The Abercrombie Paper Mill

Pictou County can breathe a sigh of relief.

The Abercrombie Paper Mill

On March 26, one of the county’s main employers got an emergency
lifeline. The pulp mill at Abercrombie Point will be kept afloat with a
$15 million loan from the provincial government. The loan will help the
mill deal with falling demand for its white mushy pulp, used to make
paper. The deal looks good, $15 million for more than 1,200 direct and
indirect jobs—but there’s a hidden cost.

Most of those indirect jobs go to people who harvest the piles of
trees that sit in the mill’s wood lot. Reducing trees to soft, white
mash takes a monumental amount of water. The water is clean when it
enters the mill, but at the other end, it’s dark brown. That dark brown
wastewater, and where it goes is where you’ll find the true cost of
those jobs.

Since 1967, the wastewater has flowed into Boat Harbour, a quiet
estuary near Pictou Landing, two kilometres east of the mill. There,
oxygen is added to the water, the solids are settled out and thewater
makes its way to the Northumberland Strait over about 30 days.

Boat Harbour borders a native reserve, the Pictou Landing First
Nation. Forty-four years ago, the federal government gave the province
permission to treat the mill’s waste in Boat Harbour. In December 2008
the band demanded the Province clean up Boat Harbour and put the waste
somewhere else.

The province agreed. Now, secret talks are just underway to decide
how that will happen. One thing is certain: It will cost lots of money.
A new facility will cost about $100 million, and dredging Boat Harbour
of its toxic sediments will cost another $7 to 12 million. All this
money is for a pulp mill that is already taking emergency loans.

During our investigation we found more than four decades of promises
broken by a succession of governments and agencies, leaving a toxic
mess with no solution in sight. Boat Harbour’s history as a waste
treatment lagoon began in a murk of lies and betrayal. These lies have
haunted successive governments to this day.

Lies like residents being told the wastewater would have little
impact on the environment. And officials telling band councillors
face-to-face they would be able to drink the water in the estuary. And
the promises in 1993, 1995, 2002 and 2006 to stop using Boat Harbour,
deadlines that passed with wastewater still flowing into Boat
Harbour.

Even the provincial government acknowledges this problem has gone on
too long.

“Many deadlines have come and gone, I’m the first to admit that, it
may be somewhat disheartening,” says Brook Taylor, minister of
transportation and infrastructure renewal. Taylor’s department is part
of those closed-door talks to close Boat Harbour. Right now, the
government is studying other locations to put the wastewater. But Boat
Harbour has been studied so much it’s not hard to imagine consultants
making careers out of the place.

Death of Boat Harbour

Before the mill, locals enjoyed Boat Harbour. They could
boat, fish and swim to their hearts’ content.

“I learned to swim off a little island that was known as Pine
Island,” said Doug MacKay, who has lived in Pictou County for 75 years
and has owned a house on land that borders Boat Harbour since 1958.

“Clams and shellfish abounded out there at that time,” he recalls.
“You know, it was common practice that people would dig a bucket of
clams and have a fire on the shore and cook them right there with the
salt water.”

Mary Gorman’s family has a cottage at Pictou Landing. She remembers
when it changed. “All the waves that were coming in were dark brown and
foamy, they were not like the ocean coming in, they were dark brown
foamy waves,” she recalls.

Nearly a trillion litres of wastewater have gone into the lagoon
over the years. To see that much water go over Niagara Falls, you would
have to watch it 24 hours a day, for two years. All that toxic water
has a profound effect on Boat Harbour and the people who live around
it.

When the mill was built, Pictou County needed its jobs more than
ever. The coal industry was in steep decline and premier Robert
Stanfield’s government was searching for replacement industries. Enter
Scott Paper.

Scott got a sweet deal. The province gave Scott cheap water, free
water infrastructure, cheap wastewater treatment, property tax
exemptions and a huge tract of crown land. The company paid $50 million
to build the mill in 1965—that’s $342 million in 2009 dollars, about
the cost of Halifax’s Harbour Solutions project.

Building the water infrastructure for the mill fell to the newly
formed Nova Scotia Water Authority. The authority was created in 1963
to administer and oversee all water in the province.

Pulling the strings at the Water Authority was John Seaman Bates, a
chemical engineer and a lifetime friend and employee of the pulp and
paper industry. When Bates became the first head of the water
authority, he had been chief chemist for mills in Quebec’s Saguenay
River Valley, was technical advisor to more than a hundred mills in the
British Isles and had his own consulting firm that set up bleached
kraft mills around Canada. Today, the Pulp and Paper Industry
Association of Canada has two awards named after Bates.

The mill would need 112 million litres of water per day to produce
its pulp. On the toilet end, the province needed somewhere to flush the
waste. At first, Pictou Harbour was the dumping ground of choice. But
Bates devised a plan that would protect the harbour at the expense of a
tidal lagoon.

Later, in October 1966, Bates explained his views on pollution
control to the technical section of the Pulp and Paper Association of
Canada. Bates said of mill waste: “The used water carries solids,
solubles and toxic substances, often in quantity and condition too
staggering for polite conversation… bleached kraft effluent is the
most dangerous in our industry.”

Bates felt the dangerous waste better belonged in Boat Harbour, next
to a native reserve, than in the open harbour.

On May 18, 1965, Bates outlined his big plans for Boat Harbour to
the rest of the water authority and to premier Stanfield.

The place would go from natural tidal lagoon, to waste dump for both
human and industrial sewage. The human sewage would be pumped in from
the towns of Pictou, Westville, Stellarton, Trenton and New Glasgow.
The industrial sewage would come from Scott Paper and any future
industries on Abercrombie Point.

There was a hitch, though.

The minister responsible for the water authority, W.S.K. Jones,
later pointed out federal government approval would be needed to use
Boat Harbour. Boat Harbour borders the Pictou Landing reserve, and
native affairs are a federal matter.

The Water Authority’s general manager was given the job of getting
the necessary approvals. At a meeting on Sept. 2 and 3, 1965, Armand
Wigglesworth reported back about a meeting with the “Mic Mac Indians”
of Pictou Landing. They raised “four major objections” to industrial
waste in their backyard.

But Bates said using Boat Harbour was “absolutely necessary to clean
up the entire Pictou harbour.” Wigglesworth was told to get that
approval. Wigglesworth worked fast; two months later he had approval
from local, regional and federal native officials to use Boat Harbour.
The band would get $60,000 as compensation for the loss of fishing and
“other privileges” related to Boat Harbour. To approve this today would
take years of environmental study. But this was the 1960s, when things
were done differently.

We found out just how differently from Daniel Paul, a Mik’Maq writer
and former Indian Affairs official. Paul says the chief and some band
councillors were taken to an apparently similar site in Saint John to
see what Boat Harbour would look like once Scott began dumping waste
there.

“They get up there and have the engineer take out a little cup of
his sack and take a drink of water and tell him, the band chief and the
councillors, this is how pure the water is going to be,” says Paul.
“And then we discovered afterwards, at that particular place, the unit
didn’t come into operation for two years after that visit.

“The shenanigans that went on were almost criminal.”

At a water authority meeting on March 9, 1964, Bates said “toxicity
from bleached kraft pulp mills [like Scott’s] is very high.” This
information hasn’t been published until now. It comes from water
authority minutes on record at the Nova Scotia archives.

By 1966, Wigglesworth and Bates had both left the Water Authority.
Bates’ scheme to pump industrial waste into Boat Harbour would have
dramatic consequences shortly after the mill opened.

Bob Christie used to be an engineer with Canso Chemicals, a
subsidiary of Scott Paper and another polluter of Boat Harbour. Now
he’s an environmentalist. He said the theory behind the Boat Harbour
facility was sound. The scale was not.

“Rather than using a pile of treatment chemicals it would be a
natural living machine,” said Christie. “The environment would clean
[the wastewater]. But the poor environment, it got hit in the face with
a brick.”

The mill opened on November 14, 1967 and the natural machine didn’t
work. Soon there was a foul stench that hung over the whole area. It
didn’t take long for residents, who were told the waste would be
pristine, to start complaining.

To fix the Boat Harbour pollution, the Nova Scotia government
brought in Rust Consultants of Montreal in December in 1969. Outraged
residents, service clubs and fishermen wrote angry letters to the
consultants. They wrote about foul smells, swarms of bugs and fears for
the fishery.

