Cars are the number-one killer of people under 35 in this part of the world. A
couple of thousand pounds of high-speed steel and glass may have seemed
like a good idea at one time, but cars have made simple acts like
walking risky business.

Urban sprawl increases that risk. Abundant research shows a strong
link between sprawl and traffic fatalities. Large car-biased cities
like Orlando and Phoenix are most dangerous for pedestrians and drivers. Planners and safety experts say a 10-percent reduction in
sprawl reduces traffic deaths by 15 percent.

But the reality of sprawl makes life without cars unthinkable—how
would we get to Walmart?

Vauban, a suburban township of Freiburg Germany, doesn’t care about
that—Walmart was all but exiled from Germany in 2006. The town of
5,000 was designed and built by ex-hippies in the mid-’90s to be
sustainable, car-free.

The only motor vehicles in Vauban—a former Nazi barracks—are
delivery trucks. Their stay is limited to a few minutes. People
traverse on foot and bicycle. Vauban’s become a tourist attraction for
the eco-curious, who arrive by the busload to watch children make chalk
art in the middle of the road.

If a former base for one of humanity’s worst atrocities, and a
suburb, can be transformed into a model of sustainable living, maybe
there is hope for Halifax Regional Municipality, even though it’s huge,
sparsely populated, with a crappy bus system.

According to Genuine Progress Index Atlantic, the average HRMer
drives 8,000 kilometres a year, emitting two tonnes of greenhouse
gasses. We spend four grand each in property and income taxes for
building and repairing driving infrastructure and on accidents. We
travel just 26 km on public transit each year, while 90 percent of us
live within 500 metres of a bus stop. Personally, I don’t own a car and
yet I manage to drive—thanks to sharing friends’—more than I take
the bus.

We have the equivalent of a two-pack-a-day habit. Our patch may be
the act of integrating our transportation systems, says Jason Pelley,
co-lead of Fusion Halifax’s sustainability team. “When you arrive at
the airport you should be able to get onto a train into the city,”
Pelley says, “hop on the bike you’ve left parked at the train station,
cycle home.”

Vauban couldn’t be car-free if it weren’t for the reliable tram that
takes people in and out of town. Meanwhile, “Halifax is notorious for
its buses not showing up and 300 metres of disconnected bike lanes
without benefit,” says Pelley.

Nova Scotia’s transportation system is hampered by a weak economy,
but the Halifax Chamber of Commerce says greater efficiency and cost
savings come from integration—bringing management of all the various
modes of transportation together into one system. “It’s time Halifax
considered creating an Integrated Transit Authority,” Pelley
argues.

If we look beyond the cost of transit we see rewards of increased
productivity, fewer traffic jams, reduced costs of healthcare and
highway policing. Integration doesn’t necessarily mean trams, but we
need to see reliable public transit as a basic right for HRM
residents—give people in places like Beaver Bank and Lucasville
innovative means to get downtown without cars.

“In the Hamptons they have a series of cost-effective, semi-private
small buses or vans called jitneys,” Pelley says. It reminds me of
places like Indonesia and Ghana, which give even the poorest residents
reliable, regular transportation in cities and often the countryside
too. It isn’t exactly car-free, but such systems could drastically
reduce the number of cars on HRM roads.

Pelley argues further for a change in mindset to transportation
planning based on people, not vehicles. “The generation that built our
infrastructure for cars still has a lot of power,” Pelley says. “We
need real leadership listening to knowledgeable constituents.”

One such constituent, Charmaine Dymond, grew up in Sackville and
spent a few too many hours on the “dreaded 80” bus. Her family of three
has been car-free for about two years. “We live on the peninsula now,”
she says, “so that makes it easier.”

She has a wish-list that would make car-free life in HRM better.
“I’d love to get rid of all those parking lots on the waterfront and
have a beautiful water park, lots of green space, a decent kiddie
pool,” she says.

She is a fan of the shuttle bus approach—direct routes to
high-traffic areas like Bayers Lake and Dartmouth Crossing. “Or better
yet,” she adds, “get rid of them. Encourage street shopping and stores
in neighbourhoods where people live and can walk, bike or bus
easily.”

That’s the Vauban spirit.

Join the Conversation

17 Comments

  1. Nice, but this would require a complete change in neighbourhood infrastructure, and I can’t see anyone willing to do that. I live near Nic Nac Mall and used to work in Burnside. Pull out a map and try to work out a safe(ish) bike route between those two points. Not possible. Try to get into Dartmouth Crossing by foot or bike. And if you get there by bus, start walking! The whole place — like Burnside, like Bayers Lake — is designed to be actively antagonistic to walkers.
    yes, if you can live on the peninsula, you can go car free. Many do. Perhaps that should be the first target, greatly reducing car travel into the peninsula. But even that reasonable goal isn’t high on anyone’s list of priorities.
    I’ve seen articles about this issue for decades and expect to see them for decades more, with little change in the city to make any improvements.

  2. LOL…. A “TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY”… yes.. more layers of government is always the solution to any public sector problem.. How about the privatization of metro-transit??

  3. If cars were banned, bicycles would be the leading cause of death for people under 35.

    Either that, or suicide from people unable to get jobs because the economy collapsed as a result.

