When Don Connolly sat down last Wednesday to play on-air poker with NS Finance Minister Graham Steele, the veteran CBC Information Morning host was holding a royal flush. That winning hand had been dealt to him two days earlier by gambling expert John McMullan. The Saint Mary’s prof told Connolly that the real reason provincial governments want to get into online gambling is that they’re hoping to grab money flowing to big, private sites such as Full Tilt Poker and Poker Stars. That was Connolly’s 10 of spades. McMullan’s point that the NS government’s own figures show that only 1.6 percent of the population actually gambles online was Connolly’s jack. His queen consisted of McMullan’s observation that a government online site would stand little chance of enticing existing gamblers from glitzy private sites that offer big prizes and bonuses. So, McMullan said, handing Connolly his king, the government would have to lure people into online gambling who hadn’t tried it before. McMullan added that would likely lead to more gambling addictions with their high social costs. And that was Connolly’s ace.
I couldn’t help admiring Graham Steele. After all, he knew that, thanks to John McMullan’s expertise, Connolly held an unbeatable hand. Yet, Steele’s office still called CBC requesting that the minister be given a chance to respond. Steele clearly thought he could bullshit enough to make up for his own miserable cards. “Internet gambling is right here, right now. There are thousands of Nova Scotians who do it,” Steele told Connolly. That was his pair of deuces.
His four of hearts consisted of his claim that “we have to seriously consider the possibility of having a regulated, Nova Scotia site in order to deal with the problem of the illegal, unregulated, offshore gambling sites.” Steele admitted the government couldn’t stop Nova Scotians from going to private gambling sites, but in an obvious bluff he added, “I cannot consider it to be responsible to leave problem gamblers to the mercy of illegal, unregulated offshore gambling sites many of which are thought to be fronts for organized crime.” Steele suggested that government-run online gambling would raise money that could be used to help problem gamblers. That was his six of clubs. He said alcohol prohibition didn’t work a hundred years ago and therefore, prohibiting online gambling wouldn’t work now. That was Steele’s joker.
As I listened, I noticed that, in spite of his great cards, Connolly seemed inept and unsure of himself. It reminded me of a saying about poker that applies equally well to radio interviewing: A player’s character is revealed at the table; unless he is able to see himself as others do, flaws and all, he will be a loser in cards, as in journalism.
Instead of triumphantly laying down the hand that McMullan had dealt him, Connolly desperately tried to pluck new cards out of thin air. He strayed from the pros and cons of online government gambling to talk about problems caused by VLTs. “I can’t imagine you don’t look at that and just shiver as an individual and as an ethical person,” Connolly told Steele who answered without missing a beat that “Nova Scotia spends more money than any other province on problem gambling.”
Shortly after that, Connolly folded. The interview and poker match were over, an easy, on-air victory for Steele. Connolly may have been impressed by Steele’s “good points,” but I suspect most CBC listeners would agree with SMU prof John McMullan’s observation, on another CBC program, that statistics can’t begin to convey the suffering caused by problem gambling.
“We sometimes forget that what a statistic really is, is a human being with the tears wiped off,” he said. “There are lots of examples of people whose lives have been devastated by different forms of gambling in the province.” McMullan added the NS government should think twice about getting into online gambling—a business that exploits the citizens the government supposedly serves.
This article appears in Sep 2-8, 2010.
I heard the prof interview and did not need to hear the Steele excuses.
Why are prominent NDP supporters not outraged and out in public expressing disgust at the plan to give more people the heartache of addictive gambling ?
The Raging Grannies appear not to be outraged, must be under central NDP office instructions to stay away from the library.
Anyone who heard the two interviews won’t be bothered by the alleged failure of Connolly to wipe the deck with Steele. You don’t need a high IQ to realise that Connolly just let Steele hang himself. Looks good on him, if he had a shred of decency he’d resign. As should Marilyn More and Ms MacDonald.
I wonder what Stephen Lewis and Jack Layton think of this plan.
Tommy Douglas must be turning in his grave, again.
Do you know why there are so many Casion’s people ?
Because they make a profit…a very big profit.
No one is forcing anyone to play at these places & no one is being forced to play at a government run gambling site.
Since the suck…I mean gamblers are going to play anyway, I would much rather see govenment profit from it than say, the Mafia.
The Government will undoubtably waste much of the profits, (they waste so damn much tax dollars now) I can’t see how this will change anything. BUT one can be hopeful that with this large revenue stream the rest of us will see smaller tax increases to pay for the asshol…I mean Politicians wasteful ways.
SO since I don’t gamble & I do pay taxes, I could possibly come out ahead by this !
Perhaps the GST will even be lowered again ! ! !
Come on Lady Luck, papa needs a new big screen TV ~;)
It’s *blood money* plain and simple. You could make the same argument for government run porn, meth or assassination contracts (oh ya… we do that don’t we?). It’s amazing though how free-market thinking has collapsed all value of personal responsibility, community and altruism. It would seem government is just here to build our Thunderdomes.