“If just a few of us who were unlucky enough to live in the
neighbourhood were the only ones affected, we could smile and think of
all the money being spent in our community,” wrote Cameron Garrett.
“But, I say the price is too high.

“Our provincial government took the job of handling waste disposal.
It isn’t doing enough,” he continues. “Must we as citizens, because our
government is a soft touch for slick talking, allow ourselves to allow
them to make a cesspool out of our environment?”

After talking with residents and reviewing other reports, Rust said
there was a problem with Boat Harbour, but it was an aesthetic problem.
To fix the odour, Rust recommended mechanical aerators to add oxygen to
the water. The report also said raising and lowering Boat Harbour’s
water level would take care of the insect problem. Rust dismissed the
lobster industry’s concerns that mill waste was killing lobster larvae
that spawned just outside Boat Harbour.

In the early ’70s, the province and the mill spent several million
of dollars on improvements to the treatment process, the first of many
upgrades. The odour, insects and public outcry subsided somewhat, but
in private, people were still angry.

The band bites back

By the 1980s, the band was fed up with the toxic waste. The
leadership had been focusing their lobbying efforts on the provincial
government. In the mid ’80s Daniel Paul became involved. He felt the
band should sue his employer, the federal department of Indian
Affairs.

“[The province] couldn’t have done anything unless they had the
consent of the federal government. So those are the people you have to
go after,” says Paul. “If the federal government was acting in the best
interests of the band at the time they would have refused it; it’s as
simple as that.”

“I was looking out for the best interests of the band at that point
in time,” explains Paul of his complicated role. “Which was my
responsibility as district superintendent of lands, revenues and
trusts.”

The case never made it to court, but in 1993 the band and the
federal government agreed to a $35 million settlement.

The money dealt only with the federal government’s failure to
protect the interests of the band in the early ’60s. The settlement did
nothing to stop the provincial government treating mill waste in Boat
Harbour, little to deal with the band’s health concerns and nothing to
clean up Boat Harbour. The communities’ anger and health worries
continued.

Health worries have fueled Jonathan Beadle’s personal crusade
against the pollution. He’s a native man from Pictou Landing who has
been protesting the Boat Harbour waste since he was a teenager in the
early ’90s.

“To see Boat Harbour the way my parents see it would be an awesome
thing,” he says. “I’d like to see it back to its original state.”

Today, Boat Harbour is not pristine, but it’s much cleaner than it
once was—water flowing out of Boat Harbour and into Northumberland
Strait is far cleaner than federal standards for pulp mills require.
The people of Nova Scotia, however, are still responsible for all the
waste dumped into Boat Harbour prior to 1995, after which mill owners
Kimberly Clark leased Boat Harbour from the province.

The pre-1995 waste sits in sediment on the bottom of Boat Harbour.
Repeated tests have shown the sediments contain some of the most toxic
chemicals known to science: dioxins, furans, mercury and cadmium.

The reserve’s wells are constantly monitored to see if these
chemicals are leaching into the ground water. These monitoring stations
continue to show clean drinking water. But the locals have their
doubts.

“People get their tap water [from ground wells] but we don’t use
it,” said Beadle. “Nobody wants to use it but it’s there.”

Cathy Felderhof is a physician at the Pictou Landing Health Centre.
She says there are many sick people on the reserve but can’t say for
sure if their ailments are pollution-related. “Skin problems I seem to
see a lot of here, boils—that I think I see more here than when I
practice uptown,” she says. “The health issues—I’ve thought about
that and it’s hard to know whether that’s mill-related.”

Non-native residents share these health concerns. MacKay wonders
about his wife.

“There was never a cleaner living person than she was. She never
smoked a cigarette or anything in her life and she developed lung
cancer and passed away three years ago,” he said. “And maybe it’s not
even related, but you are highly suspicious of it.”

The concerns among non-natives go beyond health issues. There is
resentment among some that the band got money, but non-natives never
got any compensation.

Alexander MacKenzie, a white man from Pictou Landing, took drastic
measures to draw attention to the issue during the 2000 federal
election.

“I went to each one of the candidates and said ‘I need some support
on this, I need this concern addressed and what I’d like to see is a
piece in the media that you will address this concern,'” he says. “I
didn’t get it.”

MacKenzie took out his frustration on a ballot box.

“I just walked out the door with the box, got in my truck, went down
the road, threw it and all the ballots into Boat Harbour and I come
home and waited for action.”

Action came quick. MacKenzie was arrested and charged him with
disrupting an election. He ended up with 30 days of house arrest and
100 hours of community service. MacKenzie protested the Boat Harbour
pollution in Ottawa to serve his 100 hours. MacKenzie repeated the
ballot box theft in the 2006 federal election. He was dubbed “the
ballot box bandit” by media across the country.

More promises

Over the years there have been many promises to clean up Boat
Harbour. It may be one of the most well-studied environmental problems
in the province; literally dozens of reports and studies have been done
since the mill opened, especially in the 1990s. Residents thought the
pollution would end in 1995, when the original agreement to treat the
mill waste expired. But, the province negotiated a 10-year extension to
the deal. The government promised Boat Harbour would close by 2005,
although that date was not in the wording of the agreement.

In 2001 the band signed an agreement with the paper company that saw
the band receive almost a million dollars initially and $200,000 a year
after that. The company and the province wanted to be sure the band
consented to the continued use of Boat Harbour. The band ratified the
deal in 2002. That same year, the province and the mill extended the
treatment agreement to 2030.

Band and mill officials declined to be interviewed for this
article.

At the end of 2005, the treatment operation was still going. In
2006, the deal was amended with December 2008 as the new cleanup
deadline. A provincial licence to allow continued pollution expired at
the end of 2008, with pollution still flowing into Boat Harbour.

Since then, there have been closed-door negotiations between the
province, the mill and the band.

The province has no idea how to clean up Boat Harbour. There have
been a variety of proposals through the years, including a plan to pipe
the waste directly out into the Strait. The most recent plan was to
return Boat Harbour to its natural tidal state.

The province filed an application under the federal environmental
assessment rules and created a website, still posted today, saying this
was the plan. But it had to shelve the idea and go back to the drawing
board.

Citing concerns of eutrophication—out-of-control algae blooms that
kill off all other life—Chris Moir, of the Department of
Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, says turning Boat Harbour
tidal might make the situation worse.

“No one wanted to go ahead if eutrophication was a potential,” says
Moir.

Whatever happens, the province is still on the hook for up to $12
million to dredge Boat Harbour and possibly $100 million for a new
sewage treatment plant, although the federal government and the mill
may contribute to the latter.

However it plays out, MacKay will keep his cynicism.

“We were told so many things that were proved to be untrue that now
you don’t trust anybody with any dealings with Boat Harbour,” he
says.

“I don’t think in our time we’ll ever see it cleaned up.”

This special report was produced by the investigative workshop at King’s: Colin Parrott, Katie May, Zeb Qureshi, Tony Ferguson, Breanne McAdam, Vivian Belik, Zander Brosky, Stephany Tlalka, Terrence McEachern, David Olsen, Steve Davis and photographer John Packman.

You’ll find a lot more on this story, including maps and original documents, at boatharbour.kingsjournalism.com

Related Stories

Join the Conversation

18 Comments

  1. A great job guys, thorough work and balanced perspectives. You worked your butts off with this one.
    Too bad The Coast doesn’t pay closer attention to spell check with front cover flub.

  2. Thank-you for writing this article!!!

    These students did an excellent job! With their perspectives and an eye for exposing some “hidden” environmental problems in NS, I hope they continue down the path of journalism!!

  3. Great job Coast and Kings students! We should get this kind of true investigative journalism from our mainstream media!!

  4. Outstanding work Kings students! Well done. This is the kind of in-depth investigative journalism that has all but disappeared from mainstream news media as costs and jobs are slashed. Prof. Dean Jobb must be very proud of you all. Keep up the good work. I hope there are still some jobs left for you when you graduate.

    As for the story itself – shocking! Clearly the province has paid and will continue to pay a very steep financial and ecological price for the jobs at that mill (not to mention the environmental costs of 50 years of massive clearcutting on the surrounding landscape).

    Methinks the costs have been too high.

    A. Reader, Rural NS

  5. Funny though, none of the other media outlets have picked up the story, even though it will certainly mean that Nova Scotians are on the line for millions of dollars to clean up Boat Harbour.

    I hope it’s because they are waiting for the story to progress, and not because they are suffering from gutting out their newsrooms.