    There’s always something…

  4. Thanks for linking car sharing, sea level.

    Carsharing is a less drastic change for the current car owner, and is a step in the direction of a car-free peninsula. Plus, car sharing will have immediate reductions on our exhaust emissions.

    It has only been open since December, but worth a look. http://www.carsharehfx.ca

  5. a car-free city seems like a good idea if you never have to travel more than 10 km from your home or transport anything over 30 lbs.

  6. I like powered vehicles.
    I dislike powering the vehicle.

    I like personal transportation vehicles.
    I dislike public transportation vehicles.

    I like living away from the city core.
    I’d dislike living in the city core.

    I like living in a single family dwelling.
    I’d hate living in a multifamily dwelling building.

    To each their own.

  7. “LOL…. A ‘TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY'”

    Buck. Buck, Buck, Buck.

    Derisive tone and GRATUITOUS USE OF CAPS LOCK aside, please be informed that it’s logically absurd to enclose in quotation marks text that doesn’t in fact appear anywhere in the article you’re apparently quoting; it is repeating verbatim something that has never been said in the first place. As actually reported, Mr. Pelley’s words were “Integrated Transit Authority”, “Integrated” being I think an (if not the) operative word.

    “Integrated Transit” brings to my mind well-run extant transit systems such as Toronto’s (integrated subway, streetcar, and buses) and Vancouver’s (integrated Skytrain, buses, and bicycles). I believe the context provided by the entire paragraph of which the words “Integrated Transit Authority” were but a small part bears out my interpretation. I have some fair personal experience with both Vancouver’s and Toronto’s better-integrated systems, and have found both to be economical and convenient. (I have a slight preference for the Vancouver system, but maybe I just like the added cool factor of taking your bikes right with you onto the Skytrain.)

    I’d trade Metro Transit in for either of these systems any day – and even chip in for some netiquette lessons for Buck to boot.

  8. “She has a wish-list that would make car-free life in HRM better. “I’d love to get rid of all those parking lots on the waterfront and have a beautiful water park, lots of green space, a decent kiddie pool,” she says.

    She is a fan of the shuttle bus approach—direct routes to high-traffic areas like Bayers Lake and Dartmouth Crossing. “Or better yet,” she adds, “get rid of them. Encourage street shopping and stores in neighbourhoods where people live and can walk, bike or bus easily.”

    I could not agree more.

    Shuttle bus, yay, more local shopping downtown, double yay.

  9. Sure.. when Halifax is a tiny suburb of just 5000 people, sorry 5000 people, mostly ex-hippies. Eyeroll. How about some real ideas instead of “turn parking lots into kiddie pools”? The last thing I want too see on my daily (walking) commute are screaming kids on every corner. Besides, I thought Hippies were all for water conservation? Stop crapping on cars. We have a great city with a fine pedestrian balance.

    Signed,

    Non car-owning, Downtown Hi-Rise living Pedestrian with Some Actual Sense.

  10. re Freiburg, Cranky, i love it… thanks for the pic

    oh and look… not only is it a car-free zone, but there’s even a cyclist riding amongst the pedestrians. imagine that… how civilized. if only halifax could be… meh, nevermind, not gonna happen.

  11. looks fantastic to me, Cranky – pedestrians, trolleys, bicycles, open air markets, etc… and not a car in sight. beautiful, it all looks so peaceful & civilized, i love it.

    i completely agree – why not here?? i’d love to see certain areas of HRM designated as pedestrian malls – 100% car-free zones. and notice that cyclists & pedestrians co-exist quite nicely on the car-free streets of Freiburg. why is that? maybe because a bike is NOT anything like a friggin car – a cyclist IS a pedestrian-on-wheels.

  12. and you know something else, Cranky… pedestrian malls are actually better for business than streets clogged/smogged with cars (most of which are just driving through anyway). whereas hundreds of pedestrians walking around/shopping downtown is very good for business and contributes to safer streets and vibrant communities.

    but do the jagoffs who run our city understand that… not on your life. they are too stupid and short-sighted.

  13. Great article. I’d like to see more creative thinking about transportation problems in the HRM.

    The folks at the Bridge Commission shocked me last year when they suggested that what Halifax needs is ANOTHER bridge linking Dartmouth and Halifax to reduce congestion on the two existing bridges. If this is any indication of the type of ‘thinking’ that goes on in HRM planning meetings we are in BIG trouble.

    The other idea that keeps cropping up is a high speed ferry service linking Bedford and Halifax. While it sounds like an exciting idea to be whizzing across the Bedford Basin at top speed with spray blowing over the vessel, just how cost effective is this idea?

    Wouldn’t it make more sense for the entire HRM to begin working towards a rail transport system. We already have tracks around the entire harbour. I think a rail link to the airport makes perfect sense. It might even be possible to retrofit one of the bridges with a rail link across the harbour. What HRM needs is an effective and reliable public transportation system, more downtown streets turned into pedestrian malls, parking facilities for bikes only, and fewer cars crammed into the limited space available.

    Besides, thinking in the long term, cars were a twentieth century aberration, made possible by abundant and cheap oil. That world is coming to an end.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *