his show canceled. 

That photo is a concrete example in a world that lives and dies by photographic evidence. The dangerous and disgusting truth is that domestic abuse is often “rationalized” away otherwise (“He just snapped and hit her once, it could have happened to anyone”). It wasn’t just a heat of the moment slap across the face (as if that would have somehow been more acceptable). It was a vicious, brutal beating that Brown has showed little remorse for.

Unfortunately, violence against women—be it domestic abuse, sexual assault, street harassment or rape—needing to be seen to be believed is nothing new for women. In Rehteah Parsons‘ case, even a photo wasn’t proof enough.

What makes Brown’s case unique and so horrifying is the photo—the proof—still isn’t enough to condemn Brown. Women can sit in a courtroom and be grilled about their pasts, their wardrobe, their choice of words, while trying—often in vain—to seek justice for abuse, wishing, praying, they had some photographic evidence, some key eyewitness account to save them. A woman’s word is never enough.

As mentioned in this excellent Gawker article by Cord Jefferson, “people hate to read and like pictures.”

“…that photo of Rihanna—bloodied, swollen, tear streaked—is not words in a divorce filing or a Hollywood starlet acting out true events. It is an unvarnished, grotesque, and unquestionable reality, and it is the kindling that started the blaze this is the world’s hatred for Chris Brown.” wrote Jefferson.

But surprisingly, in the PR aftermath that followed Brown’s assault of Rihanna (that included throwing a chair on Good Morning America, fighting with Drake and most recently, a hit and run for which his probation was revoked today), even that photo was forgotten. Legions of loyal fans are all too willing to forgive and forget. We must separate the art from the man! Or don’t even bother.

Now, I don’t pretend everyone I have personally covered as a journalist or supported hasn’t broken a law. Without a doubt know that I have. The numbers just support it, plain and simple.

Let’s do a rough estimate. I’ve been writing about musicians for roughly seven years at an average of three groups a week (give or take). That’s 1092 groups. We’ll average each group at four people each, that’s 4368 folks. Just for fun, let’s say 50 percent of the people in these groups are female (there’s no way it’s been that even, but humour me). That’s 2184 men that I’ve spoken to, sat down with, phoned, emailed, had a coffee with, recorded their words and supported by then writing an article about their projects. 

In 2010 2.26 women out of 100 were assaulted by a partner in Canada. Exact numbers on abusers are surprisingly hard to find (maybe because this violence against women is strictly seen as a a women’s issue). It’s not likely that for every abused woman there is a single abuser. Some men may be abusing multiple women or children in a household, which would bring my final number much higher. But let’s take a bit of a leap together. Say that every woman abused was beaten by a single man. That’s 2.26 men out of 100 who beat their partners. 

If we apply those numbers to mine, the rough estimate is that I’ve likely personally supported 43.6 abusers in their personal musical projects. It’s a fact that makes me sick, especially since there’s little I can do to vet the past (or present) of my interview subjects. This is just a numbers game that I’m sure we all could play. How many Facebook friends do you have? Or why not take a guess at how many people you stand in a crowded bar with every weekend, maybe even joke around with, who turn into monsters at a moment’s notice?

It’s enough to drive anyone crazy, but the point is we don’t have to be similarly conflicted about Brown. There’s no conjecture. We don’t just have a sinking suspicion based on numbers of sexual assault, battery and rape. We all have proof.

And for once I can say I won’t be involved.

flossin' off on a natural charge bon voyage

Join the Conversation

16 Comments

  1. By your own admission, do you not admit to doing that which you are criticizing other people for ???

  2. not sure I understand what you’re asking but I think I see where the confusion might be. I am saying it’s likely that I have UNWITTINGLY interviewed and supported abusers. And I don’t intend to do it with this concert.

  3. Tickets for Brown don’t go on sale until tomorrow, the 17th, so ticket sales remain to be seen. People buying tickets would be smart to check the refund policy. Since Brown’s parole was revoked, the whole argument may be moot. Even if he’s not in custody before August 31, there’s doubt as to whether or not he’ll be permitted entry into Canada.

    I just read the affidavit from the assault incident. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/ He has a hair-trigger temper. Sure hope a local fan doesn’t irritate him.

  4. “It was a vicious, brutal beating that Brown has showed little remorse for.” not only has he shown little remorse, but he decided to commemorate domestic abuse with a tattoo of a battered woman on his neck. i highly doubt that if he worked in most other industries (like, say, education) people would say, “just let him do his job.”

