We’ve been here before, many times. On Monday night, Black community members packed into a room at the Cornwallis Street Baptist Church to discuss street checks and racial profiling with researchers from the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission.
The community meeting was one of a series of three “Starting the Conversation” sessions conducted this week that will be analyzed for a larger report by the commission on the use of street checks—the police practice of monitoring or stopping citizens—and its long-standing ties to racial profiling in this province.
Kymberly Franklin, senior legal counsel for the HRC, and Scot Wortley, head of the University of Toronto’s Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies, facilitated the meeting to hear the community’s stories and concerns regarding interactions with police.
Tensions ran high. Person after person stood to air their grievances—about police behaviour, yes, but also about the ineffectiveness of these kinds of community conversations in sparking tangible change.
“It’s the community that’s asked over and over to share their pain, and there’s no progress,” said Marcus James, co-creator of 902 Man Up, an organization built to support Black men in Halifax. “We’re asked to express and share our pain when people don’t understand how hard that is.”
Many individuals at the meeting shared reflections of the same story; of being stopped and confronted during mundane activities by police officers who claimed to be conducting “routine checks.”
“I’ve been harassed, been followed [by police], bringing groceries home,” said Tom, another community member at the meeting. “Maybe it’s the organic bananas I buy, but this is some bullshit.”
Overwhelmingly, those who shared their stories were united by a distrust in the ability of law enforcement to protect and serve their communities, and a distrust of processes like the Human Rights Commission’s report to represent their lived experiences in a way that can bring about progress.
“We’ve been going through this for many generations,” said attendee and Ceasefire outreach worker Shawn Parker. “What’s different today, when this story’s been told a thousand times?”
Countless stories of aggressive interactions between Halifax police and local Black communities have been shared in years past. Those encounters aren’t urban myths that are whispered about but never put to public scrutiny. It’s verified
The street check data published last January by CBC, which found Black residents of HRM were three times more likely to be street checked by police than white Haligonians, was assembled over the last decade because of the racial discrimination case Kirk Johnson brought against the police department in 2003.
So this isn’t a new question, but it keeps getting asked. Black and other racialized peoples are habitually asked to prove their lived experience of racism to white institutions and populations. Time and again, the response they’re met with is aggressive, indifferent or ineffectual to actually produce change.
The question remains: Why is it so difficult to believe us? Why haven’t our voices been enough?
“Why is it so important for you to hear the victims’ scream over and over and over again?” —Mark Daye
It’s a topic that’s been bearing down heavily on the city over the last few weeks. Dalhousie Student Union executive Masuma Khan called it out in a Facebook post this summer, leading to countless cries of racism from the white people she offended. Lido Pimienta said she had no time for it after online trolls harassed her for prioritizing women of colour at her Halifax Pop Explosion show.
The term itself was coined by Seattle, Washington racial and social justice educator Robin DiAngelo, who defines it as “a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves.”
According to DiAngelo’s 2011 paper introducing the term, any challenge to familiar racial relations, any erosion of privilege, can trigger emotional displays of “anger, fear and guilt” and cause responses like “argumentation, silence and
Halifax social worker and professor Robert Wright
One doesn’t have to look far to find examples.
At Lido Pimienta’s October 19 Pop Explosion show, a white volunteer photographer loudly and aggressively refused to leave her spot at the front of the stage after Pimienta asked all the brown girls to come to the front of the room. Pimienta often asks her crowds to arrange themselves with men in the back, women in the front and women of colour in front of white women in an attempt to create as safe a space as possible. The resulting news coverage inspired a barrage of hateful and offensive online harassment from people who saw Pimienta’s prioritization of women of colour as somehow anti-white.
