An information item headed to next week’s Board of Police Commissioners meeting says body-worn cameras (BWV) aren’t a cost-effective way to improve police practices and shouldn’t be used by Halifax Regional Police.
“While the technology may have some value, the evidence to date does not justify the expenditure—by our estimates, over $1.4 million per year in direct and labour costs, for a five-year pilot involving 50 cameras,” the report reads.
Body-worn cameras offer an independent—though not unbiased—way to record interactions between police and the public. Their use has dramatically increased due to recent high-profile cases of police violence in the United States and Canada.
Although the devices seemingly increase police accountability, a review of case studies and academic literature by HRP officials found no convincing evidence they would improve public confidence or officer behaviour.
“In some cases BWV may have negative impacts on policing,” the report finds.
The staff report notes studies in other jurisdictions have been frustratingly unpredictable—showing evidence both for and against the cameras’ effectiveness. In some cases, BWV systems have reduced complaints about police by 90 percent. In other cases, it’s only 10 percent. One study found a 50 percent reduction in the use of force during arrests. Another found a 71 percent increase.
The most rigorous empirical study of body cameras was recently undertaken in Washington DC, where over a thousand police officers were randomly assigned cameras to wear over a seven-month period. The results were less than stellar. Says the New York Times:
“Researchers tracked use-of-force incidents, civilian complaints, charging decisions and other outcomes to see if the cameras changed behaviour. But on every metric, the effects were too small to be statistically significant. Officers with cameras used force and faced civilian complaints at about the same rates as officers without cameras.”
The direct cost for 50 cameras, chargers and data storage would total $2.19 million over five years if done in-house. With indirect costs such as labour, training and the processing of evidence, the total five-year cost for a pilot program tops out at $7.52 million.
The Board of Police Commissioners meets Monday at City Hall.
Related Stories
The intentional ignorance of Halifax police street checks
Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Inquiry: Day One
Watch this: Dalhousie students riot during homecoming
Police board to discuss new services for First Nations communities
Police commission to look for new legal rules on street checks
Not guilty—what the jury heard in Jimmy Melvin Jr.’s murder trial
Who checks the street checkers?
Halifax police prep for cyber attacks
This article appears in Nov 16-22, 2017.
Lol, protection of citizens is too expensive. I bet you could afford those cameras if you could only get those cops to shut off their cars when they’re at accident scenes, Tim Hortons/McDonald’s parking lots, while they’re “street cheking” black people, etc…
Yes, it’s hard to imagine that there is lack of evidence when the evidence is great in cities where these are used. The HRPD is far from a trusted lot; saying their shit doesn’t stink only adds to the suspicion. This is being controlled by an old boys club and until they die off, distrust will be at the forefront of HRPD’s reputation.
Good thing I’m white or this news might make me pretty mad. 7.5m seems like a lot in writing, but they will easily spend that much on other less important bullshit in the next year or two. Like mediation and court time that could have been prevented with a video footage, lol.
Considering they assaulted me viciously in November. Luckily I got it on video. Would you like to see it?