Pin It


To the editor,

I just published an online housing ad on your website. As a gay man I was offended by the "gay-friendly option" in the details section.

Since it is illegal to discriminate against an individual based on sexual orientation for housing, why do you present "gay-friendly" as an option? By doing so aren't you suggesting that not being "gay-friendly" is an option?

As well, if for whatever justification you think this is a necessary option to provide to your potentially "non gay-friendly" readers/advertisers, it is offensive to find "gay-friendly" grouped in the same category with "dog-friendly" and "drummer-friendly," etc. It is really not the same thing at all, and gay people do not deserve to be grouped in the same category as animals.

By Barry Roode

Pin It


Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Survey Asks

Women are boycotting Twitter in protest of how the social network has ignored abuse directed at its members. What should men boycott?

  • Comment sections
  • Mansplaining
  • 20 percent of their salaries
  • Systemic inequality and aggressive patriarchal dominance creating a culture of abuse and harassment towards women.
  • Dick pics

View Results

Coast Top Ten


More »

Reality Bites

More »


More »

In Print This Week

Vol 25, No 20
October 12, 2017

Cover Gallery »

Real Time Web Analytics

© 2017 Coast Publishing Ltd.