No-flogging rule is a silly ban | Savage Love | Halifax, Nova Scotia | THE COAST

No-flogging rule is a silly ban

Plus: Two same-sex couples renew marriage vows in a joint celebration of 10 happy years. Dan sends his belated congratulations.

Q My boyfriend and I are in college and doing the long-distance thing until June 2013. Over the years, he's granted me increasing amounts of freedom to be intimate with women--- I'm female, and date women while we're apart--- but I still don't have full autonomy. It's much better than it used to be, but lately another one of my "needs" has been eating at me: my masochism. He's repeatedly refused me permission to let someone lay into me with a flogger. That's all I ask!

In order to abide by the rules of his jealousy, am I missing out on a huge facet of the best years of my life? I don't even want to have anything sexual with the person who flogs me! I just want them to beat me! And this might be relevant: He has the freedom to do whatever he wishes but---god only knows why---he never indulges in anything more than the odd vanilla woman here and there. Also, I'm not allowed to attend fetish clubs because he knows I'll make bad choices if I do (I'll play!), but the burner and fetish scenes are converging here in Los Angeles and I'm going to get in trouble soon! —University Pain Slut

AYou've given your boyfriend permission to do who he wants, what he wants, when he wants. But you're not allowed to do half of humanity---the male half---or get your ass beat at a BDSM club?

That hardly seems fair, UPS.

But my knees don't automatically jerk when I hear about a couple with an arrangement that appears to be "unfair" on its face. If Person A enjoys more "freedom" than Person B, it doesn't necessarily follow that Person B is being wronged. Some people get off on the tension that an erotic power imbalance creates, and nothing says "you're in charge" quite like your partner having the freedom to do people and things that you're not allowed to do.

Or maybe the idea of you being with other men makes the boyfriend feel threatened and insecure, while the idea of him being with other women turns you on. If that's the case, UPS, then you're not doing something that makes him unhappy (sleeping with other men) while he's doing something that makes you happy (sleeping with other women).

For me, UPS, it comes down to this: If you're happy---if you're getting off on your unfair deal---then I'm happy.

But are you happy? Or are you still happy? If this deal isn't working anymore, UPS, then it's time to negotiate a new, perhaps slightly fairer deal. His insistence that you mess around only with other girls while you're apart is understandable---I don't think it's fair, UPS, but I can understand it---but the "no flogging" rule seems ridiculously arbitrary. Tell your boyfriend that you'll continue to stick to his no-other-dudes rule on the condition that he lift his silly flogging ban.

Q My girlfriend of four years cheated on me. I'm in college now; we've been dating since high school. She and a male friend hooked up four times when they were both drunk. This guy was supposed to be her best friend, and it turns out he was into her.

I asked her once about their relationship, and she assured me that nothing had or ever would happen between them. That was a few weeks after she cheated on me. She rationalizes the events in a manner that makes her seem like she's not to blame and she constantly tells me how much she really loves me.

Do I hook up with another girl and tell her about it? —Cucked Over College Kid

ANo, COCK, you don't hook up with another girl. You ask yourself this question: How many adults---people over 30---do you know who are still with and/or married to their high-school sweethearts? The answer is either zero or approaching zero. A breakup was inevitable-ish all along, COCK, and now seems like a pretty good time to pull the plug.

And while your girlfriend is telling you she loves you, and while she may still have feelings for you, she's slamming her hand down on the self-destruct button because---consciously or not---she wants out, too.

Q In your advice to The Straight Best Man, you suggested that the first gay couples to legally wed in both Canada and the United States ended up divorcing and that this fact was largely unknown because anti-divorce and anti-gay marriage evangelical Christians have essentially dodged the issue in a bid to divert attention from their own spectacularly high rates of marriage implosion.

While the first American same-sex marriage ended in divorce, I can happily report that the first legal same-sex marriages in Canada are still going strong 10 years later. A gay couple, Joe Varnell and Kevin Bourassa, and a lesbian couple, Anne and Elaine Vautour, were married in a joint ceremony on January 14, 2001, at Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto (MCCT).

At that time, the government was still refusing to issue marriage licences to same-sex couples. To solve this problem, the church, on advice from its legal team, did an end run around the pre-authorized licence requirement, using the ancient, but perfectly legal, Christian tradition of proclaiming the banns of marriage.

While the government refused to register the marriages as valid, on June 10, 2003, the Ontario Court of Appeal declared that the marriages had been legally performed, and ordered the Province of Ontario to register them immediately. The court also ruled that a ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional and ordered the province to begin issuing marriage licences for same-sex couples that same day.

Both couples remain happily married, having renewed their vows in a public ceremony at MCCT on the occasion of their joint 10-year anniversaries earlier this year. —Nice Thing To Be Wrong About, Eh

aI'm happy to stand corrected---I'm delighted ---and I'd like to send my belated congrats to Joe and Kevin, and Anne and Elaine, on the occasion of their 10th anniversaries.

Here's to many, many more happy years together!

Comments (0)
Add a Comment