  6. I’m pretty sure it was King’s professor Fred Vallance-Jones who oversaw this project, not Dean Jobb.

  7. Hi
    I’m from Pictou and enjoyed your article. The stink from the plant is not like it was when I was a kid, but I’m biased, I work there.

    Technology has changed in the last 40 years but companies willingness to spend is not. Reduction in pollution is possibe but the PAYBACK period is often too long. It is much easier to export the pollution problem to an area with less controls, small wages, and a more flexible government.

    The big government payoff has long gone.The huge tracts of land was mortgaged and then sold by Neenah Paper and Kimberly Clark (the ones with the cute huggies commercials)to buy Mills in Germany. Then the mill was given to Northern Pulp for 20 Million bucks. This entity gets stuck with a potential environmental nightmare with no equity to lose if it fails. Funny part is the Neenah And KC are now marketing themselves as Green Companies, but did not give two shits about the issues if production was compromised.

    End result: They are gone, The land is gone, the market is shrinking, and the mess will still be there. The big danger we now face locally is broken legs fron steeping in holes left by aour fedaral and provincial politicos sticking their heads in the sand and their arses in the air.

    I do so like the free market in action.

    therepo

  8. valuable information like this was so neglected,when the heavy polluters been to court to ratify this toxic tragedy. hope the next court appearence all eyes and ears will justify the deeply disturbed concerns which neglected contracts where unjustly ignored ,thanks for all concrns and genuine concern on the topic at hand.
    sincerly, concerned band member of p.l.f.n.

  9. I am from New Glasgow… I remember protesting this mess back in 1988 (in high school) with our Environmental Club. We visited the site as a field trip once. Until you see it in person (and smell it) you won’t understand the horrors of this place. The travesty has stuck with me all these years, and my heart goes out to the Native Peoples who have it on their doorstep. We’re talking lakes as black as Coca Cola (one glass of it looks solid black, no light gets through) and it smells like chemicals/swamp/sewage/dead fish all mixed into one. The Sydney tar ponds get a lot of press… Boat Harbour could be a close second as Canada’s biggest environmental disaster. Thanks for telling the story in 2009.

  10. Pollution and Diabetes,

    I wonder what the Type II Diabetes Rate is at Pictou Landing?

    Diabetes may be linked to pollutants
    Published: Jan. 29, 2010 at 4:00 PM – UPI

    WINNIPEG, Manitoba, Jan. 29 (UPI) — There is growing evidence diabetes — especially among indigenous people — may be linked to environmental pollutants, U.S. and Canadian researchers say.

    One-out-of-four indigenous adults living on reserves in Canada have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, The Dominion reports.

    More than a dozen published studies show a diabetes link to persistent organic pollutants, including polychlorinated biphenyls, carcinogenic hydrocarbons, or dioxins and synthetic pesticides such as DDT.

    Environment Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory says there are 212 indigenous communities in Canada living near or downstream from pulp mills and other facilities that produce dioxins and furans.

    In 2006, Dr. Duk-Hee Lee and colleagues found people with the highest rate of exposure to persistent organic pollutants were roughly 38 times more likely to have diabetes than those with the lowest rate of exposure.

    However, people who were obese but did not have high levels of persistent organic pollutants were not at increased risk of developing diabetes.

    A 1994 draft report by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which has never been formally released to the public, says 93 percent of exposure to dioxin comes from the consumption of beef, dairy, milk, chicken, pork, fish and eggs, The Dominion says.

    Bitter Sweet or Toxic? Indigenous people, diabetes and the burden of pollution
    There may be more to diabetes than our diet, or whether or not we get enough exercise. According to several new studies, it may be the result of our exposure to Persistent Organic Pollutants.

    Note: this is a revised version of my article, “Bitter Sweet or Toxic?” featured in this month’s issue of the Dominion, February 2010.

    Bitter Sweet or Toxic?
    Indigenous people, diabetes and the burden of pollution

    WINNIPEG—Diabetes is now widely regarded as the 21st century epidemic. With some 284 million people currently diagnosed with the disease, it’s certainly no exaggeration—least of all for Indigenous people.

    According to the State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples Report by the United Nations, more than 50 per cent of Indigenous adults over the age of 35 have Type 2 Diabetes, “and these numbers are predicted to rise.”

    Diabetes is referred to as a “lifestyle disease,” its rampant spread believed to be caused by obesity due to our increased reliance on the western diet (also known as the “meat-sweet” diet) and our avoidance of regular exercise.

    While these may certainly be contributing factors, there is growing evidence that diabetes is closely linked with our environment. More than a dozen studies have been published that show a connection between Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); carcinogenic hydrocarbons known as Dioxins; and the “violently deadly” synthetic pesticide, DDT and higher rates of the disease.

    “If it is the POPs, not the obesity that causes diabetes, this is really striking if true,” says Dr. David O. Carpenter, director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University of Albany.

    One out of four Indigenous adults living on reserves in Canada have been diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes, the most common form of diabetes. The prevalence of the disease appears to be so great that the number of new cases being diagnosed in Canada may exceed the growth of the Indigenous population. It’s no longer uncommon to find children as young as three with the disease. According to government statistics, 27 per cent of all Indigenous people in Canada will have Type 2 Diabetes in the next ten years.

    Sandy Lake First Nation, in the Sioux Lookout Zone of northern Ontario, has all but met the mark. A March 2009 study co-authored by Dr. Stewart Harris found that 26 per cent of the community has the disease, the highest recorded rate of diabetes in Canada. With a population of 2,500, the northern Cree community was recently described as an “epicentre” of the epidemic.

    There has been little research on the levels of persistent organic pollutants in Sandy Lake; however, according to the First Nations Environmental Health Innovation Network, several neighboring communities who also have high rates of diabetes, like Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug First Nation, are known to have elevated levels of PCBs in their blood.

    The Mohawk community of Akwesasne has its own conflict with diabetes and exposure to POPs. Located across the New York-Ontario-Quebec borders along the St. Lawrence River, three aluminum foundries upriver from the reserve dumped PCBs into the river for decades, contaminating the water, soil, and vegetation.

    For many years, Dr. Carpenter has been involved in the study of Adult Mohawks at Akwesasne. Most recently, in 2007, he took part in a study to examine the diabetes/pollution link in the community. “Our study of adult Mohawks showed a striking elevation in rates of diabetes in relation to blood levels of three persistent organic pollutants, DDE, the metabolite of DDT, hexachlorobenzene and PCBs,” Dr. Carpenter explains. “Our results are quite compatible with those of Lee et al.”

    In 2006, Dr. Duk-Hee Lee and her colleagues showed that people with the highest rate of exposure to POPs were roughly 38 times more likely to have diabetes than those with the lowest rate of exposure. Further, “they showed that people who were obese but did not have high levels of POPs were not at increased risk of developing diabetes,” continues Dr. Carpenter. “Probably the reason most people get obese is that they eat too many animal fats, and this is where the POPs are.”

    The dietary source of POPs was confirmed by the US Environmental Protection Agency in their Draft 1994 Dioxin Reassessment, which has never been formally released to the public. According to the Draft Reassessment, 93 per cent of our exposure to Dioxin comes from the consumption of beef, dairy, milk, chicken, pork, fish, and eggs; in other words, the western diet.

    A May 2001 study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health drew similar conclusions to the EPA Reassessment. In addition, the study found that “nursing infants have a far higher intake of dioxins relative to body weight than do all older age groups,” and that human breast milk was twice as toxic as dairy milk. It also found that vegans had the overall lowest rate of POPs in their bodies.

    According to an October 2009 paper by the Research Centre for Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology at Masaryk University, another major source of POPs, specifically DDT, is the world’s oceans. The paper also found that despite restrictions placed on the use of DDT more than 30 years ago, concentrations of the toxin are on the rise.

    Indigenous people carry an unequally high proportion of this global toxic burden. For instance, according to Environment Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) there are 212 Indigenous communities in Canada living near or downstream from pulp mills and other facilities that produce dioxins and furans. One striking example is the old Dryden pulp mill near Grassy Narrows which, according to the Grassy Narrows and Islington Bands Mercury Disability Board, dumped tonnes of dioxin-laced mercury wastewater into the English-Wabigoon River system from 1962-70.

    Forty years later, the poisonous waste continues to pose a “serious health threat” to Grassy Narrows and the Wabaseemoong First Nations, says the Disability Board. No formal steps have been taken toward remediation by federal or provincial governments.

    The Tohono O’odham Nation’s experience bears a close resemblance to Grassy Narrows: the world’s highest rate of diabetes can be found in the southwest Arizona nation. According to Tribal health officials, nearly 70 per cent of the population of 28,000 has been diagnosed with the illness. The O’odham People make up the second largest Indigenous Nation in the United States.

    Lori Riddle is a member of Aquimel O’odham Community and founder of the Gila River Alliance for a Clean Environment (GRACE).

    GRACE was instrumental in the 10 year struggle against a hazardous waste recycling plant that operated without full permits on O’odham land for decades. Owned by Romic Environmental Technologies Corporation, the plant continuously spewed effluents into the air until it was finally shut down in 2007.

    The Romic plant was not the first contributor to the O’odham’s toxic burden, explained Riddle. Looking back to her childhood, she recalled: “For nearly a year, [when] a plane would go over our heads, you could see the mist. We never thought to cover our water. The chemicals just took over and they became a part of us.”

    From the early 1950s until the late 60s, cotton farmers in the Gila River watershed routinely sprayed DDT onto their crops to protect them from bollworms. According to the Agency of Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), each and every year, the farmers used roughly Twenty-three pounds of DDT per acre.

    In 1969, the State of Arizona banned the use of DDT; by this time the river was gravely contaminated. According to the ATSDR, farmers then switched to Toxaphene, a substitute for DDT—until it was banned by the US government in 1990.

    Because of these chemicals, Riddle explains, the O’odham were forced to abandon their traditional foods and adopt a western diet. Farms also went into a recession, forcing many families to leave their communities. Companies, such as Romic, began moving on to their territory, exasperating the situation. “It’s taken a toll on our quality of life,” she says. “I’ve cried myself to sleep.”

    The O’odham are dealing with what Riddle terms “cluster symptoms” including miscarriages, arthritis in the spine, breathing problems, unexplainable skin rashes, and problems regenerating blood cells. This in addition to diabetes, which frequently leads to renal failure, blindness, heart disease, and amputations.

    More and more studies are being published that show the link between diabetes and persistent organic pollutants like DDT—stemming from the landmark “Ranch Hand” study. In 1998, the study found a 166 per cent increase in diabetes (requiring insulin control) in US Air Force personnel who were sprayed with the herbicide and defoliant Agent Orange during the Vietnam War. The study also found that as dioxin levels increased so did the presence and severity of Type 2 diabetes, the time to onset declined following a similar trend.

    However, Dr. Carpenter notes that because of the widely-endorsed belief that diabetes is a life-style disease related to diet and exercise, the link is gaining little attention by governments, news agencies, or by any of the hundreds of non-profit diabetes foundations around the world. “[It] hasn’t even made it into the medical community at this point,” Dr. Carpenter adds. “It takes a long time to change both medical and public opinion.”

    “Clearly one thing everyone can do is to eat less animal fats,” suggests Dr. Carpenter. Several Indigenous communities in northern Manitoba and British Columbia have begun to do this, planting their own gardens and building greenhouses; returning, in a traditional sense, to some of the foods that sustained them for millennia. Others are turning to exercise, which plays a vital role not just in the prevention of diabetes, but in their overall health.

    “Also, we must find ways of getting the POPs out of the animals that we eat. That is not going to be easy, given how contaminated we have made the world,” adds Dr. Carpenter. For this, Lori Riddle, who is herself a diabetic, points to the Tribal Council and the Federal Government.

    John Schertow is an Indigenous rights advocate and author of the blog, Intercontinental Cry.

    Additional Resources
    Videos
    Introduction to Persistent Organic Pollutants
    Introduction to PCBs
    Plastics and Marine Debris in the world’s oceans
    Film: The Gift of Diabetes
    Studies
    Three Patterns of Rising type 2 Diabetes Prevalence in the World
    Pesticide Exposure and Self-Reported Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus among First Nations and non-First Nations adults
    POPs lead to insulin resistance in rats
    An Exploratory Study of Diabetes in a First Nation Community with Respect to Serum Concentrations of p,p’-DDE and PCBs and Fish Consumption
    Association Between Insulin Resistance and Co-Exposure to Dioxins and Mercury
    Temporal changes in PCB and DDE levels among a cohort of frequent and infrequent consumers of Great Lakes sportfish
    Reports
    New Research: Nitrates and Nitrites May Cause Alzheimer’s, Diabetes and Parkinson’s Disease
    Environmental toxins, a potential risk factor for diabetes among Canadian Aboriginals
    Inorganic mercury causes pancreatic beta-cell death
    Pollution Linked To Obesity, New Study Finds
    Persistant Organic Pollutants may be the cause of diabetes epidemic NOT obesity
    Long-term Pesticide Exposure May Increase Risk of Diabetes
    Common Herbicides and Fibrates Block Nutrient-Sensing Receptor Found in Gut and Pancreas
    Tasmania: Chronic diseases and chemical exposure. The Burden of Diabetes
    BPA Linked to Heart Disease, Diabetes
    Confronting Chronic Pollution: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Risk and Precaution
    Mother Load: Arsenic May Contribute to Gestational Diabetes
    Report: Strong Correlation Between Diabetes and Air Pollution
    Higher farmworker risks include diabetes, respiratory disease
    Further Reading
    Toxic shock: Does dioxin trigger diabetes
    Environmental pollution and diabetes: a neglected association
    DDT used as a chemical warfare agent on Indigenous People
    Diabetes hits almost half of aboriginal women
    Manitoba diabetic refused insulin for living on reserve
    Inside the DDT Propaganda Machine
    Thanks to John Hummel for his tireless research efforts

    Pollution and Diabetes
    Submitted by John Hummel on Sun, 2010-01-31 17:08.
    Source: Emerging Health Threats Forum

    About the Emerging Health Threats Forum: http://www.eht-forum.org/common/aboutus.ht…

    Friday 29 January 2010
    Beyond diet in diabetes
    Pollutants interact with obesity to raise diabetes risk

    Exposure to dioxins is linked to insulin resistance, which causes diabetes, according to research published this month in Epidemiology.1 Experts say that there is now strong evidence for a link between diabetes and exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including dioxins, but that this is still being largely overlooked by the medical community.

    “There’s just been a flood of evidence linking POPs to diabetics in the last five years,” says David Carpenter, Director of the Institute for Health and the Environment at the University at Albany, New York, USA. “When you put this study in the context of what’s being done in other groups, it gives a very convincing story.”

    The researchers, led by Jung-Wei Chang of the National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Taiwan, measured the levels of serum dioxins, fasting glucose, and insulin in 1234 people living near an abandoned pentachlorophenol manufacturing plant. They used a homeostasis model, which uses fasting glucose and insulin levels to estimate insulin resistance. After controlling for risk factors such as age, obesity, and family history of diabetes, they found a positive association, with a linear dose-response, between serum dioxins and the prevalence of insulin resistance.

    Earlier studies have linked a variety of POPs, including dioxins, polychlorinated biphenols (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides such as DDT, to an increased risk of type II diabetes. Since obesity is linked with greater levels of POPs in the body, scientists speculate that the link between obesity and the development of diabetes might be mediated through these toxins.

    “People get obese because they eat too much animal fat, and that’s where the contaminants are,” Carpenter points out. This effect may explain why indigenous populations in Canada are at higher risk of diabetes, Carpenter explains, as they are often exposed to greater levels of POPs than the general population.

    One study in particular,2 led by Duk-Hee Lee of the Kyungpook National University in Daegu, Korea, looked at 2016 participants to the 1999–2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which took blood samples from a cross section of the general US population, and found no association between obesity and diabetes among people with no detectable levels of POPs in their blood. This implies that the risk of diabetes from obesity could be largely due to POPs, which accumulate in adipose tissue, rather than physiological changes that come with obesity, Carpenter says.

    “I am somewhat sceptical of that finding,” says David Jacobs, Professor of Public Health at the University of Minnesota and one of Lee’s co-authors. The association between exposure to POPs and diabetes is stronger in obese people, he points out. But it’s clear that POPs and obesity interact to raise the risk of diabetes, he says.

    This would suggest that losing weight may only partially reduce the risk for diabetes. POPs accumulate in adipose tissue — which means that weight loss releases the toxins back into the blood. “That stuff has got to go somewhere,” Jacobs says. “It’s clear that POPs [released from fat deposits] distribute into blood and other tissues.”

    Worryingly, some data show a stronger association with diabetes at low concentrations of POPs, Jacobs says. “We have seen that kind of pattern, but it’s very difficult to interpret,” says Jacobs. Because of the difficulty of measuring low-level exposure to these pollutants, a lot more research is needed to confirm whether they have this effect, he argues.

    Despite the body of evidence linking POPs and diabetes, the link is still not widely acknowledged in the medical community. “Physicians are totally oblivious to this being a risk factor,” Carpenter says. “The nutrition community have oversold the benefits of fish and underplayed the dangers of contaminants.”

    Although production of many of the toxins studied has been banned worldwide, they persist in the environment, are distributed globally, and continue to bioaccumulate in the food chain. Pesticides like DDT, which are still used in malarial regions, can turn up in the food supply all over the world. And others are still on the increase. “[POP] exposure is to some degree going down, except in the case of flame retardants where exposure is increasing exponentially,” Carpenter says. Flame retardants are structurally very similar to PCBs, he points out, and so these too should be investigated for the potential to cause diabetes — especially as children are among the most highly exposed population groups.

    Reference and links

    1. Chang JW, Chen HS, Su HJ, Liao PC, Guo HR,and Lee CC. Dioxin Exposure and Insulin Resistance in Taiwanese Living Near a Highly Contaminated Area. Epidemiology 2010;21:56–61. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c2fc6e
    2. Lee DH, Lee IK, Song K, Steffes M, Toscano W, Baker BA and Jacobs JR. A Strong Dose-Response Relation Between Serum Concentrations of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1638–1644. doi:10.2337/dc06-0543

    Epidemiology:
    January 2010 – Volume 21 – Issue 1 – pp 56-61
    doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c2fc6e
    Endocrine: Original Article
    Dioxin Exposure and Insulin Resistance in Taiwanese Living Near a Highly Contaminated Area
    Chang, Jung-Wei; Chen, Hsiu-Ling; Su, Huey-Jen; Liao, Po-Chi; Guo, How-Ran; Lee, Ching-Chang

    Abstract
    Background: Several epidemiologic studies suggest a slightly increased risk of type 2 diabetes in relation to background levels of dioxins. Little is known about how serum dioxins might affect insulin resistance, a hallmark of type 2 diabetes. We examined the association between exposure to dioxins and insulin resistance.

    Methods: We investigated 1234 nondiabetic persons living near a deserted pentachlorophenol factory. Using high-resolution gas chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry and blood biochemistry tests, we measured serum dioxins, fasting glucose, and insulin. Finally, we examined associations between serum dioxin levels and the homoeostasis model assessments of insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell function.

    Results: Participants with insulin resistance (index at or above the 75th percentile) had higher dioxin levels (24.3 vs. 19.8 pg WHO98-TEQDF/g lipid) than those without insulin resistance. In both the crude and adjusted models, insulin resistance increased with serum polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofuran (PCDD/F) levels. We found a slight monotonic increase in insulin resistance across the serum PCDD/F categories (P for the trend <0.001). Groups with serum dioxin levels higher than 20.5 pg WHO98-TEQDF/g lipid had higher insulin resistance (adjusted odds ratios of 2.7, 3.5, and 5.0 for 50th to <75th, 75th to <90th, and ≥90th percentile, respectively) compared with the reference group (<9.6 pg WHO98-TEQDF/g lipid [< 10th percentile]). Conclusions: After adjusting for confounding factors, we found a positive association between serum dioxins and the prevalence of insulin resistance. News Release Re: Pollution and Diabetes
    Submitted by John Hummel on Sun, 2010-01-31 17:11.
    Dear Friends,

    The pollution/diabetes connection has received no major news coverage anywhere in the world. I hope you will share the media release below with all your media contacts. Also, please share this information with all your scientific, environmental and Tribal colleagues who are studying diabetes. Much is at stake for the health of people all over the world. All the very best to you.

    For Land and Life,
    John H.W. Hummel,
    Volunteer Pollution/Health Researcher,
    611 Eighth Street, Nelson B.C.
    Canada
    (250)505-2165
    Email: jhwhummel@shaw.ca

    Story Idea: The Link between Pollution and Diabetes

    Health Canada Predicts that within 10 years, 27% of all First Nations people in Canada will have Type II Diabetes. Many First Nations People have been exposed to toxins such as DDT, Dioxin, Arsenic, Cadmium Hexachlorobenzene and PCB’s for many decades.

    For a Summary of the latest Scientific research on this topic, please go to:

    http://www.ajmed.fr/documents/pdf/perturba&hellip;

    For some of the very latest studies on pollution/diabetes links please go to:

    http://groups.google.ca/group/friends-of-a&hellip;

    (and click on ‘show quoted text’)

    The Pesticide DDT, Persistant Pollutants and Diabetes:

    http://groups.google.com/group/friends-of-&hellip;

    Key Scientific Contacts Re: Diabetes and Pollution
    (Please Note, above are links to many of these scientists most recently published and peer reviewed studies on the pollution/diabetes connections):

    1) Dr. David Carpenter carpent@uamail.albany.edu United States

    2) Dr. Duk-Hee Lee lee_dh@knu.ac.kr Korea

    3) Dr. Joel Michalek michalekj@uthscsa.edu United States

    4) Dr. Mary Turyk mturyk1@uic.edu United States

    5) Dr. Miquel Porta mporta@imim.es Spain

    6) Dr. Lars Rylander lars.rylander@med.lu.se Sweden

    7) Dr. Anna Rignell-Hydbom anna.rignell-hydbom@med.lu.se Sweden

    8) Dr. Laurie Chan lchan@unbc.ca Canada

    9) Dr. Harold Schwartz harold_schwartz@hc-sc.gc.ca Canada

    10) Dr. Allen E. Silverstone silversa@upstate.edu United States

    11) Dr. Donna Mergler mergler.donna@uqam.ca Canada
    First Nations Pollution/Health Contacts:

    Research Tools and Contacts for the Communities Re: Pollution and Health

    Dear Friends,

    Many communities are experiencing health problems related to exposure to industrial pollutants. Many people want to investigate the pollution/health links in their community but have little funding and aren’t sure where to begin. To assist people in their pollution/health research, here are a few inexpensive community action tools to get started and some key contacts to compare notes with and get advice from. Hope this information is helpful to protect the health and well being of your community. Also, here are the tools to start a broad based coalition to eliminate pollution and protect the health of the people and the earth. All the best to you all.

    For Land and life,
    Your Friend,
    John H.W. Hummel
    Nelson, B.C.

    ‘Bucket Brigade’ :An Inexpensive Way to Find Out What Pollution is in Your Communities Air: http://www.bucketbrigade.net/article.php?l&hellip;

    Body Mapping for Pollution Related Health Problems: http://www.ohcow.on.ca/clinics/sarnia/docs&hellip;

    More on Body Mapping: http://newsreel.org/transcripts/beloved.ht&hellip;

    Bucket Brigade Contacts: Denny Larson, Global Community Monitor: denny@gcmonitor.org

    Ruth Breech, Global Community Monitor: ruth@gcmonitor.org

    Body Mapping Contacts: Ada Lockridge, Aamjiwnaang First Nation: ada_lockridge@hotmail.com

    James Brophy, Scientist and expert in Worker Health and safety: jimbrophy@sympatico.ca

    Dear Friends,

    Here are a few key contacts for you if you wish to investigate the health impacts of industrial pollution on First Nations, Metis and Inuit people in North America in 2009.

    1) Dr. David Carpenter,Toxicologist, University of Albany, NY: carpent@uamail.albany.edu
    – David has been doing toxics research with the Mohawks of Akwesasne for many years and recently published scientific papers showing a dramatic increase in Diabetes and Heart Disease in
    Akwesasne Mohawks with PCB’s and Pesticides in their blood

    2) Henry Lickers, Akwesasne Mohawk Nation, Cornwall, Ontario: hlickers@akwesasne.ca
    – Henry has worked at the Akwesasne Environment department for decades and can describe the impacts of PCB’s, mercury, pesticides, fluoride etc on his people

    3) Ken Jock, Akwesasne Mohawk Nation, Cornwall, Ontario : ken_jock@srmtenv.org
    – Ken works on environmental issues at Akwesasne and can describe the health impacts pollution has had on his people

    4) Joyce King, Haudenosaune Environmental Task Force: joyceking@westelcom.com
    – Joyce can describe pollution/health impacts on the Six Nations people as a whole

    5) Eva Johnson, Environmental Department, Kahnawake Mohawk Nation: (450) 635-3035 or (450) 635-0600
    -Eva can describe how toxic dumpsites, Lead pollution and solvent pollution from Industry has harmed the health of Kahnawake people e.g. the Scleroderma, heart disease, diabetes and cancer epidemics

    6) Lynn Jacobs, Environmental Department, Kahnawake Mohawk Nation: lynn.jacobs@mck.ca
    – Lynn and Eva are a team and she can well describe pollution/health impacts in her community

    7) Sue Chiblow, Chiefs of Ontario, Environmental Department: sue@coo.org
    – Sue Can describe pollution/health impacts on aboriginal communities all over Ontario

    8) Dr. Michael Gilbertson, Research Scientist: michael.gilbertson@rogers.com
    – Michael discovered possible mercury poisoning (Minamata Disease) outbreaks at specific pollution Hotspots around the Great Lakes and is presently assisting Aamjiwnaang First Nation expose pollution/health problems in their area e.g. skewed birth ratios likely attributable to pollution exposure

    9) James Brophy, Research Scientist: jimbrophy@sympatico.ca
    – James Co-Authored Pollution/Health papers with Michael Gilbertson and is presently helping Aamjiwnaang First Nation expose pollution related health problems in their community

    10) Ron Plain, Aamjiwnaang First Nation, Sarnia, Ontario: rplain@environmentaldefence.ca
    – Ron is a Pollution/Health Activist at Aamjiwnaang and works at Environmental Defence Canada to expose pollution/health issues in Aboriginal Communities

    11) Ada Lockridge, Aamjiwnaang First Nation, Sarnia, Ontario: ada_lockridge@hotmail.com
    – Heads up the Aamjiwnaang Environment Committee exposing Benzene, Mercury etc. impacts on the health of her people

    12) Wilson Plain, Aamjiwnaang First Nation, Sarnia, Ontario: wilsonplain2@hotmail.com
    -Wilson is part of the Aamjiwnaang Environment Committee and was recently found to have PCB’s and all kinds of other industrial toxins in his body

    13) Judy DaSilva, Grassy Narrows First Nation, Ontario: jsilva@northone.ca
    -Judy is a Clan Mother, Healer, environmental activist and spokesperson at Grassy Narrows and can tell you about the mercury poisoning in her community, the dioxins and furans found in Grassy’s wild meat and the herbicide spraying of Grassy’s traditional territory

    14) Steve Fobister Sr., Grassy Narrows First Nation, Ontario: gsfobister@hotmail.com
    – Steve is a Councillor at Grassy Narrows First Nation and has been a leader of his people for decades.
    Steve can tell you about what has happened at Grassy from all the pulp-mill pollution and herbicide spraying.
    My pal Steve, his daughter and his little Granddaughter and many of his other family members all have Mercury Poisoning from that Pulp Mill at Dryden

    15) Joe B. Fobister, Grassy Narrows First Nation, Ontario: jbfobister@yahoo.ca
    – Joe is a spokesperson for the Grassy Blockaders and a leader of his community. He can tell you all about what the pollution has done to the health of his people

    16) Sherry Fobister, Grassy Narrows First Nation, Ontario: namesfobister@hotmail.com
    -Sherry is another dear friend. She is a great spokesperson and can tell you firsthand about the difficulties she has faced as a single Mum dealing with her own mercury related health problems as well as that of her little daughter Catherine

    17) Emily Fobister, Grassy Narrows First Nation,Ontario: mommie52006@hotmail.com
    – Emily did a Sacred walk to help her people heal from all the industrial sicknesses harming her family and people. She inspired many youth and helped many people.

    18) Dr. Masazumi Harada, Mercury Expert in Japan: mharada@kumagaku.ac.jp
    – Dr. Harada discovered mercury poisoning at Grassy Narrows and Whitedog in the 1970’s and found new cases amongst Grassy children when he returned and tested people in 2003.

    19) Dr. Leanne Simpson, Expert on First Nations Pollution/Health Issues: leannesimpson@sympatico.ca
    – Leanne worked on the Grassy Narrows/Wabauskang wild meat testing study and is presently investigating all the deaths and sickness among Wabauskang people from when they lived at Quibel, Ontario immediately downstream from the Dryden Pulp Mill

    20) Betty Riffel, Wabauskang First Nation, Ontario: bet093@hotmail.com
    – Betty is working with Leanne Simpson to investigate the deaths of all those infants when her people lived at Quibel. She also worked on the Grassy Narrows/Wabauskang wild meat study where they recently found mercury, furans etc. in the fish and wildmeat eaten by the people

    21) Damien Lee, Fort William First Nation, Ontario: connectwithdamien@gmail.com
    -Damien heads up the Anishinabek of the Gitchi Gami (AGG) environmental group at Fort William First Nation and is knowledgable about the hundreds of random dumpsites at his community, the pollution from local industry surrounding his community and much more!

    22) Wendy Solomon, Fort William First Nation, Ontario: ladysigni_sha@msn.com
    – Wendy is the outreach coordinator for AGG and another dedicated environmental/health advocate at Fort William First Nation who knows alot about pollution/health issues

    33) Betsy Mandamin, Grand Council Treaty 3, Kenora, Ontario: health@treaty3.ca
    – Betsy works at Treaty 3 Health department and has much knowledge of Mercury pollution and environmental/health issues in the whole Treaty 3 Area

    34) Dorothy Friday, Grand Council Treaty 3, Kenora, Ontario: health@treaty3.ca
    – Dorothy also works at Treaty 3 Health Department and knows alot about pollution/health issues in the Treaty 3 Area

    35) Steve and Susanne Lawson, First Nations Environment Network (FNEN), Tofino, B.C.: councilfire@hotmail.com
    – Steve and Susanne co-ordinate FNEN, are lifelong environmental activists and can put you in touch with dozens of Aboriginal communities impacted by pollution

    36) Tom Goldtooth, Director, Indigenous Environment Network (IEN): ien@igc.org
    – Tom Coordinates the IEN south of the border, a big focus of IEN has been pollution/health issues and he can put you in touch with Aboriginal communities who have health problems due to pollution all over North America and beyond!

    38) Allister Marshall, FNEN – East Coast: amarshall@potlotek.ca
    -Allister is very knowledgable about pollution/health issues impacting First Nations on the East Coast of Canada

    39) Ishbel Munro, FNEN – East Coast: coastalnet@ns.sympatico.ca
    -Ishbel has been an advocate for environmental/Aboriginal issues for decades and can put you in touch with pollution impacted First Nations all over (especially in Nova Scotia)

    40) Willi Nolan, Elder/Environmental Activist, East Coast: willi@web.ca
    – Willi is a respected Anishinawbe Elder who is very knowledgable about pollution/health impacts on First Nations communities. Willi’s main focus is to share traditional knowledge of the environment and Mother Earth with the youth. Willi has done truly remarkable things! Someone should write a book about her.

    41) Al Hunter, FNEN – Ontario: tbird2@netscape.net
    – Al Hunter is a former Chief of his people, a respected Elder (even though he is young) and knows lots about pollution in the Manitou Rapids, Rainy River area of Ontario. He has many contacts knowledgable about pollution/health impacts on Aboriginal communities.

    42) Fred Greene, Grand Council Treaty 3, Kenora, Ontario: fred.greene@treaty3.ca
    – Fred is a political advisor to the Ogichida of Grand Council Treaty 3 and is very knowledgable about pollution impacts on the Treaty 3 First Nations

    43) Alan Penn, Expert on Mercury Poisoning of James Bay Cree: apenn@gc.ca
    – Alan is an expert on the Mercury pollution of the James Bay Cree communities

    44) Jennifer Foulds, Environmental Defence Canada (EDC): jfoulds@environmentaldefence.ca
    – Jennifer works with Ron Plain at EDC. EDC is presently engaged in uniting First Nations, Environmental NGO’s and Scientists to battle pollution impacting the health of us all.

    45) David McLaren, Saugeen First Nation, Ontario: d.mclaren@the-matrix.ca
    – David is a pollution/health/environment expert from Saugeen First Nation

    46) Dean Jacobs, Walpole Island First Nation, Ontario: dean.jacobs@wifn.org
    – Dean is a pollution/health/environment expert at Walpole Island First Nation

    47) Dr. John O’Connor, Former Dr. for Fort Chipewyan People: gramocroi@shaw.ca
    – Dr. O’Connor discovered rare cancers in the people of Fort Chipewyan First Nation in Alberta likely due to pollution from Tar sands development. The Government has been hounding him and trying to take away his Physicians lisence ever since he went public with his concerns for Fort Chipewyan people.