  5. Yes, Thank You for writing what many of us feel. Once known, how can we support abusers? If we do are we not saying that the music and the fame of the person is more important than their actions? Bravo to you Stephanie.

  6. I noticed the lack of statistic of men being abused by their partners. It’s a thing, and more widely hidden. If you’re going to quote stats, do it for both sides. Equlaity.

  7. I get the fact that people don’t like Chris Brown because of his actions, but I wish people would see that it is not only affecting him. There are plenty of other artists that would like to have their music showcased at this annual event, that is known to draw crowds. This is likely to include local artists that, perhaps, need an opportunity like this to get their music out to a wider audience.
    My real question is, would this even be an issues if Chris Brown assaulted another male? By no means am I condoning his actions, I’m just wondering if things would be any different. He did go through the court system and received justice for his actions. I’m not sure what more you could ask. It’s not like he can go back and erase his actions completely.
    I’m not even a fan of Chris Brown, but I do plan on attending the event, as it is something I always go to. I just don’t think it’s fair to the rest to try and ruin an event that many enjoy every year. A concert is about taking in a live performance and celebrating talent, all this controversy surrounding this years Energy Rush is really taking away from that.

  8. re: lack of statistics on men

    The study cited above states “7 in 10 (70%) victims of police-reported family violence were girls or women”. The same study includes a chart (Chart 1.2) with the breakdown of types of violence and the frequencies of men and women as victims of specific violent acts. That chart shows that women are most frequently the victims of extreme violence like beating and sexual assault. Considering the relative severity of the violence against women (choking, sexual assault etc) compared to the types of domestic violence that men are more commonly the victims of (kicking) it makes sense that women more commonly report abuse, as that type of violence is way more severe. That’s not to say that men aren’t ever the victims of domestic violence, but saying that men are treated unfairly in regards to issues of domestic violence is baffling.

  9. Don’t listen to his music so I can’t say whether he has any talent or not but his actions seem to border on being a Thug or Thug Wannabe, likely for publicity, be it good or bad. I think Tina might be right though if his probation is revoked I don’t believe he can travel, at least not out of the States.

  10. I get the fact that people don’t like Chris Brown because of his actions, but I wish people would see that it is not only affecting him. There are plenty of other artists that would like to have their music showcased at this annual event, that is known to draw crowds. This is likely to include local artists that, perhaps, need an opportunity like this to get their music out to a wider audience.
    My real question is, would this even be an issues if Chris Brown assaulted another male? By no means am I condoning his actions, I’m just wondering if things would be any different. He did go through the court system and received justice for his actions. I’m not sure what more you could ask. It’s not like he can go back and erase his actions completely.
    I’m not even a fan of Chris Brown, but I do plan on attending the event, as it is something I always go to. I just don’t think it’s fair to the rest to try and ruin an event that many enjoy every year. A concert is about taking in a live performance and celebrating talent, all this controversy surrounding this years Energy Rush is really taking away from that.

  11. I look forward to a Ms Johns column about how a pathological liar can convince the Supreme Court that a plot by her to murder her out of the house husband was a result of ‘threats’ that she had never informed the RCMP about. And Ms Johns can add on bits about the daughter choosing to live with the father rather than the liar.

  12. Great article. You said it well, people cannot deny this brutality as it stares them in the face every time they see the photo of Rihanna. It’s sad that people are so quick to turn away from it otherwise. And sometimes as mentioned even with evidence like with Rehtaeh people don’t want to face the issue. More services/funding for domestic and sexual violence centers, more public outreach to young people is needed. We need to break the cycle of violence somehow.

  13. So is HRM going to run a criminal records check on every celebrity (sports, music, entertainment, etc) who comes here and deny them entry? That list would be pretty long, including actors, sports figures, and you could probably forget any country concerts.

  14. Bro Tim:

    No, HRM isn’t, that’s the responsibility of the Feds. Convicted criminals are not supposed to be allowed entry into Canada. Sure, there are usually work-arounds, and that’s how some artists end up playing here, who have records, but that doesn’t change the fact that they are still checked out before allowed entry.

  15. TDF, I know how Immigration works. My point is if the Feds let someone in will HRM do a check and say the person can’t be here? Strange when “Poor” Mike makes a stand it’s usually when everyone else has decided something.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *