It was a largely symbolic gesture about the future of the planet. And Halifax Regional Council shot it down.
Before the city’s elected leaders on Tuesday was a motion from councillor Richard Zurawski in opposition to offshore drilling and oil exploration in Nova Scotia.
Zurawski wanted council to write a letter to the province voicing disapproval of the practice—not only due to the disastrous impact potential spills could have on marine ecosystems, but also in recognition of the dire warnings contained in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report, Global Warming of 1.5°C.
“Probably the scariest report” that Zurawski says he’s ever read.
“The old rules are gone,” he told his colleagues. “There will be no future unless we begin to act and I think we need to push our provincial brethren off the fossil fuel bandwagon…In the name of our young.”
The IPCC special report was prepared by 91 researchers across 40 countries, based on over 6,000 scientific resources. It’s message is unequivocally clear. Rapid, unprecedented changes across all aspects of society are needed to limit global warming to 1.5C and avoid cataclysmic environmental devastation.
We only have 12 years left to make that change happen. That means this city is just three municipal elections away from large portions of Halifax being underwater, heatwaves killing elderly residents and huge portions of the province being rendered useless for agriculture.
Zurawski’s pleas, however, were met with a range of criticism. Although David Hendsbee expressed concern about the impact of an oil spill on HRM’s coastal areas, the councillor noted offshore issues are not “our jurisdiction.”
Ironically, earlier in the day council unanimously approved a motion to send a similar strongly worded letter to the federal government, which argues Canada should keep all maintenance work on its naval frigates here in Halifax. That matter is also not a part of HRM’s jurisdiction, but council agreed the government’s decision could impact jobs and tax revenues.
“We’re talking families and lives here,” said councillor Stephen Adams.
In response to Zurawski’s concerns, Dartmouth Centre councillor Sam Austin suggested HRM write a response in general to the IPCC report, rather than “cherry-picking one specific thing.”
“There’s lots we can do on climate change that’s directly in our wheelhouse rather than writing the province about sort of one-offs,” said Austin.
But Zurawski stressed the motion’s purpose was to take a stand and show the public that council recognizes it must take steps to stop climate change immediately.
“Right now we have a dire report coming out saying that the continued use of fossil fuels is bad and what epitomizes the use of fossil fuels is offshore drilling of oil,” said Zurawski. “This is an important issue. It may be, in fact, a one-off issue in some minds. However, it is the principal issue.”
Not enough of an issue for some city councillors, it would seem.
The motion was ultimately defeated six-to-10. Only councillors Adams, Shawn Cleary, Lisa Blackburn, Waye Mason and Lindell Smith voted with Zurawski. Mayor Mike Savage was absent.
“The speech you gave was a nice speech,” councillor Steve Streatch told Zurawski shortly before the vote while stating in no uncertain terms that he was against voicing any opposition to offshore drilling. “Absolutely not. Not me.”
Deputy mayor Waye Mason pointed out that other municipalities have passed similar motions, though those letters have been based more on concerns about what a blowout could do to coastal communities.
“Well good for them,” replied Streatch, off-mic.
This article appears in Oct 11-17, 2018.
Human garbage bags
well both are matters that the city should be concerned about. one is money and jobs and the other could be more dangerous if a spill happens… they also need to go to the tenancy board concerning Landlords not allowing marijuana on their property, in their buildings and not allowing the growth of legal plants. this is not far to those renting in the city that they can not enjoy a legal product in the comforts of their primary residence
He should have just focused on how dangerous and devastating a BP oil spill would be for us, I think he lost some votes by broadening the letter to include climate change as well, it made the effort seem unfocused. Getting really sick of these useless lumps Streatch and Whitman and Hendsbee etc in our council who always vote against the environment and progress. Kudos to Mason and Zurawski for at least making the effort to save our ocean environment from becoming the next Gulf of Mexico chemical cesspool. Really disappointed in Sam Austin, I probably won’t vote for him again.
He should have just focused on how dangerous and devastating a BP oil spill would be for us, I think he lost some votes by broadening the letter to include climate change as well, it made the effort seem unfocused. Getting really sick of these useless lumps Streatch and Whitman and Hendsbee etc in our council who always vote against the environment and progress. Kudos to Mason and Zurawski for at least making the effort to save our ocean environment from becoming the next Gulf of Mexico chemical cesspool.