Earlier last month, a war on free speech was waged over Masuma Khan’s choice to challenge white fragility at Dalhousie while showing solidarity with Indigenous students. For ending a Facebook post with the hashtag “
While many students and educators came to Khan’s defence, some—like fellow Dalhousie student Mehak Saini—took direct action against her. Saini wrote a letter to the DSU calling for Khan’s impeachment and condemning her words, saying that “by implying that all white people are fragile in nature” Khan was trying to “mock people that are white.” Khan’s words capture why it can be so difficult create any change on racial injustice. It’s the heart of the
These aggressive responses to the politics and lived experiences of people of colour make sense within the context of Canadian race relations, according to Wright.
“The original sin of North America is racism,” he says. Historically, power and privilege have belonged to white people. “When a person’s privilege is being eroded, then to the individual that feels like persecution.”
The result is that stories like the ones shared at Monday’s community meeting are met with what Wright calls an “intentional ignorance” that allows white people to remain unconcerned with racial injustices.
“When we threaten the narrative, we are actually asking them to dip their toe into the racial trauma that the rest of us are experiencing,” says Wright. “And when they dip their toe in that pit of racial trauma and racial stress, they draw their toe out like a Southerner who’s trying to swim in the North Atlantic.”
The problem of street-checking in Halifax isn’t new. This week’s community meetings are part of
“We’ve been going through this for many generations. What’s different today when this story’s been told a thousand times?” —Shawn Parker
After boxer Kirk Johnson won his human rights case against the police department for discrimination during a street check five years prior, Halifax Regional Police was ordered to begin recording data by ethnicity. The department began that collection in 2005, but the data went unanalyzed until it was requested under Freedom of Information legislation by CBC last October.
The resulting news investigation found that Black Nova Scotians were 3.1 times more likely to be street checked than white people.
According to the Globe and Mail, a January report from Halifax-district RCMP found a similar pattern. In the first 10 months of 2016, 41 percent of the RCMP’s 1,246 street checks involved African Nova Scotians, despite the fact that they make up only 3.6 percent of the municipality’s population.
In response to these findings, Sylvia Parris—the Board of Police Commissioners’ sole Black member at the time—called for a moratorium on the practice of street checking. Her idea was rejected by chief Jean-Michel Blais, who said more research was needed before any action would be taken.
Wright, along with social worker Lanna MacLean and lawyer Shawna Hoyte, ended up writing a letter to the police watchdog Serious Incident Response Team and the Human Rights Commission asking that the practice cease, or at least pause while research was being conducted.
Halifax police have always defended the practice as a necessary information gathering tool for preventing and solving
4,833 street checks were conducted by HRP from October 2016 until September 30 of this year. The department was unable to break down what percentage involved non-white individuals.
Still, residents are hesitant to trust that another review, another “conversation,” will bring an end to street checks once and for all. Many attendees at Monday’s meeting recalled a moment from a similar public session held earlier this year by
Ah, there’s that pesky intentional ignorance again.
At the same time, the Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission has secured Wortley for an independent analysis of the data, which will include historic, national and international literature and stories from community members shared at the public meetings or submitted through online forums.
Wortley, who has been instrumental in documenting racial profiling conducted by police departments in Toronto and Hamilton, says the analysis is scheduled to be compiled by the end of the year.
He’s cautiously optimistic that the finished report will be objective but comprehensive. Whether that will be enough information for white communities and institutions to recognize the suffering experienced by Black people is another question.
“Will this particular report and this particular investigation result in change?” Wortley asks. “I don’t know. I don’t know yet.”
The members of Nova Scotia’s Black community have heard a lot of these vague promises before. White individuals treat racialized people with hatred, with violence, and the authorities solemnly vow to study the issue or start a dialogue.
The intentional ignorance of Black voices and stories has gone on long enough, attendees of Monday’s meeting stressed. Be honest about what’s happening. It’s racism.
“Unless you’re ready to call it what it really is, which is ugly, we’re not going to move forward,” said James.
Sometime soon the stories of trauma from Nova Scotia’s Black community might be, on their own, enough to inspire action and accountability amongst law enforcement. Whether that time
“Starting the conversation? No, we are not here to start the conversation,” said James, referencing the title of the community meeting series. “We are here to end the conversation.”