    48) George Poitras, Health Official, Fort Chipewyan Area: george.poitras@shawbiz.ca
    – George is one of the spokespeople for First Nations in Alberta concerned about pollution/health problems associated with Tar sands Development in northern Alberta.

    49) Kevin Timoney, Researcher: ktimoney@compusmart.ab.ca
    – Kevin did a huge report on pollution from the Tar Sands development which could be harmful to First Nations in the area.

    50) Winona LaDuke, Famous First Nations Environmental Activist: honorearth@earthlink.net
    -Winona is a very famous Native American environmental activist who can tell you alot about pollutions health impacts on Aboriginal communities all over North America

    51) Chief Thomas Alexis, Chief of Tl’azt’en First Nation, B.C.: thomas.alexis@tlazten.bc.ca
    – Many of Chief Alexis’s people are sick and dying of mercury poisoning from an old mercury mine in northern B.C. He has many stories to tell on that topic.

    52) Brenda Duncan, Haisla First Nation, Kitimat, B.C.: executivedir@uniserve.com
    – Brenda heads up the Nanakila Institute which protects the environment in Haisla Traditional Territory. She can tell you about the impacts of pollution from Alcan, Eurocan and Methanex on the health of her people

    53) Sheila Watt-Cloutier, Famous Inuit Leader and Environmental Activist: iccan@baffin.ca
    – Sheila is a very famous Inuit leader and environmental activist who can tell you all about what the mercury, dioxin and PCB’s from Southern industry has done to the health of Aboriginal people of the Circumpolar Region

    54) Ramsey Hart, Mining Watch Canada: ramsey@miningwatch.ca
    – Ramsey heads up Mining Watch Canada which is a collaberation of environmental NGO’s, First Nations organizations and labour groups. He can tell you lots about the impacts of mining and smelting impacts on the health and well being of aboriginal communities all over Canada.

    55) Jamie Kneen, Mining Watch, Canada: jamie@miningwatch.ca
    – Jamie is an aboriginal rights/environmental justice activist from way back! He is a treasure trove of knowledge and contacts on pollution impacts in Aboriginal communities.

    All the best to you

    For Land and Life,
    John H.W. Hummel
    Nelson, B.C.

    UPI and Pollution/Diabetes Story in the Dominion
    Submitted by John Hummel on Sun, 2010-01-31 17:25.
    A Summary of this article has just gone Global! Good work!

    United Press International Has Just Sent this out All Over the World! It’s all over the internet if you Google the Web using the Key words “diabetes may be linked to Pollutants”

    Link
    http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2010/01/29/&hellip;

    Aboriginal Women Suffer Surge in Diabetes
    Submitted by John Hummel on Sun, 2010-01-31 21:40.
    Link to full text of New Study: http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/rapidpdf/cmaj.09084&hellip;
    Link to Article on Gestational Diabetes and Pesticide Exposure: http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/new&hellip;

    Link to Full Text of Gestational Diabetes/Pesticide Exposure Study: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/3&hellip;

    Please Note: Pesticides have been found in the fish and wildmeat eaten by many First Nations communities all across Canada. That is in addition to the body burden of pesticides we all carry by simply eating a variety of store bought foods.
    Aboriginal women suffer surge in diabetes
    Native people, especially women, are developing the disease in their 40s – 30 years sooner than non-natives, study finds

    André Picard Public Health Reporter

    From Tuesday’s Globe and Mail Published on Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2010 9:16AM EST Last updated on Tuesday, Jan. 19, 2010 9:45AM EST

    The rate of diabetes among aboriginal women is four times that of women in the general Canadian population, a new study reveals.

    Moreover, members of first nations are developing the debilitating illness by their 40s, while in the rest of society it tends to strike people in their 70s.

    “Diabetes is a disease of young first-nations adults with a marked predilection for women,” said lead author Roland Dyck of the department of community health and epidemiology at the University of Saskatchewan.

    “In contrast, diabetes is a disease of aging non-first-nations adults that is more common in men,” he said.

    Dr. Dyck said the big difference in the age of onset has serious implications; diabetes is one of the principal causes of blindness, amputations, kidney failure and heart disease.

    The study, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, examined trends among patients diagnosed with diabetes in Saskatchewan from 1980 to 2005. The sample included 8,275 aboriginal people and 82,306 non-aboriginals.

    The data paint a troubling picture of an unrelenting diabetes epidemic in native communities that “is likely to continue increasing in the foreseeable future,” the paper notes.

    Dr. Dyck and his team found that in 2005, 20 per cent of women and 16 per cent of men living in native communities had Type 2 diabetes. That was up sharply from 9.5 per cent and 4.9 per cent respectively in 1980.

    Rates of diabetes in the non-aboriginal population rose to 5.5 per cent from 2 per cent in women over the same period, and to 6.2 per cent from 2 per cent in men.

    Over all, the incidence (the frequency of development of diabetes in a population over a given time period) and the prevalence (the number of people currently suffering from the disease) were both about four times higher among aboriginal women and 2.5 times higher among aboriginal men.

    The epidemiological study was not designed to explain the underlying causes of this disparity, but Dr. Dyck put forth a couple of likely explanations.

    First, it has been well documented that rates of overweight and obesity are significantly higher in native communities. (Excess weight, particularly in the abdominal area, is a key factor in Type 2 diabetes.) In aboriginal communities, women are more likely to be overweight or obese than men, and at a younger age.

    Second, there are high rates of gestational diabetes in pregnant aboriginal women. Those who develop diabetes during pregnancy are at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes later in life, and so are their children.

    “Gestational diabetes has been implicated in the intergenerational ‘vicious cycle’ by increasing diabetes among the offspring,” Dr. Dyck said.

    He added that the differences in the epidemiology of the disease in native and non-native people means prevention programs should be different as well.

    In particular, programs for first nations should focus on women in their reproductive years and on preventing gestational diabetes, Dr. Dyck said.

    There are three distinct forms of diabetes: Gestational diabetes is a temporary condition that occurs during pregnancy; Type 1 diabetes, usually diagnosed in children, occurs when the pancreas is unable to produce insulin; Type 2 diabetes occurs when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin, or the body does not effectively use the insulin it produces.

    About 90 per cent of diabetics have Type 2 disease, which is usually a consequence of obesity, inactivity, poor diet and aging. Poverty is also strongly associated with diabetes, which could be another factor that helps explain high rates in native communities.

    Dear Friends,

    The discovery, in the new scientific study described below, is very significant regarding the relationship between exposure to persistent organic pollutants and the onset of insulin resistance related diseases like Type II Diabetes. You can view the full text of this important study at this Link:

    http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2009/0901&hellip;
    All the best to you.

    For Land and Life,
    John H.W. Hummel
    Pollution/Health Researcher
    Nelson, B.C.
    Canada

    Environmental Health News – January 14, 2010

    POPs lead to insulin resistance in rats.
    Jan 14, 2010

    Ruzzin J, R Petersen, E Meugnier, L Madsen, EJ Lock, H Lillefosse, T Ma, S Pesenti, SB Sonne, TT Marstrand, MK Malde, ZY Du, C Chavey, L Fajas, AK Lundebye, CL Brand, H Vidal, K Kristiansen and L Froyland. 2009. Persistent organic pollutant exposure leads to insulin resistance syndrome. Environmental Health Perspectives doi:10.1289/ehp.0901321.

    Context
    What did they do?
    What did they find?
    What does it mean?
    Resources
    More new science from EHN

    ——————————————————————————–

    Synopsis by Negin P. Martin, Ph. D , Kathleen M. McCarty, Sc.D. and Wendy Hessler

    ShareThis

    NatalieMaynor/flickr
    Male rats fed fish oil from farmed salmon developed insulin resistance, obesity and related health issues.
    A new study in rats shows that persistent organic pollutants (POPs) – at levels found in food – cause insulin resistance and associated obesity and liver disease in the animals. The study is the first to show this experimentally. Insulin resistance can lead to type 2 diabetes, which is becoming a global epidemic. The association between high levels of POPs in people and increased chance of developing diabetes has been known since 2006. Until now, scientists could not positively conclude that POPs influenced the onset of diabetes.

    Context
    Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are a diverse group of toxic chemicals that resist degradation and can remain in the environment for decades. The compounds are known to adversely affect health in people and wildlife.

