Halifax has tried to convince residents that tap, not bottled, water is best for everyday drinking and cooking, for some time now. Tap the Tap, a new campaign by Nova Scotia pediatricians, is urging parents to get their kids consuming tap water. While water is always a healthier choice than sugary drinks, and Halifax Water provides an excellent product, unfortunately the utility also chooses to fluoridate HRM water. This optional step in municipal water treatment has led many citizens to resort to buying bottled water or home filtration systems, in order to avoid the added fluoride.

Why would an educated individual with no aversion to science choose to avoid fluoridated water? Safe Water Halifax members started meeting because we were unconvinced of the pro-fluoridation arguments we’ve heard. There is a strongly documented body of scientific evidence which opposes fluoridation on multiple grounds: it does not prevent cavities in children or adults; it is linked to hypothyroidism and thyroid cancer; it leads to discoloured teeth (fluorosis) and brittle bones. The chemical additive sodium hexafluorosilicate, which is added to fluoridate water, is a substance which Halifax Water customers pay for. The argument that it is a “free” treatment is invalid—the cost is part of our water bills.

There is a passing of the buck when it comes to who is responsible for the decision to fluoridate in HRM. Halifax Water notes on its website that the use of fluoride is controversial, and defers to the provincial medical officer of health’s opinion on the substance. His opinion is not binding: there are Nova Scotian municipalities which opt not to fluoridate, and at least one in which high levels of naturally occurring fluoride were being removed from municipal water at great expense.

Ultimately, what is at issue is not the right to use fluoride—if individuals choose to buy fluoridated toothpaste and get fluoride applications at the dentist, that’s their personal choice. The problem is when the sodium hexafluorosilicate is added to the municipal water treatment chain, leaving citizens with no choice other than bottled water if they want it fluoride-free. (Brita filters, incidentally, cannot remove fluoride from water.) Opting out of imbibing the chemical becomes the choice; the default position is consuming a drug most of us were never prescribed, at a dose which is dependent on how thirsty we are.

Just think: if Halifax Water was adding any other drug/chemical to the water, would you be concerned? Should tap water be used as a distribution medium for medication?

In other communities across Canada, there’s been debate about municipal water fluoridation. Citizens have spoken out against unnecessary additives in their drinking water, citing scientists like environmental chemistry and toxicology professor emeritus Paul Connett, PhD of St. Lawrence University; dentists like Dr. Hardy Limeback, a biochemistry PhD and former head of preventive dentistry at the University of Toronto. Yet in some locations, such as Cape Breton Regional Municipality, council has short-circuited meaningful debate about fluoridation. This is typically done by accusing opponents of fluoridation with “not understanding science” and belittling them with ad hominem attacks.

Whenever fluoride debates erupt, the “what about poor children?” argument is dutifully trotted out. Considering that every inexpensive toothpaste on the market contains sodium fluoride, it is very easy for even the poorest families to access fluoride, should they wish to. This allows parents to control their children’s exposure to fluoride, thus preventing the unlimited dose that kids get when they are drinking fluoridated water throughout the day. Fluoride-free toothpastes are expensive; if a parent wants to avoid the substance, they had better have deep pockets.

Israel is ending all fluoridation in summer 2014, citing health concerns. No community will be allowed to continue the practice. Last December, Moncton voted to end fluoridation. CBC News reported that the move would save the city $100,000 annually.

Safe Water Halifax is a recently created group, and we would like to meet with other residents of HRM who want their water fluoride-free. We don’t wear tinfoil hats or talk about conspiracy theories—the goal is simply to work together to encourage the end of Halifax Water’s fluoridation practice. You can find us on Facebook or Twitter @safewaterhfx.

Dana Landry is a founding member of Safe Water Halifax. She works in the natural health field and hopes to ‘”ap the tap’”once the fluoride is gone.

Join the Conversation

44 Comments

  1. Up next – why vaccines are bad for your children and on the late news tonight we’ll have a panel discussion on chem trails – ‘ Why is the government poisoning our skies ?” But first, a message from our sponsor.
    This is CNN, Conspiracy News Network.

  2. The world has learned the truth that fluoridation is ineffective for teeth and dangerous to health, so only 5% of the world and only 3% of Europe fluoridate their drinking water. To see why, Google “Fluoride dangers” and read a few of the 800,000 articles.

    Medical professionals should be ashamed to support such a crude and unethical practice which results in cancer, thyroid & pineal gland damage, broken hips from brittle bones, lowered IQ, kidney disease, arthritis and other serious health problems.
    See “Dangerous Health Effects” at http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/health/.

  3. Gah. Other commenters have addressed the tinfoil-hat nature of the argument, but let’s address the author’s financial argument: Removing fluoride saved Moncton $100,000.

    $100,000?

    For a public-health measure that benefits every single person in the city, $100,000 is nothing.

  4. I’ll stop drinking bottled water when the water commission can do something about the foul smelling and tasting water in my area … this happened last year and it’s happened again …

  5. There is a place in West Virginia called Green Bank, which is a radio free zone to eliminate interference at a local observatory.

    It is also becoming a mecca for people who believe they are allergic to radio signals (*giggle*). Seems a good place for you, author.

  6. I do not really care one way or another about flouride in the water, but I dispute the point “Considering that every inexpensive toothpaste on the market contains sodium fluoride, it is very easy for even the poorest families to access fluoride, should they wish to.”

    Considering I can buy my child an inexpensive, and unhealthy, meal or a tube of toothpaste to eat, I’ll choose the meal. Less risks. He can get his flouride drinking the water.

    What would the city do with $100,000 extra a year anyway? Not anything to help the less fortunate residents like donating it to FEED Nova Scotia.

  7. The government has no place in medicating me, wether it’s good or bad. I’ll leave that to medical professionals like my doctor.

  8. The reader’s of this article should be adequately informed about the scientific facts of fluoride, which Dana fails to accomplish here.

    Firstly, fluoride is not a drug. Fluoride is a mineral found naturally in the earth’s crust. It is found in oceans and most fresh water supplies have some level of fluoride in them.

    Over NINETY national and international professional health organizations (including the Canadian Dental Association and the World Health Organization) support the use of fluoride for preventing cavities.

    Dental cavities is still a major problem in our society today, and may even be becoming a greater problem with the rates of obesity and sugar consumption rapidly rising.

    Valid systematic scientific review studies have been done, including the review done in 1991 by the U.S. Public Health Service Committee, which found NO association between levels of fluoride in water and human toxicity causing cancers, etc.

    As for Dana’s comment about dental fluorosis – it should be noted that the Canadian Health Measures survey study (2007-2009) showed that combined, the prevalence of moderate and severe fluorosis (which is not associated with any toxic effects, only cosmetic problems), was so low that is was not even reportable.

    There are numerous benefits to community water fluoridation. It benefits all age groups and backgrounds, reduces the cost of dental treatment, and has shown to reduce dental cavities by 20-40%. Communities that have stopped water fluoridation have shown a drastic increase in dental cavities. And as far as cost goes, in reality, the cost of fluoridating water is minimal (approximately 70-something cents per person per year).

  9. Thanks Dana.

    To those who have ridiculed the anti-fluoride position, please state how many hours you have spent studying the issue. If you spelled fluoride “flouride” you are immediately disqualified from having any credibility.

  10. Fluoridated water is about as sensible as drinking sunscreen to prevent sunburns . . . if fluoride is so safe, why do all toothpastes that contain it warn you to call a poison control center immediately if you swallow more than a pea-sized amount?? Makes you wonder.

  11. Saying you have “scientific evidence” is not the same as actually showing proof.

    “There is a strongly documented body of scientific evidence” – Your ‘story’ would sound less like quackery if you actually cited some peer reviewed published studies that support your claims…

  12. The benefits to the makers of fluoride have been clearly established by experts in the field, and the health of the economy is an unquestionable. If you like fluoride, it’s easy to get it in your toothpaste, if you don’t, it’s hard to get used to paying extra for bottled water and lugging it around. Let’s press the Easy button. For those who get anxious at any questioning of top-down programs like fluoridation, as if it were some kind of deep betrayal of the Trust In Authority model: relax. Just about everything is a Trust In Authority program, after all.

  13. its funny how the US did a study on a town that had naturally occuring Sodium flouride(used by HRM and almost every other city in north america NOT Hexaflouride) after discovering that the residents of the town had exceptional standards of oral health. their study found 60ppm of sodium flouride. HRM and other places around North america use around 5 if im not mistaken. flouride enriched toothpaste in North america is about 350 ppm…whereas toothpaste in europe is often above 1200ppm. You would have to eat tube after tube of toothpaste in one sitting to have even minor effects. there is also no direct relation to sodium flouride having any long lasting or negative effects in the population at the levels that are in our drinking water. fucking whack job morons like the idiot writer of this article should be lined up and shot for the outright bullshit lies they spew. and Joeblow beat me to it but she probably doesnt advocate innoculations as well. James Reeves…i seriously hope you do a better job at researching than that site…what a load of horseshit…go give yourself a fucking dunk in a toilet bowl and shake your head as hard as you can..

  14. What bugs me the most about this whole thing is the issue of CHOICE. It’s my understanding that fluoride is ONLY effective topically, swallowing it has no benefit whatsoever. If you don’t want to drink fluoride then you have to buy bottled water or spend upwards of $200 on a reverse osmosis filter and then carry your drinking water with you wherever you go. If you DO want Fluoride you could just use toothpaste. Simple. Or maybe they could make little free Fluoride packets for Fluoride drinkers to carry around with them to add to their water. It just doesn’t seem fair that we have no choice whatsoever but to drink this stuff. And as far as HRM using “natural fluoride”, I can’t find that info anywhere. Most likely it’s the same industrial byproduct used across North America. Fact of the matter, and perhaps the bottom line, is that this is INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION. It’s ridiculous. Seriously, stop making me drink this crap. TAKE IT OUT.
    It’s also a bit unsettling to me just how aggressive and condescending the so called sane and level headed pro Fluoride folks are coming off. Just saying.
    One of many sources making me question Fluoridation:
    http://firewaterfilm.files.wordpress.com/2…

  15. I couldn’t find any reference to fluoridation in that story about UFO’s.

    If you are suggesting that those of us who oppose fluoridation also oppose chlorination and other forms of water treatment you are mistaken. Fluoride doesn’t treat the water. It treats the person. Since it isn’t an essential nutrient, it must be considered a drug, given without dose control or the informed consent of the recipients.

    Guilt by association is common when you have no argument. Time to do some research instead of belittling those that have.

  16. I get not wanting the government to medicate you.  You could rally against iodizing salt (hugely successful in reducing the number of goiters) and adding Vitamin D to milk using the same arguments.  There is room for conversation, debate and opinion there.  I’m for fluoridation, but I can see why others might be against it on personal liberty grounds.

    However, arguing against the efficacy of fluoride is ignorance. Of course there will be some science that points to fluoride being bad, but on the whole, it’s shown to be effective and safe (see meta analysis links in the following example). The stuff that points out the bad is almost always cherry-picked, out-of-context, misinterpreted, and loudly trumpeted by anti-fluoridationists, lending it undeserved perceived imporrtance.  Usually it relates to extraordinarily high doses from sources other than municipal water.
    For example: http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/antifl…

    Also, if you find tinfoil hatters agree with you on something, that is a re-he-he-heally good sign you should spend a few hours earnestly trying to prove your position wrong, instead of trying to prove it right.

  17. Thank you for the link Shawn, fairly well written article. However, I found the comments section to be particularly illuminating. Wouldn’t it be nice if the readers of The Coast were so eloquent! I’m now even more convinced that Fluoridation is at best, a questionable practice.

  18. So you oppose fluoride, but love pot? I call bullshit. To quote another recent article in Voice of the Shitty [about pot]: “Really, the stuff that’s out there now is so bad, so full of chemicals. If people knew what they were smoking, they probably wouldn’t smoke it. It’s bad for your kidneys, bad for your liver, bad for your what have you. “

    Like-minded homeopaths like o.p. here scream bloody murder about fluoride, but keep encouraging you to suck that herbal bullshit down as fast as you can, though, don’t they? None of them give a shit as long as the blaze keeps coming – and you know why? Nobody asks too many questions about writing cheques for ineffective snake oil when they’re nice and mellow. Keep citing experts about fluoride from homemade webpage entries, too, “experts”. The occasional rants and insane conclusions they produce out of literal thin air are nothing short of hilarious.

    [I’m particularly disappointed in you, Coast. Your desperate attempt here to f̶l̶o̶g̶ ̶a̶d̶s̶p̶a̶c̶e̶ stay current and edgy by digging right down to the seedy, hysterical bottom of ‘alternative’ really makes me think you’ve finally reached the other side of relevance.

    Go home, Coast. You’re old.]

  19. One thing to keep in mind is that while $100,000 is nothing to Halifax, it’s extremely vital to the company who sells it to Halifax, and that spamming any discussion about it with heavy-handed insults and insane comparisons and vitiating any sense of reasonable discussion would be Good Business for anybody who might work there or own that business. This is not an accusation against any of the fine posts above. I am an untrusting personality by nature, I see. So I have to say it was hard for me to read the Wikipedia pages about Fluoride and The Water Fluoridation Controversy, as it does look like fluoridation has some valid reasons behind it. Thinking – for me, trying to think – for yourself is a thankless task, but I can’t let it go, despite plenty of evidence that it gets me nowhere.

  20. I wrote a great comment..it disappeared…damn windows phone,..however, new comment…we all agree fluorides and chlorides are dangerous…so is kraft dinner and proactive using yellow number 5 as an ingredient…it is about depopulation and greed..

  21. Choose….fluoride (in tap water) or poly biphenyl chlorides (in bottled water). Grow it or gather it all yourself….only safe way to eat….but I drink tap water and have not been to a dentist since 1993…guess what…never had a toothache ever…lol…not saying I agree with fluoride in the water ….but hey….the world is a vampire…sent to drain!

  22. Dear Author

    I’m guessing you’re anti immunisation as well, preferring the plague, polio, diphtheria etc to roam the earth at will?

    Do you know how many other chemicals are used to actually provide safe water to drink? Are they poisoning you as well?

    Do you know that bottled water is more expensive than petrol, increases the demand for plastic (which also contains chemicals), uses more power than other means and harms the environment?

    Get a grip, hippy

  23. Just as a side note the Nazi’s are the ones who introduced fluoridation into H2O systems primarily to control the minds of the population and it has proven it’s effectiveness in the past, it’s something to consider what would you rather have, a weaker resistance to oral cavitation, or a development of brain cancer and breakdown of brain cells, to me it’s an easy choice.

  24. This is a social/political argument, not a scientific one. The science is clear. There have been no causal links revealed through peer-reviewed scientific research, linking fluoridation in public water systems and diseases like cancer and hypothyroidism (which is highly likely auto-immune and runs in families). This is simply an argument against a government taking an action that results in its citizens ingesting something involuntarily. I have no concerns for my health, or that of my family, because we drink tap water. I respect that others would not choose to ingest fluoride, but are forced to. Unfortunately, the anti-fluoridation movement undermines this argument through fear-mongering based on information that isn’t factual, and by feeding into some people’s susceptibility to paranoia.

  25. Great work Dana! I wonder if the sceptics know where the fluoride used in drinking water is sourced from….and how it all came to be.

    http://www.livescience.com/38952-epa-arsen…

    There are a lot of questions and controversy about fluoridation for good reason. Those who want fluoride….no problem….add it to your water. But forcing it on the population as a whole is wrong in my opinion. And…..if you know anything about removing fluoride from drinking water….it’s an expensive process and therefore not an option for the majority of the population.

  26. I am grateful for my well water…..which I bring to work with me in Halifax. I guess that makes me a hippie 🙂

  27. When I ask for water,or am provided it ,I want water.Nothing else.H2O.If I saw someone slip something in my drink anywhere else.Alarms would go off.Guess what?Alarms are going off.Use your brains people.There’s an elephant in the room.Anyone care to look?

  28. Google Dr. Mercola on the fluoride issue. Many studies show fluride tap H2O links to cancer.

    Aspartame is another product in many sugarless products that was supposed to never have rached the public. Watch the documentary Sweet Misery on YouTube.

  29. I am a local plumbing contractor who does allot of work on water quality in our area. I cannot weigh in on the fluoride issue, however I can verify that the majority of the city does have very unhealthy lead deposits in the tap water . This is due to an abundance of lead service lines. These lines are the responsibility of Halifax water for some of the main distribution lines are still lead AND the private homeowner who still has a lead service line bringing water into the home.
    This to me is more concerning?

  30. Andrew mellon one of the main founders of ALCOA (Aluminum Company of America) also funded the research that said that fluoride was good for you when put in water. It leads to skeletal and dental fluorisis and many other neurological diseases which can be correlated with the amount of this poison which is in your blood. Similar to how lead toxicity was causing increased crime in areas. This is not pseudo-science, fluoride is a biproduct of the production of aluminum which does cause cancer that’s why people avoid anti-persperant.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *