[Image-1]
Halifax has some problems. There’s an affordable housing crisis bearing down, executives are fleeing city hall and winter is coming.
At least Regional Council will be able to keep warm during the oncoming snowstorms by stoking the fires of public outrage. If there’s one thing people love to hate more than donair debate, it’s what their elected representatives are being paid.
So let’s talk about councillor severance packages.
The idea was floated at Monday’s executive standing committee meeting. Metro’s Stephanie Taylor reports that city staff are preparing a report to discuss the impact of introducing severance pay for Halifax councillors who are defeated in future municipal elections.
The current problem, according to Mike Savage as quoted by Taylor, is that those councillors are fired without a safety net.
“‘You’re a month-and-a-half away from Christmas and you’ve got nothing,’ Savage said.”
Currently a sitting councillor who loses doesn’t receive any severance or benefits. According to Waye Mason, this is about aligning elected officials with the minimum requirements of Nova Scotia’s Labour Act.
“It makes sense to me that you have a small cushion. You campaign to win, it is not possible to look for a job ‘just in case I need it.’ I am not worried about future employment personally, but not everyone on council comes from a consulting type background. It is hard to say to someone with regular employment experience ‘just get a job.’”
As Brett Bundale at the Herald notes, both federal and provincial politicians are already set up to receive allowances if they lose on election day.
Likewise, many other municipalities in Canada provide severance pay for elected representatives. Toronto allows every member of council to collect one-twelfth of their salary for every year of service, whether they leave through resignation, retirement or defeat. Ottawa’s city council receives one month of pay for each year elected, to a maximum of six months.
But this is one of those issues where council can’t really win for trying. Unless Savage, Mason and everyone at City Hall votes to donate 100 percent of their pay to refugee puppies with gluten allergies, they will all still be making far too much according to the many who consider a government salary unilaterally equal with government waste.
But it’s not all blank cheques. This council has taken some steps to curtail their own coffers. Aside from reviewing councillor compensation, council is also trying to push through campaign finance reform to limit how much candidates can raise and how much one person or corporation can donate.
Meanwhile, the 16 sitting councillors and mayor Savage are now overdue for their annual pay raise. Human Resources are in the midst of processing that increase and will have a report back before the end of the month.
Last year saw Mike Savage receive a 3.4 per increase in his salary, topping out at $168,449. His fellow councillors received a 2.63 percent raise to $80,849, except for the deputy mayor who currently makes $88,934. As the Herald noted last year, council salaries have outpaced inflation faster than the wages of other municipal workers.
This year’s annual pay raise will be retroactively effective to November 1.
Related Stories
Dead weight: The cost of Halifax’s orphaned cemeteries
This article appears in Oct 29 – Nov 4, 2015.
Put this to a referendum. There is no job description for this position. Anyone can apply. It’s a downright sneaky attempt to line their own pockets, even if they are fired by voters.
Its weird, we consider public office ‘serving the public good’ or some such romanticized notion and then at the end of the day, these ‘public servants’ expect some kind of financial prize for doing something they volunteered for. Head shake. Face palm. Fuck you all.
In the age restraint our leaders are suppose to lead and do that which is best for the people. The article I read in the metro today would almost make you cry, but if you can manage your money why are you in the position of leadership. Other levels of government you are not and these other government have taken away severance pay from the common worker. It always seem elected officials take care of themselves before those who really need help. We just got rid of a dictator, the masses are speaking, anyone can be replaced!
“The current problem, according to Mike Savage as quoted by Taylor, is that those councillors are fired without a safety net”
Give me a break Mike, these jobs are taken with eyes wide open, the pro’s and con’s are understood and they are not fired, its called not being re-elected. Stop trying to line your pockets! Elections are fickle and can turn against a person quickly, ask Harper…
Why don’t we set up a see through, wind booth on the library lawn where the “fired” councillors enter and try and catch as many $20 bills as they can while they swirl around them for 30 seconds. There’s your severance, now fuck off!!!
What this article neglects to mention is, when this motion was brought forward, it was suggested that should it be implemented, that it would be for the next set of councillors, not the one’s currently in. Should the current ones not be re-elected next year, they still would not get the severance.
IF it gets rid of the dead-weight, I’ll personally write a cheque.
Oh wait… Jenny is leaving; that saves me some cash!
I don’t really have a problem with this as long as the severance is reasonable. Maybe two months of pay? That would give time to transition from the hectic world of being a councillor back into the the normal workforce. It really should be a safety net and not an entitlement.
I think this is also important to the discussion: councillors don’t qualify for EI.
Fuck them, they do a shit job, period. This isn’t some big secret. They suck and don’t deserve shit and Haligonians deserve better, period.