    POPs include organochlorine pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins and furans. Many of the synthetic chemicals were created for use in agriculture and construction. Others were used in, or are byproducts of, industry. Some – such as dioxins – also occur naturally as a result of burning and combustion.

    The US and Europe banned the production and use of certain POPs more than 30 years ago. This ban was expanded globally during this century. Yet, due to their chemical nature, they can remain intact, persist in the environment and accumulate in wildlife and people. They build up in farmland soils and waterways, contaminating wildlife and making their way up the food chain. People are exposed through eating contaminated fish, poultry, meat and dairy products.

    The hormone insulin helps in the uptake and storage of the sugar glucose – a basic regulator of metabolism. Insulin resistence occurs when cells do not respond to the hormone. This allows glucose levels to build up in the blood and leads to more serious health problems. Additionally, insulin and the uptake of glucose regulate the formation of fat.

    In the U.S., one out of four adults have metabolic abnormalities that are associated with insulin resistance. Typical symptoms of insulin resistance are fatigue, obesity, accumulation of fat around the belly and difficulty regulating the blood levels of fat and sugar. Insulin resistance is the underlying cause of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular problems and liver disease.

    These drastic increases in metabolic disorders cannot be totally explained by current known risk factors – high fat diets and lack of exercise. Based on animal and human research findings, some scientists suspect that POPs have the potential to contribute to the diabetes epidemic that threatens people around the globe. Human studies have found associations between an increased chance of developing type 2 diabetes and higher levels of POPs in the body (Lee et al. 2006). Animal research has pointed in the same direction.
    What did they do?
    Adult male rats were fed for 28 days either crude or refined fish oil obtained from farmed Atlantic salmon carcasses.

    The crude fish oil contained the levels of POPs that people are typically exposed to after eating the fish. The refined fish oil contained no POPs and was fed to the control rats. The levels of fat in both diets were the same.

    After exposure, the researchers measured body weight, whole-body insulin sensitivity and levels of POPs in each group. They compared the levels of fat, triacylglycerol, diacylglycerol and cholesterol in the rat livers.

    They also determined how well rats could regulate sugars and fats and measured the expression of several key genes that are thought to be involved in the metabolic process.

    In a parallel study, fat cells were exposed to the types of POPs that were stored in the fish fat cells at similar levels found in the salmon oil. The effects on sugar uptake by the cells were measured.

    What did they find?
    Adult rats exposed to the crude fish oil – which contained the POPs mixture – put on belly fat and developed insulin resistance and liver disease. The rats could not regulate fat properly. They had higher levels of cholesterol and the fatty acids triacylglycerol and diacylglycerol in their livers.

    In contrast, none of these changes were seen in the rats that ate fish oil without the POPs.

    Although blood levels of insulin and sugar were similar among rats with either diet, the rats exposed to POPs had impaired insulin action. The POPs also altered the expression of number of genes involved in metabolism, which could explain the changes in fat and sugar regulation.

    Similar results on insulin and gene expression were seen in the cultured fat cells that were exposed to a POPs mixture similar to that found in the fish oil. The POPs – especially the organochlorine pesticides – drastically inhibited insulin’s action and the cells’ ability to take up glucose, a first step in insulin resistence.The cells expressed fewer of the genes that regulate fat and sugar levels.

    Further analysis showed the liver and fat tissue differed in the components they predominantly store. PCBs and organochlorine pesticides were measured in both liver and fat tissue while certain types of dioxins and furans were more abundant in the liver.

    What does it mean?
    Based on this study, daily exposure to POPs mixtures in food at levels found naturally in the environment leads to insulin resistance and an impaired ability to metabolize fat and sugar in adult male rats. The levels measured in the rats’ fat tissues were relevant to humans, as they were similar to those previously reported for middle-aged Europeans.

    This rodent study is the first to find that POPs can cause abnormal insulin action and adds an important missing piece to the growing body of human research that has found associations between POPs levels and insulin resistance that could cause such serious health problems as type 2 diabetes, obesity and liver disease.

    Generally, animal studies provide a way to ask and answer health-related questions that cannot be studied directly in people. Humans and rats share similar hormones that work in the same general way to guide metabolism and reproduction. Because of these similarities, rats and mice are used to assess both potential drug therapies and potential effects from environmental toxicants. Results from animal studies supply insights into what might be occurring with respect to health and disease in people.

    Animals and people accumulate these long-lived compounds from food and store them in fat. Most of us carry at least some types of the chemicals in our bodies. The authors say their results indicate that POPs – as with some other indicted environmental chemicals found in air pollution and plastics – “provide additional evidence that global environmental pollution contributes to the epidemic of insulin resistance-associated metabolic diseases.”

    The World Health Organization estimates that more than 300 million people will die from disease associated with insulin resistance and metabolic disorders by 2015. The current strategies for prevention include limiting dietary intake and increasing physical activity. This study suggests that considering the role of POPs may be warranted in prevention strategies.

    Current methods of risk assessment may also fall short in protecting health, since different types of POPs mixtures impaired insulin action differently. Some did, while others did not. The dioxin and dioxin-like PCB levels that changed insulin action did not fall within the standard measure of toxicity – called the total toxic equivalent (TEQ) concentration – that is currently used to regulate safe exposures to environmental chemicals. The findings “demonstrate that risk assessment based on TEQ assigned to dioxins and dioxins-like PCBs” does not include the risk of insulin resistance, according to the study’s authors.

    POPs production and use are regulated worldwide. For example, in the U.S., regulations imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency have significantly reduced the release of dioxins and furans. Globally, a number of international laws limit or ban their use.

    The chemicals classified as POPs do not degrade easily, so even limited production will still have an additive effect over the years. Because of this, POPs will continue to impact the environment – and possibly human health – into the future.

    ShareThis

    Resources
    Insulin resistence and pre-diabetes. The National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse, The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

    Lee, DH, IK Lee, K Song, M Steffes, W Toscano, BA Baker and DR Jacobs. 2006. A strong dose response relation between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and diabetes: Results from the National Health and Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care 29(7):1638-1644.

    Persistant organic pollutants. United Nations Environment Programme.

    Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Stockholm Convention.

    Contaminants and diabetes

    Search
    13 October Dioxin tied to metabolic syndrome in Japan. A large new epidemiological study in Japan finds that even at background levels of exposure, people with higher levels of dioxin and dioxin-like PCBs are a significantly greater risk to metabolic syndrome, which includes high blood pressure and Type 2 diabetes. Environmental Health News.

    18 August In human fat tissue, Bisphenol A inhibits release of a hormone that protects people from diabetes and heart attacks. In human fat tissues, bisphenol A suppresses levels of a key hormone, adiponectin, that protects people from heart attacks and Type II diabetes. Environmental Health News.

    3 May Insulin dependant diabetes mellitus: implications for male reproductive function — Agbaje et al., 10.1093/humrep/dem077 — Human Reproduction Men with diabetes have increased levels of DNA damage in their sperm. Human Reproduction.

    15 April Birth Weight and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis — Harder et al. 165 (8): 849 — American Journal of Epidemiology There is a non-monotonic relationship between birth weight and risk of Type II diabetes later in life. American Journal of Epidemiology.

    6 January Increased rate of hospitalization for diabetes and residential proximity of hazardous waste sites. People living closer to hazardous waste sites containing persistent organic pollutants are more likely to be hospitalized for diabetes. Environmental Health Perspectives.

    More news about
    Contaminants and diabetes

    Copyright © 2003 Environmental Health Sciences. All rights reserved.

  11. with all this information and the promise from the previous government. Not surprised the new government “NDP”, will not honour the previous governements committment of closure and clean up of the treatment facilty. Thanks for coming to our community and telling us it was on the top of your list!

  12. Please don’t forget that Pictou Landing has many residents and not all of them are native people, yet the latter are the only people who have received any compensation. Many in the “white” population at Pictou Landing are physically closer to the toxic mess, but they get no attention whatsoever. Environmental illnesses, cancers and diabetes don’t observe racial divisions. We’re all in this together, but the provincial government – though disinformation campaigns – has managed to divide and conquer us all.

  13. And this is the same sort of legacy the government will be leaving future generations if they allow fracking in the province.

  14. i live in pictou landing. the water was fun elders told stories of how they went swimming.i listen to how the mill lied to them saying that the water will not get polluted but the next day when people went to go swim hunt and fish they found the water all black and the fish were bad 🙁

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *