Pin It

Friday, December 10, 2010

First Nations rally against Lower Churchill dam

'"Green" energy deal no benefit to us'

Posted by Bruce Wark on Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM

About 100 members of an aboriginal group rallied outside provincial government offices in Happy Valley — Goose Bay, Labrador today to protest against plans to build a hydro-electric dam on the Lower Churchill River. Some of the protesters, members of NunatuKavut, formerly known as the Labrador Métis Nation, drove several hundred kilometres to protest in temperatures that dipped to -18 C with the wind chill. They were expressing their opposition to a deal under which Labradorians would lose a large section of one of the world’s most beautiful, sacred and historic rivers while the power generated at the Muskrat Falls dam would be shipped to Newfoundland, Nova Scotia and possibly the US.

“We find it quite upsetting that everybody is celebrating green energy but in order to make green energy, they’re flooding Labrador,” Chris Montague, president of NunatuKavut told the Coast in a telephone interview on Wednesday. “It’s been the same story with the Upper Churchill,” he added. “They flooded an area nearly the size of the Avalon Peninsula to bring green energy down into North America, so nobody seems to care about Labrador. Nobody seems to care about us.”

Montague is especially angry that the $6.2 billion power deal was announced with no notice to the 4,000 members of NunatuKavut. “We only heard about this Muskrat Falls deal the day before on the news,” he says. “No one in government called us about it until after the news release.”

NunatuKavut and other aboriginal groups, including the Innu, still have unsettled land claims. “We’re saying this is our territory. We’ve always been here. This is our home,” Montague says. “Why are we being excluded?”

Meantime, Montague insists the Muskrat Falls project will not go ahead unless a compensation agreement is reached with NunatuKavut. The Newfoundland government has concluded an agreement with the Innu, but refuses to negotiate with NunatuKavut until the federal government recognizes its land claim. Montague says the claim is based on a 1765 treaty with the British, two million dollars worth of independent academic research and a Supreme Court ruling which says governments have a duty to consult aboriginal communities about decisions that may affect their rights.

“We want our opinion to be considered on whether or not this project goes ahead,” Montague says, adding that a federal environmental assessment is still not complete, nor have the required public hearings been held.

“There’s a lot of people outraged by this,” Montague says, “by the suddenness, by the exclusion.”

Tags: ,

Survey Asks

Do you agree with Halifax's school board cutting 152 teachers?

  • Yes, the board needs to meet its shrinking budget.
  • Only if managers and bureaucracy get a similar cut.
  • I don't care, I support the private education system.
  • No, giving young citizens the best education is too important to cut.

View Results

Comments (3)

Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

The land that will be flooded IS a part of NunatuKavut! Consultation is one thing...Meaningful consultation is what is required. Its not a consultation when you virtually say, we'll hear you out, but we'll decide what are the facts! NunatuKavummuit have rights and have been ignored and discriminated against for far too long!

report 2 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by bthomd on 01/24/2011 at 6:36 AM

My sympathies are with NunatuKavut, but they won't get very far with this. After all, our federal and provincial and municipal governments are perfectly willing to screw over white people, through expropriations, to enrich resource extraction and road construction companies, so what chance do Metis and First Nations and Inuit have?

report 2 likes, 0 dislikes   
Posted by Realist in Dartmouth on 12/10/2010 at 9:05 PM

Only problem is there has been extensive consultation with Nunatukavut. They're not opposed to the project, whether or not the power it generates stays in Labrador, but want financial benefits. The reason that Nalcor has not started negotiations for an impact benefits agreement with them is that their land claim has not been recognized by the federal or provincial governments - without a recognized land claim there is no basis for an impact benefits agreement. Not to mention that their traditional territory doesn't exactly correspond with the project area. I wish Nunatukavut the best but its not clear if they are in a position to demand what they are asking.

report 0 likes, 2 dislikes   
Posted by WJM on 12/10/2010 at 7:44 PM
Subscribe to this thread:
Showing 1-3 of 3

Add a comment

Top Topics in
Reality Bites

Transit Strike (5)


VoteHRM (3)


Gig trouble (1)


Coast Top Ten

  1. Fireworks info   (News Feature)
  2. Blood coal   (Sustainable City)
  3. The dumpster diet   (Earth Day)
  4. Jennifer Watts   (City Council Report Card)
  5. Mayor Peter Kelly won’t seek re-election   (Reality Bites)
  6. NDP’s green screen   (Sustainable City)
  7. Recycling in HRM   (Green Halifax)
  8. Does high school matter?   (News Feature)
  9. Fred Connors is running for mayor   (Vote HRM)
  10. Drawing interest   (News Feature)
LATEST POSTS
Dartmouth Handcrafters Guild
posted May 21 07:25 AM
Dartmouth Handcrafters Guild Christmas Craft Festival, ...
Registered Dietitian
posted May 21 06:24 AM
Looking to improve your health? Confused by all the ...
"TALLEST CONDO IN CANADA"
posted May 21 05:21 AM
Type: Residential Style: A MUST SEE Development Level: ...
Halifax Jobs - 62 ads
For Sale - 43 ads
Rentals - 15 ads
Real Estate - 6 ads
Free Love - 1 ads
Services - 36 ads
Bulletin Board - 43 ads
Health & Beauty - 21 ads
Classes - 6 ads
Want Ads - 2 ads

spacer
spacer

In Print This Week

Vol 19, No 51
May 17, 2012

Cover Gallery »


© 2012 Coast Publishing Ltd.